John Chrysostom
Here some attack us, saying: "See, the Apostle also divides man in two, presenting him as though composed of opposing natures, since he attributes the struggle against the soul to the body." But this is entirely unjust, because by flesh he does not mean the body here.
If he means the body here, what meaning will the following words have? "It desires," he says, "against the spirit." But the body belongs to things that do not move, but are moved, not to things that act, but to things through which one acts. How then does it desire? Desire undoubtedly belongs to the soul, not to the body.
Read more (707 words)
In other places Scripture also says, "My soul longs" (Ps 84:2), and, "Whatever your soul desires, I will do for you" (1 Sam 20:4). Again it says, "Do not follow the impulse of your soul" (Sir 5:2), and, "So my soul longs" (Ps 42:1). How then does Paul say, "The flesh desires against the spirit"?
By flesh he customarily means not bodily nature, but the evil will. For example, he says, "You are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit" (Rom 8:9), and again, "Those who are in the flesh cannot please God" (Rom 8:8). What then? Must one kill the flesh? But was not the very man who said this clothed with flesh?
Such suggestions are not the work of the flesh, but of the devil, for "he was a murderer from the beginning" (Jn 8:44). Of what, then, does the Apostle speak? By flesh he here means the earthly, frivolous, and negligent thought, and for this the body is not guilty, but the negligent soul.
The body is only an instrument. No one turns away from or hates an instrument, but one turns away from the person who uses the instrument for evil. We do not hate and punish the sword, but the murderer.
"But," someone will say, "to call the sins of the soul by the name of flesh is precisely to accuse the body." I acknowledge that, although the flesh is lower than the soul, it too is beautiful. For what is lower than the good is itself good, whereas evil is not lower than the good, but wholly opposite to it.
If you can truly point out an evil that comes from the body, then accuse the flesh. But if you wish to reproach the flesh on the basis of the name alone, beware lest you also have to accuse the soul. For the man deprived of truth is called a soulish man (1 Cor 2:14), and the armies of demons are called spirits of evil (Eph 6:12).
On the other hand, Scripture also customarily calls the mysteries by the name of flesh. Likewise it calls the whole Church the Body of Christ (Col 1:18). If you wish me to indicate the benefits we receive through the body, imagine all its senses destroyed. Then you will see the soul deprived of every knowledge and having no conception of what it now knows.
For if the power of God from the creation of the world is seen through the contemplation of created things (Rom 1:20), how could we know it without eyes? If faith also comes by hearing (Rom 10:17), how shall we hear of it without ears? Preaching and going around the earth are possible only by means of the tongue and feet. For how shall they preach unless they are sent? (Rom 10:15). Writing too is possible thanks to the hands.
Do you see how many good things the service of the flesh brings us? If the Apostle says, "The flesh desires against the spirit," he is speaking of two opposing kinds of thoughts, virtue and vice. These are what oppose one another, not soul and body.
If soul and body were mutually hostile, they would destroy one another, just as water destroys fire and darkness destroys light. But the soul cares for the body and shows great concern for it. It endures very much so as not to be separated from it, and resists when others wish to part it from the body. In turn, the body serves the soul, brings it much knowledge, and is itself fitted for its activity. How then can they be opposed and hostile to one another?
Indeed, from their very actions I see that they are not only not opposed, but very much in agreement and mutually support one another. Therefore the Apostle does not speak of body and soul in the words, "they oppose one another." Rather, he points to the struggle of evil and good thoughts.
To will and not to will is certainly the work of the soul. Therefore he says, "They are opposed, so that you may not allow the soul to give itself over to its evil desires." He said this as a guide and teacher, arousing fear.