John Chrysostom
"And he rejoiced," says the writer, although he had received nothing except conversation and a good hope. The proof of his faith is that he abandoned all evil.
What is worse than a prison guard? What is more harsh, what is more severe than he? Yet he received them with great honor.
He "rejoiced" not because he had escaped danger, but because he "believed in God." "Believe," Paul said, "in the Lord."
For this reason the writer added: "he believed in God," lest it seem that a condemned and sinful man is saved. Here the faith of the prison guard took the place of preaching.
What can be compared with this? Paul is bound, and while bound he looses. He looses double bonds. He looses the one who bound him precisely through being bound.
Read more (459 words)
Truly this is the work of grace. Let us also always remember this prisoner, and not only the miracle.
What is remarkable, the Greeks will say, if he, being a prisoner, instructed the prison guard? Whom, they will say, could he persuade except a crude, wretched man?
They will say he was not distinguished by understanding, was filled with vices, and was easily persuaded. To this they add: who believed at all except a tanner, a seller of purple, a eunuch, a prison guard, slaves, and women?
But what will they say if we point to dignitaries, to the centurion, to the proconsul, and to others from that time until now, even to rulers and kings?
Yet I will say something else, greater than this. Let us look at those very simple people.
What, they will say, is marvelous here? This itself is marvelous. If someone were persuaded about ordinary matters, it would be nothing wonderful.
But when simple people are taught about the resurrection, the kingdom of heaven, and a life of philosophy, and are persuaded, this is far more wonderful than persuading wise men.
If there is no danger and someone persuades others, they point to the irrationality of the believers. But consider when someone says to a slave: if you believe me, you will be in danger.
All will be your enemies. You will have to die and endure countless evils. If, even then, they catch his soul, this is no longer from madness.
If the Christian teaching served pleasure, then one could rightly say this. But if a slave learns what philosophers would not wish to accept, this is the highest miracle.
Let us suppose that they accepted the teaching more from lack of understanding. But can adopting such a philosophical life come from lack of understanding?
Thus, the less intelligent the one persuaded is, and yet he is persuaded of what philosophers could not persuade philosophers, the greater the miracle becomes.
This is especially so when women and slaves are persuaded and show by deeds what Platos and all the other philosophers could not persuade anyone to do.
Why do I say anyone? They could not persuade even themselves.
Plato taught that wealth should not be despised. He taught this by gathering so much property, so much money, and golden rings and cups.
Socrates himself taught that worldly glory should not be despised, although he philosophized much about it. He taught this by doing everything out of vainglory.
If you were acquainted with his teaching, I would speak at greater length about this. I would show how much hypocrisy is in them.
I would also show how, in Socrates himself, if we trust what his disciple says, the whole teaching is permeated with vainglory.