Communicating the teaching about Christ historically, the Apostle Peter also speaks of the witnesses of the especially great events he proclaims.
He speaks of all that Christ did in Judea and Jerusalem, ending with His death on the Cross.
He speaks separately of Christ’s Resurrection and of the testimony to it. Here he draws attention to the fact that His appearances after the Resurrection were before those chosen beforehand by God.
These appearances were evident to the same degree as ordinary eating and drinking. They ate and drank with Him.
Therefore there can be no shadow of doubt that His appearances were not phantasmal.
Of course, these evident proofs of the reality of Jesus Christ’s Resurrection and His appearance after rising from the dead are not offered without purpose.
Read more (105 words)
One may think that the hearers could have believed the Apostle Peter even without the presentation of proofs.
Yet the essence of the matter and the historical fullness of the account required this. So did the need to communicate that he, Peter, was among these chosen witnesses.
Therefore his testimony is worthy of every acceptance.
“Why, after rising, did Jesus Christ not work a miracle, but eat and drink? Because the Resurrection itself was a great miracle.”
The speech about the Lord’s being raised by the Father was also evidently required by caution in teaching everything in proper gradual order, according to the hearers’ receptivity.