At first they spoke of him indefinitely and in passing. They spoke as of a person whose appearance and character of activity alone were known, while the more particular features of his image were hidden in the unknown future.
Only now does the Apostle Paul give a more definite depiction of this person. But concerning his actual appearance, he says that it would have taken place long ago, except that something restrains him, to katechon.
According to the Apostle's remark, the Thessalonians knew about this restraining thing, certainly from the oral instruction of the Apostle Paul. But what it is has not been revealed to us, either from other passages of the apostolic epistles or from the tradition of the Thessalonian or Apostolic Church.
Therefore, in defining this restraining object or person, 7, ho katechon, the interpreters differ. According to the explanation of Saint John Chrysostom, Theodoret, and others, one cannot understand here either extraordinary gifts or, in general, the grace of the Holy Spirit.
The extraordinary gifts long ago became scarce in the Church, while the antichrist still had not appeared. The grace of the Holy Spirit, however, will never be exhausted. Therefore the antichrist could never appear.
Nor can one consider this restraining thing to be the fact that the preaching of the Gospel has not yet spread among all nations, according to the words of the Savior (Mt 24:14).
Nor can one consider it to be the blindness of Israel, which, according to the same Apostle Paul (Rom 11:25-26), must cease before the end of the world.
The reason is that neither the failure of the Gentiles to receive the preaching nor the hardening of Israel is something actually existing within the Church, possessing the power to restrain the appearance of the antichrist.
The conversion of the Gentiles and the Jews must only precede the end of the world. It does not stand in causal connection with this event.
In other words, the world must end, or, closer to our question, the antichrist must appear, after all nations have accepted Christianity.
But this does not mean that the appearance of the antichrist and the end of the world depend on the acceptance or non-acceptance of Christianity.
According to the word of the Apostle, the mystery of lawlessness is already at work. That is, the coming of this lawless one is being prepared.
But no one will say that this takes place through the greater and greater spread of Christianity. Turning to the interpretation of the Fathers, we find that by the restraining object, to katechon, they understand the Roman state.
By the restraining person, ho katechon, they understand the Roman emperor. In confirmation of this, it is noted that the restraining thing was contemporary with the Apostle.
For he says, "and now you know the restraining thing," kai nyn to katechon oidate, where the word nyn refers not to oidate but to katechon. This is clear from comparison with ho katechon arti.
If the Apostle did not name the restrainer directly, then, as Chrysostom observes, it was from fear that, by pointing to the fall of the Roman Empire, he might bring excessive hostility and useless danger upon Christians.
But it is self-evident that the correctness of such an opinion is closely connected with the historical existence of the Roman Empire.
With its fall in 476, and with the abolition in 1806 by Napoleon Bonaparte of the German Empire founded in 800 on its ruins, which bore the name of the Roman Empire, it became clear that the restraining thing is not this empire.
Nor is it the secular power of the Roman pontiffs, both because it did not yet exist at the time of the Apostles, and because at the present time it has fallen completely.
Nevertheless, one cannot fail to acknowledge that in this almost unanimous opinion of the ancient interpreters there is a share of truth. Namely, the restraining thing is the existence of state authority in general, the existence of the state.
It is not the Roman state or any other particular state, but the state in general. However a state may be organized, and by whomever it may be governed, the antichrist cannot appear while religion, morality, law, public welfare and peace, and respect for the person are regarded as the root foundations of the state's existence.
In this way, the existence of the Church and the world is outwardly safeguarded. Of course, the highest form of government, under which all these goods can be observed to the greatest extent, allowing man to develop toward moral perfection, is the autocrat established by God and acknowledged by the people.
He must be blood of the blood and flesh of the flesh of his people: "You shall surely choose as king the one whom the Lord will choose. Let one of your own be king over you. Do not set a foreigner as king over yourselves" (Deut 17:15).
"And then the king will not consider himself better than his people. He will not turn aside from the Law, but will follow it exactly, and that king and his descendants will rule long..." (Deut 17:20).
But as soon as state authority is undermined and government is destroyed, both state and Church find themselves in the greatest danger.
The history of revolutions has shown us examples of how, for a time, the restrainer is taken from the midst of the world, and types and forerunners of the antichrist appear.
Although the existence of a firm state order restrains the appearance of the antichrist, the mystery of lawlessness is already at work. Already in secret those principles hostile to Christianity are spreading and strengthening.
That spirit and direction strive to overthrow everything lawful, holy, and divine. They will be expressed most clearly in the person of the antichrist.
Already in the times of the Apostles, heresies and schisms were secretly gaining strength in the very bosom of the Church, and "many antichrists have come" (1 Jn 2:18).
Simon the Magician presented himself in Samaria as someone great, as the power of God (Acts 8:9-10), and in Rome called himself a god. Arius denied the Godhead of Jesus Christ.
Atheists, who do not acknowledge the existence of God at all, and all heretics of every age and school, are only manifestations of the spirit of antichrist and his forerunners.
In the civic life of peoples, too, not a few antichrists have appeared. Not only Nero and Diocletian, persecutors of Christianity, could be called forerunners of the antichrist.
Many others deserved this name, even among Christians, either for their apostasy from Christ or for other anti-Christian actions.
Julian the Apostate, Constantine Copronymus, and revolutionaries of every color, communists, democrats, socialists, and anarchists, will not yield to Nero either in cruelty or in malice against Christianity.
When "he who now restrains" is ek mesou genetai, that is, is taken, as in the Russian text, or removed, then the lawless one will appear.
He is precisely that man of sin and son of perdition who will be the adversary of Christ, the antichrist.
One cannot see in him only the spirit of the age, or that anti-Christian and anti-religious tendency in the teaching and life of men which will deny the Godhead of Jesus Christ and His redemptive merits for mankind.
Nor is he merely that tendency which will revere as god, not a personal and all-perfect Being, but itself, that is, the same human spirit insofar as it appears in the history of mankind and in the great works of the world.
No, he will be an actual historical person, like all men. He will be a man whose coming is "according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, and with every deceit of unrighteousness."
It is difficult to imagine who exactly this antichrist will be. All ancient interpreters, and most modern ones, agree that he will be a known and definite person.
But they think differently about his relation to Satan. Some consider him the incarnate devil. They say that the devil, wishing in everything to resemble the Son of God, will be incarnate at the end of time in the form of a man.
Or at least he will unite himself with some man, in order to act against Christ and Christianity (Theodoret, Brief Exposition of the Dogmas, 23).
Others, Lactantius and Hesychius, suppose that he will be born of the devil and some harlot or virgin. This directly contradicts the spiritual nature of the devil.
More rightly, with Chrysostom, Theophylact, and others, they consider the antichrist to be a true man. He will not be simply an instrument of the devil and executor of his evil actions and intentions against Christians.
Rather, he will be an instrument that is not unconscious, but free, with the full preservation of his faculties.
As for the antichrist's origin from the Jewish people, and specifically from the tribe of Dan, almost all ancient teachers of the Church, beginning with Irenaeus, agree in this opinion among themselves.
They likewise agree concerning the kingly authority of the antichrist, his name, and the country of his appearance.
The antichrist will act according to the power of Satan and will perform false miracles. The Lord will permit such miracles to be performed for the deception of those who have not acknowledged the true teaching and have neglected their salvation.
The miracles of the antichrist will work deceptively on such people. Together with his false teaching, they will stir in them admiration for him and worship equal to divine worship.
We know nothing about how these miracles will be performed. But their very name as false already shows that they will consist in the deception of the senses by knowledge of hidden powers of nature, by cunning, dexterity, and the like.
Yet however strong and dangerous the action of the antichrist will be, it will not last long. The Lord Jesus will slay him with the Spirit of His mouth and abolish him by the appearing of His coming.
As dust is scattered by the blowing of the wind, and as darkness disappears at the appearance of the luminary, the sun, so the antichrist will vanish from the face of God, from the breath of His mouth, from the mere appearing of Jesus Christ.
With him all who follow him and oppose the truth will also disappear.