John Chrysostom
The benefactions of God are so great and so surpass every human expectation and hope that often they are not even believed. Indeed, God has granted us what the human mind neither conceived nor expected.
Therefore the apostles speak much about this, to awaken in us faith in the gifts bestowed on us by God. When we receive great blessings, we are brought to such a state that, not trusting ourselves, we say, “Is this not a dream?” So it is with the gifts of God.
What was there in them that was scarcely believable? That enemies, sinners, those who found justification neither in the law nor through works, should suddenly receive such privileges through faith alone.
Read more (820 words)
For this reason the apostle discusses this subject at length in the Epistle to the Romans, and also here. “Faithful,” he says, “and worthy of all acceptance is the saying, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am first.”
Since the Jews were especially drawn by this, he persuades them not to be attached to the law, because without faith it is impossible to be saved through it.
This is precisely what the apostle contends for, because it seemed incredible that a man, although he had spent his entire previous life idly and vainly and had wasted it on evil deeds, could afterward be saved through faith alone. Therefore he says: “Faithful is the saying.”
Some, however, not only did not believe, but reproached him, just as pagans do even now, saying, “Why not do evil that good may come?” (Rom 3:8). Since they had heard him say, “Where sin increased, grace abounded all the more” (Rom 5:20), they distorted our teaching and preached in this way.
In the same manner, when we speak with them about Gehenna, they object: How can this be worthy of God? If a man seizes his servant who has sinned against him in many ways, then releases his guilt and grants pardon, will God punish eternally?
Again, when we speak to them about the font of baptism and the forgiveness of sins through it, they object: Is it worthy of God that He forgive the sins of one who has committed countless crimes?
Do you see the corruption of their mind, how in everything it reveals its own passion for disputes? If the forgiveness of sins is evil, then punishment is good. Conversely, if punishment is not good, then the forgiveness of sins is good.
I speak this way in accordance with their opinion. According to our teaching, both are good. Why this is so, I will show at another time, since it is not possible to do so now.
This subject is deep and requires detailed investigation. In due time it must be presented to your love. For now, let us turn to the question before us.
“Faithful,” he says, “is the saying.” In what way is it faithful? This is clear from what precedes and from what follows. See how he first prepares his hearers, and then, having prepared them, proceeds to the investigation.
By saying that God had mercy on him, a blasphemer and persecutor, he intended to prepare them. And not only, he says, did He have mercy, but He also made me a believer. To such a degree, he says, it is impossible to doubt that He had mercy on me.
For no one who sees a prisoner living in royal chambers will doubt that he has received mercy. The same could be seen in Paul. Therefore he brings himself forward as proof.
He is not ashamed to call himself a sinner, but especially rejoices in it. For by this he could best show the great miracle of God’s care, and that he had been counted worthy of such great mercy.
Why, then, having said elsewhere of himself, “as to righteousness under the law, blameless” (Phil 3:6), does he here say that he is a sinner and the first of sinners?
Because, in comparison with the righteousness of which God has made us partakers and which truly must be sought, even those who were righteous in the law are sinners. “For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Rom 3:23).
Therefore he did not simply say, “as to righteousness,” but “as to righteousness under the law.” A man who has acquired much money may seem rich in himself. Yet, compared with royal treasures, he proves to be very poor and the first of the poor.
So here, compared with angels, men are sinners, even the righteous. If Paul, who performed righteousness according to the law, is the first sinner, then who else can be called righteous?
Therefore he speaks this way not in order to censure his life as disorderly. No. By comparing one righteousness with the other, the righteousness of the law with the righteousness of grace, he shows the insignificance of the former.
Nor does he say only this, but he also recognizes as sinners those who acquired righteousness under the law.
There is no humility in a sinner thinking himself a sinner. Humility consists in this: while being conscious of many great things in oneself, to think nothing great about oneself.
It means to be like Paul and, while able to say, “I know nothing against myself,” at the same time to say, “yet I am not thereby justified” (1 Cor 4:4). And again: “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am first” (1 Tim 1:15).
In this humility consists: when one who is exalted in merits humbles himself in mind.