In this instance, He vehemently condemned the deliberate absurdity embraced by those blind leaders of the people's moral compass: “Woe unto you, ye guides of the blind,” He said; “Whosoever swears by the church is nothing, while whoever swears by the gold of the church is bound.” He challenged their reasoning, asking, “Which is greater: the gold or the church that sanctifies the gold?” Furthermore, He noted that swearing by the altar carried no weight, whereas swearing by the offering upon it held significance. Once again, He questioned, “Which is greater, the offering or the altar that sanctifies the offering?” According to the interpretation of the esteemed Theophylact, “one who swore by a golden vessel, or an ox, or a sheep designated for sacrifice, and then broke their oath, was obliged to present to the temple what they swore by,” revealing their preference for the gift over the altar for financial gain from sacrifices. Ultimately, the essence of an oath is to invoke the omniscient and omnipresent God as a witness to the truth. Thus, clarifying the true meaning of an oath, the Lord stated: “If anyone swears by the altar, he swears by it and by Him who is upon it; and if anyone swears by the church, he swears by it and by Him who dwells in it; if anyone swears by heaven, he swears by the Throne of God and by Him who sits upon it.”