John Chrysostom
After this, leaving aside the refutation of their teaching, since it had no importance except as a shadow and image of spiritual realities, he turns to something far more agreeable. What is this? He praises the law, calling the Decalogue law.
Yet he excludes the former ceremonial ordinances from the latter law. For if these commandments of the law punish transgressors and remain useless for us, much more do the former ceremonial ordinances.
“We know,” he says, “that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully, knowing that the law is not laid down for the righteous” (vv. 8-9). He says that the law is good and not good. How is this, you ask? Does it become not good because someone does not fulfill it as he should?
Read more (546 words)
Even then it remains good. But what he says has this meaning: if someone fulfills it in deed. The phrase, “if one uses it lawfully,” must be understood here in this way.
But when people explain it in words and transgress it in deed, this means not fulfilling it as one should. Such a person also fulfills it, but not to his own profit.
Still, something else may also be said about this. What is it? If you fulfill the law properly, it will lead you to Christ. For since the goal of the law is the justification of man, and yet it cannot accomplish this, it leads to Him who can.
One may also fulfill the law properly in another way, namely, when one keeps it from abundance. What does “from abundance” mean? Just as a horse is said to use the bridle properly when it neither leaps nor bites, but simply wears it as an adornment, so the one who lives chastely fulfills the law properly, not from necessity imposed by the letter.
Who, then, will fulfill it properly? The one who knows that he has no need of it. Whoever has attained such moral perfection that he fulfills the law not from fear of it, but for virtue alone, fulfills it rightly and without stumbling.
This happens when someone fulfills it as one who does not fear it, but rather looks with disapproval upon the punishments laid down in it. On the other hand, by “righteous” he here means the one who has already been perfected in virtue.
Therefore the one who fulfills the law well is the one who does not need its guidance. The first elements of letters are taught to children. Yet one who completes them not from them, but from other sources, gains greater experience in learning and uses knowledge much better.
So too, one who is above the law is no longer guided by the law. For whoever fulfills it not from fear, but from love of virtue, fulfills it much more perfectly.
Therefore the one who fears punishment and the one who seeks honor do not fulfill the law in the same way. Nor do the one who is under the law and the one who is above the law fulfill it alike.
To fulfill the law properly means to live better than the law prescribes. For the one who fulfills and keeps the law well is the one who does more than the law commands, and who does not need its guidance.
For the most part, the law forbids evil. Yet a man becomes righteous not by this, but by good works. Therefore those who refrain from evil deeds like slaves have not yet fulfilled the goal of the law. Thus it was appointed to punish transgression.
Accordingly, they too fulfill the law, but only because they fear punishment. “Do you wish not to fear the authority? Do what is good” (Rom 13:3). Thus one may say that the law foretells punishments only to the lawless.
But what benefit can the law bring to one who does works worthy of crowns? In the same way, a physician is useful to one who has wounds, not to the healthy, nor to one who is in good condition.