The Church Fathers on this verse

Matthew 17:25Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And he said: Of strangers. Jesus said to him: Then the children are free.

Douay-Rheims

λεγει ναι και οτε εισηλθεν εις την οικιαν προεφθασεν αυτον ο ιησους λεγων τι σοι δοκει σιμων οι βασιλεις της γης απο τινων λαμβανουσιν τελη η κηνσον απο των υιων αυτων η απο των αλλοτριων

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

What was Peter’s response? He stated, “To her!” Peter informed the tax collectors that Christ would provide the didrachma; however, he did not communicate this directly to Christ Himself, possibly feeling hesitant to bring up such matters. Consequently, the gentle and discerning Jesus cautioned him by asking, “What is your view, Simon? From whom do the kings of the earth collect tribute or tax? From their own sons, or from outsiders?” To which Peter replied, “From outsiders.” Jesus then said, “Therefore the sons are free” (vv. 25, 26). To ensure Peter did not think He had overheard anything, Jesus began by expressing His own thoughts on the matter, instilling courage in Peter, who had felt shy to address it earlier. The essence of His message was that He is exempt from such obligations.

Read more (268 words)

If earthly kings do not tax their own sons, but rather those who are not their children, how much more should I be free from such charges, being the King and the Son of the King, not of an earthly kingdom, but of the heavenly one. Do you perceive how He differentiates the sons from those who are not? If He were not a Son, it would be meaningless to cite examples of kings. Indeed, they acknowledge Him as the Son, but question whether He is the true Son. Therefore, they claim He is not the Son at all. And if He is not the Son, nor the true Son, then He cannot be the Son of God, but is merely an outsider. If He were an outsider, then the examples of kings would hold no weight. His reference is not merely to any sons but specifically to legitimate sons, who share in the kingdom with their progenitors. Hence, He contrasts them with those who are born of others, referring to the latter as outsiders. But He identifies as His own sons those who are born of the kings themselves. Furthermore, notice how He reinforces the understanding previously granted to Peter. Yet, He goes further by His graciousness, inviting Peter into a new experience filled with profound wisdom. After conveying this, He continues, “However, do not allow them to be misled; instead, go and cast a line into the sea, and you shall find a coin in the mouth of the fish you catch. This take and give it to them for Me and for you” (v. 27).

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

Our Lord, in both His physical form and spiritual essence, is the Son of a King, being born of the lineage of David and embodying the Word of the all-powerful Father. As the Son of Kings, He was not required to render tribute; however, having taken on humble humanity, He was compelled to fulfill all righteousness. Yet we, who are unworthy and bear the name of Christ while failing to live up to that name, offer Him nothing commensurate with His greatness and are considered free from taxation as if we were royal heirs because He bore the cross and paid the tribute on our behalf.

Maximus the Confessor

7th centuryChurch Father

What is the didrachma required of the Lord, and what is the fish that Peter is instructed to catch, retrieve the coin from its mouth, and provide to those who request it? The individuals who seek the didrachma symbolize our innate desires. They approached Peter, representing the active essence of the Lord, which is humble and obedient to the Father like a disciple, demanding from Him—which is to say, as a man—the tribute typically imposed on all. Yet, the Lord, as both God and Master, illustrated through a parable that He is unbound by such obligations. Nevertheless, since He took on our humanity and truly assumed its pure essence, He consented to pay the natural tribute without sin.

Read more (141 words)

In the beginning, when the Lord fashioned mankind, He instilled within him two fundamental principles: the first, the original principle of the soul, and the second, according to divine order, the principle of the body. However, humanity strayed from both principles, corrupting the first through disobedience and the second by transgressing the limits of nature itself. As a result, this second principle became obscured by desires, allowing man to drift in a sea of vanity. Thus, when the Lord was called to account for a tribute to nature, He, as the Lord and Restorer of nature, captured the entangled sinful passion from the tumult of life through the power of His word, extracting the original principle intrinsic to it—that is, the divine blueprint for the body, originally conferred through grace—and offered this principle to nature free from the taint of sin.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

Having initially demonstrated that He is not obligated to pay tribute because of His divine nature, He nonetheless instructs them to contribute from His human nature. This is to avoid any temptation to believe that He disrespected God by refraining from paying the didrachm Himself.

Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity

19th centuryCommentator

The Lord derived from His words: JESUS said to him, Thus the sons are free - those who belong to the rulers of this world. On what basis did you pledge to cover the taxes for me regarding my Father’s temple in heaven? Did you not recently proclaim Me as the Son of the Living God? ‘Notice,’ remarks St. Chrysostom, ‘how He makes a distinction between true sons and those outside this relationship. If He were not a Son, citing earthly kings would serve no purpose. But indeed, say the heretics, He is the Son, yet not the authentic Son. If He is not the genuine Son, then He is merely a stranger. And if He is a stranger, then the comparison to kings loses its significance.

Read more (86 words)

He speaks not just of any sons, but of those who are legitimate, natural heirs sharing in the kingdom with Him who begets them. Therefore, to emphasize this difference, He compares true sons to those who are not born of them (not of kings). He embraces as His own those whom the kings themselves have fathered. This demonstrates the revelation given to Peter. Yet, He does not stop at this point; through His humility, He also imparts this wisdom to Peter, enriching him with profound understanding.’

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

As Jesus and His disciples arrived in Capernaum, the collectors of the temple tax approached Peter, asking, "Does your Master pay the temple tax?" The term refers to a specific tax, customary and established by law. The two drachmas, known in the Attic system, represented the sacred half-shekel that every Jewish man over the age of twenty was obligated to contribute for the upkeep of the temple, as instructed in the law of Moses (Ex. 30:13-16; 38:26; 2 Sam. 24:6). This tax was typically collected during the month of Adar, corresponding to our February. However, it is likely that the tax was gathered at other times to accommodate those who were not present when it was normally collected.

Read more (117 words)

In this instance, it did not occur during Adar; the timing was well after Passover and shortly before the Feast of Tabernacles.

When Jesus spoke to Peter upon entering the house, where He maintained a permanent residence, He conveyed the idea that, just as earthly rulers do not impose taxes on their own children but on their subjects, He, as the Son of God, is not bound by the temple tax, which represents God’s house. Nevertheless, Jesus said, "So that we do not cause offense, go to the sea, cast out a hook, and the first fish you catch will have a coin in its mouth—take that and give it to them for me and for you."

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

Jesus was obligated to pay the temple tax, as though it were for the Lord; however, being the Son of God, He was not bound by this duty, similar to how earthly kings impose taxes on foreigners, while their own children, or family members, do not have to pay them.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

Not wanting to disturb Jesus directly, they turned to the apostle Peter to request assistance. In his characteristic straightforwardness, Peter presented the request to the Lord, hoping for guidance since there were no funds available in the apostolic treasury. On this occasion, the Savior imparted a profound lesson alongside a fresh revelation of His divine nature. "What do you think, Simon?" He asked. "From whom do the kings of the earth collect duties or taxes? From their own sons or from others?" The only reasonable reply was "from others." "Therefore," Christ continued, "the sons are free." As the Son of the heavenly King, I am not required to pay this tax, and you, as my fellow son in a different sense, are also not bound by this obligation. Should we choose to pay, it would not be from necessity but rather as a voluntary and generous offering.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

From those who do not belong to the royal lineage. Thus, "the sons are exempt," indicating that they are not required to pay tributes or taxes. The implication is clear: I am free from the obligation to pay didrachmas because I am the Son of God, and it is His temple from which these offerings are taken. Furthermore, if earthly rulers do not impose taxes on their own children but rather on outsiders, how much more should I, the King and Son of the King—not of this world, but of the heavenly realms—be free from such obligations?

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

Peter affirmed, "Indeed, I am convinced that the Lord has never failed to meet the requirements of the law. However, upon entering the house, Jesus Christ inquired, 'What are your thoughts, Simon? From whom do the rulers of the earth collect taxes or tribute, from their own sons or from others?' Peter acknowledged that he had assured the tax collectors that he would pay the temple tax like everyone else, but he questioned whose temple it truly was. Is it not the temple of my heavenly Father? Is it not peculiar for a son to pay a tax to his father?" Peter recognized that taxes are typically collected from outsiders. The Lord then told him, "The sons are free; thus, I am not obliged to pay the didrachma for my Father's temple.

Read more (157 words)

Nevertheless, let us not cause offense, so that they do not view us as lawbreakers. Pay the tribute: I do not provide it out of obligation, but to alleviate their weakness. Retrieve it from the endless treasury of my Father, and offer it as a gift from His abundance. Go to the sea, cast a hook, and the first fish you catch will have a coin in its mouth. This coin, known as a statyr, is equivalent to four drachmas or a Jewish shekel, which is the exact amount needed to cover the tax for two individuals." After providing the necessary funds, the Lord instructed, "Take this and give it to them for you and for Me." In this miracle, Jesus Christ demonstrated His divinity. If He knew there was a statyr in the mouth of the first fish Peter caught, He is all-knowing. If He created the statyr found in the fish's mouth, He is all-powerful.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 34 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Λέγει
    legei
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  2. Ναί
    nai
    yes
    G3483 · ναί
  3. Καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  4. ἐλθόντα
    elthonta
    I come
    G2064 · ἔρχομαι
  5. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  6. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. οἰκίαν
    oikian
    a house
    G3614 · οἰκία
  8. προέφθασεν
    proephthasen
    I anticipate
    G4399 · προφθάνω
  9. αὐτὸν
    auton
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  10. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  11. Ἰησοῦς
    iēsous
    Jesus
    G2424 · Ἰησοῦς
  12. λέγων
    legōn
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  13. Τί
    ti
    who
    G5101 · τίς
  14. σοι
    soi
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  15. δοκεῖ
    dokei
    I think
    G1380 · δοκέω
  16. Σίμων
    simōn
    Simon
    G4613 · Σίμων
  17. οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  18. βασιλεῖς
    basileis
    a king
    G935 · βασιλεύς
  19. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  20. γῆς
    gēs
    the earth
    G1093 · γῆ
  21. ἀπὸ
    apo
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  22. τίνων
    tinōn
    who
    G5101 · τίς
  23. λαμβάνουσιν
    lambanousin
    I receive
    G2983 · λαμβάνω
  24. τέλη
    telē
    an end
    G5056 · τέλος
  25. ἢ
    ē
    or
    G2228 · ἤ
  26. κῆνσον
    kēnson
    a poll-tax
    G2778 · κῆνσος
  27. ἀπὸ
    apo
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  28. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  29. υἱῶν
    huiōn
    a son
    G5207 · υἱός
  30. αὐτῶν
    autōn
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  31. ἢ
    ē
    or
    G2228 · ἤ
  32. ἀπὸ
    apo
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  33. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  34. ἀλλοτρίων
    allotriōn
    belonging to another person
    G245 · ἀλλότριος