The Church Fathers on this verse

2 Peter 1:21Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

For prophecy came not by the will of man at any time: but the holy men of God spoke, inspired by the Holy Ghost.

Douay-Rheims

ου γαρ θεληματι ανθρωπου ηνεχθη ποτε προφητεια αλλ υπο πνευματος αγιου φερομενοι ελαλησαν αγιοι θεου ανθρωποι

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

“For prophecy never came by the will of man.” This means that the prophets receive prophecy from God, yet not as they wish, but as the Spirit of God acts. They were conscious of and understood the prophetic word sent down to them, but they did not explain it.

That the prophets, when the Spirit of God acted upon them, were conscious that the word was being sent down to them from the Spirit of God is clear from this: they submitted voluntarily. What they wished, they spoke; what they did not wish, they passed over in silence.

It is not so with false prophets. During the action upon them they were not in possession of consciousness. Driven into frenzy, like drunken men, they did not know what was happening to them.

Read more (251 words)

The holy prophets, though they understood, had no need to explain their predictions. This was both because they were serving others, namely us, and so that the coming of the Lord might remain hidden and not be exposed to plots from the ungodly.

It could have escaped such plots by the power of the Lord. Yet the event of the accomplished Incarnation would probably have seemed illusory, if several escapes had taken place in an extraordinary manner.

That this is true is evident from the example of the New Testament prophets. They prophesied and explained themselves, though not all of them did so. For in the New Testament nothing of this kind need be feared.

That the prophets did not foretell in ecstasy is also evident from the following. The prophets of the Old and New Testaments prophesied by one Spirit.

The Apostle Paul says, “If a revelation is made to another sitting by, let the first be silent” (1 Cor 14:30). From this it is clear that the prophets prophesied voluntarily, remaining in their natural state.

Therefore, when another inspired man rose up, the one who had been speaking before was commanded to be silent. No one will find this among the possessed. For how will he who does not know what he is doing be silent?

That the Holy Spirit acts in the prophets is stated by the same Apostle Paul: “To one is given through the Spirit the word of wisdom, to another prophecy” (1 Cor 12:8, 10).

Hippolytus of Rome

2nd centuryChurch Father

The blessed prophets were eyes for us, since by faith they contemplated the mysteries of the Word. These mysteries served later generations also. The prophets spoke not only of the past, but also of the present, and they proclaimed the future.

Thus a prophet would not appear to be a prophet only for his own time. By foretelling the future for all generations, he would truly be recognized as a prophet.

These fathers were prepared by the prophetic Spirit and rightly honored by the Word Himself. Like musical instruments enclosed within themselves, they always had the Word within them as the instrument that struck them. Moved by Him, the prophets proclaimed what was pleasing to God.

Read more (208 words)

They did not speak by their own power, do not be deceived. Nor did they announce to others what they themselves wished. First, they were directly made wise by the Word. Then, in visions, they were well instructed beforehand concerning the future.

Thus, with firm assurance, they spoke what had been revealed by God to them alone. Otherwise, how could a prophet be called a prophet, if he did not foresee the future by the Spirit?

Therefore we also, having carefully studied their predictions, do not speak from our own invention. Nor do we allow ourselves to replace the words once spoken by the prophets with other new words.

We set forth their writings in the Church and read them to those able to believe rightly. From this comes a common benefit for both speaker and hearer.

For the speaker, the benefit is that, holding in memory what is set forth, he explains it rightly. For the hearer, it is that he applies his mind to what is said.

And so, since even now a common labor lies before us both, I ask you to lift up prayer to God with me. The speaker must transmit without error, and the hearer must receive faithfully what is set forth.

Hilary of Arles

5th centuryChurch Father

Peter warns us not to consider prophecies chiefly according to the place, time, and person of the prophets, as if they were creations of the human mind. Rather, we must rely on the clarity and sufficiency of the Spirit.

Symeon the New Theologian

10th centuryChurch Father

You see that it is not I who speak extraordinary and great things to your love, but the Holy Spirit speaking in us. Peter, the chief Apostle, also testified to this: "For prophecy never came by the will of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit" (2 Pet 1:21). For although we are insignificant and unworthy, far from all holiness and from the holy men of God, we cannot deny the gift given to us by God.

Ignatij (Briantchaninow)

19th centuryChurch Father

You ask why the reading of the holy Fathers is necessary. Is it not enough to be guided by the word of God, by Holy Scripture alone, the pure word of God, in which there is no admixture of human word?

I answer: when reading Scripture, it is absolutely necessary also to read the holy Fathers of the Eastern Church. This is what the holy Apostle Peter says about Holy Scripture: “No prophecy of Scripture is of one’s own interpretation.” The Russian translation says: no prophecy in Scripture can be resolved by itself.

“For prophecy never came by the will of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were enlightened by the Holy Spirit” (2 Pet 1:20-21).

Read more (138 words)

How, then, do you wish to understand the spiritual word arbitrarily? It was not spoken arbitrarily, but by the inspiration of the Spirit, and it itself forbids arbitrary interpretation. The Spirit spoke Holy Scripture, and only the Spirit can interpret it.

Men inspired by God, the holy Fathers, interpreted it. Therefore everyone who desires to acquire true knowledge of Holy Scripture must read the holy Fathers.

If you limit yourself to reading Holy Scripture alone, then of necessity you must understand and explain it arbitrarily. By the same necessity, it will be impossible for you to avoid errors.

For “the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, and cannot understand them, because they must be judged spiritually.” “No one knows the things of God except the Spirit of God” (1 Cor 2:11, 14).

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

By deriving prophecies from the Holy Spirit, the Apostle sharply distinguishes them from the false predictions of pagan oracles and gods. He also distinguishes them from deceptive divinations, which depended on the will and cunning of priests, and from a person's dark presentiments, which depend on his physiological or psychological condition.

Kochomski S.W.

19th centuryChurch Father

By “interpretation” here explanation is meant. The Apostle Peter is saying, as it were, that prophecy is not a matter of private explanation, nor something that men themselves can explain. The word “one’s own” is opposed to the words “but by the Holy Spirit” in verse 21.

For this reason, earlier, in 1 Pet 1:10-11, the Apostle Peter said that the prophets searched and inquired, inquiring what person or time the Spirit of Christ in them was indicating, when He testified beforehand of the sufferings of Christ.

Read more (303 words)

The Spirit did not reveal this to them, and they themselves tried to discern when salvation would come. Yet to discern this was beyond human power. Therefore it is said further, in verse 12, that “it was revealed to them,” certainly not by their own reason, “that not to themselves,” nor to their contemporaries, “but to us they ministered the things now preached.”

From this it generally follows that even the prophets themselves, though they knew and understood the prophetic word sent down to them, could not give its interpretation or explanation. They knew neither the time nor the circumstances in which the future they foretold would be accomplished.

And if the prophets themselves could not do this, it is still less possible for their readers. Therefore the pious eunuch, the dignitary of Candace, who was reading the book of the prophet Isaiah, answered the Apostle Philip’s question, “Do you understand what you are reading?” by saying, “How can I, unless someone guides me?” (Acts 8:30-31).

Therefore, in the interpretation of prophecies, instruction is required. In general, not everyone who has bought a Bible can explain it. It is possible that a man who undertakes this task, being “ignorant and unstable,” will encounter in the Bible something “hard to understand” and “twist” it, that is, falsely interpret it, “to his own destruction” (2 Pet 3:16).

Why does this happen? According to the Apostle Peter, it is because prophecy, and in general divinely inspired teaching, “was never produced by the will of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.” We men, however, are often natural and carnal (1 Cor 9:14-34).

In general, the wisdom of the divine Spirit stands so far above human wisdom that it necessarily appears mysterious to us (Prov 1:2; 1 Cor 13:12).

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

This verse forms the immediate ground of the preceding statement, both negatively and positively. The expression "by human will" corresponds to the expression in the preceding verse, "by one's own interpretation." By human will means by human self-will. It is opposed to the unshakable firmness of the truth uttered by the Spirit of God. The meaning is this: true prophecy was never the product of the personal will of the prophet who spoke it. Such was usually the case with false prophets and pagan soothsayers. The prophets understood what the prophetic spirit inspired in them, and concerning what it spoke. Yet they did not understand it as clearly and precisely as everything was fulfilled in detail.

Read more (679 words)

The Apostle explains why the prophets did not interpret their own sayings. At the same time, he shows the difference between true prophecy and demonic or invented prophecy, such as is accepted also among heretics. "The prophets receive prophecy from God, yet not as they wish, but as the Spirit of God acts. They consciously apprehended the prophetic word sent down to them, but did not give its explanation" (Theophylact).

"Was not brought": that is, was not carried. Here the same Greek word is used as in verses 17 and 18, concerning the voice brought to Christ from the majestic glory on Mount Tabor. Such a voice was brought from heaven, from God the Father, to Christ. So the prophetic word is presented here as being brought to the prophet from heaven, from God. Therefore this also is the genuine and true word of God, just as the voice of God the Father to Christ on Mount Tabor was genuine and true.

"They spoke it": this refers not only to spoken discourse, but also to the written word, that is, to the prophetic writings. From this saying it is clear that the prophetic word, written and oral alike, is the true word of God. It is inspired by the Holy Spirit, both in its very content and no less in its outward form.

"Holy men of God" (cf. 1 Tim 6:11) spoke while being moved by the Holy Spirit, or borne, carried away, and caught up (cf. Jn 3:8). The Holy Spirit caught them up and bore them away apart from their own will and desire. He did so according to His almighty and all-powerful will. Thus they could not, even had they wished, go against His desire.

The prophets were therefore passive instruments of the Holy Spirit, Who sovereignly governed their mind and word. Yet they spoke and wrote with full and clear consciousness what the Spirit commanded them. They were by no means unconscious instruments, nor could they be so. Pagan soothsayers, for example, were such instruments. By contrast, under the action of the Holy Spirit their consciousness was illumined, purified, and exalted. Their consciousness acted within them in a higher, indeed the highest, degree.

Of course, they did not know everything, but only what the Spirit revealed to them, and as much as He revealed. If He revealed it clearly, they also spoke or wrote clearly. If the Spirit's own utterances were veiled, they also spoke or wrote in a veiled manner. For this reason the same Apostle says that the prophets sought and searched what pertained, for example, to Christ. They searched what person or time the Spirit of Christ within them was indicating (1 Pet 1:10-11).

"That the prophets, while the Spirit of God was acting in them, knew that the word was being sent to them by the Spirit of God is clear from this. They submitted voluntarily and spoke what they wished, while they kept silent about what they did not wish. It is not so with false prophets. While under this action they did not possess consciousness. Driven into frenzy, like drunken men, they did not know what was happening to them. The prophets did not prophesy in ecstasy, as is clear from the following. The prophets of the Old and New Covenants prophesied by one Spirit. The Apostle Paul says: if a revelation is made to another sitting by, let the first keep silence (1 Cor 14:30). Hence it is clear that the prophets prophesied voluntarily, remaining in their natural state. Therefore, when another inspired man rose, the one who had spoken before was commanded to be silent. No one will find this among those possessed by demons. For how shall one be silent who himself does not know what he is doing?" (Theophylact).

This whole saying contains a clear and firm proof of the full and indisputable truth of all Holy Scripture. From it there also necessarily follows this conclusion: Scripture must be interpreted not arbitrarily, but according to the sense of Scripture itself, inspired by the Holy Spirit.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Here the apostle proves the truth of the apostolic preaching about Christ by pointing to fulfilled prophetic revelation. Jesus Christ Himself indicated this as the clearest proof. The apostles later appealed to it, and after them other teachers of the faith, such as Saint Justin the Philosopher, and likewise all the holy fathers and teachers of the Church.

Concerning prophecies, in keeping with his general purpose, the apostle urges us to remember that they were never uttered by men merely according to their own desire, without the action of God. False teachers, however, like false prophets, priests, and oracles, utter their fables and teachings by their own will, craft, and other improper motives.

Read more (145 words)

Thus it is evident that Christians possess undoubted truth. In the Old Testament it was a light shining in darkness. In Christian teaching it shines like the morning star (see Rev 22:16). Its light will later give way to the radiance of the true Sun of righteousness, when the day of Christ comes.

Until that time, no prophecy will be fully disclosed by itself (cf. 1 Pet 1:10-11). Since prophecies were spoken by the action of God, their full disclosure will also be according to the will of God.

Blessed Augustine says, “We walk in the day when compared with unbelievers; but compared with that day when the dead shall rise, we are still in darkness.” From this it is clear that, in explaining Scripture, one must heed the voice of the Church, which is the pillar and ground of the truth (1 Tim 3:15).

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle Peter described the law by which true prophecies are born in the following words: “For prophecy never came by the will of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were enlightened by the Holy Spirit” (2 Pet 1:21).

Two marks must be joined together in order to show such a prophecy reliably and distinguish it. First, the prediction must be such that it cannot be derived from known circumstances by the conclusions of reason, nor explained from the natural condition of the one who predicts.

Second, the prediction must be fulfilled exactly. If a prediction is derived by the conclusions of reason, or is explained from the natural condition of the one who predicts, then it is a human conjecture, not a prophecy inspired by God.

Read more (59 words)

If the prediction has not been fulfilled exactly, then it is a false prophecy, not a true one. Or, at the least, it has not been proved true.

The prophets themselves teach us to judge prophets in this way: “When the word comes to pass, the prophet whom the Lord has sent in faith will be known” (Jer 28:9).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 16 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. οὐ
    ou
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  2. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  3. θελήματι
    thelēmati
    will
    G2307 · θέλημα
  4. ἀνθρώπου
    anthrōpou
    a man
    G444 · ἄνθρωπος
  5. ἠνέχθη
    ēnechthē
    I carry
    G5342 · φέρω
  6. προφητεία
    prophēteia
    prophecy
    G4394 · προφητεία
  7. ποτέ
    pote
    at one time or other
    G4218 · ποτέ
  8. ἀλλὰ
    alla
    but
    G235 · ἀλλά
  9. ὑπὸ
    hypo
    by
    G5259 · ὑπό
  10. Πνεύματος
    pneumatos
    wind
    G4151 · πνεῦμα
  11. Ἁγίου
    hagiou
    set apart
    G40 · ἅγιος
  12. φερόμενοι
    pheromenoi
    I carry
    G5342 · φέρω
  13. ἐλάλησαν
    elalēsan
    I speak
    G2980 · λαλέω
  14. ἀπὸ
    apo
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  15. Θεοῦ
    theou
    God
    G2316 · θεός
  16. ἄνθρωποι
    anthrōpoi
    a man
    G444 · ἄνθρωπος