The Church Fathers on this verse

Matthew 12:24Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

But the Pharisees hearing it, said: This man casteth not out devils but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils.

Douay-Rheims

οι δε φαρισαιοι ακουσαντες ειπον ουτος ουκ εκβαλλει τα δαιμονια ει μη εν τω βεελζεβουλ αρχοντι των δαιμονιων

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

14 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 17 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

We may wonder at the wickedness of the dæmon; he had obstructed both inlets by which he could believe, namely, hearing and sight. But Christ opened both, whence it follows, And he healed him., insomuch that the blind and dumb both spake and saw.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Even though the Lord had distanced Himself, they remained nearby, eavesdropping and speaking ill of Him at the very moment He was bestowing blessings upon humanity. In this way, they revealed their inherent enmity, akin to that of the adversary.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

For he that believes not, is truly dæmoniac, blind, and dumb; and he that has not understanding of the faith, nor confesses, nor gives praise to God, is subject to the devil.

This narrative is given by Luke, not in this place, but after many other things intervening, and speaks of him as dumb only, and not blind. But he is not to be thought to be speaking of another man, because he is silent respecting this one particular; for in what follows he agrees exactly with Matthew.

Jerome of Stridon

5th centuryChurch Father

Three miracles were wrought in one and the same person at the same time; the blind sees, the dumb speaks, the possessed is delivered from the dæmon. This was at that time done in the flesh, but is now daily being fulfilled in the conversion of them that believe; the dæmon is cast out when they first behold the light of the faith, and then their mouths which had before been stopped are opened to utter the praises of God.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

Motivated by their jealousy of His splendor, they could not hold back from their most vicious defamation, ascribing the deeds of the Divine to Beelzebub. They claimed He drove out demons not through His own authority but through the influence of Beelzebub, His relative and associate. On another occasion, they further accused, “Beelzebub hath” (Mark 3:22).

Hilarius of Poitiers

4th centuryChurch Father

Not without reason, after having mentioned that all the multitude was healed together, does he bring in the cure of this man separately who was dæmoniac, blind and dumb. For after the man of the withered hand had been brought before Him, and been healed in the Synagogue, it behoved that the salvation of the Gentiles should be represented in the person of some other afflicted man; he who had been the habitation of a dæmon, and blind and dumb, should be made meet to receive God, should contain God in Christ, and by confession of God should give praise to the works of Christ.

All the multitude were astonished at this which was done, but the jealousy of the Pharisees grew thereupon, And all the multitude were astonished and said, Is not this the Son of David?

Rabanus Maurus

9th centuryChurch Father

The multitude who seemed less learned, always wondered at the works of the Lord; they, on the other hand, either denied these things, or what they could not deny laboured to pervert by an ill interpretation, as though they were wrought not by a Deity, but by an unclean spirit, namely, Beelzebub, who was the God of Acharon: The Pharisees when they heard it said, This man does not cast out dæmons but by Beelzebub, the prince of the dæmons.

Remigius of Auxerre

9th centuryChurch Father

The word Then refers to that above, where having healed the man who had the withered hand, He went out of the synagogue. Or it may be taken of a more extended time; Then, namely, when these things were being done or said.

Beelzebub is the same as Beel or Baal, or Beelphegor. Beel was father of Ninus king of Assyria; Baal was so called because he was worshipped on high; he was called Beelphegor from the mountain Phegor; Zebub was the servant of Abimelech the son of Gedeon, who, having slain his seventy brothers, built a temple to Baal, and set him up as Priest therein, to drive away the flies which were collected there by the abundant blood of the victims; for Zebub means, a fly. Beelzebub therefore is interpreted, The man of flies, wherefore from this most unclean worship they called him the Prince of the dæmons. Having therefore nothing more mean to cast upon the Lord, they said that He cast out dæmons by Beelzebub. And it should be known that this word is not to be read with d or t at the end, as some corrupt copies have, but with b.

Anonymous Commentary (Opus Imperfectum)

4th centuryCommentator

How true is the statement, "They were astonished, for they had yet to recognize Him." No one can adequately assess a creation without understanding the identity of its maker. For instance, when a disciple of a renowned master produces an impressive work, we marvel at the accomplishments of someone else's student. However, if the master himself were to create the same, our astonishment would not be as pronounced. What is surprising about the great master crafting a remarkable creation? Similarly, every work of God falls short of His infinite power. Therefore, when the Son of God performed a miracle, it was not meant to simply evoke wonder, but to inspire belief.

Read more (267 words)

Do you wish to discern whether they were astonished because they lacked knowledge of Him? Consider their words: "Is this not the Son of David?" If they had truly known Him, they would have proclaimed, "This is the Son of God." However, when the Pharisees heard this, they remarked, "He drives out demons by Beelzebul, the ruler of the demons." But did the Pharisees vocalize this or merely entertain such thoughts? The relevance of this inquiry arises from the statement: "The Pharisees, upon hearing these things, said." Yet, the subsequent verse clarifies, "But Jesus, perceiving their thoughts," rather than stating, "having heard their words."

What does this suggest? They might have spoken indeed, but their words were filled with malice. Often, individuals voice falsehoods about another, not out of a wish to demean, but due to a lack of understanding. The Pharisees issued false claims against Christ stemming from wicked intentions, not from a lack of knowledge of the truth, but in a bid to dissuade others from faith in Christ through their slanderous remarks. They recognized the crowd's amazement and exclaimed, "Is this not the Son of David?" Such declarations came from those teetering on the edge of belief. Consequently, the Pharisees, driven by jealousy, expressed, “What has astonished you so greatly? Why do you utter these empty words, believing Him to be the Son of David? We know for certain that He casts out demons by Beelzebul, the prince of demons.” Their statements were not born of ignorance regarding the truth; they were well aware that the spirit of Satan could not perform such miracles.

Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity

19th centuryCommentator

Upon hearing the remarks of the people, the Pharisees proclaimed, “He drives out demons only by the authority of Beelzebub, the ruler of the demons.” The miracles performed by Christ were so evident that they could not be disputed, leading the Pharisees to attribute them to the power of the demon prince. Their intent was to incite fear and animosity toward Him, diverting belief in the Lord due to His supposed alliance with Satan. If Jesus were indeed to heal the possessed through collusion with Satan to mislead the masses, it would imply that His other miracles could not be attributed to the power of God, branding Him as an enemy of the Almighty and a companion of the adversary.

Read more (109 words)

The Pharisees had previously made such accusations against the Lord; however, He refrained from rebuking them then, allowing them time to discern His authority through even greater miracles and His wisdom through His teachings. Yet, the Pharisees would not accept correction and continued their diabolical and blasphemous slander. Consequently, the Lord confronted their falsehood with both vigor and His characteristic gentleness, demonstrating to us the importance of responding to our adversaries with humility and patience in defense of the truth. Above all, He evidences His divine nature by revealing their innermost thoughts; it is uncommon for one possessed to exhibit such profound gentleness and knowledge of the heart’s secrets.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The miraculous healing of the blind man possessed by demons deeply impacted the crowd, leading them to wonder if the one who healed him was indeed the Messiah. This sentiment surely frustrated the adversaries of Jesus, the scribes and Pharisees, yet it was clear to everyone present that the healing was an act of divine intervention. In an attempt to distort this miracle, they accused Jesus of casting out demons through the power of Beelzebub, the lord of demons. To counter this false accusation, Christ raised two key points: First, if He expelled demons by Beelzebub's authority, it would imply that Satan is acting against himself, which is nonsensical since such internal conflict would lead to the collapse of Satan's kingdom.

Read more (196 words)

Second, if they attribute His actions to Beelzebub, they must also account for the exorcisms performed by their own followers, which they refuse to do.

Then, the Lord made an accurate assessment regarding His exorcisms: He carried them out by the Holy Spirit, referred to in Luke as the "finger of God." Therefore, those who witnessed these acts should rightly conclude that the dominion of Satan, who once tormented humanity, is now being dismantled, signaling the arrival of God’s kingdom. The following verse emphasizes this conclusion: if the captives of Satan are set free, it indicates that the Greater One, the Messiah, has invaded the stronghold of Satan, subdued him, and is now liberating his spoils.

Afterwards, Jesus declared, “Whoever is not with Me is against Me, and whoever does not gather with Me scatters.” This imagery reflects the harvest and is meant to clarify that there can be no alliance between Beelzebub and Christ. Individuals must choose sides, for neutrality toward Christ equates to opposition against Him. However, when considering this verse in light of the subsequent exposition, it serves as a dire admonition to those wavering between allegiance to the Pharisees or embracing Christ.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

The accusation made by the Pharisees that Jesus expelled demons through the authority of the prince of demons should have been addressed by the leaders of the people, including the scribes and Pharisees. However, upon realizing that the populace was poised to acknowledge Jesus as the Christ, they quickly resorted to their malicious defamation. Unable to refute Jesus' power to drive out demons from the possessed, they attributed this miraculous act not to divine authority but to the influence of Satan, seeking to sow animosity and fear among the people, implying that Jesus was allied with unholy forces.

Read more (46 words)

The Evangelist Matthew records that this charge originated with the Pharisees, while the Evangelist Mark notes that the scribes who had come from Jerusalem disseminated the same slander (Mark 3:22). The Pharisees and the scribes collaborated as a unified opposition to Jesus, acting together against Him.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

Upon hearing the voices of the crowd, the Pharisees remarked not directly to Jesus but to the people, questioning whether this was the son of David, Christ. They labeled Him as "Beelzebub, the prince of demons." The Pharisees had already made the choice to reject Jesus of Nazareth as God's anointed one, the Messiah, and now sought to justify their stance regarding the remarkable miracles He performed, including the healing of those possessed by demons, the deaf-mute, and the blind. These acts were undeniably extraordinary, making it clear that they could not have been achieved through ordinary human abilities or skill. The crowd began to speculate if this miracle-worker was indeed the Messiah.

Read more (74 words)

Had the Pharisees failed to rationalize His miraculous deeds, their influence over the people could have wavered and ultimately crumbled. Consequently, they were compelled to interpret these miracles, not as divine acts, but as manifestations of an unclean force. Instead of nurturing the people's growing faith in Him as the Messiah, they aimed to instill fear and animosity towards Him, associating Him with malevolent influences, similar to the aversion common folk have towards sorcerers.

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

Among the Pharisees and scribes who were present during the miraculous event were some who had traveled from Jerusalem, and together they devised a new scheme against Jesus Christ. Initially, those filled with jealousy spread the tale that He was beside Himself, prompting His neighbors to come and attempt to take Him away. When they could not refute the miracle that had been performed openly, they began to assert that He expelled demons only by the power of Beelzebub, the ruler of the demons.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 18 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. Φαρισαῖοι
    pharisaioi
    a Pharisee
    G5330 · Φαρισαῖος
  4. ἀκούσαντες
    akousantes
    I hear
    G191 · ἀκούω
  5. εἶπον
    eipon
    to say
    G2036 · ἔπω, ἐρῶ, εἶπον
  6. Οὗτος
    houtos
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  7. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  8. ἐκβάλλει
    ekballei
    I throw
    G1544 · ἐκβάλλω
  9. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  10. δαιμόνια
    daimonia
    an evil-spirit
    G1140 · δαιμόνιον
  11. εἰ
    ei
    if
    G1487 · εἰ
  12. μὴ
    mē
    not
    G3361 · μή
  13. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  14. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  15. Βεελζεβοὺλ
    beelzeboul
    Beelzebul
    G954 · Βεελζεβούλ
  16. ἄρχοντι
    archonti
    a ruler
    G758 · ἄρχων
  17. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  18. δαιμονίων
    daimoniōn
    an evil-spirit
    G1140 · δαιμόνιον