The Church Fathers on this verse

1 Corinthians 12:17Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

If the whole body were the eye, where would be the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where would be the smelling?

Douay-Rheims

ει ολον το σωμα οφθαλμος που η ακοη ει ολον ακοη που η οσφρησις

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Since he pointed to the difference of the members, mentioning feet, hands, eyes, and ears, and thereby suggested the thought of lower and higher dignity, see how he again consoles and shows that this is profitable. A body is especially a body because its members are many and different. If they were all one, they would not make up a body. Therefore he says: "And if they were all one member, where would the body be?" (1 Cor 12:19). He says this later, but now he expresses something still greater. In that case there would not only be no body, but there would be no other members either: "If the whole were hearing," he says, "where would be the sense of smell?" Then, since his hearers could still be troubled, he does here what he did above.

Read more (307 words)

There, after consoling them by pointing to usefulness, he completely stopped their mouths by saying: "But one and the same Spirit works all these things, distributing to each one individually as He wills" (1 Cor 12:11). So also here, after proving that everything has been arranged profitably, he again attributes everything to the will of God and says: "But now God has set the members, each one of them, in the body just as He pleased" (1 Cor 12:18). As he said of the Spirit, "as He wills," so here also, "as He pleased." Therefore do not ask why it is so and why it is not otherwise. Even if we could present thousands of reasons, we could prove that this is good by nothing so powerfully as by the words: as the supreme Craftsman willed, so it came to be, because He wills what is profitable. If we must not be too inquisitive about the members in our body, much less should we be so in the Church. Notice the Apostle's wisdom. He points not to a difference of the members by nature or activity, but to a difference of local position: "But," he says, "God has set the members, each one of them, in the body just as He pleased." He rightly said, "each one," expressing the benefit of them all. You cannot say that the Lord arranged this member, but not that one. Each has been placed so by His will. It is profitable for the foot to be in precisely such a place, not only for the head to be in its own. If some member changed position, left its own place, and passed to another, then even if it seemed to occupy a better place, it would ruin and disorder everything. It would lose its own place and not attain the other's.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Since he mentioned the eye and the foot, the ear and the hand, and presented them reasoning about elevation and abasement, the Corinthians might naturally fall again into sorrow instead of consolation. Therefore he now shows that it is useful and necessary for the gifts to be diverse.

For if the whole body were one member, where would the other members be? Are you not ashamed to reject so many members and exalt only yourself?

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Let the very form of your body and the actions of its members teach you. Will any part of your body demand for itself the function of another? For example, will the eye demand the function of the mouth, or the mouth the function of the eye? Will the hand demand the function of the feet, or the foot that of the hands? More than this, the hands themselves, right and left, in most cases perform different functions. If you change the function of each, this will be contrary to nature. You would sooner deprive the whole man of activity than change the use of the bodily parts. For example, you would begin taking food with the left hand and use the right as the left, gathering up the remnants of food, unless necessity required it (cf. 1 Cor 12:12; Rom 12:4-5).

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

If the whole body should have only one member, even the most honorable one, it would undoubtedly be useless, since it would lack the other members.

Tichon of Zadonsk

18th centuryChurch Father

What the members are in the body, Christians are among themselves. Bodily members compose the body. So also Christians compose a spiritual body. The members in the body are joined and are one body. So also Christians are spiritually joined and are one spiritual body. The members in the body are joined and bound together by sinews. So also Christians are joined and bound together by faith, spirit, and love. The members in the body do not harm one another. So also Christians must not offend one another or harm one another. The members in the body are at peace and in agreement with one another. So also among Christians there must be peace and concord. The members in the body help one another and defend one another. So also Christians must help one another and defend one another.

Read more (227 words)

When one member in the body suffers, the other members suffer with it. So also, when any Christian suffers, Christians must suffer with him and weep with those who weep. The members in the body do not despise one another or exalt themselves over one another. So also Christians must not despise one another or exalt themselves over one another. The members in the body are all of equal dignity. So also Christians must think of themselves. The members warn one another against approaching evil, as the eyes by sight, the ears by hearing, the feet by flight, and so on. So also Christians must warn one another: one by word, another by counsel, another by fear, another by prayer. The head cares and provides for the whole bodily structure. So also the Head, Christ, cares and provides for His whole spiritual Body. To Him be glory forever. Amen. Do you see, Christian, what Christians are, and what love, peace, concord, mercy, compassion, and the like ought to exist among them? Consider whether you belong to this holy fellowship. Of the first Christians it is written: "Now the multitude of those who believed were of one heart and one soul" (Acts 4:32). Oh, if only it were so now! But with pain and sighing we see the opposite (cf. Rom 12:4-5; 1 Cor 10:17; 12:12-13, and others).

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

To explain the actions and mutual relations of the members of the Church, the Apostle points to the actions and relations of the members of the human body. Through this comparison, he clarifies the need for mutual care, cooperation, and even dependence among the members of the Church.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

Having spoken of the unity of the source of the gifts of grace, and wishing to bring the Corinthians into concord and unity. Since they envied one another over the unequal miraculous gifts of grace they had received, the Apostle Paul explains to them the necessity of a firm union among the members of the Church in the one Christ Jesus. He does so by the likeness of the bodily organism, whose common good is secured only by the unity of all the body's members and by our common care for them, despite their diversity and the differing degrees of their relative dignity. "For as the body is one and has many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body, so also is Christ" (1 Cor 12:12). That is, so also is the Body of Christ, which is the Church (Saint Chrysostom).

Read more (111 words)

"The eye cannot say to the hand, 'I have no need of you'; nor again the head to the feet, 'I have no need of you'" (1 Cor 12:21). On the contrary, the members of the body that seem weaker, such as the tongue, the heart, and others, are much more necessary (1 Cor 12:22). Those that seem to us less honorable in the body, such as the stomach, the feet, and others, receive greater care from us (1 Cor 12:23). Therefore, if one member suffers, all the members suffer with it (1 Cor 12:26). "And you," the Apostle concludes, "are the Body of Christ, and individually members" (1 Cor 12:27).

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Most directly, his comparison of the Church with the body expresses this thought: as the members of the body, though many, make up one body, so the bearers of gifts of grace, as members of the Church of Christ, must through love make up one whole. Each serves the common life of the Church with his own gift. A second essential thought flowing from this comparison is the teaching that all gifts are equally necessary and equal in worth for the fullness of the Church's life. This remains true despite their apparently sharp difference, corresponding to the difference among bodily members. Each member performs its own particular function and has the common purpose of serving the benefit of the whole body.

Read more (282 words)

It especially serves those members that for some reason seem insufficiently protected or seem to disturb the dignity of the body as a whole. So also in the Church, those bearers of gifts of grace who have them in lesser measure may receive care from other bearers of higher gifts. Thus, as in a healthy body no member can grumble at its place or condition, but all hasten to serve one another and the whole body, so there must be common contentment and mutual help among the members of the Church generally. This must also exist especially among the bearers of different spiritual gifts of grace. Finally, the members of the body cannot leave their own condition, perform functions not proper to them, or occupy another place. Each member performs its functions not by accidental position, but according to the foreseen plan of our wise Creator. So also each member of the Church must necessarily do the work suited to his gift, through faith in the all-acting and all-sustaining Wisdom and goodness of God the Provider, our Savior Jesus Christ, and of the accomplishing Spirit, the one Cause of all gifts. As if summing up the Apostle's thought, blessed Theodoret says: "Therefore let everyone love what has been given. For if God has distributed active powers to the parts of the body, then the one who does not remain within the appointed bounds goes directly against Him Who set those bounds." Saint John Chrysostom says: "As the supreme Craftsman willed, so it came to be, for He wills what is profitable. If we must not be inquisitive about the members in our body, much less should we be so in the Church."

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

When the matter concerns dogmas, Mysteries, or the sacred hierarchy, beware lest you appear as a worker whom the Lord did not send into His vineyard. If He by Whom "the whole body" of the Church, "supplied and knit together by joints and ligaments, grows with the increase of God" (Col 2:19), has not appointed you as the eye or mouth of this body, do not appropriate the special duties of these members for yourself. The hand, or another member, cannot say to the eye or mouth: I will fulfill your function. Yet there are duties that are foreign to no member of the body, such as preserving life and turning away danger. The life of the spiritual body is love, just as, conversely, "he who does not love abides in death" (1 Jn 3:14). Good works are manifestations of spiritual life.

Read more (108 words)

Therefore all members of the Church without exception must care that the vital power of Christian love not be extinguished. They must care that its fruits not become scarce, and that the dead works of vanity and vice not suppress it. Can any member of the body say to another: I do not care whether there is life in you, or whether there will be? Therefore, brethren, fellow members of the one Body of the Church, we must all guard one another from sinful death. We must encourage one another toward love of God and love of the brethren. We must stir one another up to good works.

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

This desire to reach toward the higher members leads to the abolition of the lower ones, and this leads to the body's disorder and common ruin. If such a desire were satisfied, all would have to be made, for example, into eyes or hearing, the nobler members. Then the whole body would become an eye or hearing. What would that resemble? "If the whole body had only one member, even the most sufficient one, it would without doubt be good for nothing, being deprived of the other members" (Theodoret). "Since he pointed to the difference of the members, mentioned feet, hands, eyes, and ears, and thereby suggested the thought of lower and higher dignity, see how he again consoles and shows that this is profitable. A body is especially a body because its members are many and different.

Read more (52 words)

If they were all one, they would not make up a body. Therefore he says below: 'If all were one member, where would the body be?' Here he expresses something still greater: in that case there would not only be no body, but there would be no other members either" (Saint Chrysostom).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 14 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. εἰ
    ei
    if
    G1487 · εἰ
  2. ὅλον
    holon
    all
    G3650 · ὅλος
  3. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  4. σῶμα
    sōma
    body
    G4983 · σῶμα
  5. ὀφθαλμός
    ophthalmos
    the eye
    G3788 · ὀφθαλμός
  6. ποῦ
    pou
    where
    G4226 · ποῦ
  7. ἡ
    hē
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. ἀκοή
    akoē
    hearing
    G189 · ἀκοή
  9. εἰ
    ei
    if
    G1487 · εἰ
  10. ὅλον
    holon
    all
    G3650 · ὅλος
  11. ἀκοή
    akoē
    hearing
    G189 · ἀκοή
  12. ποῦ
    pou
    where
    G4226 · ποῦ
  13. ἡ
    hē
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  14. ὄσφρησις
    osphrēsis
    the sense of smell
    G3750 · ὄσφρησις