The Church Fathers on this verse

1 Corinthians 13:1Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

Douay-Rheims

εαν ταις γλωσσαις των ανθρωπων λαλω και των αγγελων αγαπην δε μη εχω γεγονα χαλκος ηχων η κυμβαλον αλαλαζον

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

12 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Love should rightly appear important already from this, that the gifts not only failed to unite them, but divided those already united. Love, by contrast, can by itself unite the divided and make them one body.

However, he does not say this at once. He points to what they especially desired: that love also is a gift, and the most excellent way to receive all gifts.

Therefore, if you do not wish to love your brother from duty, then at least cherish love so that you may receive a great gift of miracles and more abundant grace.

See where the Apostle begins: first of all with what they considered wondrous and great, that is, with the gift of tongues. Speaking of this gift, he presents it not as they had it, but as much greater.

Read more (346 words)

He did not say, "If I speak with tongues," but, "If I speak with the tongues of men" (1 Cor 13:1). What does "of men" mean? The tongues of all the peoples of the inhabited world.

Not content with this enlargement, he adds another, much greater one, and says, "and of angels, but have not love, I am sounding brass or a clanging cymbal."

Do you see how he exalted this gift, and how afterward he cast it down and overthrew it? He did not simply say, "Then I am nothing," but, "I am sounding brass," something insensible and soulless.

How is he sounding brass? He makes a sound, but vainly, to no purpose and without any need. Moreover, besides bringing no benefit, he seems to many disturbing, burdensome, and unbearable.

Do you see how one who lacks love is likened to soulless and insensible things?

When speaking of an angelic tongue, the Apostle did not attribute a tongue to angels. Rather, he expresses this: even if I speak as angels usually converse among themselves, without it, that is, love, I am nothing.

I am even burdensome and unbearable. Likewise, elsewhere, when he says, "Every knee in heaven and on earth and under the earth should bow to Him" (Phil 2:10), he does not attribute knees and bones to angels.

May it not be so. By the likeness of our worship, he wishes to express the angels' zealous worship. So also here he speaks of a tongue, meaning not a bodily organ.

By a manner of conversation known to us, he expresses their mutual conversation among themselves.

Then, so that his words may be accepted more readily, he does not stop at the gift of tongues. He points also to the other gifts.

After showing their insignificance without love, he then sketches its image. Since he wished to intensify the discourse gradually, he ascends from lesser to greater.

What he placed last when enumerating the gifts, namely the gift of tongues, he now places first, ascending, as I said, little by little from lesser to greater.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle did not immediately show them the way. First he compared it with the gift they considered great, that is, the gift of tongues.

He shows that this way is incomparably more excellent than that gift, and even than all other gifts. Only afterward does he prove that it is desirable.

By human tongues he means the tongues of all the peoples of the inhabited world. Not content with this, he adds another superiority, saying, "the tongues of angels."

He did not say this because angels have tongues, but to indicate something better and more excellent than human tongues.

For by angelic tongue is meant their noetic power to communicate divine thoughts to one another. He called it so by analogy with our instrument of speech.

Read more (57 words)

Likewise, by the phrase "every knee should bow, of those in heaven" (Phil 2:10), he signified their most zealous submission, for they do not have bones.

"I am," he says, "sounding brass." That is, I make a sound, but speak in vain. I trouble others, yet bring no benefit to anyone, because I do not have love.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

What praise will there be for the man who through the Spirit has received the gift of speaking in one or another tongue? For if I spoke with the tongues of men or of angels but had no love, then I would become like sounding brass or a clanging cymbal.

As brass or a cymbal are soulless objects and make sounds with another's voice and tone, so everyone who speaks in a tongue, since he does not know what he says, is like brass. He does not understand the meaning of the voice.

Ambrosiaster

4th centuryChurch Father

Great is the grace of speaking in different tongues. Yet greater still is the grace if someone can know the tongue of angels, that is, if he can know the thoughts of angels in the Spirit.

Truly, the Apostle does not attribute this to human merits, but to the glory of God. He indicates this to His servants by using the comparison with sounding brass and a clanging cymbal.

For brass sounds when struck by another, and so also a cymbal sounds. Such is speaking in tongues, which is the result of the action of the Holy Spirit.

The Savior says this elsewhere: "For it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father Who speaks in you" (Mt 10:20).

Read more (69 words)

For even the donkey spoke in human language to Balaam, the son of Beor, in order to reveal the greatness of God (Num 22:28). Little children cried out praise to the glory of God, putting the chief priests and scribes to shame (Mt 21:15-16).

The Savior showed that not only they, but even stones can cry out to the glory of God in condemnation of the Pharisees (Lk 19:40).

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

When comparing the gifts, the Apostle placed the gift of tongues first of all, because in the Corinthians' opinion it was more important than the others.

They considered it the most important because it was given to the Apostles before all the others on the day of Pentecost, at the descent of the All-Holy Spirit.

Therefore he says: if I know all human tongues and, beyond this, the tongues of the invisible Powers, but do not have love for my neighbor, then I differ in nothing from lifeless instruments.

By angelic tongues he means not sensible tongues, but certain noetic tongues, by which the Angels hymn the God of all and converse among themselves.

For Isaiah heard them singing. Ezekiel, Daniel, Zechariah, and Micah also heard them conversing. The divine Apostle expressed this by way of hyperbole, intending to show the superiority of love.

Ammon Abba

4th centuryChurch Father

Without love, as the Apostle says, even if we spoke with the tongues of angels, had the whole right faith, moved mountains, distributed all our possessions to the poor, and gave our body to martyrdom, all this brings us no benefit.

But you will say, "How can someone give all his possessions to the poor and not have love? Is almsgiving not love?"

No. Almsgiving is not perfect love, but only one manifestation of love. Many give alms to some and wrong others. They show hospitality to some and bear grudges against others.

They defend some and slander others. They have compassion for strangers and hate their own. This is not love, for love hates no one, slanders no one, judges no one, and grieves no one.

Read more (148 words)

It abhors no one: neither believer nor unbeliever, neither stranger nor sinner, neither fornicator nor unclean person. On the contrary, it loves sinners, the weak, and the negligent.

It suffers, grieves, and weeps for them. Even more, it has greater compassion for wicked and sinful people, imitating Christ, Who called sinners and ate and drank with them.

Therefore, showing what true love is, He teaches us, "Be good and merciful, as your heavenly Father is." As He sends rain upon the evil and the good, and commands the sun to rise upon the righteous and the unrighteous (Mt 5:45), so those who have true love love all, pity all, and pray for all.

Some give alms and, trusting in this alone, commit many sins. They hate many and defile their bodies with unclean desires. Such people deceive themselves, hoping only in the alms they suppose they are giving.

Macarius the Egyptian

4th centuryChurch Father

Do you not hear what Paul says? If I have all gifts, "if I deliver my body to be burned, if I speak with the tongues of angels, but have not love, I am nothing."

For these gifts only guide a man toward perfection. Those who have attained them, although they are in the light, are still infants.

Many of the brethren rose to this degree and had gifts of healings, revelation, and prophecy. Yet because they had not yet come to perfect love, in which is the bond of perfection (Col 3:14), warfare rose within them.

Then, becoming negligent, they fell. But whoever attains perfect love becomes already a prisoner and captive of grace.

Read more (444 words)

Whoever gradually approaches the perfect measure of love, but has not yet reached the point of becoming love's prisoner, is still under fear. Warfare and falling threaten him.

If he does not guard himself, Satan overthrows him.

Question: In what sense does the Apostle say, "If I have all knowledge and all prophecy," and "speak with the tongues of Angels, I am nothing"?

Answer: We must not understand this as though the Apostle were nothing. Rather, in comparison with that love which is perfect, these gifts are still small. Whoever stands on this degree falls, but whoever has love cannot fall.

I tell you that I have seen people who had all the gifts and became partakers of the Spirit, yet because they did not attain perfect love, they fell.

A certain nobleman renounced the world, sold his property, and freed his slaves. Being prudent and intelligent, he had already become renowned for an honorable life. Meanwhile, giving himself over to self-conceit and arrogance, he finally fell into dissipation and countless evils.

Another, during persecution, delivered his body and became a confessor. Later, when peace came, he was released and held in honor. His eyelids had been damaged because he was tormented in dense smoke.

When this celebrated man was called to prayer, he took bread and gave it to his servant. His mind came into such a state as though he had never heard the word of God.

Another delivered his body to torment during persecution. He was suspended and scraped, then cast into prison. A certain nun served him in faith, and, drawing close to her while he was in prison, he fell into fornication.

See, then, why they fell: this rich man who sold his possessions, and this man who delivered his body to torment.

There was also another prudent ascetic who lived with me in one house and prayed with me. He was so rich in grace that, praying beside me, he was moved to compunction, because grace was boiling within him.

The gift of healings had been given to him. He not only cast out demons, but also healed by the laying on of hands those bound hand and foot and suffering severe illnesses.

Then, becoming negligent, praised by the world, and taking pleasure in himself, he became proud and fell into the very depth of sin.

See how even one who had the gift of healing fell. Do you see how those who have not come to the measure of love fall?

But whoever has attained love, being bound and intoxicated by it, is plunged and carried captive into another world, as though not sensing his own nature.

Isidore of Pelusium

5th centuryChurch Father

A word spoken for the benefit of those who hear is a powerful word. It is rightly called a word, and it is godlike. But a word that results only in pleasure and applause is the clanging of bronze that fills the ear with loud sounds.

Therefore either conduct your speech with dignity, preferring modesty to pomp, or know that you are a cymbal fit only for public spectacles.

Severian of Gabala

5th centuryChurch Father

What tongue do angels have, since they have neither breast, nor throat, nor voice, nor anything else bodily? By angelic tongues the Apostle means the differences of tongues over which angels were appointed during the dispersion after the building of the tower (Gen 11:4-9).

For, as Moses says in Deuteronomy, God established the boundaries of the nations according to the number of the angels of God (Deut 32:8, LXX). Clearly He appointed them when He divided the tongues of those who began building the tower.

Since, without unanimity, they no longer preserved concord, but were as though estranged from one another through the changes of tongues, angels were appointed over them.

Read more (135 words)

Each angel was to protect the nation entrusted to him, so that nothing would be lost or perish. Therefore the Apostle calls the difference of tongues angelic tongues.

One should know that, just as David calls it the bread of angels (Ps 78:25), not because angels eat it, so the Apostle calls them angelic tongues, not because angels converse in them.

As by the bread of angels we understand bread delivered by the command of angels, not bread that angels ate, but bread that angels ordered to be delivered, so by angelic tongues we understand the differences of tongues over which angels were appointed.

A human tongue is a learned language, since it is introduced, not natural but artificial. By human tongue he means the language of rhetoric, grammar, philosophy, thought, prose, art, and discussion.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

"Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels." In the first place, for comparison with love, the Apostle sets the gift of tongues, which was considered highest among the Corinthians.

To magnify this gift still more, he adds angelic tongues to human tongues. By these he means not sensory tongues, but noetic tongues, in which the angels hymn God and converse with one another.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

At the end of the preceding, twelfth chapter, Paul said that besides the extraordinary gifts there are other gifts, and indeed higher ones. Here he indicates such a higher gift in love.

Love serves as the highest means, or the surest and shortest path, to the Kingdom of God. Since the Corinthians viewed all the gifts comparatively, the Apostle also speaks of love comparatively.

First of all he compares love with the gift of tongues, which the Greeks especially valued. In general, they held verbal speech in high esteem.

Viewing language as the manifestation of sounds, the Apostle compares heartless speech with the monotone ringing of brass and the indistinct rattling of a drum or rattle.

Read more (158 words)

It is clear that the instruments of such sounds are insignificant. But this is not enough. Even the most perfect and spiritual expressions of thought, such as angelic ones, cannot give true dignity to soulless speech.

If someone, like the prophet Isaiah, Daniel, and others, heard the noetic doxology by which the Angels hymn God and converse among themselves, and could convey the beauty of their speech in human words, yet without any expression of love, then even in that case this gift would not be lofty in comparison with the gift of love.

Love is the gift of the inward spiritual power of life, whereas verbal transmission of thoughts is an external matter.

According to St. John Chrysostom, "The Apostle, speaking of an angelic tongue, does not attribute bodies to the Angels. Rather, he expresses this: even if I speak as Angels usually converse among themselves, without love I am nothing, and am even burdensome and unbearable."

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

Love is the inner power of life. Immersing itself in God and being filled with God, it spends both all that is God's and all that is its own upon the brethren.

In them it also lives, not by thought but by the heart. It regards everything concerning them as concerning itself.

This is a self-crucified life, an inexhaustible source of every good. Speaking in tongues is an entirely external matter. In the natural order, perhaps only memory is occupied with it.

In the gracious order, even that is absent. For the donkey could speak when it was needed, and the stones will cry out, says the Lord, when there is no one to utter the will of God.

Read more (473 words)

One who speaks without the presence of inner life is truly sounding brass or a clanging cymbal. The first expression denotes a monotone sound, like a blow on a piece of brass or a brass object.

The second denotes changes of tone, but without meaning. In Greek, αλαλαζον means babbling, saying nothing definite.

"When comparing the gifts, the Apostle placed the gift of tongues first of all, because in the Corinthians' opinion it was more important than the others.

They considered it the most important because it was given to the Apostles before all the others on the day of Pentecost, at the descent of the All-Holy Spirit.

He says: if I know all human tongues and, beyond this, the tongues of the invisible Powers, but do not have love for my neighbor, then I differ in nothing from lifeless instruments" (Theodoret).

"See where he begins: first of all with what they considered wondrous and great, that is, with the gift of tongues. Speaking of this gift, he presents it not as they had it, but as much greater.

He did not say, 'Though I speak with tongues,' but, 'Though I speak with human tongues.' What does 'human' mean? The tongues of all the peoples of the inhabited world.

Not content with this enlargement, he adds another, much greater one: 'and angelic,' he says. Do you see how he exalted this gift, and how afterward he cast it down and humbled it?

He did not simply say, 'Then I am nothing,' but, 'I have become sounding brass,' something insensible and soulless, making sound in vain, without purpose and without any benefit.

Not only does it bring benefit to no one, but to many it seems disturbing, burdensome, and unbearable. Κυμβαλον also means a rattle" (Chrysostom).

What is the angelic tongue? Blessed Theodoret writes of it: "By angelic tongues he means not sensible tongues, but certain noetic tongues.

By them the Angels hymn the God of all and converse among themselves. For Isaiah heard them singing. Ezekiel, Daniel, Zechariah, and Micah also heard them conversing.

The divine Apostle expressed this by way of hyperbole, intending to show the superiority of love."

Chrysostom says: "When speaking of an angelic tongue, the Apostle does not attribute bodies to the Angels. Rather, he expresses this: even if I speak as Angels usually converse among themselves, without love I am nothing.

I am even burdensome and unbearable. Likewise, elsewhere, when he says, 'Every knee in heaven should bow to Him' (Phil 2:10), he does not attribute knees and bones to Angels. May it not be so.

By the likeness of our worship, he wishes to express the Angels' zealous worship. So also here he speaks of a tongue, meaning not a bodily member.

By a manner of conversation known to us, he expresses their mutual conversation among themselves."

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 19 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἐὰν
    ean
    if
    G1437 · ἐάν
  2. ταῖς
    tais
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  3. γλώσσαις
    glōssais
    the tongue
    G1100 · γλῶσσα
  4. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. ἀνθρώπων
    anthrōpōn
    a man
    G444 · ἄνθρωπος
  6. λαλῶ
    lalō
    I speak
    G2980 · λαλέω
  7. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  8. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  9. ἀγγέλων
    angelōn
    an angel
    G32 · ἄγγελος
  10. ἀγάπην
    agapēn
    love
    G26 · ἀγάπη
  11. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  12. μὴ
    mē
    not
    G3361 · μή
  13. ἔχω
    echō
    I have
    G2192 · ἔχω
  14. γέγονα
    gegona
    I come into being
    G1096 · γίνομαι
  15. χαλκὸς
    chalkos
    copper
    G5475 · χαλκός
  16. ἠχῶν
    ēchōn
    I make a sound
    G2278 · ἠχέω
  17. ἢ
    ē
    or
    G2228 · ἤ
  18. κύμβαλον
    kymbalon
    a cymbal
    G2950 · κύμβαλον
  19. ἀλαλάζον
    alalazon
    I cry aloud
    G214 · ἀλαλάζω