The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 1:30Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And to all beasts of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to all that move upon the earth, and wherein there is life, that they may have to feed upon. And it was so done.

Douay-Rheims

וּֽלְכָל־חַיַּ֣ת הָ֠אָרֶץ וּלְכָל־ע֨וֹף הַשָּׁמַ֜יִם וּלְכֹ֣ל ׀ רוֹמֵ֣שׂ עַל־הָאָ֗רֶץ אֲשֶׁר־בּוֹ֙ נֶ֣פֶשׁ חַיָּ֔ה אֶת־כָּל־יֶ֥רֶק עֵ֖שֶׂב לְאָכְלָ֑ה וַֽיְהִי־כֵֽן׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

6 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

To grasp the vast kindness of the Lord, consider how He exhibits His mercy and generous provision, not just toward the husband and wife who have yet to be formed, but also for the voiceless creatures. He proclaims, "to you this shall be for food," and then extends this gift to "all the beasts of the earth." This reveals an additional layer of compassion: His care extends beyond merely the meek beings suited for our sustenance and service, reaching even to the animals. Who can truly fathom such boundless goodness?

Read more (184 words)

He asserts, "to you this shall be for food; but to all the beasts of the earth, and to all the fowls of the air, and to every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth, in which is the living soul, I have given all the green herbs for food." The Lord’s providence for the man He created is indeed great. He endowed humanity with dominion over all living creatures, reassuring him that, despite the overwhelming number of voiceless beings, he need not worry about providing nourishment for them. Even before man had the chance to fret over this, the compassionate Lord sought to comfort him, indicating that both he and all the voiceless creatures would find complete satisfaction, for the earth, in accordance with the Lord's decree, would be their source of sustenance, as He states: "And to all the beasts of the earth, and to all the fowls of the air, and to every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth, in which is the living soul, I have given all the green herbs for food." And so it came to pass.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

To understand the significance of the phrase in verse 30, it is essential to observe that, following the statement "And it came to pass," the author further observes, "And God saw all that He had made, and it was good." This pertains to the empowerment bestowed upon humanity, enabling it to consume the vegetation of the earth and the fruit of the trees. The phrase "And it came to be so" is associated with the declaration that begins with "And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed," and it connects to the subsequent affirmation of what took place.

Read more (177 words)

If we were to apply the phrase "And it came to be so" retrospectively to everything previously mentioned, we would have to acknowledge that humanity was fruitful and multiplied, filling the earth, right on the sixth day itself. However, scriptural testimony indicates that this occurred over many years. Thus, the phrase "And it came to pass" refers specifically to the moment when the capacity to consume food was granted to humankind, who learned this from the Creator's word. If humanity had immediately begun to eat—that is, to partake of what was provided for nourishment—the Scriptures would have maintained their customary phrasing and would have included the action explicitly, stating "and they took and ate." Therefore, it might have been expressed without invoking the name of God. Similarly, after the command to gather the waters into one place and let the dry land appear, it is stated "And it came to be so," yet it does not follow with "And God created..." Instead, it merely reaffirms, "And the waters were gathered into their distinct places," and so forth.

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

What significance does the mystery concealed here hold for you? The Scripture declares that fruits, as well as herbs and greens, are provided "to you for food, and to the fowls of the heavens, and to all the wild beasts of the earth." However, it is evident that many animals do not consume fruit. For instance, what does a panther find suitable for sustenance? What fruit can a lion eat? Yet, these creatures still partook of some natural provisions intended by the divine order. When humanity strayed from this design and exceeded their appointed boundaries, God, after the flood, permitted them to consume all things: "You shall eat all these things as the green of grass" (Gen. 9:3). This allowance also granted other living beings the liberty to choose their sustenance freely.

Read more (177 words)

Consequently, from that point forward, lions began to feast on flesh, and vultures sought out carrion. In the era of their creation, the vultures had yet to scour the earth, for nothing that had received its purpose and essence from God had died, leaving them without any food source. There was harmony in nature, flourishing in all its majesty; hunters had not begun to hunt, as that practice was not yet among humankind. The beasts posed no threat to others, for they were not carnivorous. Vultures are known for scavenging, yet at that time, there were no carcasses or foul odors for them to feed upon, leading to a different diet. All creatures thrived like swans, grazing peacefully in meadows. Occasionally, we observe dogs consuming grass as a remedy, not because it is their primary food, but rather because unintelligent beings, guided by instinct, seek what is beneficial to them. From this, we can infer that even during those early times, carnivorous animals acted similarly; they viewed grass as nourishment and did not prey upon one another.

Theophilus

2nd centuryChurch Father

commanding that animals should also partake of the same sustenance as humans, being sustained by them from all the vegetation of the earth.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

Specifically, fruits of the trees are designated for humanity, while other creatures are provided grass, suggesting that the highest creation is given the highest sustenance. Yet, does this imply that those without voices are forbidden from consuming fruits or various animals? Some argue it does not. If animals were originally created in limited numbers, they likely should not have been predators at the outset. This idea aligns with the mythos of a golden age.

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryCommentator

Plant-based sustenance is designated for the mute beings, similar to how it is for humanity, though they are not granted access to fruits from trees, only to various herbs. This suggests that in the original state, animals did not consume flesh and existed not only in complete subjugation to humans but also in perfect harmony amongst themselves. This understanding is supported by the prophecy of Isaiah regarding the era of the Messiah, envisioned as a time of universal tranquility. The prophet expresses, “the wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid goat; and the calf and the young lion and the bull shall be together, and a little child shall lead them.

Read more (236 words)

The cow shall graze with the bear, and their young shall peacefully lie down together, and the lion shall eat straw like an ox. A child will play by the hole of the asp, and one will put their hand on the den of snakes” (Is. 11:6-8, cf. Is. 65:25). These illustrations serve as representations: through the relationships depicted amongst the wild animals, livestock, and humans, the prophet conveys harmonious interactions within humanity, free from those embodying savage traits—everyone will embody gentleness, peace, and kindness. The metaphorical elements highlighting the moral condition of the forthcoming Christian community draw from that idyllic period when sin did not exist on earth, along with its damaging repercussions on humanity and nature, a time when not only did humans coexist peacefully with animals, but there was also serenity amongst the animals themselves. This notion gains further credence when considering later instances where animals that typically opposed humans displayed gentleness toward individuals in whom the power of sin was diminished by grace. The righteous examples include Noah, who resided securely in the ark alongside various animal species; Daniel, who “shut the mouths of the lions” (Dan. 6:22); the apostle Paul, who was unscathed by the snake that clung to his hand (Acts 28:5); and the martyrs thrown to wild beasts yet remained unharmed, as well as holy figures who received the company of wild creatures (such as Gerasimos at the Jordan).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.