John Chrysostom
The Chief Priests knowing that they had purchased a murder were condemned by their own conscience; they said, It is the price of blood.
And they gave them unto the potter's field, as the Lord appointed to me.
και εδωκαν αυτα εις τον αγρον του κεραμεως καθα συνεταξεν μοι κυριος
13 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 19 commentaries
The Chief Priests knowing that they had purchased a murder were condemned by their own conscience; they said, It is the price of blood.
It was brought about, I conceive, by God’s providence, that the Saviour’s price should not minister means of excess to sinners, but repose to foreigners, that thence Christ might both redeem the living by the shedding of His blood, and harbour the dead by the price of His passion. Therefore with the price of the Lord’s blood the potter’s field is purchased. We read in Scripture that the salvation of the whole human race has been purchased by the Saviour’s blood. This field then is the whole world. The potter who is the Lord of the soil, is He who has formed of clay the vessels of our bodies. This potter’s field then was purchased by Christ’s blood, and to strangers who without country or home wander over the whole world, repose is provided by Christ’s blood.
These foreigners are the more devout Christians, who have renounced the world, and have no possession in it, and so repose in Christ’s blood; for the burial of Christ is nothing but the repose of a Christian; for as the Apostle says, We are buried with him by baptism into death. (Rom. 6:4.) We are in this life then as foreigners.
But if any one thinks this lowers the historian’s credit, first let him know that not all the copies of the Gospels have the name Hieremias, but some simply by the Prophet. But I do not like this defence, because the more, and the more ancient, copies have Hieremias, and there could be no reason for adding the name, and thus making an error. But its erasure is well accounted for by the hardihood of ignorance having heard the foregoing objection urged.
It might be then, that the name Hieremias occurred to the mind of Matthew as he wrote, instead of the name Zacharias, as so often happens; and that he would have straightway corrected it, when pointed out to him by such as read this while he yet lived in the flesh, had he not thought that his memory, being guided by the Holy Spirit, would not thus have called up to him one name instead of another, had not the Lord determined that it should thus be written. And why He should have so determined, the first reason is, that it would convey the wonderful consent of the Prophets, who all spake by one Spirit, which is much greater than if all the words of all the Prophets had been uttered through the mouth of one man; so that we receive without doubt whatever the Holy Spirit spake through them, each word belongs to all in common, and the whole is the utterance of each. Suppose it to happen at this day, that in repeating another’s words one should mention not the speaker’s name, but that of some other person, who however was the other’s greater friend, and then immediately recollecting himself should correct himself, he might yet add, Yet am I right, if you only think of the close unanimity that exists between the two. How much more is this to be observed of the holy Prophets! There is a second reason why the name Hieremias should be suffered to remain in this quotation from Zacharias, or rather why it should have been suggested by the Holy Spirit. (Jer. 32:9.) It is said in Hieremias, that he bought a field of his brother’s son, and gave him silver for it, though not indeed the sum stated in Zacharias, thirty pieces of silver. That the Evangelist has here adapted the thirty pieces of silver in Zacharias to this transaction in the Lord’s history, is plain; but he may also wish to convey that what Hieremias speaks of the field is mystically alluded to here, and therefore he puts not the name of Zacharias who spoke of the thirty pieces of silver, but of Hieremias who spoke of the purchase of the field. So that in reading the Gospel and finding the name of Hieremias, but not finding there the passage respecting the thirty pieces of silver, but the account of the purchase of the field, the reader might be induced to compare the two together, and so extract from them the sense of the prophecy, how far it refers to what was now accomplished in the Lord. For what Matthew adds to the prophecy, Whom they of the children of Israel did value, and gave them for the potter’s field, as the Lord appointed me, this, as the Lord appointed me, is found neither in Zacharias nor Hieremias. It must then be taken in the person of the Evangelist as inserted with a mystic meaning, that he had learned by revelation that the prophecy referred to this matter of the price for which Christ was betrayed.
This is not found at all in Hieremias; but in Zacharias (Zech. 11:13.), who is the last but one of the twelve Prophets, something like it is told, and though the sense is not very different, yet the arrangement and the words are different.
Far be it then from a follower of Christ to suppose him guilty of falsehood, whereas his business was not to pry into words and syllables, but to lay down the staple of doctrine.
Truly straining out the gnat, and swallowing the camel; for if they would not put the money into the treasury, because it was the price of blood, why did they shed the blood at all?
Also we, who were strangers to the Law and the Prophets, have profited by the perverse temper of the Jews to obtain salvation for ourselves.
I have lately read in a Hebrew book given me by a Hebrew of the Nazarene sect, an apocryphal Hieremias, in which I find the very words here quoted. After all, I am rather inclined to think that the passage was taken by Matthew out of Zacharias, in the usual manner of the Apostles and Evangelists when they quote from the Old Testament, neglecting the words, and attending only to the sense.
The Jewish leaders did not return the money they received for the blood of Christ to the treasury; instead, they acquired a potter’s field for burying travelers. This action fulfilled the prophetic words as noted in Zechariah 11:12 and unveiled the mystery of the forthcoming Church. According to divine revelation, the field represents the world, as stated in Matthew 13:38. The potter is the Creator, who formed humanity from the earth, as described in Genesis 2:7. He possesses the authority to create us by nature and to recreate us through grace in His sovereign will. While we stumble through our own transgressions, His mercy restores us by renewing our spirits, as illustrated in Jeremiah 18:7-8.
The cost of blood signifies the anguish endured by Christ. With this price, Christ redeems the world, as mentioned in St. Hidarius of Pictavia: in Matthew 32:6. He came so that the world could find salvation through Him, as evidenced by John 3:17. He is both the Creator and the Lawgiver of the universe, coming to ensure eternal grace for all who are buried and resurrected with Him through baptism, as stated in Romans 6:4 and Colossians 2:12. However, there is not a burial place available everywhere or for everyone. Although the world can accommodate all things, it does not safeguard all. The space may be shared, but burial is rightful only for those who are now part of God’s family through faith, though they were once outsiders and foreigners under the law. As it is written, "Remember that you, who were once Gentiles in the flesh, were excluded from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers to the covenants of promise" (Ephesians 2:11-12). Yet now, they are no longer outsiders or strangers; by faith, they have attained the privilege of being fellow citizens with the saints.
The passage is not found in the book of Jeremiah that we currently examine; consequently, it must have been recorded in a text that has since been lost. It is plausible that the writings we have now were later deliberately omitted by the Jews, similar to the fate of other declarations. Thus, the high priests acquired the value of the incomparable Christ, whom they deemed significant among the descendants of Israel. They are referred to as the chief priests when Judas approached them with the question, ‘What will you give me if I hand Him over to you?’ and they promised him thirty pieces of silver (Matthew 26:15). The Lord instructed me, meaning He revealed it to me.
They thought it meet to spend upon the dead that money which was the price of blood. But as there are differences even in burial places, they used the price of Jesus’ blood in the purchase of some potter’s field, where foreigners might be buried, not as they desired in the sepulchres of their fathers.
Or, the foreigners are they who to the end are aliens from God, for the righteous are buried with Christ in a new tomb hewn out in the rock. But they who are aliens from God, even to the end, are buried in the field of a potter, a worker in clay, which being bought by the price of blood, is called the field of blood.
This world represents the entirety of earthly existence, wherein we, scattered and dispersed, offer to the Lord the fruits of our righteous deeds. You might wonder, if this world is the earth, who then is the craftsman in charge of creation. The craftsman is indeed the One who fashioned our physical bodies from the dust of the ground. As Scripture declares, "And the Lord God created man from the dust of the earth" (Gen. 2:7). This craftsman is the One who breathed life into the formless clay of our being and refined our earthly substance through His divine fire. I assert that this craftsman is the One who sculpted us to life and continues to shape us into glory through Christ.
The apostle writes, "But we all with open face, as in a mirror, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, as by the Spirit of the Lord" (2 Cor. 3:18). We, having fallen apart due to our transgressions, are restored to life through the second birth, made possible by the tender mercy of this craftsman. Those of us who have been condemned because of Adam's sin are resurrected through the grace of our Saviour.
It is this craftsman about whom the blessed apostle inquires: "Will the workman say to him that made it, ‘Why hast thou made me so?’ - and also: 'Does not the potter have power over the clay, that out of the same mixture he may make one vessel for honourable use, and another for low use?'” (Rom. 9:20-21). From the same clay of our earthly form, God prepares some for the kingdom based on their merits, while others are destined for judgment.
Thus, the territory of this craftsman was redeemed by the blood of Christ for those who wander. These wanderers, who possess neither home nor land and are scattered as exiles throughout the world, find their rest through the blood of Christ, allowing those without earthly belongings to attain a resting place in Him. Who are these wanderers, if not faithful Christians who, having renounced worldly possessions, find solace in the blood of the Saviour? For the Christian who claims no stake in this world finds possession in their Saviour. The grave of Christ offers rest to the pilgrims, and those who abstain from worldly desires as wanderers and strangers will be honored with the eternal peace of Christ.
What signifies Christ’s grave, if not the resting place of a believer? As we are indeed strangers in this life, we exist here as visitors, as the apostle reminds us: "As we dwell in the body, we are removed from the Lord" (2 Cor. 5:6). Therefore, we acknowledge that we are strangers, and the place of rest has been won for us by the blood of the Saviour. We are indeed buried with Him, as the apostle states, "by baptism into death" (Rom. 6:4). Thus, baptism serves as our connection to Christ’s burial; in it, we die to sin, are buried from evil deeds, and rise to a renewed life, shedding the old self for the new creation.
Merely shaming the Sanhedrin was insufficient. By purchasing the potter's field with the pieces of silver that were rejected, they not only sealed their own disgrace but also contributed to the narrative of Jesus according to the prophetic words regarding the Messiah, effectively crafting both a mark of shame and a hymn of praise for Him. The Lord conveyed through the prophet, “And I said unto them, If it please you, give my payment; but if not, do not give it. And they counted out to Me the payment of thirty pieces of silver. And Jehovah said unto me, Throw this treasure to the potter; dear is this price by which I am valued with them. And I took the thirty pieces of silver, and cast them into the house of Jehovah, unto the potter” (Zech. 11:12-13).
The Evangelist does not cite these words from the prophet verbatim but rather from recollection. In this passage, the Lord reveals Himself to the prophet as the shepherd of Israel and laments Israel's lack of appreciation, asserting that they ought to honor His efforts with suitable compensation. The specified payment is thirty pieces of silver, which the Lord instructs the prophet to cast aside as a sign of ungratefulness to the potter. It is evident how precisely this prophecy was realized in the events surrounding Jesus, even through the actions of the chief priests.
In their actions, the Sanhedrin, without realizing it, enacted an ancient prophecy, bringing shame upon themselves while honoring Jesus. Thus, it was accomplished as foretold by the prophets, particularly through Jeremiah (Jeremiah 32:9, Jeremiah 18:2) and even more precisely by Ahariah (Zechariah 11:12-13), who declares, “And take them out.” In Zechariah, it is stated that "they took thirty pieces of silver, the price of Him that was valued, whom the children of Israel valued, and gave them for the potter’s field, as the Lord commanded me." Even today, remnants of a village soaked in blood can still be seen near Jerusalem.
In this context, the fact that Christ was valued at thirty pieces of silver—an amount designated for a slave, representing the worth of Him, whom the children of Israel esteemed—was later utilized to acquire the potter's field. This occurrence is seen as the fulfillment of the prophecy given by Zechariah (Zechariah 11:12-13). In this scripture, the prophet illustrates the neglect and ungratefulness of the Israelites toward their shepherd, who cared for their salvation. Following the instruction of God, he inquires of the Israelites what they would be willing to offer him for his pastoral service. Their response was thirty pieces of silver.
Subsequently, God instructed the prophet to cast this derisive and degrading sum into the crucible, which is also translated by some as "for the potter." Thus, the prophet threw it into the house of the Lord, specifically into the receptacle used for melting down old coins.
The Evangelist sees in Zechariah's portrayal of Israel's attitude toward the prophet a prophetic foreshadowing of the events surrounding the betrayal of the Lord. While he does not quote the prophet's words verbatim from either the Hebrew text or the Septuagint, he offers a free interpretation, applying them to the narrative at hand. The parallels between the experiences of the prophet and those of Christ are significant: the prophet, in his role as a shepherd to God's people, serves as a foreshadowing of the Messiah; just as the people disrespected the prophet, they likewise show disdain for Christ. He is regarded in the same manner as a prophet, treated with scorn and undervalued. They appraised both the prophet and Christ at the price of a slave, thirty pieces of silver, which, in both instances, was subsequently put to a lowly purpose, ultimately coming into the possession of the potter—first, to be melted down, and in the latter case, to be exchanged for the potter's land.
The evangelist notes in his account that the prophecy of Jeremiah was realized in these events. However, it was actually Zechariah who proclaimed, ‘And they will give me thirty pieces of silver as payment. And the Lord said unto me, Cast them into the treasury of the church, - The high price at which they have valued me! And I took the thirty pieces of silver and cast them into the house of the Lord for the potter’ (Zechariah 11:12-13). It is thought that the mention of Jeremiah instead of Zechariah arises from a transcription error, as the earliest manuscripts correctly attribute the prophecy to Zechariah.
The words referenced by the Evangelist from the writings of the prophet Jeremiah are not found in his text; however, they closely resemble passages in the book of the prophet Zechariah (Zechariah 11:12-13). To clarify this discrepancy, various theories have arisen. For instance, Origen and Euthymius Zigabenus suggested that these phrases may have been derived from a lost prophecy of Jeremiah. Augustine proposed that the author might have mistakenly credited Jeremiah when he meant Zechariah. Others speculate that the imagery found in Zechariah has roots in Jeremiah's writings (specifically Jeremiah 18 and 19), resulting in the writer attributing the message to the former rather than the latter.
Among these theories, the most plausible is that the reference indeed stems from Zechariah—even if not verbatim and retaining only the essence of the prophecy, which aligns with Matthew’s common approach (Matt. 4:15-16). It is likely that the mention of Jeremiah arose from a later scribe's error that became widespread in ancient manuscripts; originally, it may have indicated Zechariah, as seen in many early texts (refer to Tischendorf, Nov. Testam.). Such mistakes were common due to the abbreviated forms of names used in antiquity—for example, Ιερεμι'ου might have been written as Ιρι'ου, and Ζαχαρι'ου as Ζρι'ου—making it easy to confuse one name for another.
The phrase "Took thirty pieces of silver" reflects the meaning of the quotations drawn from Zechariah—the prophet is depicted as sent by God to guide the wayward sheep of Israel, acting as a representative of the Supreme Shepherd, who is God Himself. The Jewish people disregarded this prophet, as they had others, thereby neglecting the call of God. To illustrate the lack of value they placed on the prophet’s care—and thereby on God’s care—God instructed the prophet to inquire what compensation they would be willing to offer for his pastoral service. Their answer was thirty pieces of silver, a sum typically associated with the price of a slave (see note to Matthew 26:15). This demonstrates their devaluation of the prophet’s work, equating it, and by extension the work of God, to that of a servant. Consequently, God told the prophet to throw this "glorious" (in an ironic sense) sum, by which He is valued by them, to the potter. The prophet responded by taking thirty pieces of silver and casting them into the house of the Lord for the potter (Zech. 11:4, 11-12). This action was fulfilled through the betrayal of Jesus Christ, who appeared as the Messiah, the good shepherd. The Jewish people assessed His life at thirty pieces of silver—the price of a slave—and with that amount, they purchased a field from the potter. The Evangelist highlights this prophetic fulfillment, though he does not quote the prophetic text in its exact wording.
The thirty pieces of silver were also allocated for the land of the potter, as noted by the holy Evangelist Matthew in his gospel (27:9, 10). This was a fulfillment of the prophecy recorded in the Book of the Prophets: “And I took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of that which was esteemed, valued by the children of Israel; and I gave them for the field of the potter, as the Lord commanded me” (Zechariah 11:12, 13; cf. Jer. 18:2; cf. 32:6ff.).
Passages read together with this verse.
Greek text, 12 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.