The Church Fathers on this verse

Psalm 7:1Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

The psalm of David, which he sung to the Lord, for the words of Chusi, the son of Jemini.

Douay-Rheims · Hebrew numbering, Septuagint numbering in brackets.

שִׁגָּי֗וֹן לְדָ֫וִ֥ד אֲשֶׁר־שָׁ֥ר לַיהוָ֑ה עַל־דִּבְרֵי־כ֝֗וּשׁ בֶּן־יְמִינִֽי׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

11 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 12 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

We ought to be sufficiently familiar with the Scriptures and historical accounts such that we do not need to analyze them in depth. However, due to the distractions of worldly concerns and indifference among some, it is essential to explore the themes of this psalm further. Thus, I urge you to pay close attention. What is this psalm about? It is addressed to David and sung to the Lord. Another interpreter (Aquila) refers to it as a psalm of ignorance for David (ψαλμμός ύπερ άγνοίας τω). A third source (Symmachus) mentions ignorance concerning David (άγννόημ τω Δαυίδ), while Aquila uses the term the Ethiopian instead of Husius. The current discussion remains unclear because of a lack of understanding of the background.

Read more (957 words)

Since our goal includes both correction and instruction, it is crucial to recount the event in detail.

First, let’s consider who Hushai, the son of the Jemenite, was and the message that prompted David’s psalm of praise to God. David had a son named Absalom, a defiant and reckless youth who rebelled against his father. He expelled David from his throne and claimed dominion over the realm, disregarding his lineage, upbringing, age, and all that had transpired beforehand. His insatiable desire for power led him to act more like a wild beast than a human, trampling on the very principles of nature and spreading chaos and fear. During this upheaval, the tenets of nature, societal norms, reverence for God, human compassion, and gratitude for one’s upbringing were all cast aside.

If he would not honor David as his father, he should have respected him for his age; if that respect was lacking, he should have regarded him as a benefactor; and even if this were not the case, he ought to have acknowledged that he had received no wrong from David. Yet overwhelmed by his ambition, he cast aside all sense of propriety and decency. As the noble David wandered as a fugitive in the wilderness, enduring the trials of exile, Absalom reveled in the privileges of kingship.

At such a time, as the armies rallied to Absalom and the cities submitted to this usurper, a man named Hushai, devoted and honorable, remained steadfast in his loyalty to David, regardless of the changing tides. Upon witnessing David’s plight, he tore his garments, covered himself with ashes, and wept deeply, expressing his sorrow through his tears. Hushai was not a fair-weather friend who aligned himself with those in power; he championed virtue, and thus his loyalty did not falter despite the turmoil. Recognizing Hushai’s heartfelt solidarity, David acknowledged his sincerity but emphasized the necessity of strategizing to navigate their dire situation.

David instructed Hushai to approach Absalom under pretense of loyalty, to discern his plans, and to render the counsel of Ahithophel ineffective. Ahithophel was well-versed in warfare and held considerable influence over Absalom, causing David great concern over his formidable capabilities. Accepting David’s counsel, Hushai set out, undeterred by any cowardice or dishonor that such an undertaking might imply. He placed his trust in God, ready to face potential dangers.

I recount all of this not merely to commend David but to highlight the afflictions he endured and the valuable lessons to be gained from this narrative. Questions often arise about why the righteous endure hardship while the wicked exist in ease. This scenario illustrates that the righteous may suffer grievously while the unjust thrive. Nonetheless, neither party's condition ultimately defines their worth, for the righteous are refined by suffering, akin to gold in a furnace.

From this, we learn several truths: first, do not let such tribulations trouble you, especially when they befall the righteous; second, maintain steadfastness in friendships despite changing circumstances; third, be courageous in facing dangers for the sake of virtue; and fourth, amid adversity, cling to hope, awaiting divine assistance. Hushai did not allow the sight of Absalom's forces or the tyrant’s might to dissuade him; instead, he focused solely on God’s unyielding support and His favor, reasoning that the opposing side was unjust while he upheld what was right.

Thus, positioned not among the multitude, but within the sanctum of virtue, Hushai became a recipient of God’s grace. I share this so that we may stand in solidarity with the righteous, however weak they may appear, and disassociate ourselves from the wicked, however powerful they may seem. For while vice may gather the world on its side, it is the weakest of all; yet virtue, even in solitude, stands the strongest, bolstered by God. Indeed, who can save anyone against whom God acts? Who can undo the one whom God supports?

With this understanding and unwavering hope, Hushai proceeded to fulfill his mission, and upon encountering Absalom, he approached him without fear. The tyrant, blinded by his power, dismissed any suspicion and derisively questioned Hushai: “Why did you not go with your friend?” (2 Kings 16:17), failing to even mention David’s name in his disdain. Hushai, unfazed, replied, “When God was with him, I was on his side; but now that He is with you, I shall serve you.” This response flattered the pride of Absalom, enabling Hushai to gain favor quickly.

Thus did God orchestrate the course of events. When a council was convened to deliberate war strategies, various opinions were proposed regarding an immediate attack or a more patient approach. Ahithophel, ever the shrewd advisor, suggested striking while David was weary and demoralized. However, Absalom sought Hushai's counsel, despite his recent appearance, and, as I previously noted, God can turn the seemingly impossible into the plausible.

Without outright denying Ahithophel's wisdom, Hushai acknowledged it but crafted a counter-argument by expressing astonishment at the current counsel’s lack of effectiveness. He warned that an immediate assault would provoke David, causing him to fight fiercely for his life, whereas a delay would allow a more strategic attack. Absalom accepted this reasoning, viewing it as more advantageous. Meanwhile, Hushai’s true intent was to provide David with time to regroup and gather allies.

Ultimately, Hushai managed to inform David of the tyrant’s plans, ensuring that David could prepare accordingly, which led to Absalom’s defeat. Ahithophel, realizing the ramifications of his advice and the danger it posed to Absalom, could not bear the disgrace and tragically took his own life.

Having learned these events, David composed this psalm, giving expression to his gratitude to God and attributing his triumph to divine intervention. He begins with, “O Lord my God, in Thee I put my trust.”

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

The narrative that gives rise to this prophecy can be readily located in the second book of Kings. In this account, Hushai, a companion of King David, chose to ally himself with David's son Absalom, who was waging war against his father. Hushai aimed to gather intelligence on Absalom's schemes, which were influenced by Ahithophel, who had turned away from his loyalty to David and was advising Absalom in his rebellion. However, it is not merely the historical context that should be emphasized in the psalm; the prophet has obscured it with ceremonial regulations. If we are to transition to Christ, let us remove this veil.

The narrative that inspired this prophecy can be clearly identified in the second book of Kings. In 2 Samuel 15:34-37, Hushai, a loyal companion of King David, chose to ally himself with his son Absalom, who was waging war against his father. His intent was to uncover and relay Absalom's plans, which had been instigated by Ahithophel, a once-loyal advisor who had turned against David. However, this psalm is not primarily focused on the historical account itself. Instead, as the prophet uncovers deeper truths, we should also move to Christ, allowing the veil to be lifted (2 Cor. 3:16).

Read more (463 words)

We begin by exploring the meanings of the names mentioned, as there are interpreters who, examining these terms not purely in a literal sense but spiritually, convey that Hushai signifies silence, Jeminias denotes righteousness, and Ahithophel represents the downfall of a brother. Among these interpretations, we discern the presence of Judas the betrayer, bearing a likeness to Absalom, in that he was perceived as a semblance of peace from his father, even while harboring treachery in his heart, as noted in the third Psalm. The Gospels, which refer to the disciples of Christ as sons (Matthew 9:15), also call them brothers. After His resurrection, the Lord instructed, "Go and tell My brethren" (John 20:17). The Apostle refers to Him as the Firstborn among many brethren, making the fate of the betraying disciple understandable as that of a brother, resonating with the meaning of Ahithophel.

Considering Hushai's meaning of silence, it reveals how our Lord contended against this deceit in quietude, veiling the deepest mysteries, which led to a partial hardening of Israel (Rom. 11:25), whilst allowing the fullness of the Gentiles to enter, thus ensuring the salvation of all Israel. Upon comprehending such profound mysteries, the Apostle marvels at the depth of God’s wisdom and knowledge, exclaiming the inexplicability of His judgments and the unfathomability of His ways (Rom. 11:33-34). His profound silence is not merely subject to elucidation but is filled with awe.

In this profound silence, the Lord, while concealing the mystery of His admirable suffering and the voluntary destruction of His brother—symbolizing the wickedness of the betrayer—transposes it into a testament of mercy and Providence. What was intended for the downfall of one man is orchestrated by divine intervention for the salvation of all. The soul, contemplative of the divine mystery, sings a psalm to the Lord, reflecting the understanding of Hushai’s message, revealing the hidden truths amidst unbelievers and adversaries. Among His own, to whom He has declared, "I no longer call you servants... but I have called you friends; for all that I have heard from My Father I have made known to you" (John 15:15), there exists no silence, but rather the essence of silence is unveiled.

The one who is silent, Hushai, is recognized as the son of the Twins, or the esteemed right-hand man. The actions taken for the saints cannot be kept from their understanding, yet He advises that "Let the left hand not know what the right hand is doing" (Matt. 6:3). The perfected soul, to whom this divine mystery is disclosed, prophesies the knowledge embodied in Hushai’s words, reflecting on the secret work that God, at her right hand, has accomplished in her favor. Hence, this silence is representative of the Son of the right hand, symbolically Hushi, the son of Jeminias.

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

The title of the seventh psalm appears to present a discrepancy with the accounts found in the books of Kings, particularly regarding David's companion, Hushai. While the narrative mentions Hushai, noted as David's close ally (see 2 Sam. 15:32), the text refers to him as Hushai, the son of Iemenian. However, it is clear that this Hushai is not identified as the son of Jemeniyon, and there is no other Hushai mentioned in those accounts. It raises the question of whether he was designated the son of Iemenian due to his notable bravery and valor, especially when he approached Absalom under the pretense of friendship and successfully thwarted the counsel of Ahithophel, who had offered strategies suitable only for a seasoned warrior.

Read more (285 words)

In this context, the term son of Jemenite signifies the son of the right hand. When Ahithophel urged an immediate attack on David, who was unprepared, Hushai opposed this counsel. He believed, as it is recorded, that the Lord would bring calamity upon Absalom (2 Sam. 17:14). Conversely, to buy David some time to assemble his forces, Hushai argued for a delay, which pleased Absalom, leading him to declare that Hushai's advice was superior to that of Ahithophel (2 Sam. 17:14). Furthermore, through the priests Sadok and Abiathar, Hushai informed David of Absalom’s commands, advising him not to spend the night in the wilderness of Aravoth but to hasten his escape. His wise counsel earned him a reputation as David's right hand, which is why he was acknowledged as the son of Jemen, or the son of the right hand. The scriptures typically name the wicked more by their sins than by their lineage, while the virtuous are often identified by the qualities that define them. For instance, the Apostle Paul refers to the devil as the son of perdition, stating that the man of lawlessness will be revealed as such (2 Thess. 2:3). In the Gospel, the Lord labels Judas as the son of perdition, saying that none shall be lost except for him (John 17:12). He also designates those skilled in theology as children of wisdom, declaring that wisdom shall be vindicated by her offspring (Matt. 11:19). Additionally, He mentions the son of peace when referring to certain individuals (Luke 10:6). Thus, it is not surprising that the earthly father of David's first companion remains unmentioned; instead, he is recognized as the son of the right hand, a title earned through his deeds.

Gregory of Nyssa

4th centuryChurch Father

As if risen anew, Absalom gathers forces for war, yet through our discernment—better said, God’s aid—the one who seeks our demise is sent fleeing. The prophet acknowledges that the positive outcome stemming from Hushai's counsel is indeed a gift from God and expresses gratitude for this. However, it would be unnecessary to recount the tale of how Hushai, a loyal servant of David, infiltrated Absalom’s circle and gained greater trust from the usurper than the strategies of Ahithophel. It warrants our contemplation to draw parallels between virtuous living and the enigmatic aspects of history: why is it that a perspective which brings salvation to us becomes a constricting force against our enemies? This redemptive viewpoint is articulated in both historical accounts and psalms.

Read more (79 words)

Let us then focus on an idea that ultimately brings destruction to those who offer misleading counsel. What is this notion? It is to associate the inception of wickedness with vice and to visit retribution upon its instigator. For David recognizes his own unworthiness to escape dire trials and resolves that if he responds to wrongs with further wrongdoings, he justly invites his own punishment, thereby repaying the injustices he has suffered with the very actions he has endured.

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

Hushai, the closest ally of David, was dispatched by him to Absalom to thwart the counsel of Ahithophel, who advised against David. Upon leaving David, Hushai feigned allegiance to Absalom. When Absalom sought guidance from both him and Ahithophel, and Ahithophel suggested attacking David, Hushai responded, "No; we should not pursue a skilled warrior without adequate forces," effectively securing David's safety. In response to this divine deliverance, which appeared to come without human intervention, David offers a heartfelt song of praise to God, crediting all to His grace rather than to any human effort.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

Things are designated by names to facilitate their identification. Similarly, the psalms are titled so that their significance can be discerned from their headings. For instance, the fifth psalm is titled, "To the end, O ye that are heirs," while the sixth is titled, "To the end, in songs, of the eighth, a psalm of David." The fifth references "the heir," and the sixth mentions "the eighth." In the seventh psalm, which is also associated with "hallelujah," we find a connection to the sixth psalm, which we struggled to interpret due to illness. Today, we focus on the seventh psalm, which begins, "A Psalm of David, which he sang concerning the words of Hushai the son of Archit" (Psalm 7:1). Consider the mysteries within: is this written without purpose?

Read more (799 words)

The fifth references "the heir," the sixth mentions "the eighth," and the seventh refers to "the words of Hushai the son of Archit." Herein lies profound mystery.

The theme of "inheritance" is addressed in the fifth psalm, interpreted as a song for the Church that will inherit Christ. The sixth psalm specifically pertains to the proper resurrection of the Lord, celebrated on that eighth day. We see the significance of both the first and eighth days. The eighth day, following the Sabbath, heralds the coming of the Kingdom of Heaven. There is much to discuss regarding the number eight: Matthew’s Gospel includes eight beatitudes; Psalm 118 has eight verses corresponding to each letter of the Hebrew alphabet. The fifteen psalms known as songs of ascent reflect both seven and eight. Ecclesiastes advises, "Give part of the seventh and give part of the eighth" (Ecclesiastes 11:2). Ezekiel’s east gate had seven and eight steps (Ezekiel 40:22,31). David, too, the eighth son of Jesse, embodies this significance, as on the eighth day, we shall receive the kingdom of heaven. This understanding illuminates the psalmist's plea: "Lord, do not rebuke me in Your anger, nor chasten me in Your wrath" (Psalm 6:2). Since we cannot analyze the two psalms simultaneously, we will focus on the commencement of the sixth psalm today.

Let us now examine the beginning of the seventh psalm, which states, "A psalm of David, which he sang unto the Lord concerning Hushai the son of Archit." Many learned individuals have offered interpretations of this title. They assert that Absalom rebelled against his father David; please listen closely as we strive to interpret Scripture. In the midst of Absalom's rebellion, Hushai, a friend of David, chose to align himself with the king, yet David sent him back to thwart the advice of Ahithophel. When Ahithophel counseled Absalom to swiftly pursue an unsuspecting David and kill him, Hushai provided alternative guidance that undermined Ahithophel’s counsel. Hushai subsequently informed David of Absalom's plans, prompting David to prepare for flight. It was during this time of distress that David composed this psalm to the Lord, expressing gratitude for the thwarting of Ahithophel's advice. This explanation, while reasonable, requires careful examination of the texts, noting that this Hushai is called the son of Archit, whereas in the book of Kings, the name is presented differently: there it is written "Hushai" with a "Samekh," while here it appears with a "Sin." The name Hushai, son of Archit, is mistakenly read by some Greeks as "Hushai, the friend of David." However, the original text indicates it is "Hushai the son of Archit, a friend of David." This discrepancy clarifies that those Greek interpretations are flawed.

Thus, according to the principles of biblical interpretation, one must conclude that this Hushai is indeed the son of Archit. However, there is also a reference to him as the son of Jemini. If we have confirmed that Hushai is the son of Archit, we now ponder who Jemini is, seeking a deeper spiritual meaning. The name Jemini is likely derived from one of the twelve tribes, specifically Benjamin, which translates to "son of the right hand." Rachel, upon her passing at Ephrathah, named her son Benoni, meaning "son of my sorrow" (Gen. 35:18). Yet Jacob, her husband, changed the name to Benjamin, signifying "son of my right hand," or "son of virtue." Therefore, the name Benjamin combines the Hebrew words for "son" and "right hand": "ben" meaning "son" and "yamin" meaning "right hand."

The tribe of Benjamin is mentioned in the book of Kings, where it describes a man from Benjamin, the son of Kish (1 Sam. 9:1). Additionally, another passage illustrates an enemy of David from the house of Saul, who also belonged to the tribe of Benjamin (2 Sam. 16:7). This points to our conclusion regarding Jemini being linked to the tribe of Benjamin.

Having identified Benjamin and his paternal lineage, we now inquire about Hushai, son of Jemini. The term "Hus" in Hebrew translates to “Ethiopian,” relating to darkness in complexion, akin to the comparison in Jeremiah, "Does the Ethiopian change his skin and the leopard his spots?" (Jer. 13:23). David reflects that just as the Ethiopian cannot alter his skin, so too the heart remains unchanged. This ties back to David’s experience with Saul—despite the opportunity to take revenge, he desired to act with grace. He pens his heartfelt pleas, asking, "My Lord, my God, if I have done any harm; if I have repaid evil for evil." His words convey that he has responded to wickedness from his enemy not with malice, but rather with a spirit of good. Hence, it is evident that this psalm is directed against Saul, expressing David's gratitude towards God and imploring His assistance in protecting him from Saul’s wrath.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The blessed King David, in his flight from his rebellious son, encountered Hushai, who became a valuable ally. Hushai convinced Absalom to disregard Ahithophel's counsel, suggesting instead that he should first rally the people before turning against his father. Distressed and deeply hurt that Hushai's advice was preferred over his own, Ahithophel despaired and took his own life. Seizing this opportunity presented by the delay in the conflict, the divinely protected David was able to escape and secure his safety. Consequently, this psalm serves as both a song and a prayer directed towards God, the Savior. It also offers guidance to those who are wronged, encouraging them to trust in the Lord and look to Him for assistance, while also warning those who cause harm by reminding them of God's just judgment.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

The heading of this psalm aligns well with the accounts in the books of Kings, particularly 2 Samuel 17, where the actions of David are documented. In those passages, Hushai is also mentioned, but he is identified as the son of Arachiah rather than Jemena. However, this apparent inconsistency can be reconciled by considering that Hushai may have had dual names or that he later adopted the title son of Iemenian. This Hushai, son of Arachiah and a supporter of David, feigned betrayal by joining Absalom during his revolt against his father. His allegiance to Absalom was motivated by a desire to undermine the strategies of Ahithophel, a skilled advisor to Absalom, in which he successfully managed to do.

Read more (233 words)

In opposition to Ahithophel’s counsel, Hushai worked to sway Absalom away from swift action against David, thereby granting the fleeing king a chance to flee and regroup, as narrated extensively in the accounts of Kings. Hushai was thus honored with the designation son of Jehoiakim, which translates to ‘the son of the right hand.’ In Scripture, names often reflect the character or status of individuals, so terms like ‘the son of peace’ or ‘the child of wisdom’ illustrate this practice; similarly, this individual is referred to as ‘the son of the right hand,’ indicating his righteousness and his close, supportive relationship with his friend. Notably, the inscription refers to "the words of Hushai," yet throughout the psalm, David makes no mention of Hushai at all. This raises the question of how this inscription correlates with the psalm itself. It is important to remember that the prophet composed this psalm as he repented for having relied on Hushai’s clever advice in devising a scheme to deceive Absalom and undermine Ahithophel’s counsel. Therefore, he did not sing it to celebrate the victory of the conflict, which he owed to Hushai’s guile, but instead lamented that he had, while trusting in God, placed his confidence in Hushai’s counsel and even sent him to Absalom. Thus, this psalm serves as a plea for mercy, in which the prophet seeks to regain God's favor and earn His assistance.

Irenaeus (Klementjewsky)

18th centuryCommentator

INSCRIPTION AND CONTENTS. A Psalm of David, which he sang to the Lord regarding the words of Hushai, the son of the Jemenite. The scholars differ on the identity of this Hushai. Augustine and others identify him as the son of Arachin, who, as mentioned in the second book of Kings, chapter 16, conveyed to David the counsel given by Ahithophel to Absalom. However, in the Hebrew texts, the name Husijah the Arachite is spelled with the letter het, whereas the individual referred to in this psalm is spelled with the letter kaph.

Read more (237 words)

It remains uncertain whether Hushai the Arachite was the son of Jemen, and David, in this psalm, appears to reflect upon the slander of a certain son of Jemen, as indicated by his words, "If I have done these things." Yet, Hushai the Arachite did not speak any slander against David; rather, he brought news of Ahithophel's treachery. Jerome interprets this inscription to reference Saul, whom he calls Hushai, an Ephraimite, noting the gravity of his character. He spoke to David, as recorded in the first book of Kings, chapter 22, addressing his young men who stood before him, "There is no one among you who is sorrowful for me, for my son, my servant, has raised an adversary against me, as is evident today." Jerome suggests that David reflects upon this slander in this psalm. Similarly, we could argue that Hushai, mentioned here, is Shimei, the son of Gera, who, as David fled from Absalom, hurled these insults: "Get out, get out, you man of bloodshed, you worthless man! The Lord has returned upon you all the blood of the house of Saul, in whose place you have reigned" (2 Samuel 16:7-8). In response to such base and erroneous slander, it seems probable that David composed this psalm, imploring God to safeguard his innocence and truth. In a profound sense, this reflects the countenance of Christ and every righteous person, beset by enemies who accuse him.

Ireneus (Orda)

19th centuryCommentator

The term "Shiggayon," derived from Hebrew, is interpreted by some as a reflection on delusion or a song that addresses errors, particularly those of adversaries, as referenced in Habakkuk 3:1. Others may refer to it as a lament or a dithyramb. This psalm is attributed to David. Saul publicly accused David of conspiring against him, as seen in 1 Samuel 22:7-13, suggesting that he harbored ill will despite David's love for him. Such remarks, according to Saul, were indicative of wickedness. The mention of Hushai likely refers to an unnamed Benjamite, the son of Jeminiah (1 Samuel 9:1), known as Cush. Jerome noted that this entire psalm is composed against Saul, calling him Cush to signify his violent and brutal nature, paralleling the description found in Jeremiah 13:23. Many ancient interpreters, however, cited verses 15-17 without solid grounding. Nonetheless, figures such as Hushai the Archite or Shimei do not fit into this context.

Psalter with Commentaries (Cave Monastery in Kiew)

19th centuryCommentator

Hushai, a steadfast companion of King David, feigned betrayal as he left David's side and went to the camp of Absalom, the usurper who had revolted against his father. Acting as a wise advisor, he astutely suggested postponing the pursuit of David. This counsel allowed David to regroup and muster an army, as noted in 2 Samuel 17. In gratitude, David composed a hymn of praise to God, recognizing that the deliverance came through divine grace. He encourages those who face wrongdoing to place their trust in God and look for His assistance.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.