This suggests that the sin entering the world had a somewhat beneficial result, given that humanity would have remained confined to the glory of the first created if not for the fear of death compelling them to procreate. However, the true understanding of this doctrine, accessible to those initiated into the mysteries of paradise like Paul, reveals that the Sadducees once debated the concept of resurrection. They pointed to a woman who had been married to seven brothers, inquiring as to whose wife she would be in the resurrection. The Lord addressed this query, not only correcting the Sadducees but also enlightening future generations about the mystery of life after resurrection, stating: “In the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage” (Mt. 22:30), “nor can they die anymore; for they are equal to the angels and are sons of God, being sons of the resurrection” (Lk. 20:36). The promise of resurrection offers nothing less than the restoration of the fallen to their original state, signifying a return to a life devoid of the expulsion from paradise. Thus, if the life of the restored is akin to that of angels, it is clear that existence prior to the fall resembled a form of angelic life. This explains why a return to our original state is compared to that of the angels. Yet, although angels do not marry, the multitude of angels is vast, as recounted in Daniel's visions. If we had not experienced transformation and a fall from our angelic state due to sin, we likewise would have had no need for marriage for procreation. However, the method of reproduction within angelic nature remains beyond human comprehension; yet it undoubtedly exists. It stands to reason that it could also occur among humans, “for You have made him a little lower than the angels” (Psalm 8:6), expanding the human race in accordance with the Creator's counsel. When one questions the origin of mankind, wondering whether marriage was essential, we can likewise question the nature of angels: how do they form countless multitudes while being one essence yet numerous? We respond that just as angels exist without marriage, so too could humanity have existed devoid of it before the fall. The restoration of humanity to this likeness supports this notion. Returning to our earlier inquiry, it is essential to ask why, following the creation of humanity in God's image, He established a distinction between male and female. The beginning we discussed is relevant here. The Creator who fashioned everything and shaped humanity in His image did not intend for the number of souls to reach fullness through gradual reproduction, but rather, by His foreknowledge, envisioned the entirety of human nature in its fullness, endowing it with a high and equal status akin to that of angels. Anticipating that human will would stray from the beauty of virtue and therefore fall from angelic equality, He devised a method of reproduction suitable for those who succumbed to sin, rather than upholding the dignity characteristic of angelic existence. This led to a way of mutual succession akin to that of beasts. Thus, it seems fitting that David mourned the plight of humanity, expressing, “Man is in honor, yet does not understand” (Ps. 48:21), referring to the equality with angels. He laments that humanity, in turning toward material desires, has become like the beasts.
There are two forms of growth: one pertains to the body, the other to the soul. The soul's growth comes through the pursuit of perfection, while bodily growth involves size increase. Therefore, God instructs unreasonable creatures to grow in physical maturity, but He commands us to develop in the inner man, progressing on the path leading to Him. This is illustrated by Paul, who, forgetting what lies behind, strives forward (Phil. 3:13).
From our previous discussions, it should not be concluded that we dismiss the sanctity of marriage, as we recognize it is indeed blessed by God. Marriage is sufficiently upheld by the innate desire for it seen in all who engage in procreation, and since virginity appears contrary to nature, it seems superfluous to further counsel or exhort regarding marriage when the natural inclination itself serves as its advocate. Every virtue must be understood as a balance, with deviation from it on either end being vice. Chastity represents the mean, and straying from it toward either extreme leads to vice. For those lacking steadfastness may fall prey to the passions of lust, and those who exceed the bounds of chastity wander into disgraceful desires. This is as the Apostle states, those who consider marriage a vile institution risk branding themselves with their own failings. We uphold the preference for marriage alongside a dedication to divine pursuits, yet we do not disregard those who can approach marriage with moderation and temperance.
Let us exercise control over the wild beasts. “Rule over every living thing” prompts an inquiry: how can I govern the creature within myself? Indeed, one might find a multitude of beasts internally. Consider not these words an affront. Anger can be viewed as a small beast; when it surges within the heart, does it not manifest as more savage than any dog? Does not the wicked soul resemble a fresh bait before a bear? Control your thoughts within, and you will become sovereign over all. He who granted us dominion over the creatures will likewise enable us to command ourselves.
Since the existence of voiceless creatures first entered this world, mankind has adopted aspects of their nature, including the method of birth. Thus, humanity also inherits traits from this silent realm. It is neither irritability nor fleeting pleasure that embodies divine likeness. Rather, fearfulness, bold ambition, desire for abundance, and aversion to scarcity are distant from the attributes of God. Therefore, these aspects of humanity are derived from the speechless nature residing within.