Not everything, he says, has been written “in this book.” By my mouth only that has been related which I considered fully sufficient to persuade the hearers “that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God.” Thus speaks the divine Evangelist. For my part, I think it useful to say the following. The whole content of what is written awakens such faith in us. It wholly persuades us to confess that He who was born of the Holy Virgin, and who was named Jesus by the angelic voice, is the very One proclaimed as Christ in the God-inspired Scripture. He is one and the same, and not another. He is not simply Son (ὑιός), but “the Son of God” (ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ Θεοῦ), uniquely and properly.
What, then, are they doing? What do they proclaim? To what condemnation will they be subject on the great day, who in ignorance dispute concerning the faith? They even try to teach others that one must confess two Christs. For they divide Him, separately into a man and separately into God the Word, even after the union and the ineffable and incomprehensible coming together with the body.
Therefore they are in error. Having departed far from the truth, they deny the Master who redeemed them. For when we consider the matter according to nature, and understand something concerning Christ, we find that the flesh is something other than God the Word, who is from the Father and in the Father. But when we consider the matter according to the union of the flesh with Him, searching as far as possible into this mystery, which is inaccessible and surpasses reason, we understand the Word as one with His own flesh. He has not been changed into flesh. We do not admit this, for the nature of the Word is in no way subject to any change. Rather, in accordance with our holy and God-inspired Scripture, we affirm this. He who is conceived as existing both from the divine temple, the body, which contains human nature in its whole fullness, and from the living Word, is finally one Jesus, Christ, and Son.
The same can be seen in us as true and according to nature. We are composed into one man, consisting of soul and body. Though the body is one thing, and the soul in the body is another in relation to it according to nature, they are united as one living being. They in no way admit division after being joined to one another.
Let the Arians, who dare madly to wage war against God, tell us this. They call Christ, as the Word, a creature. Do they confess Him to be the Son of God and the Father? But I think they themselves will strongly condemn their own mindlessness, if they look to the reasoning about these matters. Let them examine exactly what is created, and what is begotten by someone. For what is created is not taken from the essence of the one who creates. But what is begotten lays hold of the nature of the one who begets (άποσυλά). We say this as though with reference to bodies. With reference to God, however, the matter stands otherwise. Nevertheless, from our own properties a most true image of divine generation is drawn.
Therefore, when such a difference lies between the Son and creation, and their meaning is so distinct, why does the blessed Evangelist speak as he does? Presenting to us the truths he received from the Spirit, he speaks of many and most wondrous signs, that we may believe that Jesus Christ is Himself the Son of God, and not one of the things created by God. This would be so if He really were created, as they say in their empty talk [...]. But he does not say this. Rather, he raises the mind of his hearers to the understanding of sonship. Therefore he wishes the Son to be understood not as created, but precisely as the Word.