The Church Fathers on this verse

1 Corinthians 1:16Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And I baptized also the household of Stephanus. Besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.

Douay-Rheims

εβαπτισα δε και τον στεφανα οικον λοιπον ουκ οιδα ει τινα αλλον εβαπτισα

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

9 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Having thus rebuked those in error, and having added, "I also baptized the household of Stephanas" (1 Cor 1:16), he again casts down their pride with the words, "Beyond that. I do not know whether I baptized anyone else." Here he shows that he did not try to gain honor for himself from the people through such an act, nor did he approach it for glory. Not only by these words, but also by those that follow, he strongly strikes their pride: "For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the Gospel" (1 Cor 1:17).

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

"I also baptized the household of Stephanas." That is, all who were in Stephanas’s house. He was a great and very distinguished man in Corinth. "Whether I baptized anyone else, I do not know." Baptizing is so far from flattering to me, he says, that I do not even remember whether I baptized anyone else. How, then, do you boast in baptism?

Basilios Michailowski

19th centuryChurch Father

The holy Apostle also baptized the household, that is, the family, of the virtuous Stephanas, who showed hospitality to Orthodox Christians (1 Cor 16:15). Did I baptize anyone else in Corinth? I do not know, says the holy Apostle.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle strengthens the accusation with each added word, yet he does not strike the accused severely. He puts his own person in place of the Corinthian teachers. He also gives them to understand that they named themselves not only after teachers, but also after those who baptized them. He then presents the reason why he did not baptize many.

Nicephoros (Theotokis)

18th centuryChurch Father

Crispus was the ruler of the synagogue in Corinth, where Paul baptized him with his whole household.

Three men named Gaius are found in Holy Scripture. The first was a Macedonian, Paul's companion in Ephesus (Acts 19:29).

The second was a Thessalonian, who followed him even as far as Asia (Acts 20:4).

The third was his host and the host of the whole Church (Rom 16:23).

Since he says, "none of you," that is, I baptized none of you Corinthians except Crispus and Gaius, it follows that Gaius also was a Corinthian, like Crispus.

From this one may conclude that he is not speaking here of the Macedonian or the Thessalonian, but of the Gaius whom he called his host.

He received both Paul himself when he was in Corinth and all the faithful who came there.

Read more (161 words)

Stephanas, however, is the prison guard whom Paul baptized in the city of Philippi with his whole household (Acts 16:33).

This is how Paul assures the Corinthians that they were not baptized in his name. He testifies that he baptized none of them except the three mentioned above.

But why does he give thanks to God that he baptized no one except Crispus, Gaius, and the household of Stephanas?

He himself will give the reason. I thank God, he says, that He providentially arranged it so that I baptized no one except these.

Thus none of those causing quarrels would have occasion to say that I baptized him in my own name.

Since he also said, "I do not know whether I baptized anyone else," he then explains the reason why he baptized.

He does this so that no one may think he regarded Baptism as a small matter and therefore did not even remember whether he had baptized anyone else.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

"The household of Stephanas." Stephanas, or more precisely Stephana, was a Corinthian Christian. The Apostle calls his household the firstfruits of Achaia (1 Cor 16:15). Perhaps Epaenetus belonged to this household (Rom 16:5). "Beyond that, I do not know whether I baptized anyone else." The Apostle could say this not because of the forgetfulness common to all men, but because he did not know for certain which of those baptized by him might still have been in Corinth at that time.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

Then the Apostle sets forth how groundless the Corinthian disagreements are (1 Cor 1:13-16).

"Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?" (1 Cor 1:13).

By the first question the Apostle wanted to show the Corinthians their groundlessness.

If their various teachers do not preach different Christs, but on the contrary one and the same Christ is the subject of their common preaching, then it is extremely unreasonable to place oneself under the headship of one teacher in preference to another.

By the remaining questions the Apostle directly sets forth the obvious absurdity contained in their thought. Yet this thought could be attributed to the Corinthians because of their divisions, as though their teachers were also their redeemers.

Read more (92 words)

Having reproved the Corinthians by the questions cited above, the Apostle Paul expresses joyful thanksgiving to God for himself.

He had given them no occasion for divisions, for he himself had baptized almost none of them (1 Cor 1:14).

"Lest anyone should say," the Apostle explains, "that I baptized in my own name" (1 Cor 1:15).

That is, it could easily have happened that, by confusing the ministers of the mystery of Baptism with Him in whose name it is performed, some would imagine that the Apostles baptized in their own name.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Turning to himself and to similar persons, the Apostle proclaims that the circumstance of who performed the Baptism of this or that person gives no occasion for division.

In entering Christianity, from the human point of view, the more difficult work is not Baptism, but preaching the Gospel and preparing for it.

Thus, when the Apostle Paul sends up thanksgiving to God that he baptized few, he does not diminish Baptism or those who perform it.

On the contrary, he even exalts it, and at the same time removes every possibility of finding in himself an occasion for divisions.

For division according to those who baptize may seem in Christianity to have greater significance than division according to the dignity of teachers.

Read more (40 words)

The Greeks valued such teachers, seeking wisdom in its expression through speech, which often suppressed thought and inner content.

This, of course, could not be so in Christianity, whose power is not in speech, but in the work of salvation.

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle has listed by name all those baptized by him.

Crispus, the ruler of the synagogue, was the first to believe in the Lord with his whole household. Following his example, many others believed and were baptized.

This happened as soon as Saint Paul left the Jews and began teaching in the house of Justus (Acts 18:8).

In the Apostolic Constitutions it is said that this Crispus was appointed bishop of Egypt (book 7, chapter 46).

Gaius was the one with whom Saint Paul stayed when he arrived in Corinth after this epistle. From his house the Apostle wrote the Epistle to the Romans and conveyed his greeting from him.

"Gaius, my host and the host of the whole Church, greets you" (Rom 16:23).

Read more (344 words)

"Host of the whole Church" gives the thought that all believers, from whatever country they came, found shelter in his house when they arrived in Corinth.

Saint Demetrius of Rostov holds that he later became bishop in Ephesus.

Concerning the household of Stephanas, Saint Paul writes at the end of this epistle that it was the firstfruits of Achaia.

That is, the members of this house were the first of the Achaeans to devote themselves to the service of the saints, to assist the Gospel and labor together with those laboring in this work.

Stephanas himself, together with Fortunatus and Achaicus, had now been sent to Saint Paul with a letter from the Corinthians, which he answers below (1 Cor 16:15-17).

These, he says, are all who were baptized by me. Whether I baptized anyone else, I do not know.

This turn of speech means a complete denial. He is expressing: I baptized no one else.

I had no concern to baptize. "He did not strive to gain honor from the people by such a deed" (Saint Chrysostom).

My helpers fulfilled this, and even the first converts and baptized.

Undoubtedly not all of the Corinthians were carried away by the crowds of vain wise men, and the persons named by the Apostle, who were baptized by him, did not belong to their circle.

By pointing to them, he speaks as if saying: these people, baptized by me, do not count me as their head.

For what reason have you others fallen into such a sickness of mind, and why do you remain in it?

Come to your senses. Follow in their steps.

That such a thought is fitting is shown by the Apostle's words at the end of the epistle about the household of Stephanas: "You also submit to such people" (1 Cor 16:16).

This thought also accords more directly with his thanksgiving: glory to God that I baptized almost no one.

And those whom I baptized are sound. Not only are they sound, but they will serve to bring others to their senses.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 13 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ἐβάπτισα
    ebaptisa
    I dip
    G907 · βαπτίζω
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  4. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. Στεφανᾶ
    stephana
    Stephanas
    G4734 · Στεφανᾶς
  6. οἶκον
    oikon
    a house
    G3624 · οἶκος
  7. λοιπὸν
    loipon
    finally
    G3063 · λοιπόν
  8. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  9. οἶδα
    oida
    I know
    G1492 · εἴδω
  10. εἴ
    ei
    if
    G1487 · εἰ
  11. τινα
    tina
    any one
    G5100 · τις
  12. ἄλλον
    allon
    other
    G243 · ἄλλος
  13. ἐβάπτισα
    ebaptisa
    I dip
    G907 · βαπτίζω