For Scripture delivers nothing of the kind to us. Rather, He Himself who will judge us says: “And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life” (Mt 25:46).
Again He says: “Those who have done good will come forth to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment” (Jn 5:29).
Thus no intermediate place remains at all. After He divided all who are judged into two parts, He placed some at His right hand and others at His left.
He called the first sheep and the second goats. He in no way showed that there are some who must be purified by that purifying fire.
It seems that the fire of which the Apostle speaks is the fire of which the prophet David says: “Before Him is a devouring fire, and around Him a mighty tempest” (Ps 49:3).
And again: “Fire goes before Him, and burns up His enemies round about” (Ps 96:3). The prophet Daniel also speaks of this fire: “A stream of fire issued and came forth before Him” (Dan 7:10).
Since the saints bring with them no evil deed or mark of evil, this fire will show them still more radiant. They will be like gold tested in the furnace.
They will also be like the stone amiantus. It is said that when placed in fire it appears charred, but when taken from the fire it becomes still cleaner, as though washed with water.
So also were the bodies of the holy Three Children in the furnace of Babylon.
But sinners bring evil with them. Since this is fit material for the fire, the fire will seize it and immediately kindle it.
It will burn their “work,” that is, their evil disposition or activity, their energia. It will utterly destroy it and deprive them of what they brought with them, namely, their evil burden.
Yet it will “save” them. That is, it will preserve and keep them forever, so that they are not destroyed together with their evil.
The divine Father Chrysostom, whom we call the “Mouth of Paul,” as Paul is the “Mouth of Christ,” deemed it necessary to give this interpretation of the Apostle’s saying when explaining the Epistle.
Paul speaks through Chrysostom, as was shown by the vision of Proclus, his disciple and successor on his throne.
Chrysostom devoted a special treatise to this single saying, so that the Origenists would not use these apostolic words to confirm their way of thinking.
They seem to suit them more than they suit you. Nor should they harm the Church by introducing an end to the torment of Hades and a final restoration, apokatastasis, of sinners.
For the expression that the sinner is “saved as through fire” means that he will remain tormented in fire and will not be destroyed with his evil deeds and his evil disposition of soul.
Basil the Great also says this in the Moralia, interpreting the Psalm verse, “The voice of the Lord dividing the flame of fire” (Ps 28:7).
“The fire prepared for the torment of the devil and his angels is divided by the voice of the Lord, so that thereafter there are two powers in it.
One power burns, and the other illumines. The tormenting and punitive power of that fire is kept for those worthy of torment.
The illuminating and enlightening power is appointed for the radiance of those who rejoice.
Therefore there is the voice of the Lord, cutting and dividing the flame of fire, so that the dark part may be a fire of torment, while the part that does not burn remains a light of delight.”
Thus, as it appears, this cutting and division of the fire will take place when all alike pass through it.
The works that are bright and shining will appear still brighter. Those who bring them will become heirs of the light and will receive that eternal reward.
Those who bring evil and easily burned works will be punished by the loss of them. Remaining eternally in the fire, they will inherit a salvation worse than destruction.
For, properly speaking, this is what “to be saved” signifies here: that the destructive power of the fire should not utterly destroy them also.
Following these Fathers, many others of our Teachers have understood this saying in the same sense.
If someone has interpreted it otherwise, understanding “salvation” as release from punishment and “passing through fire” as purgatory, then such a man, if one may say so, has understood the saying quite wrongly.
This is not surprising, for he is a man. Many of the Teachers also appear to interpret passages of Scripture differently, and not all have attained the precise meaning in equal measure.
It is impossible for the same text, when transmitted in different understandings, to correspond equally to all of them.
We must therefore choose the most important interpretations, and those more in accord with the dogmas of the Church. The remaining interpretations must be set in a secondary place.
Therefore we shall not depart from the interpretation of the Apostle’s words given above, even if Augustine, Gregory the Dialogist, or some other of our Teachers gave such an unsuitable interpretation.
Such an interpretation helps the notion of a temporary purifying fire less than it helps Origen’s teaching.
That teaching speaks of the final restoration of souls through that fire and of release from torment. It was forbidden and anathematized by the Fifth Ecumenical Council.
It was finally rejected as a common dishonor to the Church.