The Lord must have seen potential in him to be worthy of apostolic dignity; otherwise, he would not have been included in such close fellowship or treated like the other apostles.
This does not rule out the possibility that Judas possessed both virtuous and sinful inclinations. The Lord undoubtedly recognized in Judas both the nascent goodness and the seeds of malevolence; the internal conflict between these opposing forces had yet to be resolved, and there was hope that goodness would triumph over evil. What drove Judas's betrayal? Historically, one logically turns to his love of money; the Evangelist John notes that Judas carried a money box intended for the disciples’ communal funds, yet he was unfaithful in managing it, using its contents for his personal gain. This aligns with accounts from the first three Evangelists, who report that Judas conspired to hand over his Master to the Sanhedrin for a specified sum of money.
Such observations might lead us to conclude that Judas's greed had grown to such proportions that he would commit this atrocity to fulfill it. However, this notion is difficult to reconcile. If Judas's self-serving greed dominated him completely, it seems implausible that the Lord would have accepted him as a disciple. Given the Lord's deep insight into the hearts of men and His ability to utilize each individual for their greatest purpose, how could He have placed a man so driven by greed in charge of the treasury? If Judas's motivations were solely for monetary gain, it raises questions as to why he would settle for a meager thirty pieces of silver. One could argue that the Sanhedrin, intent on seizing Jesus prior to the Passover, would not have been stingy if Judas had demanded a higher price. Perhaps the Sanhedrin was frugal due to other plans for apprehending the Lord, or perhaps they believed that Jesus would not seek to rally a defense from the crowd. Regardless, it seems implausible that such a small sum could have been the sole motivation for Judas's actions.
It must also be considered that a man who had enjoyed intimate proximity to Jesus and had, at least for a period, recognized Him as the Messiah would have had a profoundly different internal relationship with Him than he had previously or than the other disciples did. Hence, it appears likely that the love of money was not the principal reason for the betrayal. Did Judas foresee the resulting consequences of his actions? His tragic end and remorse upon witnessing Jesus condemned suggest that he may not have anticipated the outcome. It is theorized that Judas wished to expedite the situation; by placing Jesus in peril, he might have hoped to force a revelation of His kingship or demonstrate divine power to overcome obstacles. When events unfolded contrary to his intentions, and observing that the one he once devotedly followed was condemned, his despair must have solidified. Such actions cannot be justified, for immoral means do not sanctify the end. And how can the works of God be treated so unjustly?
If Judas intended to follow such reasoning, however misguided, it seems unlikely the Lord would have allowed him to be consumed by such delusions. Furthermore, if this were the case, it is perplexing that the Lord would have offered Judas words that could be interpreted as approval, essentially telling him to act as he planned. It seems reasonable to suppose that Judas, like his fellow apostles, approached the Lord with worldly aspirations and earthly hopes. However, when these expectations were unmet, he grew indifferent to the cause he had once ardently embraced. A year before His death, during a well-known conversation in the synagogue at Capernaum, when many deserted Him, the Lord pointed out that a devil was among them, referring to Judas. Peter, too, received a rebuke: “Follow me, Satan; you do not set your mind on the things of God, but on the things of man” (Matthew 16:23). Yet, while Peter's heart was open to repentance, Judas's heart had grown cold. Detached from Jesus, tethered only by worldly interests, Judas had long ceased to be a true disciple, waiting only for an opportunity to turn away. The Lord tolerated his presence, partly to influence his soul, and partly because He foresaw the significance of Judas's fate (Jesus knew from the beginning who was the one who would betray him; John 6:64).
We now turn to the critical moments of the Lord’s final days of ministry. As the resurrection of Lazarus drew the people's attention, the Sanhedrin's determination to eliminate Jesus became even more pronounced. They deliberated on the method of His destruction, assessing the circumstances surrounding His movements. It remained uncertain whether He would arrive in Jerusalem. In an unexpected turn, Jesus not only made a public appearance in Jerusalem in spite of threats, but He entered with unprecedented triumph. The Pharisees, realizing their plans were unraveling, lamented, “Look, the world has gone after Him” (John 12:19). They began scheming to entrap Jesus and kill Him by deceit (Matthew 26:4), unsure whether this would be executed by a hidden traitor or through a premeditated scheme to apprehend Him in an ignoble manner under the guise of legality. Ultimately, it was decided that the deed would be done not during the feast, but either before or after it, with the preference leaning toward before. At this crucial moment, Judas Iscariot, one of the Lord's chosen disciples, stepped forward to offer his services (Matthew 26:14-16; Luke 22:3-6). A price was agreed upon, and he vowed to deliver his Teacher and Lord into their hands.