Alexander Gorsky
Following a series of probing inquiries, the Pharisees sought His permission to pose one final question regarding a point of contention: Is divorce allowed? The two prominent rabbinic schools, Hillel and Shammai, had differing perspectives on this issue. Hillel permitted divorce for virtually any slight, while Shammai imposed stricter limitations. In contrast, the Lord presented His own viewpoint, rooted in the fundamental, natural law of marriage. He declared that divorce is not permitted, except in cases of infidelity. What God has united, let no man divide. When challenged with the question, "How did Moses permit this?" He responded that the allowance was a concession to the hardness of the hearts of the people in that era.
Read more (104 words)
This explanation, given the then-prevailing notions of the indissolubility of marriage, seemed too severe even to His disciples, prompting them to seek clarification later (Mk. 10). Upon receiving confirmation that He indeed allowed divorce only for the breach of faithfulness, they commented that it might be preferable not to marry at all. The Lord, however, countered that not everyone could be expected to live without marriage. Yet, for those who, whether by divine design or personal choice, are called to a life dedicated to the kingdom of God, and who receive the gift of celibacy through God’s grace, they are called to remain faithful.