Euthymios Zigabenos
The disciples realized that he was referring to John the Baptist, as he had previously indicated to them that he was the Elijah who was to arrive.
Then the disciples understood, that he had spoken to them of John the Baptist.
τοτε συνηκαν οι μαθηται οτι περι ιωαννου του βαπτιστου ειπεν αυτοις
8 Church Fathers comment on this verse
The disciples realized that he was referring to John the Baptist, as he had previously indicated to them that he was the Elijah who was to arrive.
The clarity of the Lord's message left no room for misunderstanding among the disciples. They came to realize that He was referring to John the Baptist, recalling His earlier remarks regarding him. It was a common practice among the Jews to refer to one individual by the name of another due to similarities in their service and way of life. Prophets would often liken every righteous king to David, and the Jews made comparisons to the princes of Sodom and the descendants of Ethiopia based on their conduct. As it is said, "as Elijah will be the forerunner of the Second Coming, so John was the forerunner of the First" (St John Chrysostom).
As they descended the mountain, both the Lord and the apostles returned to their previous relationship, with the Lord refraining from instructing His disciples to disclose the mysteries of the vision until after His resurrection. This sparked confusion among the apostles—particularly Peter, James, and John—who questioned the meaning of rising from the dead. Yet, they chose not to inquire of their Lord, likely out of a desire to avoid seeming inattentive. Instead, focused on the anticipated arrival of the kingdom of Christ, which the Lord had foretold would soon manifest in power, they redirected their attention to Elijah, whom they had witnessed on the mountain.
The scribes taught that Elijah was to precede the Messiah and set everything in order; thus, the apostles pondered whether the current manifestation of Elijah should be recognized as the fulfillment of this promise or if they should await another appearance. This contemplation absorbed the disciples' thoughts. The Lord addressed their inquiry, specifically referencing the scribes and offering insights that would challenge the conventional Jewish understanding of the Messiah's reign and the events leading up to it. He emphasized that the presence of Elijah should not be regarded with the significance typically attributed to it by the Jews, nor should any other physical representation of him be anticipated. Instead, the true meaning must be regarded in a spiritual context. Indeed, Elijah was destined to come before Him, as foretold by the prophet Malachi; he was to prepare the way for the Messiah, a point on which the scribes were correct. However, they erred in interpreting it to pertain to a literal manifestation and actions of Elijah. In truth, Elijah had already appeared in John; they engaged with him as they desired, in line with the prophecies of Scripture (Mark 9:12-13). Likewise, they would not recognize the Son of Man, but would treat Him according to their own will. Yet, He would suffer, just as His precursor had.
In his account of the transfiguration, Luke briefly notes that during that time, the disciples did not share with anyone what they had witnessed, without indicating that their silence stemmed from a specific directive from Christ. He also omits any mention of the discussion about Elijah's appearance prior to the Messiah's arrival. On the other hand, Mark recounts how Jesus instructed the disciples not to reveal this vision—understood in the context of Acts 7:31—until the Son of Man had risen from the dead. This left the disciples confused, prompting them to discuss among themselves what it meant for someone to rise from the dead, especially regarding Jesus, whom they believed to be the Messiah and, according to their understanding, should not face death (John 12:34).
Instead of seeking clarity from Jesus directly about this matter, they inquired, “Why do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?”
It is essential to trace the thought process of the apostles concerning their experiences and Christ’s statements about His resurrection. They sought clarity on two key issues: the meaning of the Son of Man rising from the dead and the scribes' assertion that Elijah must precede Him. Christ indeed addressed both queries. Matthew’s Gospel presents His response with clarity, adding that “then the disciples understood that He spoke to them of John the Baptist.” This highlights that the reference made in Matthew 11 should not be interpreted merely as a future prediction but as a doctrinal assertion that transcends time.
The phrasing in Mark's account can be slightly challenging, but it is vital to recognize that here Christ responds to the two inquiries separately. Initially, He clarifies the disciples’ question regarding Elijah’s role before the coming of the Messiah, affirming that indeed, Elijah must come first (Malachi 4:5) to restore all things. He then provides an answer to another question not voiced by the disciples regarding the significance of the Son of Man rising from the dead. Some interpreters suggest adding a question mark after the mention of the Son of Man and consider what is written about Him, specifically relating to the purpose of His coming: He will endure much suffering and humiliation.
Finally, Christ revisits the first question, stating that the prophecy about Elijah had already been fulfilled and that this Elijah suffered remarkable trials, akin to those He Himself was about to face. This reference likely pertains to the historical accounts of the prophet Elijah and the adversities he encountered from Ahab.
Jesus provided a similar answer to this inquiry as He previously did regarding the delegation from John (refer to Matthew 11:14). The prophecy in Malachi foretells that Elijah will return before the Second Coming of Christ to enact the final judgment upon humanity, and John was appointed to prepare the way for the Lord at His First Coming. The Archangel Gabriel indicated that John would come in the spirit and power of Elijah (Luke 1:17).
A significant question weighed heavily on their minds. They had witnessed Elijah and were now more convinced than ever that their Teacher was truly the Messiah. “But how do the scribes assert,” they inquired, “that Elijah must come first and prepare everything?” In response, the Savior revealed to them that Elijah had already come, yet they had not recognized him, and that he had suffered the same fate at the hands of his people that awaited Him. It was then they understood that He was referring to John the Baptist.
"But they did not recognize him": Despite many individuals acknowledging John as the precursor who, through baptism, readied the Jewish people for the emergence of Christ’s kingdom on earth and submitted to his baptism (cf. Matt. 3:5, 6), the broader Jewish community failed to grasp the true essence of his mission and the profound significance of his identity. "And therefore they did to him as they pleased": they imprisoned him, argued with him, executed him, and displayed his head on a platter. "For by allowing Herod to take his life, even when they had the power to stop it, they effectively became his murderers” (Theophil.). - "So likewise must the Son of Man endure suffering at their hands." The disciples recognized that He was referring to the Baptist. St.
Chrysostom, commenting on the inquiries of the disciples and the Lord's responses (Matt. 17:10-12), notes: "There was speculation about the coming of Christ and Elijah; however, the interpreters misrepresented it. The Scriptures speak of two comings of Christ, one that has occurred and one that is to come. The apostle, in disclosing these truths, declared: 'the grace of God appeared,’ etc. (Titus 2:11-13). The prophets also refer to both; they proclaim that the forerunner of the second will be Elijah, while the first had John, whom Christ referred to as Elijah—not because he was literally Elijah, but because he accomplished the role designated for him. Just as Elijah is to announce His second coming, John announced the first. However, the scribes, mixing both and misleading the populace, spoke only of the latter when they told the people that if this man was indeed the Christ, then Elijah must come before him.... What was Christ’s reply? Elijah will certainly appear before My second advent, yet Elijah has also come now, and if you inquire about him, he is on the way.... He will persuade the Jewish people to believe in Jesus Christ, so that when he comes, they may not be completely lost. Thus, recalling these matters, He stated: ‘And He will arrange all things,’ meaning He will rectify the disbelief of the Jews of that time" (cf. Theophilus).
Upon receiving the Lord's command not to disclose what they had witnessed until His resurrection, the apostles adhered to His instruction, yet they questioned one another, "What does it mean to rise from the dead?" They interpreted the resurrection as the magnificent commencement of the Messiah's Kingdom, prompting them to ask the Lord, "Why do the scribes assert that Elijah must arrive first?" In response, Jesus corrected their understanding, preparing them not for the splendor of His reign but for a profound self-abasement, saying, “Elijah will indeed come first and restore all things, and a
s it is written of the Son of Man, he must suffer many things and be humiliated.” He added, “I tell you, Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but did to him anything they desired; likewise, the Son of Man will also suffer at their hands.” The disciples realized He was referring to John the Baptist. By the Lord’s command, the holy apostles maintained silence and refrained from sharing their experience in those days. However, once the period of silence regarding this glorious occurrence had passed, Peter referred to the transfiguration as the clearest evidence of the Divine power and majesty of the Savior.
Passages read together with this verse.
Greek text, 11 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.