Ambrosiaster writes: “If the pastor of the people, the faithful, neglects this, reading and the rest, then he neglects the grace given to him. For he is made the guide of the people so that he may care for their salvation, exhorting and teaching.
Thus his appointment to this rank may bear fruit, since God raised him to this degree so that he might assist the salvation of His people. Therefore whoever, having been deemed worthy of such dignity, is negligent will be counted a despiser of God and will be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven; cf. Mt 5:19.
Besides, if a man does not care to teach, will he care to act?”
This was also the purpose for which the Apostle said here: “Do not neglect the gift.” He wished to present a pastoral incentive to the occupations just indicated. He gave to understand that the pastor’s chief work is to teach, and by teaching to lead the souls entrusted to him along the path of salvation.
A pastor who does not teach is not a pastor. But to strengthen such an incentive still more, the Apostle judged it necessary to remind Saint Timothy how this gift of pastoral ministry had been received by him.
“Which was given to you.” He did not appropriate it to himself. He did not seek and pursue it, directly or indirectly, but it was given.
Saint Timothy was chosen according to the common voice and common indication of the faithful. But the elector was not satisfied with this, and awaited an indication from above.
It was given by prophecy, that is, either by a special revelation to Saint Paul concerning the worthiness of the one chosen, or by a pronouncement about this from one of the prophets then customary in the Church, or by some other indication from above.
Saint Paul had already mentioned the prophecies concerning Saint Timothy above, in 1 Tim 1:18. It probably happened more than once. But here he speaks of what took place in Ephesus.
“Prophecy,” writes Ambrosiaster, “is an indication from above that the one chosen will be a worthy teacher.” Therefore, by saying “by prophecy,” the Apostle testified that Saint Timothy was ordained bishop “by the command of the Holy Spirit” (blessed Theophylact).
In general, at that time “bishops were appointed by the command of the Spirit, and not casually. This too is a particular kind of prophecy, when the present is indicated from above, as there in Antioch: ‘Separate for Me Barnabas and Saul’ (Acts 13:2)” (Oecumenius).
An indication from above concerning the worthiness of the chosen one occurred many times in the Church. Often those who elected did not even dare to complete their election without an indication from above.
Election is the preparation. The actual appointment as bishop was then accomplished by the laying on of hands, by the laying on of the hands of the presbyterate, tou presbyteriou, properly, the eldership, the seniority, or the assembly of elders and senior persons in the Church.
Priests were chosen from such persons, and Saint Paul probably has them in mind here. Since there were not few of them in and around Ephesus, he designated all of them by the common name presbyteriou. In Slavonic this is translated “priesthood,” the assembly of priests.
But how can this be? Does it follow that priests ordain a bishop? Chrysostom answers: “He is not speaking here of presbyters, that is, priests, but of bishops. For presbyters did not ordain bishops.” So also Oecumenius and Theophylact.
But blessed Theodoret writes that by “priesthood” the Apostle here means “those deemed worthy of apostolic grace.” Consequently, Saint Paul means here only himself. This fully agrees with what he says in the Second Epistle to Timothy.
“I remind you to stir up the gift of God which is in you through the laying on of my hands” (cf. 2 Tim 1:6). There “gift” and here “gift” signify one and the same thing.
Consequently, the gift mentioned was given by the laying on of Saint Paul’s hands, since he possessed apostolic grace.
In that case, however, the word “priesthood” receives not a direct but a figurative meaning. To retain the direct meaning of this word, and at the same time understand the laying on of hands that communicated episcopal grace as Saint Paul’s laying on of hands, not the presbyters’, one may suppose the following.
In the present passage, the laying on of the hands of the priesthood really did take place. Yet it was not the performance of the mystery of episcopal ordination, but an expression of consent to the election.
Perhaps it was even separate from Saint Paul’s consecrating laying on of hands. It may have occurred earlier, as the completion of the election indicated by revelation from above.
In that case, the meaning of the whole passage would be this: do not neglect the gift given to you by the laying on of my hands, according to prophecy, with the consent of the whole priesthood. It expressed this consent by its laying on of hands upon you.
It gave the hands of consent.