All who came are thieves and robbers. What is this, Lord: all who came? Did You not come? But understand: "All who came," I said, "apart from Me." In the Latin text praeter means "except" or "besides." Blessed Augustine understands the phrase to mean those who came not from God and without God, and did not proclaim Christ.
Let us recall, then. Before His coming, the prophets came. Were they thieves and robbers? By no means. They did not come without Him, because they came with Him. When He was about to come, He sent heralds, yet He possessed the hearts of those whom He sent.
Do you wish to know that they came with Him, who always abides? He assumed flesh at a definite time. But what does it mean that He always abides? "In the beginning was the Word" (Jn 1:1). Therefore those who came with the Word came with Him.
"I am," He says, "the way, and the truth, and the life" (Jn 14:6). If He Himself is the truth, then those who were truthful came with Him. Therefore all who came without Him are thieves and robbers. They came to steal and to kill.
But the sheep did not listen to them. This is a very weighty question: the sheep did not listen to them. Before the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, when He came humbly in the flesh, righteous men came who believed in Him who was to come.
They believed in Him as we believe in Him who has already come. The times differ, but not the faith. The verbs themselves change according to their grammatical tense when they are uttered differently. One sounds thus: "He will come." Another sounds thus: "He has come."
The sound changes: "will come" and "has come." Yet one faith unites both groups. It unites those who believed that He would come and those who believe that He has come. Though in different times, both entered through the one door of faith.
We believe that the Lord Jesus Christ was born of the Virgin, came in the flesh, suffered, rose, and ascended into heaven. We believe that all these things, as you yourselves hear from the past-tense verbs, have already been fulfilled.
In the unity of this faith those fathers stand with us. They believed that He would be born of the Virgin, would suffer, would rise, and would ascend into heaven. The apostle pointed to them when he said: "Since we have the same spirit of faith, according as it is written, 'I believed, and therefore I spoke,' we also believe, and therefore speak" (2 Cor 4:13).
The prophet said: "I believed, and therefore I spoke" (Ps 115:1). So that you may know this is one faith, hear the apostle declare: "having the same spirit of faith, we believe." Likewise elsewhere: "I do not want you to be ignorant, brethren, that our fathers were all under the cloud, and all passed through the sea. And all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea. And all ate the same spiritual food, and all drank the same spiritual drink" (1 Cor 10:1-4).
The Red Sea signifies Baptism. Moses, who led through the Red Sea, signifies Christ. The people crossing the sea signifies believers. The death of the Egyptians signifies the destruction of sinners. One and the same faith is expressed by different signs.
It is expressed by different signs, just as by different verbs. Verbs change their sound according to times, but those verbs are nothing other than signs. Words exist in order to signify. Remove meaning from a word, and only meaningless noise remains.
Therefore all these things have meaning. Did those through whom those signs were given, and through whom what we believe was prophetically foretold, believe anything other than we do? Certainly they believed this. But they believed it would happen, while we believe it has already happened.
For this reason he says: "they drank the same spiritual drink." The same spiritual drink, not the same bodily drink. It was spiritually the same, though physically a different drink. For what did they drink? "They drank from the spiritual rock that followed them, and the rock was Christ" (1 Cor 10:4).
Behold, then: while faith remains, the signs change. There the rock was Christ. Among us, Christ is what is placed upon the altar of God. There, as a great mystery of the same Christ, they drank water poured forth from the rock.
What we drink, the faithful know. If you look at the visible form, it is another thing. If you consider the intelligible form, they drank the same spiritual drink.
Thus all who believed in that time, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, the patriarchs, and the prophets who foretold Christ, were sheep and listened to Christ. They listened not to a stranger's voice, but to His voice.
The Judge was in the herald. Even when a judge speaks through a herald, the clerk does not write, "The herald said," but, "The judge said." Yet there were others whom the sheep did not hear. In them there was no voice of Christ.
These were the erring, who spoke falsehood, babbled nonsense, devised empty things, and led the wretched astray.
Why, then, did I say that this is a very weighty question? What is hidden and hard to understand here? Listen, I beg you. The Lord Jesus Christ Himself came and preached. The voice of the Shepherd was far stronger when it sounded from the Shepherd's own mouth.
If the Shepherd's voice had previously sounded through the prophets, how much more powerfully did the Shepherd's voice resound through the Shepherd's own tongue. Yet not all heard it. What, then, are we to think? Were those who heard it sheep?
Consider: Judas heard, and proved to be a wolf. He followed Him, but, clothed in sheep's clothing (cf. Mt 7:15), he plotted against the Shepherd. Meanwhile some of those who crucified Christ did not listen to the Shepherd's voice, yet became sheep.
He saw them in the crowd when He said: "When you have lifted up the Son of Man, then you will know that I am He" (cf. Jn 8:28). How, then, is this question resolved? Those who were not sheep listened, while those who were sheep did not listen.
Some who were wolves followed the Shepherd's voice, while some who were sheep spoke against Him. At last, sheep killed the Shepherd. This question finds its resolution. Someone may answer and say this.
"When they did not listen to the Shepherd's voice, they were not yet sheep, but were then wolves. When they heard the voice, it changed them and made sheep out of wolves. Once they became sheep, they listened, found the Shepherd, and followed the Shepherd.
They began to hope in the Shepherd's promises, because they submitted to His commandments." In one way or another, the question has been resolved. Perhaps this solution is enough for someone. Yet something still troubles me, and I will share what troubles me with you.
Thus, by seeking together with you, I may deserve, through His revelation, to find the solution together with you. Listen, then, to what troubles me. Through the prophet Ezekiel He rebukes the shepherds and says of the sheep: "You did not call back the sheep that had gone astray" (cf. Ezek 34:4).
He uses two words: both "gone astray" and "sheep." If, when it went astray, it remained a sheep, whose voice did it hear, so that it went astray? Without doubt, it would not have gone astray if it had listened to the shepherd's voice.
But it went astray because it heard a stranger's voice. It heard the voice of a thief and robber. Certainly sheep do not listen to the voice of robbers. "Those who came," He says, and we have understood that they came without Him, that is, "those who came without Me," "are thieves and robbers. But the sheep did not listen to them" (cf. Jn 10:8).
Lord, if the sheep did not listen to them, how did the sheep go astray? If the sheep listened to no one except You, and You are the truth, then everyone who listens to the truth certainly does not err. Yet they went astray, and still they are called sheep.
If they were not called sheep in their error, Ezekiel would not have said: "You did not call back the sheep that had gone astray." How, then, did it both go astray and remain a sheep? Did it listen to a stranger's voice? Yet it is clear that the sheep did not listen to them.
Finally, many are now gathered into Christ's sheepfold and become Orthodox from heretics. They abandon thieves and return to the Shepherd. Sometimes they murmur and resent the One who calls them, and they do not know the one who was killing them.
Yet when those who are sheep come into the fold, even not without resistance, they recognize the Shepherd's voice. They rejoice that they have come, and they are ashamed that they had erred.
When, however, in that error they boasted as though in the truth, and certainly did not listen to the Shepherd's voice, and for that reason followed another, were they sheep? If they were sheep, how did they listen to other sheep? If they were not sheep, why were those rebuked to whom it was said: "You did not call back the sheep that had gone astray" (cf. Ezek 34:4)?
Likewise, among those who have already become Orthodox and believe in the good hope, evil sometimes arises. They turn aside into error, and afterward they return from error. When they turned aside into error and were baptized again, were they sheep or not?
Or when, after dwelling in the Lord's sheepfold, they returned again to their former error, were they sheep or not? Certainly they were Orthodox. If they were faithful Orthodox, they were sheep. If they were sheep, how could they listen to a stranger's voice, when the Lord says, "the sheep did not listen to them" (Jn 10:8)?
You sense the weight of the question, brethren. Behold, I say: "The Lord knows His own" (2 Tim 2:19). He knows those whom He foreknew. He knows those whom He predestined. For it is said of Him: "Those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. And those whom He predestined, He also called. Those whom He called, He also justified. Those whom He justified, He also glorified. If God is for us, who is against us?" Add to this: "He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not also with Him freely give us all things?" (Rom 8:29-32).
But to whom does "us" refer? To the foreknown, the predestined, the justified, the glorified, of whom it is then said: "Who shall bring any charge against God's elect?" (Rom 8:33). "The Lord knows His own" (2 Tim 2:19). They are the sheep.
Sometimes they do not know themselves, but the Shepherd knows them. He knows them according to this predestination, according to this foreknowledge of God, according to the election of the sheep before the foundation of the world.
The apostle also said this: "He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world" (Eph 1:4). Thus, according to God's foreknowledge and predestination, how many sheep are outside the sheepfold. How many wolves are inside. How many sheep are inside. How many wolves are outside.
What do I mean by saying that many sheep are outside the sheepfold? How many are now gluttonous, yet will be chaste. How many blaspheme Christ, yet will believe in Christ. How many give themselves to drunkenness, yet will be sober. How many seize what belongs to others, yet will give away their own.
For the present they listen to a stranger's voice and follow strangers. In the same way, how many inside the fold praise Christ, yet will blaspheme. They are chaste, yet will give themselves to fornication. They are sober, yet later will bury themselves in wine.
They stand, yet will fall. They are not sheep, for we are speaking of the predestined. We are speaking of those whom the Lord knows as His own. Yet while they behave righteously, they listen to Christ's voice.
So these listen, and those do not listen. Yet according to predestination, these are not sheep, and those are sheep.
The question still remains. As it now seems to me, it can be resolved in this way. There is a certain voice. I say, there is a certain voice of the Shepherd, in respect to which those who are sheep do not listen to strangers.