The Church Fathers on this verse

Acts 19:7Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And all the men were about twelve.

Douay-Rheims

ησαν δε οι παντες ανδρες ωσει δεκαδυο

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

5 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Beda Venerabilis

7th centuryChurch Father

Truly, “the judgments of God are a great deep” (Ps 35:7). Behold, Asia, which only recently had not been granted a visit from the apostles; see Acts 16:6, is now sanctified by the number of the apostles and exalted by the prophetic gift. It should be noted that the Holy Spirit showed the signs of His coming both here in the twelve disciples and also in the one hundred and twenty; see Acts 1:16 and Acts 2:1-4. The one hundred and twenty are twelve multiplied by ten. One manifestation took place in Jerusalem, and the other in Ephesus, a Greek city. I think this was to show that, whether Jews or Gentiles believe, He fills only those who share in the unity of the catholic and apostolic Church.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryChurch Father

Since in Ephesus one could meet people of various eastern beliefs, Paul found there, among others, twelve disciples of John the Baptist. John had been called to prepare his contemporary countrymen for the appearing of the Redeemer. But as usually happens with preparatory manifestations in the Kingdom of God, they did not make the same impression on all. Hearts differed in their capacity to receive them. From his school came some who followed his indication and attached themselves to the Savior with living faith. Some even became His apostles. Others remained with very inadequate notions concerning the person and teaching of Jesus Christ. Still others did not imitate the example of their teacher. Remaining in their extreme prejudices, they acted even with hostility against Christians.

Read more (234 words)

The beginning of the sect of John’s disciples, which survived until modern times, should probably be placed as near as possible to the Gospel period. The disciples of John whom Paul met in Ephesus belonged to the second of these groups. It is unknown whether they became John’s disciples in Palestine and received baptism from him himself, or whether they were drawn into the fellowship of his disciples later. In any case, only this must be noted about them. Though they knew little concerning the person and teaching of Jesus Christ, they considered themselves entitled to be called Christians like the others. Luke calls them μαϑητάς in Acts 19:1. Paul indeed expected to find Christians in them. But when he entered into conversation with them, it became clear that they had as yet received nothing from the glorified Lord Jesus. They did not even know of the Holy Spirit. Paul gladly instructed them concerning the relation of John’s ministry to the ministry of Jesus Christ. He also taught them the relation of John’s baptism to the baptism which brought men into communion with Jesus Christ. This baptism made them partakers of the divine life proceeding from Him. Then he gave them Christian baptism, with the laying on of hands and prayer. And in John’s disciples there appeared the same signs of the descent of the Holy Spirit that had once appeared in the apostles.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

Even before the Apostle Paul’s second visit to Ephesus, there was already a small number of disciples of the Lord there; Acts 18:27. Among them was also a certain number of believing disciples who had received only John’s baptism. Like Apollos, they had not yet been fully instructed in the way of the Lord; Acts 18:25. They did not yet understand that John’s baptism was only a baptism with water. Through repentance it prepared men for faith in Christ. Consequently, it was insufficient for salvation, and for this one had to be baptized with Christ’s baptism. When the Apostle Paul came to Ephesus and entered into fellowship with them, he soon noticed the incompleteness of their Christian enlightenment.

Read more (304 words)

He asked them, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” That is, when you believed in Jesus Christ. They answered, “We have not even heard whether there is a Holy Spirit.” This answer of John’s disciples cannot be understood to mean that they had no notion at all of the existence of the Holy Spirit. First, one must suppose that these disciples were Jews, since there is no evidence that there were then disciples of John among the Gentiles. In that case, although they could not have had a notion of God as triune in Persons, the idea of the Holy Spirit as the Spirit of God could not have been foreign to them. Second, as disciples of John and even as believers, they had to know his prophecy concerning baptism with the Holy Spirit through Christ; Mt 3:11. Finally, they do not say that they do not know whether there is a Holy Spirit. They say, “We have not even heard whether there is a Holy Spirit.” That is, when John’s disciples were brought to faith in Christ, they were catechized only in John’s teaching. They had not been told that believers in Christ receive the Holy Spirit. There had been no mention of the Holy Spirit as the gift of faith in Jesus Christ. Then the apostle revealed to them only the preparatory significance of John’s baptism in relation to Christ. He pointed out that, in order to receive salvation, it was necessary to be baptized with Christ’s baptism. When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. By laying hands on them, Paul brought down upon them the Holy Spirit. This was plainly shown to all when they began to speak in other tongues and to prophesy. In all they were about twelve men.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

During Apollos’ stay in Corinth, that is, in Achaia; Acts 18:27. Therefore, for some reason he did not wait in Ephesus for the Apostle Paul. Perhaps there was no information in Ephesus about when the apostle would arrive there. “Having passed through the upper regions.” Compared with the low seacoast on which Ephesus stood, the upper regions are the highland regions lying outside Ephesus. These are the inland provinces of Asia Minor, including Phrygia and Galatia, which Paul visited during this journey; Acts 18:23. During his second journey Paul was forbidden by the Spirit to preach in Proconsular Asia; Acts 16:6 and following. Only on the return journey did he stay briefly in Ephesus; Acts 18:19 and following.

Read more (296 words)

Now, however, directly from Phrygia, after passing through Proconsular Asia with preaching, he arrived in Ephesus and remained there for a long time; verse 10. “Finding there certain disciples.” By the name disciples the writer of Acts usually means disciples of Christ, that is, Christians. Judging by everything, these disciples also belonged to the number of Christians. Yet what follows shows that these disciples had been baptized only into John’s baptism. Therefore the writer of Acts calls them disciples, that is, Christians, only in a broader sense. They were probably Jews, for nowhere is it evident that there were disciples of John among the Gentiles. They were probably newcomers, and recent ones, to Ephesus. On arriving there, they attached themselves to the still small Christian community in Ephesus. They believed in the coming Messiah preached by the Baptist, but did not have a full understanding of Him. In this they were like Apollos for a time. They had not yet managed, or had not been able, to be instructed more accurately in the way of the Lord; Acts 18:25-26. Where and by whom they had been baptized into John’s baptism is unknown. How they became disciples of John is also unknown. But in Ephesus they kept to the Christian community, so that Paul himself at first considered them Christians; verse 2, “when you believed.” Only through conversation and dealings with them did he learn that they were merely disciples of John. From conversation and contact with them, Paul noticed in them a lack of the pure Christian spirit in life. He also saw the incompleteness of their knowledge of the way of the Lord; compare Acts 18:26. As is evident, he was amazed by this and wondered what it meant. Hence precisely this question to them.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The baptism of the twelve disciples of John for a second time is taken by some as a repetition of baptism. Yet the preceding narrative clearly shows that John’s baptism, as insufficient, is here plainly distinguished from true baptism in the name of Christ. The fullness of this baptism is attested by the giving of the Holy Spirit to those baptized, through the laying on of apostolic hands. Its visible manifestation was the gift of speaking in various tongues and foretelling the future. Evidently, John’s disciples, like Apollos, were accepted as Christians, yet were not regarded as belonging to them in the full sense. Until the Apostle Paul came to Ephesus, no one could undertake the work of placing them definitively in their proper relation.

Read more (340 words)

And so the apostle performs this difficult work, clearly showing everyone the great difference between John’s disciples and the followers of Christ. “The identities of these twelve disciples are not outlined with special clarity and precision in the book of Acts,” says Hieromonk Gregory, a special investigator of this part of the book. “But the holy writer of Acts calls them disciples, without any other defining word. There is no need to suppose that here Saint Luke uses this term in a broad or improper sense. Rather, in this application of the epithet to John’s disciples, and amid the brevity of the narrative, one should see a desire to preserve a feature of this episode. At first these disciples of John presented themselves as genuine disciples of Christ. The Ephesian Christians, and even the Apostle Paul himself, also took them as such. This is shown by the question put to them: ‘Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?’ This question presupposes, on the one hand, that the apostle had been informed that these disciples had believed. On the other hand, it shows that either the holy apostle himself, or those who presented them to him, had conceived doubt about their full belonging to Christianity. The apostle doubted the fullness and accuracy of the information about the One in Whom they believed, that is, about Jesus Christ. Therefore he asks them about the final act of every conversion to Christ. This is the reception of the gifts of the Holy Spirit, usually bestowed after baptism. Those questioned declared that they had received only the baptism of John the Baptist. They had not yet heard of the treasury of gracious outpourings of the gifts of the Holy Spirit upon believers, which had come to pass on earth. The first baptism, John’s, gave no positive content for the spiritual life of the one baptized. The second communicated the grace of forgiveness of sins. It had the meaning of a real and essential regeneration of the spiritual nature of the one baptized.”

The original text

Greek text, 7 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ἦσαν
    ēsan
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  4. πάντες
    pantes
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  5. ἄνδρες
    andres
    a male human being
    G435 · ἀνήρ
  6. ὡσεὶ
    hōsei
    as if
    G5616 · ὡσεί
  7. δώδεκα
    dōdeka
    twelve
    G1427 · δώδεκα