The beginning of the speech by the defender of Jewish interests is full of exaggerated flattery toward the governor and judge Felix.
The impartial historian Tacitus says of Felix precisely the opposite of what the hired orator said about him, in order to incline him by flattery toward an unjust decision.
He praised his care for the people, whom Felix was ruining by his greed. Felix was impatient and cruel, but the orator praises his gentleness.
“Greedy and sensual, with the spirit of a slave in a high office, Felix was careless. Under him the robberies of the Sicarii increased in Palestine, though when they openly rebelled under the leadership of the Egyptian, he did succeed in striking them down.”
Read more (109 words)
Perhaps this gave occasion to speak of Felix as one who established peace and good order, and indeed much of it, that is, for a long time.
In this the orator already appears as a prophet, but an unsuccessful one, for quite soon Felix was removed because of disorders.
The orator also spoke falsely when he said that his speech was brief. It is rather empty of substance and therefore tedious, especially for so lively a listener as Felix.
He said nothing that truly served as an accusation against Paul, nor could he say anything. For Paul was guilty of nothing from the standpoint of Roman law and government.