The Church Fathers on this verse

1 Corinthians 14:27Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

If any speak with a tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and in course: and let one interpret.

Douay-Rheims

ειτε γλωσση τις λαλει κατα δυο η το πλειστον τρεις και ανα μερος και εις διερμηνευετω

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

8 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

What are you saying? After saying so much about the gift of tongues, that it is unprofitable and superfluous if there is no interpreter, do you again command speaking in tongues?

I do not command it, he says, but neither do I forbid it. When he says, "If one of the unbelievers invites you, and you desire to go" (1 Cor 10:27), he does not command them to go, but neither does he restrain them.

So also here. "Let him speak to himself and to God." If you cannot be silent, he says, and if you are so ambitious and vainglorious, then speak to yourself.

By this permission he forbids all the more, because he puts him to shame. He does the same elsewhere when he speaks about relations with one's wife: "This is said because of your lack of self-control" (1 Cor 7:5-6).

Read more (230 words)

But he does not speak so about prophecy. How then? Imperatively and decisively: "If anyone speaks in an unknown tongue, let two speak, or at most three."

At the same time, he nowhere requires an interpreter and does not stop the mouth of the one prophesying. This differs from what he said there: "If there is no interpreter, let him keep silent."

One who speaks in tongues is insufficient by himself. Therefore, if someone has both gifts, let him speak. If he does not, but wishes to speak, let him do so with an interpreter.

The prophet also is an interpreter, but God's interpreter, while you are a human one. "But if there is no interpreter, let him keep silent." Nothing should be done in vain or from ambition.

"Let him speak to himself and to God," that is, in the mind, or secretly and without noise, if he wishes.

Here he does not command, but perhaps rather forbids through such permission. So also when he says, "If anyone is hungry, let him eat at home" (1 Cor 11:34), he seems to permit it, but by this he shames them more strongly.

You do not assemble, he says, in order to show that you have a gift, but in order to edify the hearers. As he also said at the beginning: "Let all things be for edification" (1 Cor 14:26).

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

I do not forbid speaking in tongues, but it must not be without interpretation. Let few speak in tongues, lest confusion and disorder arise. And let them do this separately, that is, in succession. But in every case there must be an interpreter.

Ambrosiaster

4th centuryChurch Father

Let them not occupy all the time by speaking in unknown tongues. And let the prophets not take time away from the Scriptures, which are the enlighteners of the whole Church.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

“If anyone speaks in a tongue, let it be by two, or at most by three, and in turn.” Do not carry on a common conversation, from which disorder and confusion arise. And let not many converse. Two are sufficient for this. Still, let the number of speakers be limited to three. “And let one interpret.” For those present must understand what is being said.

Kochomski S.W.

19th centuryChurch Father

Here the order is depicted which was fitting in apostolic times, but not in our own.

The Church then abounded in miraculous gifts, but the number of believers was still not great. Liturgical hymns and prayers were only just being composed, and the order of worship had not yet become definite.

Therefore an individual believer, sensing within himself the presence of the Spirit of God, was allowed to come forward with his own song or psalm, with his own revelation or instruction.

But what would happen in church in our time, if, amid the immense multitude of believers, each were allowed to sing his own song and deliver his own instruction?

Read more (130 words)

Even the Apostle Paul already had to limit the number of those wishing to speak in the church assembly. He writes: "Let two speak, or at most three, and each in turn" (v. 27), and, "Let two or three prophets speak" (v. 29).

In our time, speaking in church is entrusted only to people whose right-mindedness is beyond all doubt. They must also have permission for this from a representative of the Church, a bishop or priest.

Such an order is wholly fitting. It preserves from the disorder against which the Apostle warned the Corinthians (v. 33), and it contributes to the edification of the church assembly (v. 5).

But the Shtundists desire an order in which anyone could appear as the performer of divine service. This order is disorder.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

The rule for those speaking in foreign languages is this: few should speak, one after another, and only when there is an interpreter. Otherwise, they should keep silent.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Having shown the impropriety of disorder in church assemblies, the Apostle Paul gives rules for the use in church of the gift of tongues and the gift of prophecy.

As a general foundation for those who possess either gift, he sets forth the good goal of edifying one's neighbors. Apart from this, nothing should have a place in the Church.

In particular, he counsels those who possess the gift of tongues to use their gift in turn. They should do this only when it is possible to explain what is uttered in a foreign language.

Otherwise, one must only lift up to the Lord in one's mind what has been given by Him, as a gift for the prayer of mind and heart.

Read more (204 words)

The prophets also are advised to keep order. Only two or three may speak, one after another, while the others must attend to their words and partly consider whether they are from God (2 Cor 11:13).

When an extraordinary revelation is given to someone, he may speak. Then he must again yield the word to the one who was interrupted.

Thus, with the passage of time, all who have received the gift of inspired teaching may speak. Yet they may do so only in order.

Without observing order, concord, peace, and quiet are impossible. These are so necessary during prayer to the God of peace and love.

Thus the Apostle taught the Corinthians to pray. Thus also he taught others, in all the churches.

Presenting all the great wealth of the spiritual gifts mentioned here by the holy Apostle Paul, John Chrysostom says: "The Church then was heaven. The Spirit ordered everything among the people, guiding and inspiring each of those who presided. But now it is not so. I say this with regard not to gifts, but to life and virtue."

If Saint John Chrysostom spoke in this way, should we, the unworthy, be surprised that extraordinary gifts are not seen among us?

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

This does not mean that two or three may speak at once. Rather, in the whole assembly one may speak, then another, and at most a third. And this must not be all at once, but separately, one after another (Oecumenius).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 16 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Εἴτε
    eite
    and if
    G1535 · εἴτε
  2. γλώσσῃ
    glōssē
    the tongue
    G1100 · γλῶσσα
  3. τις
    tis
    any one
    G5100 · τις
  4. λαλεῖ
    lalei
    I speak
    G2980 · λαλέω
  5. κατὰ
    kata
    down from
    G2596 · κατά
  6. δύο
    dyo
    two
    G1417 · δύο
  7. ἢ
    ē
    or
    G2228 · ἤ
  8. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  9. πλεῖστον
    pleiston
    the greatest
    G4118 · πλεῖστος
  10. τρεῖς
    treis
    three
    G5140 · τρεῖς, τρία
  11. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  12. ἀνὰ
    ana
    and
    G303 · ἀνά
  13. μέρος
    meros
    a part
    G3313 · μέρος
  14. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  15. εἷς
    heis
    one
    G1520 · εἷς
  16. διερμηνευέτω
    diermēneuetō
    I translate
    G1329 · διερμηνεύω