The Church Fathers on this verse

1 Timothy 1:20Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Of whom is Hymeneus and Alexander, whom I have delivered up to Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme.

Douay-Rheims

ων εστιν υμεναιος και αλεξανδρος ους παρεδωκα τω σατανα ινα παιδευθωσιν μη βλασφημειν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

12 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Therefore those who turn aside from this must inevitably suffer shipwreck. The Apostle shows this to us by an example: "Of such are Hymenaeus and Alexander" (v. 20). By their example he brings us to our senses.

Do you see that even in those times there were men who taught perversely, sought out many things, turned aside from the faith, and submitted everything to examination by their own reasonings? A man who has suffered shipwreck remains naked and deprived of everything. In the same way, one who has fallen away from the faith has nothing left. He has nowhere to stand and nothing on which to rest.

Read more (1520 words)

He does not live a life from which he can derive any profit. For what use is the rest of the body when the head has been injured? If faith without life is nothing, still more is the converse true: life without faith is nothing. If God, for our sake, overlooks what is His, still more must we, for His sake, forget what is ours.

This is what happens when someone falls away from the faith. He stops nowhere, but is tossed here and there until he sinks again into the deep. "Whom," he says, "I delivered to Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme." Do you see that investigating divine things by human reasonings is blasphemy? And rightly so. What does human reasoning have in common with them?

But how does Satan teach them not to blaspheme? If he teaches others not to blaspheme, then he ought much more to teach himself this. If he cannot teach himself this even now, neither can he teach others. The Apostle did not say, "that he may teach them not to blaspheme," but, "that they may learn not to blaspheme." Satan does not accomplish this, but it comes about as a consequence of his actions.

Likewise, in another place, the Apostle says of the fornicator, "to deliver him to Satan for the destruction of the flesh." This is not said with the purpose of saving the body, but "that the spirit may be saved" (1 Cor 5:5). That is, the expression is impersonal.

How does this happen? As executioners, though themselves filled with countless crimes, bring others to their senses, so here this is said of the evil demon. But why did you not punish them yourself, as you punished Bar-Jesus, and as Cephas punished Ananias, but delivered them to Satan? Not in order to subject them to punishment, but to teach them.

Still, he himself also had power to punish. For example, he says, "What do you wish? Shall I come to you with a rod?" (1 Cor 4:21). Again he says, "But that you should do what is good, though we may seem not to be what we ought" (2 Cor 13:7). And again, "for edification, and not for destruction" (2 Cor 13:10).

Why, then, does he summon Satan for punishment? So that a stronger rebuke may be joined to the severity of the punishment. Or rather, the Apostles themselves instructed unbelievers, but delivered apostates to Satan. But why did Peter himself punish Ananias? Because Ananias was both an unbeliever and one who was testing him.

Thus, so that unbelievers might know that they cannot hide, the Apostles punished them themselves. But those who already knew this and afterward fell away from the faith, they delivered to Satan. They showed that such men had been protected not by their own power, but by the Apostles’ care, and that they were delivered to Satan as soon as they fell into pride.

It is like kings, who strike enemies with their own hands, but hand over criminals from among their own subjects to executioners. So it is here. From this it becomes clear that this was done through the Apostles’ care. Besides, it was no small thing to be able to command the devil. Through this it became evident that the devil is subject and, even against his will, obeys the Apostles. Thus this also greatly contributed to the manifestation of the gifts of grace.

Hear how he delivered the guilty man to Satan: "When you are gathered together in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, together with my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ" (1 Cor 5:4). Therefore the guilty man was at once cast out of the common assembly and separated from the flock. He remained alone and naked, and was handed over to the wolf.

As the cloud marked the camp of the Hebrews, so the Spirit marks the Church. Therefore whoever was cast out from her was burned in the fire. The guilty man was cast out from her by the judgment of the Apostles. Thus the Lord also delivered Judas to Satan: "And after the morsel, Satan entered into him" (Jn 13:27).

One may also say that, when they wished to correct someone, they did not punish him themselves. But they punished the incorrigible themselves. Or, if not this, then they handed the guilty over to others for punishment in order to be more feared. Thus Job also was delivered to Satan, not for sins, but for his greater glorification.

Much of the same kind occurs even now. Since priests do not know all sinners, nor those who partake unworthily of the Holy Mysteries, God often does this and delivers them to Satan. When illnesses occur, when slanders arise, when sorrows and misfortunes come, and when similar calamities overtake men, this happens for this reason. Paul reveals this to us when he says, "For this reason many of you are weak and sick, and many sleep" (1 Cor 11:30).

How can this be, you will say, when we approach the Mysteries once a year? The whole evil lies precisely in this: you measure your worthiness in approaching the Mysteries not by purity of thoughts, but by the interval of time. You regard it as a sign of piety that you do not approach them often. You do not know that approaching unworthily, even if it happens only once, means insulting the holy thing. But approaching worthily, even often, is saving.

Boldness does not consist in approaching often, but in approaching unworthily, even if someone should do this only once in his whole life. Yet we are so senseless and wretched that, while committing a thousand transgressions throughout the whole year, we care nothing about freeing ourselves from them. We think it enough if we do not often dare to approach the Body of Christ in a way that insults Him. We do not consider that those who crucified Christ crucified Him only once.

Does sin become smaller because it happened only once? Judas betrayed Christ once. What then? Did that save him? Why do we measure this matter by intervals of time? Let a pure conscience be for us the time when we ought to approach the Mysteries.

The Mystery celebrated at Pascha contains nothing greater than the one celebrated now. It is one and the same. The grace of the Spirit is the same. It is always Pascha. Those of you who are initiated into the Mysteries know this. On Friday, on Saturday, on the Lord’s Day, and on the day of the martyrs, one and the same sacrifice is offered.

"For as often," he says, "as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death" (1 Cor 11:26). He did not limit the sacrifice by a boundary of time. Why, then, you will say, is it called Pascha then? Because Christ suffered for us then.

Therefore no one should approach the first sacrifice in one manner and the last in another. They have one power, one dignity, one grace, and one and the same Body. One is not holier than the other, and the last is not inferior to the first. You yourselves also know this, because then you see nothing unusual except these worldly veils and a splendid, crowded assembly.

Nevertheless, those days have a certain advantage in this respect: from them the saving day takes its beginning for us, since on that day Christ was slain. Apart from this, with respect to the Mysteries, they have no advantage. When you approach even bodily food, you wash your hands and rinse your mouth. But when you intend to approach spiritual food, do you not wash your soul, but come filled with impurity?

How, you will say? Are the forty days of fasting not enough to cleanse us from the heavy burden of sins? Tell me, what benefit comes from this? If someone intended to place fragrant ointment somewhere, and for this purpose cleaned the place, but then, shortly after placing it there, added dung to it, would the fragrance not be destroyed? So it happens with us.

At the time when we approached the Mystery, we were, as far as our strength allowed, worthy of it. But afterward we defile ourselves again. What benefit do we receive from this? We say this even about those who are able to cleanse themselves during the forty days.

Let us not, I beseech you, neglect our salvation, lest our labor be in vain. A man who turns away from his sin and returns to it again, acting as before, is like "a dog that returns to its vomit" (Prov 26:11). If we act in this way, and if we attend to ourselves in this way, we shall be able to be made worthy of the future rewards. May we all receive them by the grace and love for mankind of our Lord Jesus Christ, with Whom to the Father and the Holy Spirit be glory, dominion, and honor, now and ever, and unto the ages of ages. Amen.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

"Such are Hymenaeus and Alexander."

Do you see that even in those times there were people who taught perversely, who turned away from the faith and gave themselves to investigations and speculations? Therefore do not lose heart now when you see such people, but resist them.

"Whom I delivered to Satan, that they may learn," ϊνα παιδευθωσιν, "not to blaspheme."

If he teaches others, how does Satan not teach himself? Yet the Apostle did not say, "that he may teach them not to blaspheme," but, "that they may learn," ϊνα παιδευθωσιν. He does not accomplish this, but it happens as a result of his actions.

Read more (277 words)

Just as executioners, though themselves notorious criminals, bring others to their senses, so also does the devil. But why did Paul not punish them himself, as he punished Bar-Jesus, and as Peter punished Ananias?

It was so that he might unite greater dishonor with the strictness of punishment, and show that he commands even Satan, thereby becoming more fearsome. Or rather, the Apostles themselves punished unbelievers so that they might know they could not hide. For Ananias also was an unbeliever, and was even testing.

But those who already knew this and then fell away from the faith they delivered to Satan. In this way they showed them that they had been protected not by their own power, but by the care of the Apostles.

Or again, those whom they wished to correct they did not punish themselves, while the incorrigible they themselves subjected to punishment. How was the guilty man delivered to Satan? They cast him out of the common assembly, cut him off from the flock, and delivered him naked to the wolf.

For just as in ancient times the cloud surrounded the tabernacle, so the Holy Spirit surrounds the Church of Christ. Therefore he who is outside the Church is also outside the Spirit, and for that reason is wretched and easily captured.

Such is the punishment of excommunication. God Himself also teaches by delivering sinners to illnesses and calamities. "When we are judged," he says, "we are chastened by the Lord" (1 Cor 11:32).

Do you see that to investigate divine things through speculations is to blaspheme? It is an insult to divine things when someone thinks they are comprehensible by human reasoning.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Let us then, brethren, learn in similar actions to distinguish the intentions of those who act, so that we may not falsely accuse and condemn those who desire good as though they were doing harm.

Likewise, when the same Apostle says that he delivered certain persons to Satan so that they might learn not to blaspheme, did he repay evil for evil? Rather, did he not judge it a good work to correct the evil even by means of evil?

The Apostle delivered a man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit might be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus (1 Cor 5:5), not mercilessly but out of love for him. He also delivered others, that they might learn not to blaspheme.

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

Therefore, when someone acquires perfect knowledge of something of this kind, he will then have a correct and sound understanding of the faith. But if someone interprets something of this kind otherwise, he will soon fall into heresy. Thus Hymenaeus and Alexander erred by speaking before the proper time, saying that the resurrection had already taken place. The Galatians, after the proper time had already passed, loved circumcision (see Gal 3).

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Of such men one is Hymenaeus, and another is Alexander. Since they rejected good works and did not have a pure mind, they were deprived of faith and did not receive it. Or they were believers, but by casting away good works and a pure mind, they lost faith itself. Afterward they even became strong enemies of the faith.

He adds: "Whom I delivered to Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme." As he rebuked Bar-Jesus, the magician and false prophet who turned men from the way of God. And said to him, "You shall be blind, and not see the sun for a time" (Acts 13:11), so in the same way he delivered Hymenaeus and Alexander to the demons, which entered into them. Thus, being admonished for their former deeds, they turned away from the blasphemy by which they dared to revile our Lord and the children of the Church.

How, then, does Satan teach them not to blaspheme, if he cannot teach himself this? The Apostle did not say, "that Satan may teach them not to blaspheme," but, "that they may learn not to blaspheme." Satan does not accomplish this, but it comes about as a consequence of his actions. Likewise, in another place the Apostle says of the fornicator, "to deliver such a one to Satan for the destruction of the flesh." This was not said so that the body might be saved, but "that the spirit may be saved" (cf. 1 Cor 5:5). Thus the expression is impersonal.

How does this happen? As executioners, though themselves filled with countless crimes, bring others to their senses, so here this is said of the evil demon. And as to how he delivered one to Satan, hear what he says: "when you are gathered together" (cf. 1 Cor 5:4). Therefore the guilty man was at once cast out of the common assembly and separated from the flock. He remained alone and naked, and was handed over to the wolf. Whoever was cast out was burned. Thus the Lord also delivered Judas to Satan (Jn 13:27). Thus Job too was delivered to Satan, not for sins, but for his greater glorification.

Many such examples occur even now. Since priests do not know all sinners, nor those who partake unworthily of the Holy Mysteries, God often does this and delivers them to Satan. When illnesses occur, when slanders arise, when sorrows and misfortunes come, and when similar calamities overtake men, this happens for this reason. Paul revealed this to us when he said, "For this reason many among you are weak and sick, and many sleep" (1 Cor 11:30).

In his interpretation of 1 Cor 5:5, Chrysostom says that some read the passage thus: "the one who has done this in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ." Placing a stop or comma there, they then continue. "when you are gathered together." They give the saying this meaning: "Deliver to Satan the one who has done this against the name of Christ." That is, he has insulted the name of Christ, though he was faithful and was called by that name, yet dared such a deed. But Chrysostom considers the first reading more true: "when you are gathered together in the name of the Lord." That is, the very name unites you, and in it gather together. "And with my spirit": again he presents himself to them, so that, in passing judgment, they might condemn the incestuous man to excommunication as though in his presence. "With the power of our Lord Jesus Christ" means either that Christ can give them power to deliver such a man to the devil, or that He Himself, together with them, will pronounce sentence against him. He does not say, "give such a one to Satan," but "deliver," opening the doors of repentance to him and, as it were, handing him over to the tormentor.

"For the destruction of the flesh" is like what happened to blessed Job, though not for the same purpose. There it was for more glorious crowns, but here it is for release from sins, so that Satan may punish him with malignant wounds or some other illness. "That the spirit may be saved" means that the soul may be saved. It does not mean that the soul is saved alone, but refers to the certain truth that, when the soul is saved, the body will also necessarily share in salvation. Some understand "spirit" here as the spiritual gift, which is quenched by our sins. To prevent this, he says, let him be punished, so that, being corrected, he may be made worthy of grace and may be found to have kept it whole on that day. For this reason he said, "for the destruction of the flesh," laying down laws for the devil and not permitting him to go beyond the appointed limits. Likewise God said concerning Job, "Only do not touch his soul" (cf. Job 1:12; 2:6).

Theodoret, in his interpretations of 1 Tim 1:20 and 1 Cor 5:5, writes like Chrysostom, but understands "spirit" as the spiritual gift. Theodore of Mopsuestia understands delivery to Satan as excommunication. By the destruction of the flesh he understands sorrows and punishments in this life for repentance. By the spirit he understands the resurrection.

St. John of Damascus, in his interpretations of 1 Cor 5:5 and 1 Tim 1:20, and Oecumenius on 1 Tim 1:20 and 1 Cor 5:5, write: "For the destruction of the flesh" sets a boundary for Satan, allowing him to touch only the body and not the soul. Thus God also says concerning Job, "Only do not touch his soul." He says well, "for the destruction of the flesh," that is, so that Satan may waste him with illness. "That the spirit may be saved," because in this way the body too will be saved. Or otherwise: so that the Holy Spirit may be preserved for him and may not depart from him as from an impious man.

Theophylact, on 1 Cor 5:5 and 1 Tim 1:20, and Euthymius Zigabenus, on 1 Cor 5:5 and 1 Tim 1:20, interpret the affliction as leprosy or some other illness. Cramer’s Catenae on 1 Cor 5:5, besides excerpts from Theodore of Mopsuestia and Chrysostom, cite this extract from Origen: "Not for the destruction of the soul, nor for the destruction of the flesh. He is delivered so that the spirit may be saved on the day of the Lord. Paul excommunicated such a one because he knew that he would repent and be converted, but he wished to punish him and bring him to his senses. For it is one thing to cut someone off as not accepting repentance and conversion. It is another to forbid and expel him from the flock, as a shepherd separates a scabby sheep, lest the whole flock be infected." The same is found in Severian and Theodoret, who understood by "spirit" not the soul, but the spiritual gift.

Among the Western writers, on 1 Cor 5:5, Ambrosiaster says: "Since every lust of the flesh comes from the devil, the man is abandoned and delivered to Satan with this lust. As soon as he is cast out of the Church, he is delivered to Satan for the destruction of the flesh. For both soul and body perish when unlawful deeds are done." On 1 Tim 1:20 he says: "The Apostle pronounced condemnation. The devil, always ready to take under his power those who have departed from God, hears the condemnation and seizes them. So also in the Gospel it is shown that illnesses sometimes strike the body because of sins, and the Lord said that they come from the devil" (Lk 13:16).

Pelagius understands this either as the surrender of the body into Satan’s power, so that the spirit may be saved through repentance, or as the excommunicated man being handed over to Satan’s power. Meanwhile, as his flesh is wasted by repentance and is, as it were, subjected to destruction, the spirit is saved. Alexander and Hymenaeus were delivered to the destruction of the flesh, so that through present punishment they might learn not to despise the future Judgment. They were delivered for instruction, not for destruction.

Primasius, on 1 Cor 5:5, interprets it thus: "So that Satan may have power to take him, or so that the fornicator may be treated in such a way until he sees that neither here, for the flesh, nor in the age to come, for the spirit, will he have rest. This must be guarded against, because the excommunicated man is delivered to Satan. Yet Satan does not receive power over the spirit when he punishes. The spirit is preserved for the judgment of God alone." On 1 Tim 1:20 he writes like Pelagius.

Sedulius, on 1 Cor 5:5, interprets it thus: "That is, he delivers him to the torment of the devil, so that through the torment of the flesh the spirit may be saved. For one who sinned through the devil had to be healed through the devil." On 1 Tim 1:20 he interprets it as Pelagius does.

Furthermore, in his interpretation of Gal 4:14, Chrysostom writes: "When, he says, I was preaching to you, I was persecuted, scourged, and threatened with a thousand deaths. Even then you did not despise me. By weakness and temptation he means sufferings and persecutions." The same is found in Theodore of Mopsuestia, Theodoret, St. John of Damascus, Theophylact, Euthymius Zigabenus, Cramer’s Catenae, Oecumenius, and Ambrosiaster.

Pelagius says: "Either through sufferings, or through natural weakness, for he carried the treasure of grace in an earthen vessel. The temptation for the Galatians could have been that the Apostle endured persecutions and reproaches from unbelievers." Primasius adds another interpretation: "When I came to you, I did not come with a word of worldly wisdom, but humbled and despised." Sedulius understands it as either sufferings from enemies or bodily pain.

The interpretation in the sense of illness or bodily weakness, found in Jerome, Victorinus, and partly in Sedulius, seems to be favored by the direct and usual use of the preposition with the accusative, "because of weakness." That is, weakness became the cause of the Apostle’s stay among the Galatians and of his preaching the Gospel to them. Yet the expression can also be understood in the sense "in weakness" or "amid weakness."

Finally, for the interpretation of 2 Cor 12:7 as the Apostle’s trial, like Job’s, see also the Lausiac History: "God abandons men for various reasons. Sometimes this happens so that hidden virtue may be revealed, as with the great ascetic Job. Sometimes God abandons a man in order to turn him away from pride. This may be seen in the blessed Apostle Paul. He too was subjected to calamities, blows, and various privations. Therefore he said, ‘There was given to me a thorn in the flesh, an angel of Satan, to buffet me, lest I be exalted,’ and so on. The paralytic also was abandoned because of his sins, to whom Jesus Christ said, ‘Behold, you are made well. Sin no more, lest something worse happen to you’" (Jn 5:14). The comparison with Job and the paralytic suggests the thought of the Apostle’s trial by weakness of the flesh. Yet the expression "calamities, blows, and various privations" better favors the interpretation as persecutions from enemies.

Origen, in his interpretation of Exodus, mentions the bodily punishment of Ananias and Sapphira by death (Acts 5:1-10), and the blinding of Elymas the magician by the Apostle Paul (Acts 13:10-11). He then continues: "Likewise Demas and Hermogenes, whom he delivered to Satan that they might learn not to blaspheme, suffered something similar to what has been mentioned. So also did the Corinthian who had his father’s wife, who was delivered to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit might be saved on the day of the Lord."

Elsewhere, in his interpretation of Jeremiah, Origen explains the delivery of Pashhur to Nebuchadnezzar in a mystical sense, as the delivery of a sinner to the devil for punishment. He refers to the Apostle Paul, who teaches that the sinner is delivered to the devil. The Apostle says of Phygellus and Hermogenes, "whom I delivered to Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme." He also says of the fornicator, "when you are gathered together." Thus this Pashhur, because of his dark words, is delivered into the hands of the king of Babylon.

Read the full text in the app

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

"Of whom are Hymenaeus and Alexander." Then he also announces the sentence pronounced upon them: "whom I delivered to Satan, that they may be taught not to blaspheme."

But he did not state the blasphemy itself, because he was writing to one who knew the matter. He delivered them to the devil not as a teacher of good, but as a harsh executor of punishment.

Therefore the Apostle did not say, "that he may teach them not to blaspheme," but, "that they may be taught not to blaspheme." For, being cut off from the body of the Church and deprived of the grace of God, they were subjected to harsh blows from the adversary. They fell into grievous illnesses, sufferings, losses, and other calamities.

Read more (57 words)

It is pleasing to Satan to impose these things on men, since, according to the Prophet's word, he is "enemy and avenger" (Ps 8:2). But when those being taught saw the harm that came from blasphemy, it was natural for them to change their way of thinking.

After this the Apostle sets forth determinations concerning Church order.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

"Of whom are Hymenaeus and Alexander."

These also were disciples of the Apostle.

"Whom I delivered to Satan."

He delivered them to this harsh executor of punishment, δημιουργός, an executioner, and entrusted him to scourge them.

"That they may be taught not to blaspheme."

He delivered them to Satan not so that Satan would teach them not to utter blasphemy against God, for heretical and unworthy teaching about God is blasphemy. Rather, being tormented by him after his suggestion of evil to them, they would understand that they were being tormented by him because of this very evil.

Thus they would persuade their souls concerning righteousness, being brought to understanding not by the devil, but by their grievous condition and suffering.

Read more (47 words)

He delivered them to Satan not as one who suggests good, but as a cruel tormentor. Therefore he did not say, "that he may teach them," but "that they themselves may learn." Just as executioners, themselves guilty of countless crimes, teach others prudence, so also does Satan.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

"Of whom are Hymenaeus and Alexander." The Apostle says of Hymenaeus (2 Tim 2:17-18) that he regarded the resurrection of the dead as already past. Nothing is known about Alexander, unless he is to be identified with Alexander the coppersmith, who did the Apostle much harm (2 Tim 4:14).

But he cannot be considered one of the associates of Demetrius the silversmith (Acts 19:33), because he was a Christian and was excommunicated by the Apostle. Here it is added about these persons that they blasphemed.

By blasphemy here the Apostle could mean the rejection of the truth of the resurrection of the dead. He accuses Hymenaeus and his associate Philetus of this (2 Tim 2:17-18), and Alexander was probably guilty of it as well.

Read more (101 words)

For the denial of the truth of the Resurrection is closely connected with denial of God's almightiness, His providence over the world, the future Judgment and recompense, and many other fundamental truths of Christianity (cf. 1 Cor 15:12-19).

What the action of apostolic authority consisted of, here called delivery to Satan, is unknown. But from 1 Cor 5:5 it appears that it was accompanied by the destruction of the flesh. This may mean condemnation to some illness, as happened with Elymas the magician (Acts 13:11), and excommunication from the Church, from the communion of prayers and the Eucharist (2 Cor 2:7-8).

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

The guardian of the faith must not sleep or be indifferent in matters of faith. On the contrary, he must be zealous and wage war like a good soldier against the enemies of the faith. He must be inspired by the sincerity of his own faith and rely on the purity of his conscience. Hymenaeus and Alexander can serve as the opposite and fearful example of betrayal of the faith and punishment for it. St. Paul delivered them to Satan, so that they might learn not to blaspheme (1 Tim 1:18-20).

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Turning personally to Timothy, the Apostle exhorts him to struggle against the enemies of salvation, firmly preserving faith in purity of conscience. Without this one cannot remain preserved, as was shown by the heretics Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom Paul excommunicated from Church communion for their blasphemy.

The Apostle reminds Timothy that it had been foretold of him that he would be a good soldier of Christ. These were probably "certain utterances about Saint Timothy by prophets then present in the churches, or indications from above given to Paul himself and known to Timothy. One of these may have been repeated at the very appointment of Timothy to replace the Apostle in Ephesus" (Theodoret).

Read more (349 words)

According to Saint Chrysostom's explanation, "Prophecy consists not only in foretelling the future, but also in indicating the present. The words, 'Separate for Me Barnabas and Saul' (Acts 13:2), were a prophecy. Timothy also was chosen in this way.

"But here the Apostle speaks of many prophecies. Perhaps he means the one by which he first took Timothy to himself, and the one when he ordained him, as he writes below: 'Do not neglect the gift that is in you' (4:14).

"To stir him to zeal and make him sober and watchful, he reminds him of the One who chose and ordained him. He speaks as though saying: God chose you. He entrusted the Church to you. You did not become a minister of the faith by human election. Do not offend or put to shame the divine election.

"Perform the good service of a soldier. It is good, for there is also an evil service of a soldier, with weapons of wrath and uncleanness (Rom 6:19). One can see many who, having fallen into the abyss of sin, have gone astray into paganism.

"Some, so as not to be tormented by fear of the future judgment, try to convince themselves that those threats are false. All this comes from indulging the mind too much. Speculation produces shipwreck, but faith is a secure ship. Those who turn away from it inevitably suffer shipwreck."

Reasoning further about delivering apostates to Satan, Saint Chrysostom asks: "Why did you yourself, Apostle, not punish them, as you punished Bar-Jesus, but deliver them to Satan? So that he might unite strictness with a stronger condemnation, and show that he has power to command the devil.

"Executioners, though themselves filled with countless crimes, brought others to their senses. So also here he speaks of the evil demon."

"Those excommunicated from the Church and deprived of grace were subjected to harsh blows from the adversary, falling into grievous illnesses, sufferings, losses, and other calamities. When those being taught saw the harm that came from blasphemy, it was natural for them to change their way of thinking."

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

"Of whom." Therefore there were not only two such men there. These two are probably singled out because of the unrestrained character of their tongue, by which they spread blasphemous words everywhere about the divine economy of salvation in the Lord Jesus.

For this they fell under a special punishment, spiritual, yet visible to all and not without terror: being delivered to Satan. This was not the first time the Apostle used this punishment. In Corinth, the incestuous man was subjected to it (see 1 Cor 5:5).

But what is this delivering to Satan? There are two realms. One is the bright realm of faith and virtue, living in God and enlivened by God. The other is the dark realm of opposition to God and sin, ordered and guarded by our enemy, Satan.

Read more (782 words)

The first is the Church of God's saints. The second is everything outside the Church. Thus one who goes out of the Church, or is excommunicated from it, inevitably falls under his power and influence.

Chrysostom says: "If you wish to know how the Apostle delivered the guilty to Satan, listen. He says, When you are assembled, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, deliver such a one to Satan (1 Cor 5:4-5).

Therefore the guilty man was immediately cast out of the common assembly and separated from the flock. He remained alone and naked, delivered to the wolf. As the cloud covered the camp of the Hebrews, so the Holy Spirit covers the Church.

Therefore he who was cast out from it was burned. The guilty man was cast out from it by the judgment of the Apostles. Thus the Lord also delivered Judas to Satan. For immediately after the morsel, Satan entered into him (Jn 13:27)."

Yet the punishment of being delivered to Satan was not limited to this invisible calamity, accomplished in the spirit. Some guilty persons were punished for the instruction of the rest. Therefore the punishment had to be visible.

It consisted either in bodily illnesses and deprivations, or in fits of derangement that occurred from time to time. We must suppose that, as the guilty man in Corinth was delivered to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so those punished in Ephesus suffered something similar.

Blessed Theodoret writes: "The Apostle delivered them to the devil as a cruel executor of punishment. For at that time those excommunicated from the Church and deprived of grace were subjected to harsh blows from the adversary.

They fell into grievous illnesses, sufferings, losses, and other calamities. Satan delights in laying these on people, since, according to the Prophet, he is both enemy and avenger (see Ps 8:2)."

In explanation, Ambrosiaster adds: "This is why in the Gospel it is said to the paralytic of thirty-eight years: sin no more, lest something worse happen to you (Jn 5:14). This shows that bodies sometimes fall ill because of sin.

That the devil serves as the instrument for this, the Lord explained when He said in another case: ought not this daughter of Abraham, whom Satan bound for eighteen years, be loosed from this bond on the Sabbath day? (cf. Lk 13:16)."

Saint Paul delivered those two guilty men to such punishment while he was in Ephesus, personally and solemnly, in the presence of all the believers and perhaps of unbelievers also.

The purpose was "that they may learn not to blaspheme." Who? Not these two only, but all who shared the same guilt, though less boldly than they. Their blasphemy was different.

"The Apostle did not declare the blasphemy itself, because he was writing to one who knew the matter" (blessed Theodoret). Yet it is evident that it was raised against the work of God, the divine economy of salvation in the Lord.

To cut off such blasphemy, the Apostle solemnly punished the chief culprits, both to correct them and to instruct the rest. "Those being taught, seeing the harm that comes from blasphemy, would naturally change their way of thinking" (blessed Theodoret).

Chrysostom says here: "But how does Satan teach them not to blaspheme? If he teaches others not to blaspheme, he ought all the more to have taught himself this. If he cannot teach himself this even now, he cannot teach others either.

The Apostle did not say, that he may teach them not to blaspheme, but, that they may learn not to blaspheme. He does not accomplish this. Rather, it happens as a consequence of his actions.

In the same way, elsewhere the Apostle says of the fornicator: deliver such a one to Satan for the destruction of the flesh. This is not for the purpose of saving the body, but so that the spirit may be saved (1 Cor 5:5).

That is, it is said impersonally. How, then, does this happen? Just as executioners, though themselves filled with countless crimes, instruct others, so here the same is said of the evil demon.

But why, Apostle, did you not punish them yourself, as you punished Bar-Jesus, and as Peter punished Ananias, but delivered them to Satan? It was to join a stronger condemnation of their guilt to the severity of the punishment.

Moreover, it was no small thing for the Apostle to show that he had power to command the devil. Through this it became evident that the devil is subject, and already submits unwillingly to the Apostles by carrying out their sentences.

Therefore this greatly contributed to the manifestation of gifts of grace."

Tertullian

3rd centuryTeacher of the Church

The Apostle clearly delivered Hymenaeus and Alexander to Satan so that they might be corrected and learn not to blaspheme, as he writes to Timothy, his disciple. Yet he himself says that a thorn was given to him, an angel of Satan (2 Cor 12:7), to humble him, lest the Apostle be exalted.

If they also say that we must understand their delivery to Satan as being for correction and not for destruction, what has sacrilege and incest in common with a soul pure of these things? What has it in common with a soul exalted only by the highest holiness and innocence in all things?

In the Apostle, this soul suffered blows, as they say, because of pains in the ears or head. But incest or blasphemy deserved the delivery of the whole man into the power of Satan himself, and not merely of his angel.

Read more (67 words)

If the crime, that is, the sacrilege of Hymenaeus and Alexander, is unforgivable both in this age and in the age to come, then the Apostle would not have delivered them to Satan in hope of forgiveness, since they had already fallen away from the faith and sunk into blasphemy.

Therefore he called them shipwrecked concerning the faith and without relief from the ship of the Church.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 13 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ὧν
    hōn
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  2. ἐστιν
    estin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  3. Ὑμέναιος
    hymenaios
    Hymenaeus
    G5211 · Ὑμεναῖος
  4. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  5. Ἀλέξανδρος
    alexandros
    Alexander
    G223 · Ἀλέξανδρος
  6. οὓς
    hous
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  7. παρέδωκα
    paredōka
    I hand over
    G3860 · παραδίδωμι
  8. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  9. Σατανᾷ
    satana
    an adversary
    G4567 · Σατανᾶς
  10. ἵνα
    hina
    in order that
    G2443 · ἵνα
  11. παιδευθῶσιν
    paideuthōsin
    I discipline
    G3811 · παιδεύω
  12. μὴ
    mē
    not
    G3361 · μή
  13. βλασφημεῖν
    blasphēmein
    I speak evil against
    G987 · βλασφημέω