Thus, when the Apostle said 'spiritual,' he meant either something of this kind, or that the body will be lighter, finer, and able even to be borne through the air. Or better, he meant both." Oecumenius and Theophylact say the same. Photius, in Oecumenius, interprets: "This mortal body of ours is natural because it serves the passions. The natural body will rise spiritual because it will no longer serve the passions. This applies not only to the righteous, but also to sinners." The seat of the passions, their support and instrument, is the body when the soul is not filled with the Spirit. Filled with the Spirit of God, the soul arms itself against the passions and drives them out of the body. Therefore spiritual is the same as passionless, and natural the same as passionate. Having listed and explained all these opposing features of the present and future body, St. Chrysostom adds: "If you do not believe what has been said, look at the heavenly bodies, so bright, unchanging, and never growing old. Believe that God can make corruptible bodies incorruptible, and far better than the visible ones." From this let us infer that, according to St. Chrysostom as well, the distinctions of bodies mentioned above were made only to show the superiority of heavenly bodies over earthly ones. In this he presents an image of the superiority of future bodies over present ones. "There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body." It is now read: "If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body." This adds neither clarity nor force to the thought. The Apostle could have stated this as a direct affirmation, and that is more intelligible. There is, that is, there can be, both a natural body and a spiritual body. To condition it by saying that, since there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual one, is not entirely fitting. Theophylact cites Origen's opinion that a spiritual body means an ethereal body, extremely fine, and a natural body means our coarse organism, heavy, immobile, and burdened with many needs. This too may be said, but it does not present a great difference from our understanding of the natural as passionate and the spiritual as passionless.