The Church Fathers on this verse

1 Corinthians 11:13Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

You yourselves judge. Doth it become a woman to pray unto God uncovered?

Douay-Rheims

εν υμιν αυτοις κρινατε πρεπον εστιν γυναικα ακατακαλυπτον τω θεω προσευχεσθαι

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

8 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Verses 13-15. "Judge among yourselves. Is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered?" (1 Cor 11:13).

Again he leaves them to judge what has been said, as he did in the discussion of things offered to idols. There he said, "Judge for yourselves what I say" (1 Cor 10:15), and here he says, "Judge among yourselves."

By this he suggests something fearful. Here, he says, the offense touches God. Yet he does not say this directly, but speaks more gently and under a veil.

"Is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered? Does not nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him? But if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her, for her hair is given to her for a covering" (1 Cor 11:13-15).

Read more (317 words)

As elsewhere he always uses proofs known to all, so here also he turns to a custom known to all. He greatly shames his hearers, who expect instruction from him in what they could have known from common custom. This is not unknown even to barbarians.

Notice what strong expressions he uses everywhere: "Every man praying or prophesying with his head covered dishonors his head." Again: "If it is shameful for a woman to be shorn or shaved, let her be covered."

And here: "If a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him. But if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her, for her hair is given to her for a covering" (1 Cor 11:4, 6, 14-15).

But you will say, if it was given for a garment, why add another garment to the one? In order to show subjection not only by nature, but also by free will.

Nature established beforehand that you should be covered. Add something from yourself, lest you appear to transgress the laws of nature. To resist not only us, but also nature, is a sign of great shamelessness.

Therefore, reproaching the Jews, God said: "Your sons and your daughters... you offered in sacrifice." This was greater than all "your abominations" (Ezek 16:20, 22).

Likewise Paul, in the Epistle to the Romans, reproving those given over to lust, intensifies the accusation in the same way. He notes that their transgression is contrary not only to the law of God, but also to nature: "they exchanged the natural use for what is against nature" (Rom 1:26).

Here also he suggests the same thing, and further, that he prescribes nothing new. All pagan innovations are contrary to nature.

Christ expresses the same when He says, "Whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them" (Mt 7:12). He thereby shows that He introduces nothing new.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

"Judge for yourselves." Again he appoints them themselves as judges, so as to confirm fully what he wants. "Is it fitting for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered?" Here he hints at something fearful, that the dishonor rises up to God.

Ambrosiaster

4th centuryChurch Father

Paul is angry about this, and therefore earlier spoke ironically: "I praise you, brethren, because you remember all my things and keep the traditions as I delivered them to you" (1 Cor 11:2). For this is explained by the tradition of the Church, that women should remain in the temple with covered head. Yet the Corinthians tolerated women remaining in the temple with uncovered heads. Therefore he tries to persuade them of the truth, no longer from the tradition which the Corinthians had neglected, but from the very nature of things.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

If a woman counts it an honor to have hair, and regards its removal as dishonor, then let her consider how she dishonors the One who gave the hair when she approaches without proper modesty and honor.

Kochomski S.W.

19th centuryChurch Father

Here the Apostle Paul condemns men who pray or prophesy with covered head (v. 4), and also men who grow their hair long: "if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him" (v. 14).

The Stundists apply this to the clergy of the Orthodox Church and accuse them of violating the apostolic commandment. They do this because they wear long hair and place mitres, kamilavkas, and skufias on their heads during divine services.

But at the conclusion of these instructions the Apostle Paul writes: "If anyone is inclined to be contentious, we have no such custom," meaning that a man should grow his hair and a woman should not (vv. 14-15), "nor do the Churches of God."

Read more (243 words)

These words indicate that what the Apostle has set forth above concerns custom. If anyone wished to dispute it, he would be reproved not by a commandment of the Lord (cf. 7, 10), but only by existing custom. Customs change.

In particular, concerning men growing their hair, the Apostle finds that nature itself teaches that this is a dishonor for a man (v. 14). Here he appeals not to a commandment of the Lord, but only to "nature."

He considers the growing of hair natural not for a man, but only for a woman (v. 15). Yet naturalness is not always an obligatory property of human actions. In other words, not everything natural is therefore obligatory.

For example, in hot weather it is natural to go barefoot, yet it is not obligatory. As for covering the head, there is a distinction between simple covering and crowning the head.

The mitres of Orthodox bishops, and the kamilavkas and skufias of priests, are adornments of the head, like diadems or crowns, that is, bands or wreaths. The Apostle could not have condemned such adornments.

As a zealous visitor to the temple in Jerusalem, he certainly saw the headband on the head of the Jewish high priest, in Greek the mitra (Ex 29:6; Lev 8:9). He also saw the caps on the priests (Ex 29:9; Lev 8:13).

Therefore he could not have thought that every adornment or crowning of the head is contrary to God's commandments.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

A woman must be covered also according to the demand of sound reason (1 Cor 11:13-16). 1 Cor 11:14: "Judge for yourselves. Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair, it is a dishonor to him?" For he becomes like a woman. The wearing of long hair by contemporary Orthodox priests has an entirely different idea, namely the idea of Nazirite dedication, or consecration to God. According to the biblical law, the Old Testament Nazirites had to let their hair grow (Num 6:5).

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The commonly accepted order was especially often violated by women. Therefore the Apostle chiefly gives his instructions to them and humbles them most of all.

Yet lest anyone find in his words a basis for degrading women before men, he speaks of the great importance of women. This consists in their equality before God and in the fact that all men, except the first, came from woman, as all come from God.

In conclusion, the Apostle appeals to the common sense of all. He says that the order he establishes is not only natural and necessary by nature, but also accepted throughout the whole Church of God. Therefore it is impossible to argue against it.

"If they contradicted this law then, now the whole world has received and preserves it," says Chrysostom.

Read more (74 words)

Thus the universal spread of Christian customs is one of the most important proofs of the necessity of observing customs of this kind.

For this reason, from ancient times all modest wives have considered, and still consider, it necessary to cover their head in the presence of men. Only false freedom leads some to a custom contrary to this and exceedingly harmful.

For "through one person the enemy sometimes does evil to hundreds" (Theophan).

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

At last the Apostle appeals to natural feeling, or sense. Again he leaves them to judge for themselves what has been said, just as he did in the discussion about things sacrificed to idols. He suggests something fearful: "Here," he says, "the offense touches God." Yet he does not say this directly, but expresses it more gently and veiledly: "Is it fitting for a woman to pray to God uncovered?" as Chrysostom says. He directs his speech to the woman alone. By this he shows that all the preceding was said chiefly for her instruction, though there the word concerned the man also.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 11 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  2. ὑμῖν
    hymin
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  3. αὐτοῖς
    autois
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  4. κρίνατε
    krinate
    I judge
    G2919 · κρίνω
  5. πρέπον
    prepon
    it becomes
    G4241 · πρέπω
  6. ἐστὶν
    estin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  7. γυναῖκα
    gynaika
    a woman
    G1135 · γυνή
  8. ἀκατακάλυπτον
    akatakalypton
    not veiled
    G177 · ἀκατακάλυπτος
  9. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  10. Θεῷ
    theō
    God
    G2316 · θεός
  11. προσεύχεσθαι
    proseuchesthai
    I pray
    G4336 · προσεύχομαι