John Chrysostom
See verse 17. Having sufficiently stopped their mouths by pointing to God’s ordinance, he again offers reasons. In general, he does not constantly use only one method or the other, but changes and varies his speech. Whoever only stops mouths troubles the hearer. But whoever trains him to demand explanations for everything harms his faith. Therefore Paul constantly does both, so that they may neither grow weak in faith nor be troubled. Having stopped their mouths, he again gives an explanation. See his skill in contest and the superiority of his victory. From the very thing by which they inferred inequality of honor, namely the great difference among them, he proves that they have equal honor. How so? In this way: “If all were one member, where would the body be?” The meaning is this.
Read more (416 words)
If there were not great difference among you, you would not be a body. Not being a body, you would not be one. Not being one, you would not have equal honor. If you all had equal honor, you would not be a body. Not being a body, you would not be one. Not being one, how would you have equal honor? But now, because you do not all have one gift, you constitute a body. And being a body, you all constitute one whole. You do not differ from one another in the respect that you constitute a body. Therefore this very difference produces equality of honor. For this reason he adds: “But now there are many members, yet one body.” Keeping this in mind, let us also put away all envy. Let us neither envy those who have greater gifts nor despise those who have lesser ones. Thus it pleased God; let us not resist. If you are still troubled, consider that another often cannot fulfill your work. Therefore, although you are less than he, in this respect you surpass him. And although he is greater than you, in this respect he is less. Thus you are equal. In the body, members that seem unimportant perform actions that are not unimportant. Yet they often bring ruin even to important members if they are separated from them. What, for example, is more unimportant in the body than hair? But if you destroy it on the eyebrows and eyelashes, you take away all comeliness from the face. The eye will no longer be so beautiful. Though the loss is not great, all comeliness is lost through it. Not only comeliness, but also, to a great degree, the use of the eyes. Each of our members has its own particular activity and a common one. Likewise its beauty is both particular and common. Though they seem divided from one another, in reality they are closely joined. When one is harmed, another is also harmed. Consider this. Let someone have bright eyes, smiling cheeks, rosy lips, a straight nose, and well-ordered brows. Yet if you damage any one of these, you mar the common beauty of the whole. Everything becomes ugly, and what formerly seemed beautiful appears repulsive. If, for example, you disfigure only the edge of the nose, you produce great ugliness in the whole, although only one member is disfigured. The same happens with the hand if you tear off even the nail of one finger.