The Church Fathers on this verse

Daniel 2:43Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And whereas thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay, they shall be mingled indeed together with the seed of man, but they shall not stick fast one to another, as iron cannot be mixed with clay.

Douay-Rheims

די וְדִ֣י חֲזַ֗יְתָ פַּרְזְלָא֙ מְעָרַב֙ בַּחֲסַ֣ף טִינָ֔א מִתְעָרְבִ֤ין לֶהֱוֺן֙ בִּזְרַ֣ע אֲנָשָׁ֔א וְלָֽא־לֶהֱוֺ֥ן דָּבְקִ֖ין דְּנָ֣ה עִם־דְּנָ֑ה הֵֽא־כְדִ֣י פַרְזְלָ֔א לָ֥א מִתְעָרַ֖ב עִם־חַסְפָּֽא׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

3 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

What was the situation with the Romans? Consider the transformations that occurred within their empire. Not all of the rulers came from noble bloodlines, and numerous were disloyal.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

While they may form agreements among each other, they will lack harmony and genuine affection. The Prophet observes, ‘They shall be mixed together in the tribe of men, and shall not cleave to this, as iron is not mixed with clay.’

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

This passage reveals that the kingdom in question is not distinct from the iron kingdom; instead, it represents a weakened version of it, where some aspects remain strong while others are diminished. The ties of familial bonds connect the weaker parts to the stronger ones. This connection is reflected in the phrase, “There shall be mingling in the tribe of men.” Marriages will facilitate shifts between the two factions, yet conflict will distort the true nature of these familial ties, as just like iron cannot blend with clay, there will be no real unity. This interpretation aligns with the insights of the wise Daniel. It is essential to examine prior interpretations presented by others to illuminate the truth more clearly.

Read more (192 words)

Some scholars proposed that the fourth kingdom, symbolized by iron, refers to Alexander the Great, with the mixed feet and toes representing the ruling Macedonians, including the Ptolemies, Seleucids, and Demetrius, who, while varying in strength, all sought to establish connections through marriage. However, they should acknowledge that the Prophet labeled Nebuchadnezzar as the golden head, indicating the Babylonian or Assyrian kingdom. After him, the kingdoms of Persia and Media followed in succession, as Cyrus descended from both nations and reigned over the Persians after the fall of Babylon. The Persian kingdom, the second one, was subsequently defeated by Alexander, who, as the blessed Daniel noted, conquered “the whole earth.” The Prophet designated this as the third kingdom, which was succeeded not by another kingdom but by the Roman empire. Thus, interpreters should recognize that the Macedonian kingdom, represented by bronze, was the third, while the Roman kingdom, represented by iron, was the fourth. If this classification seemed ambiguous, they ought to have assessed the entirety of the prophecy in light of its conclusion. The Prophet, after highlighting the frail and vulnerable nature of the iron kingdom, proceeded with the following observation: