There is also the zeal of the first Christians, who "continued steadfastly in the breaking of bread" (Acts 2:42). Then there is the example of all holy people in later times, who likewise communed often.
Finally, no one can attain perfection in the spiritual life without frequently sanctifying himself by the Mystery of the Eucharist. Thus, among sins of omission, the most serious is when someone confesses no more than once a year, though he could approach more often.
Sin: keeping the fast for Confession only because of some external demand of law or elders, accepted custom, entrance into marriage, illness, or fear of obstacles to burial in the event of death.
In this case, what is first imputed as guilt is pretense and coldness of feeling, with which a person approaches Confession and Holy Communion.
Furthermore, can it be approved if such lofty Mysteries are used as a means for attaining ordinary and external aims?
Even when someone receives these Mysteries as preparation for death because of special need, such as illness, he may decide to replace by this the fasting preparation he should have fulfilled together with others.
He should have done this during the fast, with the preparation appointed by the rule. Even in that case, there is not full sincerity or a fully free resolve to fulfill a Christian duty.
It is written: "that your good deed might not be by compulsion, but of your own will" (Phlm 1:14). But here it is as though only an external necessity were awaited.
"They will not record me in the church confession books. I have fallen ill. Without keeping the fast they will not marry me. Without the last rites they will not bury me." Such necessity is what brings one to Confession and Holy Communion.