The wise men of this age agreed with that shameful teaching, which makes one blush. Therefore the Apostle joined every impurity with fornication, and added greed to impurity.
This is not the greed that urges us to gather money. It is that about which we spoke above: "Let no one transgress and greedily defraud his brother in the matter."
This is because the insatiable and unfulfilled man passes through every kind of shameful deed and debauchery.
"As befits saints," he says. According to this teaching, no one can be called holy who, besides fornication, is also found guilty of any impurity and thirst of lust for pleasures that delight him.
If anyone thinks that greed must be understood in the sense we have shown, he must give the reasons why greed is unusually placed among fornication, impurity, shameful and foolish talk, and jesting.
Then, by foolish talk, in my opinion, we must understand more than the words of those who speak of something shameful in order to provoke laughter.
It includes those who, with feigned folly, mock the people whom they wish to please.
It also includes the reasonings of those who are considered wise in this age. In disputes about natural things, they claim to know exactly the number of grains of sand on the seashore.
They claim to know the drops of water in the Ocean, the immense spaces of heaven, and the center of the earth.
Foolish talk is also found in the Church. For example, someone may be misled by misunderstood words of the prophet Isaiah.
He may suppose that heaven is rounded like a vault, and that a throne is set in the heavens on which God sits.
He imagines God surrounded like a ruler and judge by standing angels, who obey the words of the Commander and are sent to various ministries (Isa 6).
But since jesting follows foolish talk, these things must be referred chiefly to foolish and ignorant narratives.
There is a distinction between foolish talk and jesting. Foolish talk contains nothing wise or worthy of the human heart.
Jesting proceeds from a rational thought and deliberately seeks out certain words, whether urban or rustic, indecent or playful. In another word, it may be called comic speech meant to provoke laughter in the hearers.
Yet holy men must completely remove even this. It is more fitting for them to weep, as we read in a certain Hebrew Gospel.
There the Lord is said to have spoken to the disciples: "And be joyful only when you see your brother in love."
Up to this point nothing seems to have been set forth that is superfluous or outside the connection of the discourse and arrangement of words in the Epistle.
But concerning what follows at the end, "but rather thanksgiving," someone may ask: what do these words mean after the prohibition of adultery, impurity, excess, shameful acts, foolish talk, and jesting?
Indeed, if he had wanted to speak about some virtue, he should first have spoken about truth, justice, and love.
But as this would be inconsistent, so there would have been inconsistency there also. With the same freedom, the discourse would have lacked order.
Therefore perhaps in this place he does not mean the thanksgiving by which we thank God. Rather, he means that quality by which, among men, we are called pleasant and gracious, or conversely false.
Foolishness and jesting are not fitting for a Christian. But it is fitting that his speech be seasoned with a certain salt, so that he may have favor with the hearers.
Except among certain learned Greeks, it was customary to use the word eucaristia only to designate the mystery of communion, and not the quality of being pleasant or gracious.
Therefore I think that the Apostle, as a Hebrew of Hebrews, used a common word. He wanted to clarify its meaning by the sense of another word.
He did this especially because among the Hebrews the gracious person and the one who gives thanks are expressed by one word.
Therefore I think that in Proverbs it is also written thus: Gunh eucaristoj egeiret andri doxan, that is, "a grateful wife brings glory to her husband" (Prov 12:4), instead of "a gracious wife."
We would seem to do violence to the words of Scripture if we firmly accepted the translation "a grateful wife" instead of "a gracious wife," unless the other editions of the holy books agreed with our opinion.
Indeed, Aquila, Theodotion, and Symmachus used gunh caristoj, that is, "a gracious wife," and not eucaristoj, which pertains to the actions of grace.