The Church Fathers on this verse

Matthew 5:22Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

But I say to you, that whosoever is angry with his brother, shall be in danger of the judgment. And whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council. And whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

Douay-Rheims

εγω δε λεγω υμιν οτι πας ο οργιζομενος τω αδελφω αυτου εικη ενοχος εσται τη κρισει ος δ αν ειπη τω αδελφω αυτου ρακα ενοχος εσται τω συνεδριω ος δ αν ειπη μωρε ενοχος εσται εις την γεενναν του πυρος

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

18 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 43 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

This is the first mention of hell, though the kingdom of Heaven had been mentioned some time before, which shews that the gifts of the one comes of His love, the condemnation of the other of our sloth. Many thinking this a punishment too severe for a mere word, say that this was said figuratively. But I fear that if we thus cheat ourselves with words here, we shall suffer punishment in deed there. Think not then this too heavy a punishment, when so many sufferings and sins have their beginning in a word; a little word has often begotten a murder, and overturned whole cities. And yet it is not to be thought a little word that denies a brother reason and understanding by which we are men, and differ from the brutes.

Or, the judgment and the council denote punishment in this word; hell-fire future punishment. He denounces punishment against anger, yet does not mention any special punishment, shewing therein that it is not possible that a man should be altogether free from the passion. The Council here means the Jewish senate, for He would not seem to be always superseding all their established institutions, and introducing foreignf.

By righteousness is here meant universal virtue. But observe the superior power of grace, in that He requires of His disciples who were yet uninstructed to be better than those who were masters under the Old Testament. Thus He does not call the Scribes and Pharisees unrighteous, but speaks of their righteousness. And see how even herein He confirms the Old Testament that He compares it with the New, for the greater and the less are always of the same kind.

This, it was said by them of old time, shews that it was long ago that they had received this precept. He says this that He might rouse His sluggish hearers to proceed to more sublime precepts, as a teacher might say to an indolent boy, Know you not how long time you have spent already in merely learning to spell? In that, I say unto you, mark the authority of the legislator, none of the old Prophets spoke thus; but rather, Thus saith the Lord. They as servants repeated the commands of their Lord; He as a Son declared the will of His Father, which was also His own. They preached to their fellow servants; Ha as master ordained a law for his slaves.

Or, Racha is a word signifying contempt, and worthlessness. For where we in speaking to servants or children say, Go thou, or, Tell thou him; in Syriac they would say Racha for ‘thou.’ For the Lord descends to the smallest trifles even of our behaviour, and bids us treat one another with mutual respect.

And it were an unworthy reproach to him who has in him the Holy Spirit to call him ‘empty.’

But as none is empty who has the Holy Spirit, so none is a fool who has the knowledge of Christ; and if Racha signifies ‘empty,’ it is one and the same thing, as far as the meaning of the word goes, to say Racha, or ‘thou fool.’ But there is a difference in the meaning of the speaker; for Racha was a word in common use among the Jews, not expressing wrath or hate, but rather in a light careless way expressing confident familiarity, not anger. But you will perhaps say, if Racha is not an expression of wrath, how is it then a sin? Because it is said for contention, not for edification; and if we ought not to speak even good words but for the sake of edification, how much more not such as are in themselves bad?

In danger of the council; that is, (according to the interpretation given by the Apostles in their Constitutions,) in danger of being one of that Council which condemned Christe.

The righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees are the commandments of Moses; but the commandments of Christ are the fulfilment of that Law. This then is His meaning; Whosoever in addition to the commandments of the Law shall not fulfil My commandments, shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. For those indeed save from the punishment due to transgressors of the Law, but do not bring into the kingdom; but My commandments both deliver from punishment, and bring into the kingdom. But seeing that to break the least commandments and not to keep them are one and the same, why does He say above of him that breaks the commandments, that he shall be the least in the kingdom of heaven, and here of him who keeps them not, that he shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven?

Read more (122 words)

See how to be the least in the kingdom is the same with not entering into the kingdom. For a man to be in the kingdom is not to reign with Christ, but only to be numbered among Christ’s people; what He says then of him that breaks the commandments is, that he shall indeed be reckoned among Christians, yet the least of them. But he who enters into the kingdom, becomes partaker of His kingdom with Christ. Therefore he who does not enter into the kingdom of heaven, shall not indeed have a part of Christ’s glory, yet shall he be in the kingdom of heaven, that is, in the number of those over whom Christ reigns as King of heaven.

Christ willing to shew that He is the same God who spoke of old in the Law, and who now gives commandments in grace, now puts first of all his commandments (vid. Mat. 19:18.), that one which was the first in the Law, first, at least, of all those that forbade injury to our neighbour.

He who is angry without cause shall be judged; but he who is angry with cause shall not be judged. For if there were no anger, neither teaching would profit, nor judgments hold, nor crimes be controlled. So that he who on just cause is not angry, is in sin; for an unreasonable patience sows vices, breeds carelessness, and invites the good as well as the bad to do evil.

Yet that anger which arises from just cause is indeed not anger, but a sentence of judgment. For anger properly means a feeling of passion; but he whose anger arises from just cause does not suffer any passion, and is rightly said to sentence, not to be angry with.

But I think that Christ does not speak of anger of the flesh, but anger of the heart; for the flesh cannot be so disciplined as not to feel the passion. When then a man is angry but refrains from doing what his anger prompts him, his flesh is angry, but his heart is free from anger.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

The prophets, aiming to clarify the messages of prophecy, proclaimed, ‘This saith the Lord’; yet Christ, asserting His divine authority, boldly states, ‘I say’. While the prophets were servants, He is the Son, possessing everything that the Father has. If one harbors anger against his brother without cause, he will face condemnation; however, if such anger arises from a rightful place—such as for educational purposes or out of spiritual fervor—he will not be judged. The apostle Paul directed strong words at Elymas the sorcerer and the high priest, not out of futile anger but driven by righteous zeal. Anger that stems from a desire for material possessions or renown is indeed futile. The term ‘Sanhedrin’ refers to the Jewish court of judgment, while ‘raka’ equates to ‘you’.

Read more (139 words)

We often speak to those we look down upon by saying ‘go you’, which is why the Lord emphasizes that we should not disregard even small expressions, but rather strive to treat others with respect. Some interpret ‘raka’ as meaning ‘worthless’ in the Syriac language. Therefore, if anyone dishonors his brother by labeling him as such, he shall be judged by the council of the apostles when they evaluate the twelve tribes. Many perceive this to be a harsh judgment, but it is not. He who strips his brother of reason—depriving him of that which distinguishes humanity from beasts—surely deserves Gehenna. Those who insult and belittle erode love, and when love is lost, the virtues that thrive only through love are extinguished. Thus, anyone who brings dishonor by obliterating virtues ultimately destroys love and warrants just punishment by fire.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Here we have three arraignments, the judgment, the council, and hell-fire, being different stages ascending from the lesser to the greater. For in the judgment there is yet opportunity for defence; to the council belongs the respite of the sentence, what time the judges confer among themselves what sentence ought to be inflicted; in the third, hell-fire, condemnation is certain, and the punishment fixed. Hence is seen what a difference is between the righteousness of the Pharisees and Christ; in the first, murder subjects a man to judgment; in the second, anger alone, which is the least of the three degrees of sin.

In all these three sentences there are some words understood. In the first indeed, as many copies read without cause, there is nothing to be supplied. In the second, He who saith to his brother, Racha, we must supply the words, without cause; and again, in He who says, Thou fool, two things are understood, to his brother, and, without cause. And this forms the defence of the Apostle, when he calls the Galatians fools, though he considers them his brethren; for he did it not without cause.

We do not, because we have heard that, Thou shall not kill, deem it therefore unlawful to pluck a twig, according to the error of the Manichees, nor consider it to extend to irrational brutes; by the most righteous ordinance of the Creator their life and death is subservient to our needs. There remains, therefore, only man of whom we can understand it, and that not any other man, nor you only; for he who kills himself does nothing else but kill a man. Yet have not they in any way done contrary to this commandment who have waged wars under God’s authority, or they who charged with the administration of civil power have by most just and reasonable orders inflicted death upon criminals.

Read more (107 words)

Also Abraham was not charged with cruelty, but even received the praise of piety, for that he was willing to obey God in slaying his son. Those are to be excepted from this command whom God commands to be put to death, either by a general law given, or by particular admonition at any special time. For he is not the slayer who ministers to the command, like a hilt to one smiting with a sword, nor is Samson otherwise to be acquitted for destroying himself along with his enemies, than because he was so instructed privily of the Holy Spirit, who through him wrought the miracles.

In the third case are three things; anger, the voice expressive of anger, and a word of reproach, Thou fool. Thus here are three different degrees of sin; in the first when one is angry, but keeps the passion in his heart without giving any sign of it. If again he suffers any sound expressive of the passion to escape him, it is more than had he silently suppressed the rising anger; and if he speaks a word which conveys a direct reproach, it is a yet greater sin.

Should any ask what greater punishment is reserved for murder, if evil-speaking is visited with hell-fire? This obliges us to understand, that there are degrees in hell.

Otherwise, unless your righteousness exceed the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees, that is, exceed that of those who break what themselves teach, as it is elsewhere said of them, They say, and do not; (Mat. 23:3.) just as if He had said, Unless your righteousness exceed in this way that ye do what ye teach, you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven. We must therefore understand something other than usual by the kingdom of heaven here, in which are to be both he who breaks what he teaches, and he who does it, but the one least, the other great; this kingdom of heaven is the present Church. In another sense is the kingdom of heaven spoken of that place where none enters but he who does what he teaches, and this is the Church as it shall be hereafter.

This expression, the kingdom of heaven, so often used by our Lord, I know not whether any one would find in the books of the Old Testament. It belongs properly to the New Testament revelation, kept for His mouth whom the Old Testament figured as a King that should come to reign over His servants. This end, to which its precepts were to be referred, was hidden in the Old Testament, though even that had its saints who looked forward to the revelation that should be made.

For almost all the precepts which the Lord gave, saying, But I say unto you, are found in those ancient books. But because they knew not of any murder, besides the destruction of the body, the Lord shews them that every evil thought to the hurt of a brother is to be held for a kind of murder.

There are two different opinions among philosophers concerning the passions of the mind: the Stoics do not allow that any passion is incident to the wise man; the Peripatetics affirm that they are incident to the wise man but in a moderate degree and subject to reason; as, for example, when mercy is shewn in such a manner that justice is preserved. But in the Christian rule we do not enquire whether the mind is first affected with anger or with sorrow, but whence.

This also we affirm should be taken into consideration, what is being angry with a brother; for he is not angry with a brother who is angry at his offence. He then it is who is angry without cause, who is angry with his brother, and not with the offence.

But to be angry with a brother to the end that he may be corrected, there is no man of sound mind who forbids. Such sort of motions as come of love of good and of holy charity, are not to be called vices when they follow right reason.

And there is this same distinction between the first case here put by the Saviour and the second: in the first case there is one thing, the passion; in the second two, anger and speech following thereupon, He who saith to his brother, Raca, is in danger of the council. Some seek the interpretation of this word in the Greek, and think that Raca means ragged, from the Greek ῥάκος, a rag. But more probably it is not a word of any meaning, but a mere sound expressing the passion of the mind, which grammarians call an interjection, such as the cry of pain, ‘heu.’

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

What does 'raka' mean? It refers to a term used in local dialect that isn't overly harsh, typically exchanged among individuals who share a close relationship.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

The designation of "mad" can serve as an offense to an individual due to the implications it carries. Humans, despite their simplicity, can perceive the flow of time, while those endowed with wisdom can comprehend the movement of thought. Thus, the Divine aimed to elevate the perfect to the perfect, specifically, the perfect to the heavenly hosts. Before the Lord, even the righteous acknowledge their own guilt, prompting them to confess their shortcomings among one another. God granted freedom to humanity, created in His likeness, so that they may exercise dominion over their desires, mirroring God's own nature. While God inherently possesses everything, He willingly humbled Himself to partake in the fluctuations of human existence.

Read more (251 words)

Scripture reminds us of the warning: ‘Whoever says to his brother, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of hellfire’ (cf. Matt. 5:22). Note that sharing accusations does not lead to commendation. If you label an adulterer as such, your action will yield no reward, nor will the wrongdoer suffer more than his due. However, if the one who sinned listens to the warning and seeks to amend his ways, he will receive a greater blessing instead of the judgment he once faced. The principle stated in Scripture applies: ‘Let it be to him as he wished to do to his brother.’ The truth that prompts you to seek justice for another will equally bring forth what is just for you. Furthermore, the guilt of a man wrongfully accused of murder will fall upon the accuser, just as the accusations of adultery against the innocent return upon the slanderer. The idolatry practiced by people is equated with adultery, thus it is fitting to label slander as a form of adultery, since this too is a departure from truth. Reflect on these matters and recognize that they are fundamentally intertwined and equal in all respects. There are instances when the Tempter leads a person to sin through various means and incites them to commit evil. Likewise, there are times when he uses the words of others to wrongly assign disgraceful labels, tarnishing a person’s character. In such moments, he stirs the slanderer to speak ill and predisposes the audience to accept those falsehoods.

Jerome of Stridon

5th centuryChurch Father

Some copies add here the words, without cause; but by the true readingc the precept is made unconditional, and anger altogether forbidden. For when we are told to pray for them that persecute us, all occasion of anger is taken away. The words without cause then must be erased, for the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.

Or, Racha is a Hebrew word signifying, ‘empty,’ ‘vain;’ as we might say in the common phrase of reproach, ‘empty-pate.’ Observe that He says brother; for who is our brother, but he who has the same Father as ourselves?

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

After gently guiding their hearts with the beatitudes and inspiring them toward righteousness, He addresses the greater commandments. He initiates this discussion with more primal passions, specifically anger and lust. First, He deals with anger, followed by His words on lust. It is essential for us to understand why He did not commence with the commandment that holds the foremost place in the Law. Since it pertains to the Divine nature, one might expect it to be explicitly connected to His Godhood. However, the appropriate time for such a revelation had not yet arrived. Even after performing miracles and teaching, there were those who accused Him of being possessed, despite His silence on His Divinity. How much more scorn would have arisen had He made such declarations prematurely?

Read more (567 words)

He refrained from openly claiming to be God to prevent causing confusion among His audience. If even the disciples, who had intimate knowledge of Him and received His teachings daily, as well as witnessed His miracles and were empowered to raise the dead, had difficulty fully grasping these truths before the coming of the Holy Spirit, how could the less enlightened crowd, lacking such divine empowerment, have understood without becoming bewildered or misjudging Him as attempting to usurp God's honor? Thus, in His characteristic wisdom and prudence, while performing extraordinary deeds of God, He permits others to declare His Divinity while also occasionally using terminology that reflects His nature. Most often, He speaks of Himself in humility, considering the frailty of His listeners, knowing that His actions would testify to truths unprecedented by any other. To proclaim anything grand about Himself would seem presumptuous or suspect.

Returning to our original theme, let us observe how He upholds the Law, even as He perfects it. He states, “Thou shalt not kill,” reminding us that the ancient Law commanded, “whosoever shall kill shall be liable to condemnation.” Yet, He enhances this understanding by declaring, “But I say unto you, that whosoever is angry with his brother without cause shall be in danger of judgment.” Here, He does not invalidate all forms of anger but disallows unjust anger. Constructive anger, on the other hand, can be beneficial, especially towards those who live in opposition to God's commandments. Our righteous indignation is not for self-defense but motivated by love and concern for others who stray from the truth. He urges us, “Be angry, and do not sin” (Psalm 4:5), meaning we must not let our tempers divert us into wrongdoing. He refers to us as brothers and sisters, sharing the same God, heritage, nature, faith, commandments, and promises.

Notice what else He includes: He addresses the very source of murder. One who harbors anger viciously is unlikely to commit murder, just as removing the root of a plant prevents its branches from thriving. Whoever utters the term “Raca” is also liable to the fires of Gehenna. While He has previously admonished mere anger, here He condemns those who resort to derogatory language. The term “Raca,” rooted in Hebrew, signifies disdain, wherein someone refuses to use the offended individual's name, deeming them unworthy. Such an individual is condemned by the Lord for rejecting our shared humanity and faces judgment before the elder council. Furthermore, whoever calls another “Fool” is also liable to the fires of Gehenna. This offense bears greater weight, as it strips a brother of reason—the very quality that sets us apart from creatures without voice—and offends the faith of the community. If a brother in faith is deemed foolish, it undermines the faith itself.

It is significant that the phrase “Gehenna of fire” is introduced at this point. Some suggest that the name reflects its nature as a place continually producing fire, while others link it to Hebrew terminology signifying punishment. If our Lord imposes such severe consequences for what we may consider trivial offenses, what punishment awaits us for continually committing far greater transgressions against our brethren? He addresses seemingly minor offenses to underscore the gravity of more substantial sins, teaching us to regard even these offenses with great concern, recognizing that all forms of anger—great or small—can lead to acts of murder, igniting wrath like a spark.

Hilarius of Poitiers

4th centuryChurch Father

Or, he who reproaches with emptiness one full of the Holy Spirit, will he arraigned in the assembly of the Saints, and by their sentence will be punished for an affront against that Holy Spirit Himself.

Beautiful entrance He here makes to a teaching beyond the works of the Law, declaring to the Apostles that they should have no admission to the kingdom of heaven without a righteousness beyond that of Pharisees.

Chromatius of Aquileia

5th centuryChurch Father

The magnitude of the Lord's love for His brethren becomes evident when He demonstrates that a sacrifice presented to God is only deemed acceptable if the giver first relinquishes his anger and reconciles with his brother. Ultimately, we learn that God dismissed the offerings of Cain, who did not adhere to the commandments of love and harbored resentment toward his brother. Consequently, it is no coincidence that the Lord frequently emphasizes in the Gospel the importance of maintaining brotherly love: A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another (John 13:34). Moreover, He states: By this all will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another (John 13:35). The Lord also instructs through the prophet Zechariah, ‘Judge in truth and in peace. Let none of you think evil in his heart against his brother (Zechariah 8:16-17). Likewise, through David, He urges: Cease from anger, and forsake wrath (Psalm 36:8).

Rabanus Maurus

9th centuryChurch Father

The Saviour here names the torments of hell, Gehenna, a name thought to be derived from a valley consecrate to idols near Jerusalem, and filled of old with dead bodies, and defiled by Josiah, as we read in the Book of Kings.

Ignatij (Briantchaninow)

19th centuryChurch Father

The Old Testament explicitly rejects the destructive consequences of anger, as the Lord denounced the most fervent expressions of this emotion (Matthew 5:21, 22). This divine command carries immense weight, as it is declared by the Lord Himself. The mere recollection of the clear and straightforward language of this commandment defuses anger's grasp. This is a common effect observed in all the commandments found in the Gospel. The Lord's initial words target anger as a primary sinful affliction, a significant passion that stands in opposition to the two fundamental virtues: love for one's neighbor and humility. The entire structure of Christian endeavor is built upon these virtues. Allowing the passion of anger to take root in a person diminishes their potential for spiritual growth.

Anonymous Commentary (Opus Imperfectum)

4th centuryCommentator

The fulfillment of the law became advantageous in accordance with the way of living. Christ, by His actions and teachings, completed the law rather than nullifying it. The command of Christ does not contradict the law; rather, it encompasses and surpasses it. While the commandments of Christ contain the essence of the law, the law does not fully encapsulate the commandments of Christ. Therefore, one who adheres to the commandments of Christ inadvertently upholds the law itself. A person who refrains from anger will not resort to murder, whereas merely following the law does not guarantee adherence to Christ's command. It is possible for someone to avoid killing out of fear of consequences but still harbor resentment.

Read more (271 words)

Thus, it is evident that grace leads to the fulfillment of the law rather than its abolition. Moreover, without the commands of Christ, the law's commandments lack substance; if anger begets anger, it creates an environment for violence, as murder arises from wrath. If anger is extinguished, murder cannot occur. Those who harbor baseless anger may desire to commit murder even if they do not act on that impulse out of fear. Therefore, while the sorrow caused by wrath may not equate to the gravity of murder, the wrongdoing of the angry individual bears significant weight. John articulates this in his epistle: "Anyone who hates his brother is a murderer" (1 John 3:15). Witness the wisdom of Christ: He desires to reveal Himself as God, who once communicated through the law and now provides commands through grace. The command He established initially in the law states, "Thou shalt not kill" (Ex. 20:13). Thus, He begins with the matter of killing, illustrating the unity of His commandments and affirming His role as the source of both law and grace. "Whosoever angers his brother without reason shall be subject to judgment." Consequently, one who does not indulge in unmerited anger bears no guilt. Without anger, there would be no requirement for instruction, judgment, or punishment for offenses. Righteous anger serves as the foundation of instruction. If those who express anger have just cause, they do not sin; in fact, they would be culpable for their inaction should they fail to express justified anger. Indifference sows folly, fosters negligence, and drives both the wicked and the righteous towards evil. Anger, when warranted, becomes discernment.

Peter Chrysologus

5th centuryCommentator

Whoever addresses his brother with the term 'Raca' risks facing judgment by the Sanhedrin. This term, dear brethren, is more than just a word; it embodies derision and insult, often conveyed through subtle gestures—like a glance, a wrinkled nose, or a harsh throat sound—intended to offend while obscuring the provocateur's identity. Yet, the Lord, who discerns our motives, understands our desires, and evaluates our emotions, brings the individual who derides his brother before the assembly of the saints as a defendant. By scornfully targeting one, he wrongs all, as the plight of one member affects the entire body, elevating the sorrow experienced to the head.

Read more (154 words)

Thus, the scorn that the mocker directed toward a brother will return to him, manifesting in regret before the heavenly court for having transgressed against God Himself. Likewise, one who calls another 'fool' faces the fiery judgment of Gehenna. The anger that simmers within the heart, the disdain that lurks in the throat, and the words that erupt in fury all amount to declarations of guilt, leading to immediate condemnation to the fires of Gehenna. While concealed transgressions await the Savior’s judgment to reveal the reasons behind them, overt offenses are clearly deserving of punishment. One might question the extent of the word’s influence, pondering how severe a penalty is warranted for one who calls his brother 'fool.' It is indeed powerful, dear friends, because Christ resides in our brethren, and in Christ dwells the Wisdom of God. Thus, when someone labels a brother 'fool,' he accuses the Wisdom of God itself of folly.

Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity

19th centuryCommentator

I assure you that anyone harboring anger toward a brother or any person, recognizing that we are all children of the same Heavenly Father and brothers to one another, will face judgment. St. John Chrysostom poses a question: Who has acknowledged the fullness of power? Prophets, the righteous, or patriarchs have never claimed this. They merely communicated God's words. However, the Son of God articulates His will as the ultimate Lord and Lawgiver: “And I say unto you.” What is this teaching? He does not permit you to feel unjustified anger toward your brother. There is indeed a righteous anger that arises in response to sin, a fervent dislike for vice that harms humanity, driven by a zeal for God's honor.

Read more (850 words)

Even God is displeased with sinners; Christ, our Savior, exhibited righteous anger toward the Pharisees' hypocrisy and expelled the merchants from the temple. St. John Chrysostom reminds us of the constructive anger of the Apostle Paul, which rescued the Corinthians from impending danger. A father who remains passive in the face of his children's wrongdoing sins, just as a leader who fails to assert discipline against their subordinates' defiance. Yet this is not the anger our Lord warns against here; He denounces fruitless anger, anger without a reason, and anger that stems from self-interest, pride, or envy toward others. To those struggling with such feelings, we echo St. Basil the Great’s wisdom: “Be angry at your own failings, not at your neighbor.” Bear in mind that Christ condemns this misplaced anger as severely as murder was condemned in the Old Testament. The Apostle affirms: Anyone who harbors hatred for a brother is a murderer (1 John 3:15).

We must consider St. Chrysostom's inquiry: Are the commandments against anger and murder conflicting? Clearly, the first complements the latter. One who controls their anger will not act violently. It’s evident that Christ does not abolish the Old Law; instead, He reinforces it. Thus, according to His teachings, anyone who experiences unjust anger toward a brother is already culpable before the judgment, even if they have yet to express that anger outwardly. This sin is known only to the heart, and when the Lord states, “He is subject to judgment,” it is understood that he will face consequences at death and experience torment at the separation of soul and body. If one does not promptly discard the initial stirrings of anger from their heart, it will take root, leading to the sin of anger erupting into disrespectful words, and for this, he will face severe punishment. Whoever calls his brother "Raca" (empty-headed) is subject to the judgment of the Sanhedrin. St. John Chrysostom notes that "Raca" is not an egregious offense; it conveys mere contempt or disrespect. Yet, even for this, the Lord will impose strict penalties. The court mentioned among the Jews consisted of three judges; the Sanhedrin, composed of seventy-two elders led by the high priest, was the supreme court, where blasphemers and serious offenders faced their verdicts, including the death sentence. Thus, many biblical interpreters relate the Sanhedrin to the Final Judgment of Christ, where the twelve apostles will judge the twelve tribes of Israel, as the Lord has promised.

Moreover, the Lord sternly utters judgment upon those who insult their neighbors with arrogant disdain: “AND WHOEVER SAYS, ‘FOOL,’ (ungodly or unscrupulous), that reviler is subject to the fires of hell.” Therefore, Christ teaches us that one can kill through mere words, condemning all acts of dishonor and insult against a neighbor under the commandment “Thou shalt not kill.” St. Chrysostom observes how Christ methodically escalates the severity of punishments. As if defending His position, He illustrates that He does not wish to issue such threats but that human transgressions compel Him to do so. “I instructed you, He says, to avoid empty anger as it brings guilt before judgment. You ignored My words; see what results your anger has borne. It led you to insult your brother with ‘Raca,’ and for that, I place you under the judgment of the heavenly assembly. Yet, if you do not repent, I will subject you to the eternal suffering of hell, to deter you from committing murder. Swearing is a grave offense; thus, do not trivialize calling another person insane. Such actions strip your brother of his inherent dignity and rational nature, which distinctly elevate us above beasts, thereby removing his nobility. Do not think there is exaggeration in Christ's statements; rather, admire their humility. God desires above all that we live in harmony and love. Jesus Christ relentlessly combats anything that threatens that love, as taught by St. John Chrysostom.

When the Lord says, “Thou shalt not kill,” He forbids willful killing and anger against a neighbor, but He does not prohibit defending one’s homeland against enemies or wrongdoers. Military service exemplifies love for our neighbor, fulfilling Christ's command: “Greater love has no one than this, than to lay down one’s life for one’s friends” (John 15:13). It is not a sin to reprimand wrongdoers. The Apostle Paul clearly states that rulers appointed by God hold the sword to instill fear in evildoers (Rom. 13:4). St. Chrysostom asks: If the wicked were allowed to exist without consequence, would not chaos fill our cities, trades, homes, lands, and seas with countless atrocities? This is evident to all. Even now, under strict laws, evil is scarcely contained. What calamities would arise if there were no accountability? Not only does such cruelty befall the wicked when they act freely, but also upon innocent individuals left defenseless. Humanity necessitates that the innocent be rescued from the hands of wrongdoers, and that the latter be restrained to prevent harm to others. The Jews believed they could present sacrifices to God while nursing anger in their hearts against their neighbors. What does the Savior say to them?

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryCommentator

In Matthew 5:20-22, Jesus Christ illustrates the inadequacy of righteousness derived from adherence to the Old Testament commandments by contrasting the true intent of the law with its superficial observance. He acknowledges the commandments without dismissing them, emphasizing their foundation in the fundamental principle of love. This principle teaches that even unjustified anger is subject to judgment, and casting condemnation upon a beloved individual leads to suffering in Gehenna. One should be angry but refrain from sinning. Gehenna, derived from Gehenom in Judah, takes its name from the valley north of Jerusalem, associated with its former inhabitants, the sons of Ennom. In the era of idolatrous kings, an altar for Moloch was erected there, where children were sacrificed.

Read more (54 words)

Eventually, it became a dumping ground for refuse and carcasses, with fires perpetually burning to eradicate the foulness of decaying bodies, similar to practices in many Eastern and Southern cities today. The flames, the foul odor, the smoke, and the desperate sounds of predatory animals rendered this location a vivid representation of eternal agony.

Jewgenij A. Popow

19th centuryCommentator

The Savior stated: "Whosoever shall say unto his brother, 'Rakah' (meaning an empty or worthless individual): he shall be guilty of a host” (Matt. 5:22). It is important to differentiate between mere words and slanderous remarks; genuine speech does not simply report a particular shameful action to a neighbor, but involves general terms or gestures that carry an abusive connotation. Primarily, this relates to backbiting, which should not be equated with swearing. For instance, when one speaks of another in a derogatory manner, particularly in front of others, it implies a number of dishonorable actions. Using terms like "unscrupulous" or "desperate" is far worse; such labels strip away a person's hope for integrity and righteousness.

Read more (400 words)

Thus, the final term carries a grave warning of “Gehenna” fire, representing not a fleeting punishment but an eternal one.

Engaging in swearing, such as "by the cattle" or invoking the name of livestock, strips a person of reason and dignity, reducing them to a state comparable to the voiceless. Such expressions are seen as personal slights, even when directed at one’s wife, parents, or children. It may seem excessive to deem a single swear word as a serious offense according to God’s word, yet unjust personal insults like "unconscionable" indicate a complete abandonment of love for one's neighbor. When brotherly love diminishes, all good relations with others falter; enmity breeds all manner of sins, including theft, slander, and murder, while sincere love embodies the "fulfillment of the law" (Rom. 13:9). The prevalence of swearing, which signifies a decline in love, will escalate alongside other vices as the end times approach (2 Pet. 3:3).

Moreover, even as Scripture strongly condemns a single instance of swearing against a neighbor, it is alarming how casually many insult others using derogatory terms like “scoundrel,” “unscrupulous,” “beast,” or “villain”—even within the family. The only factor that seems to lessen the severity of such offenses, or diminish the fear of repercussions, is that many utter these insults not out of true malice, but rather in fleeting moments of anger or as a habitual reaction. Additionally, a written insult, if the letter reaches the offended party directly, is also considered a personal attack; rather than being heard, the neighbor experiences the offense visually. Such written utterances, conveying the same meaning as spoken insults, carry an even greater degree of culpability, for the pen moves with more intention and deliberation than the tongue, and a letter can be withheld prior to sending.

A unique form of insult arises when symbols or images are employed with the intent to disgrace another's reputation. This too constitutes both brazen and cruel personal affronts. For instance, breaking someone’s windows or daubing tar on their gate exemplifies such offenses. Dear reader, resist the urge, even in moments of intense anger, to express abusive sentiments towards anyone. A truly noble person expresses anger in a manner that remains respectful and devoid of coarse or abusive language. In regard to the dishonorable marks cast upon your neighbor, which serve to publicly humiliate them, your spirit should never tolerate such a low standard of behavior.

Kochomski S.W.

19th centuryCommentator

But I tell you that anyone who harbors anger toward a fellow believer is subject to judgment unnecessarily. There exists an anger that derives from a passionate devotion to God’s glory and the genuine welfare of others, as seen in John 2:15 and Mark 3:5. However, the anger being referenced here is vain anger, rooted in selfishness, which seeks to bring shame and harm to another. He who calls his brother “Raca,” meaning empty-headed, is liable to the high court. It is important to note that the Jews had three different levels of courts: 1) in every town, there was a tribunal of three; 2) in larger cities, a court of 23 known as the small Sanhedrin; 3) in Jerusalem, the great Sanhedrin operated as the supreme council for the most significant matters.

Read more (262 words)

According to the Lord’s teaching, expressing anger through words of disdain and carelessness amounts to a severe sin deserving of the highest court, the Sanhedrin, in relation to other courts. How should we interpret this, knowing that both anger and malice are equally assessed in God’s judgment? The Lord mentions both lower and higher courts to illustrate the varying severity of sins, using imagery familiar to the Jewish context. And whoever speaks ill of his brother will be liable to the fiery Gehenna. Here, the focus is not on the court’s role but on the consequence: the flames of Gehenna. This punishment is certainly applicable to one who expresses baseless anger, particularly when it is accompanied by a defiant remark. Initially, the Lord points to the judgment's severity concerning the sin of anger, intending to emphasize the weight of His call to repentance toward the conclusion. Nonetheless, a person who uses contemptuous words reflects the highest level of disdain for his neighbor and is thus subject to the greatest torment of Gehenna, compared to someone merely feeling angry or expressing that anger in a less hurtful manner. Gehenna, in its original sense, refers to the valley of Hinnom, as referenced in Numbers 15:8, which under evil rulers became a site for idol worship to Moloch, where young men were made to pass through fire and infants sacrificed, as stated in Jeremiah 7:31. It became a symbol of horror after idolatry was abandoned (cf. 2 Samuel 23:10), and by the time of Christ, it had come to represent a place of eternal punishment.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

Christ, the ultimate lawgiver, affirms that He possesses authority distinct from that of the scribes and Pharisees (Matt. 7:29). Consider the perfection of His authority and the manner of His actions that are fitting for a lawgiver. Who among the prophets spoke with such authority? Who among the righteous or the patriarchs? None. While they proclaimed, "These things saith the Lord," the Son spoke differently. They offered laws to others like themselves – to fellow slaves (Chrysostom). There exists a type of righteous anger, one that is justified when it confronts sin, injustice, or wrongdoing and arises from a fervent desire for God's glory and the salvation of others. Even God becomes angry with sinners, and Christ expressed His wrath towards the hypocritical Pharisees (Mark 3:5).

Read more (561 words)

However, we are not speaking of such justified anger, but rather of anger without cause, baseless and self-driven—anger that is not rooted in love for truth and righteousness. “If one becomes angry justly, for the sake of edification and spiritual zeal, he shall not be condemned” (Theophylact).

This applies to all people, as we are all brothers and sisters created by the same heavenly Father (Heb. 2:11 ff.). Just as someone who kills unintentionally is held accountable under the Old Testament Law (Heb. 11:11, 11), so too is every individual in the New Testament held to a higher standard. This standard is one that judges the heart and thoughts of a person who is not kind to his neighbor. It is clear that one who refrains from anger is indeed more righteous than one who refrains from killing; even unintentional harm is lesser than the state of one's heart.

Whoever says “raca” is guilty. The term “raca” represents a term of contempt, expressing disdain toward another as worthless, demonstrating the speaker's anger. Those who utter such words are held accountable by the Sanhedrin. The Sanhedrin was the highest Jewish court in Jerusalem, composed of 72 members, with the high priest serving as its president. They were responsible for severe matters within the community. Before Roman control, they held the ultimate power over life and death, but after the conquest of Judea, they could only declare death sentences with the Roman governor's approval.

Calling someone "raca" represents a greater offense than mere anger because it reveals the speaker’s inability to contain their anger and results in the slander of their neighbor's reputation and dignity, a serious infraction against the law. To call someone “fool” reflects not only a lack of wisdom but also a manifestation of ungodliness. Those indulging in vices are often labeled as foolish (Hab. 7:15; Ps. 13:1). To unjustly accuse a neighbor in this way shows malice and pride.

Gehenna of fire refers to the valley of Hinnom, once a beautiful area south-west of Jerusalem, characterized by a stream and greenery. In times of idolatry, it became associated with reprehensible acts, such as the worship of Molech where children were sacrificed in fire (4 Samuel 16:3; 2 Chronicles 28:3). In an attempt to drown out the cries of these children, loud noises and instruments were used during the horrifying rituals. After the Babylonian exile, the Jews’ revulsion towards idolatry turned against this place, leading it to become a site of refuse and executions. It became a foul and polluted area, always burning to cleanse it, thus symbolizing eternal punishment for the wicked.

Consequently, for unwarranted anger directed at a neighbor, one faces judgment; for using slanderous language, the Sanhedrin holds the offender accountable; and for malicious insults, the penalty is eternal fire in Gehenna. The language of judgment, Sanhedrin, and Gehenna serves to illustrate varying degrees of anger, indicating that pointless anger is a serious sin, swearing is even graver, and contemptuous insults merit eternal separation from God. “Some may regard this judgment as harsh and severe, but unjustly so. For who is not deserving of Gehenna when he strips his brother of reason? Apart from love, virtues cease to exist, just as love sustains them all. Thus, the one who insults and degrades others, abandoning love, rightly falls under the condemnation of Gehenna of fire” (Theophylact; cf. Chrysostom).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 39 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ἐγὼ
    egō
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. λέγω
    legō
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  4. ὑμῖν
    hymin
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  5. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  6. πᾶς
    pas
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  7. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. ὀργιζόμενος
    orgizomenos
    I irritate
    G3710 · ὀργίζω
  9. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  10. ἀδελφῷ
    adelphō
    a brother
    G80 · ἀδελφός
  11. αὐτοῦ
    autou
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  12. ἔνοχος
    enochos
    involved in
    G1777 · ἔνοχος
  13. ἔσται
    estai
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  14. τῇ
    tē
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  15. κρίσει
    krisei
    judging
    G2920 · κρίσις
  16. ὃς
    hos
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  17. δ᾽
    d
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  18. ἂν
    an
    an untranslatable word that makes a statement contingent
    G302 · ἄν
  19. εἴπῃ
    eipē
    to say
    G2036 · ἔπω, ἐρῶ, εἶπον
  20. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  21. ἀδελφῷ
    adelphō
    a brother
    G80 · ἀδελφός
  22. αὐτοῦ
    autou
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  23. Ῥακά
    rhaka
    empty
    G4469 · ῥακά
  24. ἔνοχος
    enochos
    involved in
    G1777 · ἔνοχος
  25. ἔσται
    estai
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  26. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  27. συνεδρίῳ
    synedriō
    a council
    G4892 · συνέδριον
  28. ὃς
    hos
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  29. δ᾽
    d
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  30. ἂν
    an
    an untranslatable word that makes a statement contingent
    G302 · ἄν
  31. εἴπῃ
    eipē
    to say
    G2036 · ἔπω, ἐρῶ, εἶπον
  32. Μωρέ
    mōre
    stupid
    G3474 · μωρός
  33. ἔνοχος
    enochos
    involved in
    G1777 · ἔνοχος
  34. ἔσται
    estai
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  35. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  36. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  37. γέενναν
    geennan
    Gehenna
    G1067 · γέεννα
  38. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  39. πυρός
    pyros
    fire
    G4442 · πῦρ