John Chrysostom
As an indication that He disapproved of the act and did not view it as a true union, but instead chose to accommodate their weakness, He stated that the first husband who had divorced her could not take her back as his wife “after she was defiled.” This remark clarifies that a second union, while the first husband is still alive, is more akin to defilement than to a legitimate marriage. He does not refer to it as a remarriage. Consider His words: He also provides a rationale, asserting that “for this is an abomination before the Lord.”