The Church Fathers on this verse

Matthew 26:16Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And from thenceforth he sought opportunity to betray him.

Douay-Rheims

και απο τοτε εζητει ευκαιριαν ινα αυτον παραδω

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

17 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 22 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Then, when, that is, he heard that this Gospel should be preached every where; for that made him afraid, as it was indeed a mark of unspeakable power.

One of the twelve, as much as to say, of that first band who are elected for preeminent merit1.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

That the Lord was sold for thirty pieces of silver by Judas, denotes the unrighteous Jews, who pursuing things carnal and temporal, which belong to the five bodily senses, refuse to have Christ; and forasmuch as they did this in the sixth age of the world, their receiving five times six as the price of the Lord is thus signified; and because the Lord’s words are silver, but they understood even the Law carnally, they had, as it were, stamped on silver the image of that worldly dominion which they held to when they renounced the Lord.

The order of the narrative is this. The Lord says, Ye know that after two days will be the feast of the Passover; … then assembled together the Chief Priests and Scribes; … then went one of the twelve. Thus the narrative of what took place at Bethany is inserted by way of digression, respecting an earlier time between that, Lest there be an uproar, and, Then one of the twelve.

Jerome of Stridon

5th centuryChurch Father

Joseph was not sold as many, following the LXX (Gen. 37:28.), think for twenty pieces of gold, but as the Hebrew text has for twenty pieces of silver, for it could not be that the servant should be more valuable than his Master.

The wretched Judas would fain replace, by the sale of his Master, that loss which he supposed he had incurred by the ointment. And he does not demand any fixed sum, lest his treachery should see in a gainful thing, but as though delivering up a worthless slave, he left it to those who bought, to determine how much they would give.

Maximus the Confessor

7th centuryChurch Father

Every person who is enamored with wealth and pretends to uphold virtue for the purpose of prudence, upon acquiring the desired treasure, abandons the life he once embraced as a follower of the Word.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

The high priests offered him thirty pieces of silver; and a piece of silver served as a unit of measure, akin to a denarius, a statyr, or a talent. Mark (Mark 14:11) indicates that they 'promised' to deliver the silver, while Luke (Luke 22:5) notes that they 'agreed' to do so. It is possible that initially they entered into an agreement and later reneged. Some interpret the term 'put' as meaning: agreed and designated. Additionally, Luke (Luke 22:6) mentions that Judas also 'confessed,' meaning he made a firm commitment, vowing sincerely to fulfill the arrangement. By a convenient time, I refer to a moment favorable for the capture of Jesus Christ, ensuring that there would be no disruption during His arrest.

Read more (52 words)

From this point forward in the Gospels, great care must be taken to reconcile the various accounts of the evangelists, which may seem contradictory and pose challenges for the inattentive reader. Consequently, while following Matthew's account, we will, where necessary, include references from the others for clarity and harmony in the narrative.

Origen of Alexandria

3rd centuryChurch Father

The opportunity which Judas sought is further explained by Luke, how he might betray him in the absence of the multitude; (Luke 22:6.) when the populace was not with Him, but He was withdrawn with His disciples. And this he did, delivering Him up after supper, when He was withdrawn to the garden of Gethsemane. And from that time forward, such has been the season sought for by those that would betray the word of God in time of persecution when the multitude of believers is not around the word of truth.

Went, against that one high priest, who was made a Priest for ever, to many high priests, to sell for a price Him who sought to redeem the whole world.

The same do all who take any material or worldly things to cast out of their thoughts the Saviour and the word of truth which was in them. And they covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver, as many pieces as the Saviour had dwelt years in the worlda.

Leo the Great

5th centuryChurch Father

He did not out of any fear forsake Christ, but through lust of money cast Him off; for in comparison of the love of money all our affections are feeble; the soul athirst for gain fears not to die for a very little; there is no trace of righteousness in that heart in which covetousness has once taken up its abode. The traitor Judas, intoxicated with this bane, in his thirst for lucre was so foolishly hardened, as to sell his Lord and Master.

Rabanus Maurus

9th centuryChurch Father

Went, he says, because he was neither compelled, nor invited, but of his own free will formed the wicked design.

Remigius of Auxerre

9th centuryChurch Father

So called from the village Scariotha, from which he came.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Judas sought a moment to betray Jesus Christ in secret (Luke 22:6). His intention to deceive was driven not only by the Sanhedrin's request but also by his own selfish fears. He chose the cover of darkness for his treachery, revealing the cowardice inherent in sin, which is as dim as it is misguided. Despite having witnessed numerous displays of Jesus' divine power, Judas still believed he could find a moment where Jesus might not reveal Himself to his adversaries. The thought of openly revealing his betrayal to the people was too burdensome for him. O divine Light! O Love that surrenders for our suffering! Shine upon us, that our souls may recognize the destruction of our sinful cravings. Instill within us a sacred reverence, allowing us to recoil from sin as it approaches.

Read more (286 words)

Fortify our will with Your grace, empowering us to stand against iniquity. Dear friends, the enormity of Judas's sin is striking; his willingness to trade the Savior for mere silver is horrifying. The vice of greed consumed him gradually.

It is crucial for us to combat sin, and victory is within our reach if we confront it in its early stages. Why do we indulge in triviality or indiscretion that gives breathing space to our lesser passions, allowing them to gain dominance over us? Let us not permit our wicked hearts to devise justifications for our frailties. With determination and rigor, we must resist sin at its first touch on our souls. We are called to struggle against sin to the point of shedding blood, to sacrifice our strength and all that we cherish. We should sever dangerous associations, avoid the company of the unrighteous, and not linger in the paths of the sinful (Psalm 1:1). The eternal salvation of our souls merits the greatest temporal efforts. Let us safeguard ourselves for the honor of God's name.

“Listen, all who suffer from the affliction of Judas,” warns St. Chrysostom; “heed and be wary of the sin of greed. If Judas, who walked with Christ, performed miracles, and shared profound teachings, fell into such despair due to this malady, how much more susceptible are you, who neglect the Scriptures and focus only on the transient? Without diligence, how can you hope to evade this disease? This vice is the root of all others. From it arise murder, wars, and every form of evil. Wealth brings no benefit when the soul is impoverished, nor does poverty harm when the soul is rich… To God be the glory. Amen.

Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity

19th centuryCommentator

Judas agreed and began searching for a chance to betray Him away from the crowd. Having made this disgraceful pact, the contracted betrayer secretly returned to the sacred fellowship of Jesus, portraying the guise of an apostle until that moment. One cannot help but marvel at how challenging it must have been to remain in close proximity to the Son of God for so long without being transformed, without drawing from His divine Spirit, prompting us to ask with the Church: What did you become, Judas, the betrayer of the Savior? Why were you removed from the company of the Apostles? Have you taken away our healing gift? Would I deny you your share in the meal with them? Oh, how many blessings did you forget!

Read more (386 words)

Judas’s soul was beset with sinful thoughts, and it seems that Satan himself penetrated it. The holy Evangelists describe his plight as follows: Only Satan could transform an Apostle into a traitor and a son of destruction. It is vital to recognize that the mystery of humanity's redemption through the death of the Son of God was hidden from the powers of darkness. Within the protection of this mystery, the Wisdom of God, who scoffs at the schemes of this primordial adversary, allowed him to orchestrate his own ruin. The enemy aimed to end the unbearable impact of Jesus Christ’s teachings and miracles, just as he had driven the prophets to martyrdom and had silenced John the Baptist at the hands of the wicked Herod. Yet, in this instance, the outcome was the opposite: through the death of the Son of God, which required immense effort from the adversary, a decisive defeat was inflicted upon him, permanently vanquishing his dominion over sin and death. St. John alludes to the entrance through which the ancient serpent slithered into Judas’s soul, ensnaring his mind and heart. This was the love of money, which had taken root in him long ago, smoldering until it erupted into a hellish blaze where Satan reigned as though it were his fortress. During the meal at Bethany, as Judas lamented the world, the devil tightened his grip on the silver-lover’s soul, dragging him toward damnation. The Lord observed all that was occurring within that tormented soul, deliberately concealing it from His disciples until the last moment; otherwise, Peter’s fervent spirit might have attempted to thwart such tragedy. St. Chrysostom exclaims: Such is the grave peril of greed! It turned Judas into both a sacrilegious wretch and a traitor. Listen, all you who love money and suffer from the malady of Judas! Heed and take warning against the vice of greed! If one who walked with Christ, performed miracles, and received profound teachings fell into such despair, how much more susceptible are you to this temptation if you remain careless? This vice stands as the worst of all vices. From it arise murderers, wars, disputes, and every form of wickedness, no matter the name you give it. There is no benefit when the soul is ailing, and no harm when the soul is affluent.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

We must now examine the sinister actions against which the Savior warned the Jewish people—the malevolent gatherings of the Jews aimed at Jesus. Our primary focus should be on the disciple who became the channel for these wicked plans. What drove this tragic disciple to denounce his Lord to the Jews for sacrifice? This question is complex and challenging to answer. How could a disciple, one of the chosen apostles, who daily witnessed the divine presence in Jesus, who observed the manifestations of His miraculous power, and who had numerous experiences of His profound love, choose such a grave act of betrayal? It is likely that he initially joined the ranks of the disciples with no intention of treachery, but rather with the same earnestness as the other apostles.

Read more (934 words)

The Lord must have seen potential in him to be worthy of apostolic dignity; otherwise, he would not have been included in such close fellowship or treated like the other apostles.

This does not rule out the possibility that Judas possessed both virtuous and sinful inclinations. The Lord undoubtedly recognized in Judas both the nascent goodness and the seeds of malevolence; the internal conflict between these opposing forces had yet to be resolved, and there was hope that goodness would triumph over evil. What drove Judas's betrayal? Historically, one logically turns to his love of money; the Evangelist John notes that Judas carried a money box intended for the disciples’ communal funds, yet he was unfaithful in managing it, using its contents for his personal gain. This aligns with accounts from the first three Evangelists, who report that Judas conspired to hand over his Master to the Sanhedrin for a specified sum of money.

Such observations might lead us to conclude that Judas's greed had grown to such proportions that he would commit this atrocity to fulfill it. However, this notion is difficult to reconcile. If Judas's self-serving greed dominated him completely, it seems implausible that the Lord would have accepted him as a disciple. Given the Lord's deep insight into the hearts of men and His ability to utilize each individual for their greatest purpose, how could He have placed a man so driven by greed in charge of the treasury? If Judas's motivations were solely for monetary gain, it raises questions as to why he would settle for a meager thirty pieces of silver. One could argue that the Sanhedrin, intent on seizing Jesus prior to the Passover, would not have been stingy if Judas had demanded a higher price. Perhaps the Sanhedrin was frugal due to other plans for apprehending the Lord, or perhaps they believed that Jesus would not seek to rally a defense from the crowd. Regardless, it seems implausible that such a small sum could have been the sole motivation for Judas's actions.

It must also be considered that a man who had enjoyed intimate proximity to Jesus and had, at least for a period, recognized Him as the Messiah would have had a profoundly different internal relationship with Him than he had previously or than the other disciples did. Hence, it appears likely that the love of money was not the principal reason for the betrayal. Did Judas foresee the resulting consequences of his actions? His tragic end and remorse upon witnessing Jesus condemned suggest that he may not have anticipated the outcome. It is theorized that Judas wished to expedite the situation; by placing Jesus in peril, he might have hoped to force a revelation of His kingship or demonstrate divine power to overcome obstacles. When events unfolded contrary to his intentions, and observing that the one he once devotedly followed was condemned, his despair must have solidified. Such actions cannot be justified, for immoral means do not sanctify the end. And how can the works of God be treated so unjustly?

If Judas intended to follow such reasoning, however misguided, it seems unlikely the Lord would have allowed him to be consumed by such delusions. Furthermore, if this were the case, it is perplexing that the Lord would have offered Judas words that could be interpreted as approval, essentially telling him to act as he planned. It seems reasonable to suppose that Judas, like his fellow apostles, approached the Lord with worldly aspirations and earthly hopes. However, when these expectations were unmet, he grew indifferent to the cause he had once ardently embraced. A year before His death, during a well-known conversation in the synagogue at Capernaum, when many deserted Him, the Lord pointed out that a devil was among them, referring to Judas. Peter, too, received a rebuke: “Follow me, Satan; you do not set your mind on the things of God, but on the things of man” (Matthew 16:23). Yet, while Peter's heart was open to repentance, Judas's heart had grown cold. Detached from Jesus, tethered only by worldly interests, Judas had long ceased to be a true disciple, waiting only for an opportunity to turn away. The Lord tolerated his presence, partly to influence his soul, and partly because He foresaw the significance of Judas's fate (Jesus knew from the beginning who was the one who would betray him; John 6:64).

We now turn to the critical moments of the Lord’s final days of ministry. As the resurrection of Lazarus drew the people's attention, the Sanhedrin's determination to eliminate Jesus became even more pronounced. They deliberated on the method of His destruction, assessing the circumstances surrounding His movements. It remained uncertain whether He would arrive in Jerusalem. In an unexpected turn, Jesus not only made a public appearance in Jerusalem in spite of threats, but He entered with unprecedented triumph. The Pharisees, realizing their plans were unraveling, lamented, “Look, the world has gone after Him” (John 12:19). They began scheming to entrap Jesus and kill Him by deceit (Matthew 26:4), unsure whether this would be executed by a hidden traitor or through a premeditated scheme to apprehend Him in an ignoble manner under the guise of legality. Ultimately, it was decided that the deed would be done not during the feast, but either before or after it, with the preference leaning toward before. At this crucial moment, Judas Iscariot, one of the Lord's chosen disciples, stepped forward to offer his services (Matthew 26:14-16; Luke 22:3-6). A price was agreed upon, and he vowed to deliver his Teacher and Lord into their hands.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

In the account recorded by Matthew, during the meal at Simon the leper's home, Judas Iscariot, one of the twelve apostles, approached the chief priests to offer them his assistance in betraying Jesus. It is quite likely that this gathering of the Sanhedrin, which sought to seize Jesus through treachery, coincided with Judas's visit. It is also possible that Judas had previous interactions with certain members of the Sanhedrin regarding Jesus' betrayal and was aware of when they convened, thus coming forward to present his offer. The Sanhedrin members, naturally, were quite pleased with his proposal; however, they compensated him for his actions with only thirty pieces of silver, the price of a slave, which demonstrated their utter disdain for Jesus.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

After the discussions concluded, Judas left, and his only concern became orchestrating a favorable and significant scheme. From that moment, he sought a chance to hand Him over. This event unfolded on the Tuesday prior to Easter.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

A red-haired Jew, according to tradition, was brought into the sinister council chamber, where his cunningly bright eyes betrayed a restless and covetous spirit. This figure was Judas Iscariot, the sole Jew among the apostles in the true sense of the word, hailing from Cariotus, a town in Judea. He embodies the only individual in the Scriptures who was condemned by the Lord Himself to destruction. His downfall arose from his sinful affection for the world. He epitomized those insincere disciples who followed Christ, anticipating an earthly reign. However, as the Savior persistently foretold the suffering and death that awaited Him, Judas realized his hopes were unfulfilled; instead of a royal throne, he was confronted with various trials and persecutions.

Read more (191 words)

Consequently, he resolved to betray his Master to His adversaries, believing that such an act would bring financial gain and compensate for his disillusioned expectations. Greed had become ingrained in his nature. He had long indulged this craving through the communal funds entrusted to him by the apostles, and this desire had escalated to the point where he displayed it openly before his fellow disciples, who recognized him as a thief. During a meal at Simon's house, when he was rebuked by the Savior for his cunning remarks about Mary’s virtuous act, bitterness took root within him, and in that moment, Satan entered into him, leading him to resolve on treachery. Under the cover of darkness, he stealthily made his way to Jerusalem and presented himself before the Sanhedrin. The high-ranking conspirators were eager for this opportunity, and when Judas requested a favor that was considerable for him but trivial for them—a sum of thirty pieces of silver—the agreement was swiftly reached. The Sanhedrin departed with a sense of accomplishment in their plotted scheme, while Judas, summoning all the forces of darkness, began to contemplate how to achieve his treacherous intentions.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

The phrase ‘a convenient occasion’ reveals the truth, as he was apprehensive of the crowd and desired to apprehend Jesus secretly, echoing the sentiments of Chrysostom and Theophilus. The Sanhedrin members were concerned about a potential uproar among the people.

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

The high priests and the traitor conspired to set a price, yet they lacked clarity regarding the specific moment or method of the betrayal. Judas committed only to taking advantage of the first chance to hand over the Master discreetly, avoiding any public commotion that might alert His devoted followers. The ungrateful apostle, consumed by his greed for silver, failed to comprehend the grave implications of his betrayal and did not recognize that he was disloyal to the innocent blood of the Master (Matthew 27:4), for which he would ultimately pay with his life and endure immense and perpetual sorrow (Matthew 26:24).

Read more (43 words)

The irreversible choice was made, and the unjust payment accepted; the traitor was irresistibly drawn into the depths of sin, compelled by the forces of darkness and his own wicked desires, seeking from that moment on a suitable opportunity to betray the Lord.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 8 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. ἀπὸ
    apo
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  3. τότε
    tote
    then
    G5119 · τότε
  4. ἐζήτει
    ezētei
    I seek
    G2212 · ζητέω
  5. εὐκαιρίαν
    eukairian
    a convenient time
    G2120 · εὐκαιρία
  6. ἵνα
    hina
    in order that
    G2443 · ἵνα
  7. αὐτὸν
    auton
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  8. παραδῷ
    paradō
    I hand over
    G3860 · παραδίδωμι