Gregory of Nyssa
However, he himself raises the objection posed by those who consider a life of indulgence to be preferable to a life of higher purpose, and he counters this claim by articulating both the objection and his own conclusion. The essence of the objection is that only what a person consumes—namely, food and drink—should be deemed good. In response, it is asserted that true nourishment comes not from physical sustenance but from wisdom and understanding; in valuing these, one engages with genuine goodness. Conversely, that which is craved by the flesh leads only to care and vanity of the spirit.
Read more (637 words)
The profound truth expressed in this lofty teaching states: “There is no good to the man that eateth and drinketh, and showeth his soul good in his labour: and this I have seen, that it is of the hand of God.” For who among us eats and drinks apart from Him? Yet to those who sin, He imparts the burden to gather and hoard, hoping to offer righteousness in His presence: for this, too, is vanity and the will of the spirit. Therefore, even though the essence of the previous writings and initial interpretation of the discourse points towards the summary we have provided, it remains beneficial to revisit and align the concepts faithfully with the words (see Ecclesiastes 2:15).
There exists a further objection, articulated as follows: If you deem these external things to be vanity, teacher, then you unjustly label as vanity that which we take into ourselves. However, since food and drink reside within us, such matters cannot be entirely dismissed; indeed, many may consider these gifts to be a grace from God. This encapsulates the spirit of the objection, and the responses take this form: “There is no good to man,” states Ecclesiastes, “except that he eat and drink, and show his soul good in his labour: and this I have seen, that it is of the hand of God, that any man eat and drink besides Him” (24-25). This is the standpoint of the advocate for indulgence, while the wise counselor counters that “man is good” (26). The inclusion of the term “good” clearly marks a distinction, clarifying what is understood by the concept of goodness in relation to its opposite. Thus, this affirmation pertains not to animals, nor to those who are preoccupied solely with their physical needs, but rather to the ‘good’ who are fashioned in the likeness of the One Good. The pleasure decreed by God is not what satisfies animals, but instead, He bestows wisdom, reason, and joy in lieu of mere sustenance. Can anyone truly enhance the gifts of goodness with carnal delights? As the true Word states, “Man shall not live by bread alone” (Matthew 4:4). Virtue does not draw its nourishment from bread, nor does the strength of the soul derive from meat; rather, it is through other forms of sustenance that the higher life is nourished and emboldened. The nourishment of the virtuous comprises chastity, wisdom as the bread, justice as the seasoning, and passionlessness as the drink; true pleasure is not found in mere physical enjoyment, but in activities that evoke both joy in name and reality (ευφροσήνη). Consequently, Ecclesiastes identified this term with the soul’s alignment to beauty, suggesting that such a disposition results from prudence (εκ του ευφρονειν). Thus, we must reflect on what the Apostle teaches us: “The kingdom of God is not a kingdom of wine and drink, but of righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost” (Rom. 14:17). The pursuit of bodily pleasures serves only to incite the cares of the sinner, drawing the spirit from the heights to the earthly, concerned solely with diligently "applying and collecting" throughout this life. Accordingly, whoever perceives these matters as good in God’s sight fails to recognize that he is placing good within the realm of vanity. I have articulated this in my own terms, but the addition of God's words will reinforce this understanding. For Ecclesiastes further states, “To the sinner He gives care to lay up and to gather, to give the good things before the face of God: for this also is vanity and the spirit's will” (26). Therefore, as we contemplate the insights we have gleaned from this comparative analysis of good and evil, let it serve as guidance for us to shun that which is condemned and to aspire towards what is truly better.