The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 1:5Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And he called the light Day, and the darkness Night; and there was evening and morning one day.

Douay-Rheims

וַיִּקְרָ֨א אֱלֹהִ֤ים ׀ לָאוֹר֙ י֔וֹם וְלַחֹ֖שֶׁךְ קָ֣רָא לָ֑יְלָה וַֽיְהִי־עֶ֥רֶב וַֽיְהִי־בֹ֖קֶר י֥וֹם אֶחָֽד׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

12 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Reflect on the remarkable separation and wondrous creation, which outstrips all understanding, accomplished merely through a single command, a divine utterance. As each element—light and darkness—was designated a unique name, the unity of their essence is encapsulated in the declaration: and there was evening, and there was morning; the day is one. In naming the conclusion of day and night as a single entity, a day, God provided a framework and order within creation to prevent chaos. Guided by the Holy Spirit through the words of the revered prophet, we discern what was brought forth on the first day compared to the following days. This sequence also illustrates the loving humility of our God. With His supreme might and boundless wisdom, He could have created everything in an instant. Yet, he chose to unfold creation incrementally, not for His necessity—since He finds satisfaction in all—but to bring forth His creation with care and nurture, imparting clarity through the prophet’s teachings. Thus, we might gain a deep understanding and resist the allure of misguided human judgment.

How tragic and irrational it is for anyone to assert that existence occurred by mere chance, disregarding divine providence! Can one fathom that such complexity and harmony throughout the universe could function without a sovereign Master? Just as a ship needs a helmsman, a soldier requires a commander, and a household demands a steward, so too does this vast reality require someone to uphold and govern it through divine wisdom. Why then do we endeavor to convince those who, as the saying goes, cannot see what is evident? Nevertheless, we must continue to guide them with Scriptural wisdom, striving tirelessly to lead them from error into truth. Despite being ensnared by falsehood, they share our human nature, compelling us to care for them with diligence, providing the spiritual remedy they need, even if it is late in their journey. God desires nothing more than the salvation of souls. As Paul exclaimed: ‘He who desires all men to be saved, and to come to the mind of the truth’ (1 Tim. 2:4), and as God states, ‘For I have no pleasure in the death of one who dies, says the Lord God. Therefore turn and live!’ (Ezek. 18:23, Ezek. 33:11). The purpose of creation was not to bring about destruction or punishment, but to offer salvation and eternal joy in His heavenly kingdom, prepared for us even before the world's foundation, as He says: ‘Come, my Father's blessing, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world’ (Matthew 25:34). Witness the profound love the Lord has for humanity, as He arranged countless blessings before creation, demonstrating His desire for all to find salvation.

With such a compassionate, good, and merciful Lord, let us attend to our own salvation and that of our brethren. By caring for others and guiding them toward truth, we contribute to our own salvation, for the soul's well-being is intimately tied to that of our neighbor. The prophet emphasizes the reward for those who assist others in turning from error: ‘If you take away the precious from the vile, you shall be as my mouth’ (Jeremiah 15:19). Leading one’s neighbor from deceit to truth or from wickedness to goodness aligns one closely with God, who became incarnate to redeem humanity. Reflect on how He embraced human experience, even enduring the cross, to rescue us from the bondage of sin and the curse of death—a sentiment echoed by Paul, who affirms, ‘Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us’ (Galatians 3:13). If the Godhead, in His unspeakable incarnation, bore these burdens for our salvation, what effort should we not exert for our fellow beings to draw them from the snares of evil toward the path of virtue?

As the soul is far superior to the body, the rewards awaiting those who lead the misguided toward righteousness outweigh those given to those who merely give alms. Thus, understanding these truths, we must share with our neighbors about the vital importance of caring for the soul, igniting within them a fervent concern for its wellbeing. Regular reminders of such significance can trigger a rise from the depths of sin that surround us, empowering them to withstand the constant assaults of temptation. Our vigilance is crucial, for our struggle is unceasing. This is why Paul exhorts the Ephesians: ‘For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places’ (Eph. 6:12). He warns against assuming our warfare is with mere mortals because we are encumbered by the material, battling against incorporeal enemies. Yet, we should not lose heart, for the might of our spiritual armament is profound. You know who your adversaries are, so take courage, and, ‘Take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day’ (Eph. 6:13). The adversary employs many clever tactics; thus, it is essential to discern and avoid the traps he sets, guarding our words, eyes, and thoughts with purity, ready to confront him, much like anticipating a wild beast’s attack.

The apostle, that heavenly guardian and educator, after urging us to don the entirety of God’s armor, offers additional counsel: ‘Stand therefore, having girded your waist with truth, having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and having shod your feet with the preparation of the gospel of peace; above all, taking the shield of faith with which you will be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked one. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God’ (Ephesians 6:14-17). Observe the comprehensive protection he has established! In preparing us for battle, he first ensures our mobility by girding us, then equips us with defensive armor against attacks, protects our steps, and envelops us in the shield of faith—this faith is critical to extinguishing the fiery arrows of temptation. These arrows symbolize evil desires, unclean thoughts, harmful passions, anger, gossip, envy, irritability, enmity, greed, and all other vices. All these can be vanquished by the spiritual sword, the Word of God.

So here is the essence of Paul’s encouragement: he fortifies the disciples, transforming them from weakness into strength. Since our battle is not against flesh and blood but against supernatural forces, we are armed not with weapons of this world but with spiritual ones that shine brightly, impervious to the darkness of evil. Clothed in such protection, we shall not shy away from conflict nor abandon our duty, remaining vigilant because the devil of our salvation is ever-conspiring against us. Thus, let us eternally prepare ourselves, guarding against speech and actions that may imperil us and engaging in acts of charity toward the poor, knowing the blessings in store for those who assist them. ‘He who has pity on the poor lends to the Lord, and He will pay back what he has given’ (Proverbs 19:17).

What a remarkable kind of lending it is: giving and yet becoming indebted! Moreover, remarkable is the fact that, in lending, there is no risk of ungratefulness or loss. Rather, God promises to return not just a small fraction of what is offered, but a hundredfold, and beyond that, the gift of eternal life in the age to come. If someone were to offer us twice what we had lent, how eagerly we would invest all we owned! But how often humans fall short in returning debts, caught in apathy or even want. Yet, we must not project such failings onto our Lord, for His promises are unfailing. What excuse will we then provide for failing to seek the abundant returns He offers? Instead, we often hoard our wealth behind locked doors, oblivious to the plight of those in need, who might serve as intercessors for us in eternity. ‘Make friends for yourselves by unrighteous mammon, that when it fails, they may receive you into everlasting habitations’ (Luke 16:9).

I recognize that many dismiss our words, attributing little worth to our insights, regarding them as empty chatter or fables. This brings me sorrow, as neither experience, divine promises, nor the dread of impending judgment prompts them to reconsider. Yet, despite this, I remain resolute in my mission to remind them of these truths until my struggles yield fruit, drawing them from the lethargy induced by their obsession with material wealth, which blinds them to their realities. I have faith that God's grace, combined with our consistent teachings and the discipline of fasting, will heal them, restoring their spiritual vigor, freeing them from the repercussions of their errors. We shall then glorify the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, now and always, forever and ever. Amen.

‘And God said, Let there be light. And there was light... And God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night.’ Why is light designated as Day? It signifies everything bright and joyful, representing rest and gentleness; thus, we consider humanity to embody meekness as we associate it with tamed creatures. ‘And God called the light Day, and the darkness Night.’ Why is the darkness termed Night? It is a reminder of death, as those who slumber during Night reflect upon their mortality, awakening a realization: ‘Know, O man, who you are; you are fleeting, a servant to sleep; why do you harbor undue pride?’ Night embodies a state of fragility; thus, David reminds us, ‘The things you speak in your hearts, you shall be broken in your beds’ (Psalm 4:5). Truly, one in the stillness of night exists neither fully alive nor completely dead. Challenge an unbeliever: ‘What is it, then? Alive or dead?’ If they respond ‘alive,’ ask, ‘Why do they fail to see those moving and speaking around them?’ If they say ‘dead,’ question, ‘How can they breathe? That which breathes cannot be dead; what remains unnoticed cannot be considered alive.’ This shows the futility of their reasoning, blinding them to their true state and what lies beyond.

Yet, I digress from contemplating the first day. The coming evening concludes the first day's events; we have interpreted these profound thoughts to the best of our ability. A believer’s duty is to reflect upon this teaching and to study the account with diligence.

As stewards of the holy fast, savoring the heavenly sustenance while refraining from physical indulgence, let us strive to uphold the sanctity of the fast. ‘Consecrate a fast,’ as it is written (Joel 1:14). Do we make it holy, or does it, in turn, sanctify us? The prophet implies we are called to observe the fast with reverence. This holds a similar meaning to the petition in our prayer, ‘Hallowed be thy name’ (Matthew 6:9). We do not pray for God's name, as it sanctifies all; instead, we express a desire that His name be revered through us, for His name is invoked upon us—thus, we are called Christians. All things are holy when they belong to God, for it is impossible for anything unholy to approach Him. The holy God resides among His saints. His dwelling is sacred: ‘He hears from His holy heaven’ (Psalm 19:7); the angels dwell in holiness, ‘in the glory of His Father with the holy angels’ (Mark 8:38); the earth and its worship bear holiness, as it is said that He will not forsake His holy land; David names the temple court as ‘His holy court’ (Psalm 95:9); Isaiah declares the temple a place of holiness, ‘the house of our sanctification and glory’ (Isaiah 64:11); the sacrificial lambs were regarded as ‘holy sheep’ (Ezek. 36:38); the covenant itself is holy, ‘He shall confirm His holy covenant’ (Daniel 9:27); the city was titled as holy: ‘the holy mountain of your fathers, Jerusalem’ (Daniel 9:16). Anything that is not sanctified cannot draw near to God. Thus, Paul instructs us to pursue peace and holiness, without which no one will see the Lord (Hebrews 12:14).

Read the full text in the app

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Allegorical interpretation can be referenced in Genesis 1:4, particularly concerning the days of creation. For further commentary, see Genesis 2:3, chapters 21-35. Regarding Genesis 1:5, one may question how the first day transpired—whether it occurred during the act of creation or following the creation of light. The first method of understanding is preferred, while the alternate perspective presents challenges. Some may wonder how this event took place outside of time, especially since the Word is co-eternal with the Father.

Read more (783 words)

However, this interpretation seems improbable when Scripture states that after creating light and separating it from darkness—naming them day and night—it concludes: "And there was evening and there was morning, one day." This clearly indicates that God’s work was accomplished within the span of the day, leading up to evening, marking the beginning of night, and then culminating in the completion of that day as morning returned, during which God initiated the next act of creation.

Moreover, if the declaration "Let there be light" was made by God without the necessary interval that syllables imply, it raises the question of why light was created so slowly, with the day continuing to pass until evening came. Was light indeed created rapidly, yet the duration of the day was essential for its separation from darkness, allowing for their respective designations? Conversely, if such a separation and designation proceeded with the slowness described, it prompts one to consider the immediate act of separation; light cannot exist without being distinguished from darkness. The inquiry extends to the duration of the divine action by which God designated the light as day and the darkness as night. If spoken in syllables, as it might be perceived, one wonders whether those few words could embody the entirety of day itself, given God's supreme nature.

Nonetheless, God's proclamation was not made through a physical voice, but rather through His Word, which aligns with His eternal and immutable Wisdom. This leads to further questions: In what language did God name these entities? What purpose did transient sounds serve when there were no mortal listeners present? Might it not be posited that although this act occurred swiftly, the light persisted until the conclusion of the day, without transitioning to nighttime?

If we acknowledge the movement of day and night throughout the world, do we then confine God to any particular locale, rendering it evening for Him as light shifts elsewhere? Ecclesiastes teaches that "the sun rises and the sun sets," indicating its cyclical journey from east to west (Ecclesiastes 1:5, 6). Thus, while the sun may shine from one direction, it simultaneously casts darkness in another, challenging the notion that God exists in a bounded realm that dictates the movement of day and night.

Reflecting on the concept of a spiritual light created on the first day prompts a consideration of whether such light yields darkness. If it is a material light, one must ponder its invisibility at sunset, given that the moon and stars were not yet created. Alternatively, if it continually aligns with the sun, the problem recurs: if that light is indistinguishable from the sun, does it not operate under the same principles, thus implying God's presence in both light and darkness?

Turning to the nature of light and darkness, we see not all darkness is night; there exist shadows where light does not reach, yet those locales are not labeled night unless the sun's radiance is removed. Similarly, not all light indicates day; lunar and artificial lights, as well as lightning, do not equate to day—only that light which is framed by night is regarded as day. If primordial light encircled the earth, stationary or in motion, there would be no portion from which night could arise since light envelops it entirely.

One might wonder if, during the time when the earth was submerged in water, an arrangement existed that facilitated day on one side of the globe through the presence of light, while the opposite side remained cloaked in darkness. Thus, there's a complexity regarding the genesis of day and night, particularly if we consider the interplay of light's expansion and contraction, which is often misunderstood as the cause of their alternations. Without animal life, which was not created until later, such fluctuations in light held no operational significance; these changes will emerge with the sun’s rotation.

Finally, regarding Genesis 1:5, when we read “And there was evening, and there was morning: the day is one,” we must clarify the nature of this day. The term day here does not solely refer to the daylight hours but encompasses both light and darkness, similar to how we might count days in a month to include nights. After clarifying that day was produced through light, it follows that both evening and morning constitute one complete day.

In what manner did evening and morning manifest? God created light and divided it from darkness in a time not defined by our measures. If everything that God accomplished is perfected in contemplation and reason, it poses no contradiction to assert that the Scripture records creation as if it unfolded through distinct acts, enabling our limited understanding to grasp the sequence of divine creation.

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

Following the creation of the sun, day signifies the illumination of the atmosphere by the sun shining above the earth, while night represents the earth being cloaked in shadow when the sun is obscured. However, the transition between day and night occurs not due to the sun's movement, but rather because the primeval light, as determined by God's design, radiates and then recedes, leading to day and subsequently to night. “And there was evening, and there was morning, one day.” Evening marks the boundary between day and night, while morning indicates the arrival of day after the night. To emphasize the historical inception of the day, Moses first acknowledged the conclusion of the day before that of the night, since night follows day.

Read more (654 words)

The condition of the world prior to light's creation was not night, but rather darkness; the term night was used for that which diverged from day, receiving its name only after day had been established. Thus, “there was evening, and there was morning.” The Prophet refers to the ongoing cycle of day and night, highlighting only the more significant of the two without explicitly naming them. This pattern is consistent throughout Scripture, which often counts days without including nights in the reckoning. “The days of our years, saith the Psalmist” (Psalms 89:10). Jacob reflects, “the days of my life are few and evil” (Gen. 47:9), and it is similarly stated, “all the days of my life” (Ps. 22:6). Hence, what is expressed historically serves as a principle for what follows. “And there was evening, and there was morning, one day.” Why is it described as one rather than first? While it seems logical to designate the initial day from which the subsequent days derive as the first, it is labeled one instead. This may imply a unified measure of day and night combined within a single cycle, since a complete day encompassing day and night totals twenty-four hours. Although the timings of day and night may diverge with the sun's position, their ongoing existence is ever restricted to a specific duration. Moses conveys that the span of twenty-four hours constitutes a single day, with the cycle of the heavens returning to the same sign in that timeframe. Thus, upon the occurrence of evening and morning, this cycle is fulfilled within one day, as God has ordained the nature of time with divine measures and signs, leading to a cycle of weeks that perpetually renews itself, with each week containing one day recurring seven times. The image of the circle embodies self-continuity, both beginning and concluding within itself. The same cyclical nature also characterizes the ages, which return upon themselves without a definitive end. Thus, Moses referred to the onset of time not as the first, but as one day, ensuring that the unity suggested by its name reflects the essence of the age. This singularity denotes its uniqueness, setting it apart from all else, aptly labeled as one. While Scripture mentions various ages, frequently saying “the age of ages and the ages of ages,” it refrains from specifying the first, second, or third age, allowing for clearer discernment of states and variations among them rather than their beginnings and conclusions. The Scripture states, “The day of the Lord is great and dreadful” (Joel 2:11), and further asks, “Why seek ye the day of the Lord? It is darkness, and not light” (Am. 5:18)—darkness clearly intended for those deserving of it. Our teachings reveal an unblemished, uninterrupted, and eternal day, which the Psalmist describes as “Osmom” (Ps. 6:1), existing outside the parameters of the seven-day cycle. Whether referred to as a day or an age, the concept remains singular rather than plural; regardless of the terminology used, it underscores a singular notion, not multiple. Consequently, Moses, in elevating thoughts toward eternal life, referred to this image of the age and the beginning of days as the holy day of the Lord, sanctified through the resurrection of the Lord, as one. Hence, he states, “There was evening, and there was morning, one day.” In closing this discourse on one evening, which aligns with our current evening, I conclude our reflections. Father of True Light, who has adorned the day with heavenly brilliance, who has illuminated the night with the glow of fire, and who has prepared rest in the coming age with spiritual, unending light, may He enlighten your hearts in the truth and perpetuate your life in wholeness. May He grant you to “walk prudently” (Rom. 13:13) in the coming days, shining brightly like the sun amidst the saints, to His glory in the day of Christ, to whom belongs glory and dominion forever. Amen.

Gregory of Nyssa

4th centuryChurch Father

The outset of this discussion reveals a sequential understanding of creation, as depicted by Moses in a historical narrative: "and there was evening, and there was morning." It is widely accepted that creation can be perceived in two distinct manners: as a mental concept and as a physical reality. The primary focus of the Divine Lawgiver is not to expound on the mental aspect but rather to illustrate through tangible phenomena the nature of the physical.

Read more (316 words)

From the moment the universe came into existence, fire, propelled like an arrow by other natural elements, was exiled from all things due to its inherent lightness and swift motion. This fire, capable of penetrating the physical essence with the same speed as thought, could not perpetuate a linear trajectory because the imaginary creature lacks the capacity for unity with the physical realm, while fire itself is indeed physical. Thus, once it reaches the farthest edges of creation, fire is compelled to move in a circular manner, driven by the intrinsic power that binds it to the universe. There is no opportunity for fire to proceed in a straight line since every physical entity is confined within its distinct boundaries. Consequently, it navigates along the periphery of physical existence, traveling wherever it finds passage, given that the mind-imagined nature does not permit fire's movement within it.

Hence, Moses, aligning his thoughts with the movement of fire, conveys that the created light did not remain stationary within specific regions of the world. Instead, it weaves around the densest matter, rhythmically illuminating the dark areas while casting shadows upon the illuminated ones. This cycle of light and darkness also prompts Moses to attribute the names of day and night to God, emphasizing that all occurrences in succession should not be construed as random or coincidental. He states: "And God called the light day, and the darkness night."

Just as the illuminating power could not remain still when the light ascended to the upper part of the sphere, its inclination was toward the lower region, leading to the covering of above with shadows as the rays were likely subdued by denser nature. Moses referred to the departure of light as "evening," and when the fire again rose from the lower regions to extend its rays upward, he designated this occurrence as "morning," thus naming the beginning of the day.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Darkness is not an everlasting entity; it is not even a creation in itself, for as the Scriptures reveal, it is merely a shadow. It was not brought into existence prior to the heavens or subsequent to the clouds, but rather, it was formed at the same time as the clouds, originating from them. Its existence relies on something else, as it possesses no essence of its own. When that which it depends upon is no more, then darkness also ceases to exist in the same way. What that ceases to be alongside is akin to non-being, for the other is the reason for its existence.

Read more (44 words)

Thus, the darkness that existed with the clouds and the expanse, which did not arise with the primal light and the sun, cannot truly be independent when the one gave rise to it through its distribution and the other dispelled it through its manifestation.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

While angels, dominions, and authorities were brought into being at a certain time, they were already present at the moment of creation.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

Darkness is an essential part of existence. It is not an inherent quality, but rather a transient state, as it arises from the interplay between heaven and earth, vanishing in the presence of light. Light, on the other hand, possesses a true essence; it exists autonomously, shining forth and receding, only to return once more. Just as our physical body is a distinct essence and the shadow it casts is merely a byproduct, so too do heaven and earth represent unique essences, producing the phenomenon we recognize as darkness in the absence of light. However, light has the power to dispel darkness.

John Damascene

8th centuryChurch Father

‘God called the light day and the darkness He named night’ (Gen. 1:5). Darkness is not a substance but rather an absence, as it represents the lack of light, for the atmosphere does not inherently contain light. Therefore, God referred to darkness as the very absence of light, highlighting its dependence rather than its intrinsic nature. The term for day was established first, making day primary and night secondary. Thus, night succeeds day; and the span from one day’s beginning to the next is a full twenty-four hours, as the Scripture states, ‘And there was evening, and there was morning: the day is one’ (Gen. 1:5). On the first three days, both day and night emerged due to the Divine command that expanded and withdrawn the light.

Read more (108 words)

However, on the fourth day, God made the greater light, which is the sun, marking the commencement and authority of the day, as the day is defined by the sun’s presence above the earth; hence, a day is measured by the sun’s journey from its rising to its setting. On that same day, God also created the lesser light, namely the moon, along with the stars, to shine during the night. In these celestial bodies, the Creator placed the original light—not due to a lack of other light, but so that this light would not remain unutilized. The luminary itself is not light, but a vessel for light.

Theophilus

2nd centuryChurch Father

And God designated the light as day and the darkness as night; indeed, humanity alone could not have named the light as day or the darkness as night, nor could he have assigned names to other creatures, if he had not first received a name from the Creator God.

Victorinus of Poetovio

3rd centuryChurch Father

At the outset, God brought forth light and apportioned it into twelve hours of day and night, so that the day would guide the night into a state of repose from human toil, while conversely the day would triumph over the night, allowing labor to give way to the night's rest, which in turn would be balanced by the day's exertions.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

When God is depicted as assigning the title of day to light and night to darkness, this illustrates His sovereignty over the light He has created and His authority to annihilate its essence and designation once again. The act of naming signifies dominion (Gen. 2:19-20, Dan. 1:7, 2 Chron. 36:4) and indicates the first day’s likeness to all days that followed, which the intellect of the first man, enlightened by Divine illumination, designated as day, night, morning, and evening. In the account of the first day, it suggests that evening precedes morning. To grasp the rationale behind this chronological sequence, one must mentally position themselves along the edge formed by the earth's structure, in the place intended for paradise.

Read more (341 words)

Next, picture the newly created light piercing through the unformed substance to this edge, appearing from the East. The interval from creation's inception to the manifestation of light represents Moses' first evening, twilight, or night; the emergence of the newly created light symbolizes morning; and the moment it departs from Eden's horizon marks the conclusion of the first day. Moses refers to this first day as one, either in a straightforward manner, implying a designation of quantity rather than order or with a specific intent to indicate that, despite its unique night, it constituted merely an ordinary day; or to convey that due to this original night, it was singular in nature.

In the beginning, the Church represented the merging of heaven and earth, or heaven manifest on earth. The fall of humanity turned it into an uneducated and vacant realm. Darkness enveloped it as if it were entirely fused with the depths of fallen spirits. However, the Spirit of God moved triumphantly over the waters, which symbolize humanity's tribes as depicted in Scripture (Isaiah 8:6, 7; Rev. 17:15) that faced extinction in Adam, and grace overshadowed the creation. God bestowed upon humanity the light of revelation concerning the Redeemer and distinguished the kingdom of light from the kingdom of darkness, believers from unrepentant sinners, the seed of the woman from the seed of the serpent, the lineage of Seth from that of Cain, and the household of Noah from the degenerate first world.

Each individual possesses their own heaven and earth, spirit and flesh, inner and outer, the remnants of original perfection and the disarray of sinful corruption, from which, through the work of Grace, a new being is slowly fashioned. Rising from spiritual void, one discovers themselves as a formless and desolate land, with darkness shrouding the depths of their heart. Yet, upon the sorrowful waters of repentance, the Spirit of God descends, and the Word of God ignites within them a magnificent light, which grows clearer and more defining, sharply illuminating the profound darkness of the human heart.

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryCommentator

And God designated the light as day and the darkness as night. Initially, light had not yet been distinguished from darkness, as the radiant material enveloped the earth and other celestial bodies in all directions, making light omnipresent yet mingled with darkness. In its rarefied state, the luminosity lacked the brilliance it would later possess. The discernment of light from darkness commenced with the compaction of this radiant matter; as it became denser, the light grew increasingly bright, and gradually, our planet along with others began to rise from the luminous haze. Consequently, they were no longer enveloped on all sides, but rather became illuminated on one side while the opposite side remained in darkness.

Read more (101 words)

Thus, light was distinguished from darkness, resulting in a differentiation between day and night; on the portion of the earth and other planets facing the radiant matter, it was day, while the opposite side experienced night. "And there was evening and there was morning, one day." As the radiant matter stopped surrounding the sphere completely, one side of the earth gradually lost its light, bringing about evening; however, due to the earth’s rotation on its axis, this side eventually turned back toward the radiant matter, heralding the morning and completing the first day of creation, which gave way to the second.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.