Even if he were to live for two thousand years without having experienced any good, does he not ultimately end up in the same grave? This reflects the plight of a miserly rich man, illustrating a common folly: he lacks nothing considered good in this world, yet he is consumed by foolish greed, hoarding wealth he won’t allow himself to enjoy. He could proclaim having a hundred children and living for an exceptionally long time, yet if his heart is tormented by greed, he is worse off than one who was stillborn, having left this life before truly beginning it. The stillborn have known neither joys nor sorrows; the miser, in contrast, possesses goods but is continually plagued by worries and distress. Ultimately, both meet the same end, for death claims them alike.
This situation can be paralleled with Israel, whom God bestowed with the law, the prophets, the covenant, and the promises. Yet the Saviour proclaims: ‘The kingdom of God shall be taken away from you, and it shall be given to a nation producing its fruits’ (Matthew 21:43). This fate is directed towards a people gathered from the Gentiles, while the Israelites witness the blessings yet fail to embrace them. We, who have often been regarded as the last and least, viewed with disdain by those who prided themselves on their heritage—boasting of their forefather Abraham (John 8:39)—find ourselves in a significantly more favorable position. Nonetheless, we and they will face the same destination—the judgment of God.
The statement about not receiving a proper burial may imply that the wealthy individual neglects the thought of his own mortality, so consumed by materialism that he barely considers building a tomb for himself. It could also refer to individuals who meet untimely, violent ends, receiving no burial at all, or perhaps it signifies his lack of virtuous deeds, leaving no legacy for future generations. Despite having the means to make his existence known, he lived without leaving any mark, much like livestock.