The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 14:18Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

But Melchisedech, the king of Salem, bringing forth bread and wine, for he was the priest of the most high God,

Douay-Rheims

וּמַלְכִּי־צֶ֙דֶק֙ מֶ֣לֶךְ שָׁלֵ֔ם הוֹצִ֖יא לֶ֣חֶם וָיָ֑יִן וְה֥וּא כֹהֵ֖ן לְאֵ֥ל עֶלְיֽוֹן׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

12 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 13 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

What does it signify to call Melchizedek the king of Salem and the priest of the Most High God? It is noted that he was indeed the king of Salem. The esteemed Apostle Paul also describes him to the believing Hebrews, drawing attention to his name and city (Hebrews 7:1). He elucidates Melchizedek’s name through its etymology, explaining that it means king of righteousness, as "melchi" translates to kingdom and "zedek" to righteousness in Hebrew. Furthermore, he highlights the name of the city, referring to Melchizedek as the king of peace, since "Salem" means peace.

Read more (244 words)

It is likely that he was a self-appointed priest, as was customary at that time, or perhaps his neighbors conferred this honor upon him due to his age, or like Noah, Abel, and Abraham, he took it upon himself to offer sacrifices. Additionally, he serves as a foreshadowing of Christ, as Paul explains, noting that Melchizedek is "without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, resembling the Son of God; he remains a priest forever" (Hebrews 7:3). However, one might question how a man could be devoid of father and mother, and without a beginning or an end. Remember, he is presented as an image; thus, do not seek to find all the attributes solely in the likeness. If he possessed all the qualities that belong only to the divine truth itself, he would not merely be an image. What, then, is intended by these descriptions? It suggests that since he had no remembrance of his parents, he is regarded as lacking father or mother. And since he had no lineage, he is depicted as ancestorless. In a similar vein, Christ is referred to as genealogy-less, having neither a mother in heaven nor a father on earth. Observe how the honor bestowed upon the patriarch unveils a deeper mystery. "And Melchizedek... brought forth bread and wine." Contemplate the image while considering the truth, and be amazed at how the divine Scriptures profoundly foretell what was to come.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Regarding Abraham and Melchizedek, the Almighty established the law as a means of guidance, for in Scripture it is stated that it was a tutor unto Christ (Galatians 3:24). Yet it is evident from Scripture that the law diminishes, while it simultaneously points toward the perfect sacrament of Christ. This truth can be uncovered by earnest examination of the biblical texts. The esteemed Apostle Paul speaks succinctly about the two covenants: "For there is a disannulling of the former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness; for the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did" (Hebrews 7:18-19).

Read more (1195 words)

Thus, no one can draw near to God through the initial commandments given by Moses, but rather through the introduction of a hope that the divine mystery holder sought to exemplify at the highest level. Paul explicitly addresses the setting aside of the law; he points out that if the first covenant had been flawless, there would have been no need for a second. As the prophet admonishes, "Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah; not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers." This new covenant proclaims, "I will put My laws into their mind and write them in their hearts, and I will be their God, and they shall be My people" (Hebrews 8:7-12). He adds, "In that He saith, 'A new covenant,' He hath made the first obsolete. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away" (Hebrews 8:13). Therefore, the law stands weak, showing itself impotent to accomplish sanctification.

The justification found in Christ and His service is of a superior nature. This is affirmed by God, who through the mouths of prophets calls out to those who were bound to the obsolete commandments. He commands, “Wash yourselves, make yourselves clean” (Isaiah 1:16), and emphasizes, “I desire mercy and not sacrifice, and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings” (Hosea 6:6; cf. Matthew 12:7). In Christ, we find forgiveness, and through Him, we contemplate the nature of the Father and truly know Him. There are myriad parallels and prophetic utterances that highlight how the works of the law displease God, leading us to consider the account of Abraham. Upon learning that his nephew Lot was in peril due to captivity in Sodom, he armed his household along with allies—Aner, Eshcol, and Mamre—to bravely confront those who had taken Lot captive. Abraham rescues not only Lot but also many others who suffered similar fates. When he returned from the battlefield, bearing the marks of victory, those whom he had saved welcomed him. The Scripture notes: "When he returned from the slaughter of Chedorlaomer and the kings that were with him, the king of Sodom went out to meet him in the valley of Shaveh" (Genesis 14:17).

Furthermore, Melchizedek, the king of Salem, offered him bread and wine—he was a priest of the Most High God. Melchizedek blessed Abraham and proclaimed, "Blessed be Abram of the Most High God, possessor of heaven and earth, and blessed be the Most High God, which hath delivered your enemies into your hand" (Genesis 14:18-20). Here, the clear reflections of the perfection found in Christ shine through Melchizedek’s figure, illustrating how inferior the service of the law truly is. It is evident that "without all contradiction the less is blessed of the better" (Hebrews 7:7).

Moreover, as Abraham represents the progenitor of Israel, Melchizedek influences Levi, who metaphorically holds the divine priesthood, as he was still in the loins of his father at the time (Hebrews 7:10). Thus, the righteousness found under the law is blessed by the ministry exemplified in Christ, the type of which is Melchizedek. Would anyone doubt that this blessing, which far surpasses a mere blessing devoid of divine authority, is not more excellent? Yet we shall not linger longer on this point, as some may be intrigued to learn more about Melchizedek. Various theories abound regarding his identity, with some suggesting he was merely a vision presented to Abraham, while others argue he represented a high angelic power.

Others posit that because the name "Salem" implies peace (Hebrews 7:2), and Melchizedek is titled king of Salem, he must therefore be construed not as a human, but as a spiritual being. They contend that because he has "neither beginning of days nor end of life" (Hebrews 7:3), it would be folly to ascribe human qualities to him. Such reasoning seems misguided as they attribute divine characteristics to Melchizedek improperly. The fact remains that Salim refers to peace, Jerusalem symbolizes the vision of peace, and God's true King is Christ, who embodies this peace.

Furthermore, it is necessary to highlight that while Jerusalem stands as the vision of peace, the historical kings who ruled were often wicked and profane. It is unreasonable to identify any earthly monarch with such a title, as they were, by nature, mere mortals. The essence of titles does not inherently confer the reality of their nature, as we see even in the untamed nature of earthly kingdoms. As acknowledged, if Jerusalem signifies the vision of peace, then it must be linked to Christ, who personifies our peace (Ephesians 2:14). That Melchizedek prefigures Christ is evident; he acts as a king of righteousness (Melchizedek means "king of righteousness") and peace in his role.

Further enlightening this, those aware of the divine mysteries understand that divine mysteries are only glimpsed dimly. Out of many potential examples, the mystery of Christ remains elusive even as we grasp it more fully through His humanity, with the incarnate Word dwelling among us (John 1:14). Christ embodies both our Messenger and our Priest (Hebrews 3:1). He liberated us from the authority of the law, imparting the gospel as sound doctrine. Additionally, He did not act unilaterally, but led the captives from death, founding the Church, and establishing dominion over us. Through faith, we are spiritually circumcised into His Kingdom.

It is also stated that Jesus "became flesh and dwelt among us" (John 1:14) and was anointed as a rightful priest and messenger. The anointing speaks to His divine kingship, reminiscent of Aaron's priesthood awarded through consecration. Aaron represented a holy calling, as he was appointed as the chief priest, therefore contrasting with All those who served under the now-obsolete covenant. The portion due to Aaron from the Levites illustrates Melchizedek’s superiority over them, as described in Hebrews.

Christ’s ministry surpasses the limitations of the Levitical priesthood as exemplified by Aaron and Melchizedek, who received tithes from Abraham. Jesus is the truer priest who not only entered the holy of holies with His own blood (Hebrews 9:11-12), but also offered Himself for our sins (1 Peter 3:18). Moses interceded for the people, while Jesus intercedes for us, ensuring we are sanctified through Him. Thus, the old testament law found in Moses can never compare against the clarity and efficacy of Christ’s teachings.

Let us highlight that a genuine understanding does not merely dwell in names but seeks the essence of actions and correlates the figures depicted accurately. Instead of focusing on genealogies, we reflect on the nature of the priesthood to which these figures belong. Thus, as we discuss the type of priesthood Melchizedek illustrates, let us not forget the reality reflected in their duties and actions, showcasing Christ as our ultimate High Priest.

Through all these reflections, we further comprehend that Melchizedek is indeed a man, representative of our Lord, not the Holy Spirit or any celestial being. In summation, we acknowledge that the lack of records about Melchizedek's genealogy heralds not his divinity but rather emphasizes the eternal priesthood Christ holds, of which Melchizedek serves as a beautiful typological illustration.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

For the first time, the offering made to God by Christians globally was accomplished. (Psalm 110: 4.) This fulfills the prophecy addressed to Christ, who was to come in human form, stating, “Thou art a priest forever after the order of Melchisedec.” This indicates a priesthood distinct from that of Aaron, whose lineage was destined to be set aside when the true realities, which these symbols prefigured, became manifest.

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek (Psalms 109:4). Unlike Aaron, who was anointed with oil for the priesthood, Melchizedek did not perform sacrifices involving blood. He served as a high priest for the Gentiles and blessed Abraham with bread and wine.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

This Melchisedec represents Shem; in his majesty, he served as king, being the forefather of the fourteen tribes, and also as high priest, having inherited the priesthood from his father Noah. Shem existed not only prior to Abram, as recorded in Scripture, but also before Jacob and Esau, the sons of Abram's descendant. Rebekah sought his counsel, and Shem revealed to her that two nations were present within her womb, and that the older would serve the younger (Gen. 25:22-23). Rebekah would not have approached him without first acknowledging her husband, who had been remarkably delivered from death, and her father-in-law, who regularly received divine insights, unless she had been aware of his significance through Abram and through his own son.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

In the book of Genesis, we encounter Melchisedec, the king of Salem, who serves as a prefiguring of Christ. He presented Abraham with bread and wine, symbolizing the Christian sacrament of the Savior's body and blood.

My brief work serves as a compilation of Jewish inquiries and traditions, so it is pertinent to share the Jewish perspective on this matter. They maintain that Melchisedec is Shem, who was the son of Noah, and by calculating the years of his life, they argue he lived into the time of Isaac, claiming that all of Noah's firstborn descendants functioned as priests until the establishment of the Aaronic priesthood. Additionally, when referring to the king of Salim, it is understood to denote the king of Jerusalem, which was previously named Salim. The holy Apostle, in his Epistle to the Hebrews, refers to Melchisedec as one without father or mother (Heb. 7:3), linking him to Christ, and through Christ to the Church of the Gentiles (as all dignity of the head reflects upon the members). For He, who was uncircumcised, blessed Abraham after his circumcision and subsequently blessed Levi through Abraham, and through Levi, blessed Aaron, from whom the subsequent priesthood arose. Thus, it follows that the priesthood of the synagogue, which underwent the rite of circumcision, was blessed by the priesthood of the Church before the rite. Furthermore, the statement, “Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec” (Psalms 109:4), points us to our established practice (as noted in the term 'established practice'). This priestly service departs entirely from the Aaronic tradition; it is not based on the sacrifice of lifeless offerings but upon the holy offering of bread and wine, symbolizing the body and blood of the Lord Jesus.

You have sent me the book, άνωνυμον άδέοσποτον, and I am uncertain whether you have omitted the author's name or if the writer chose anonymity to sidestep disputes. Upon reading, I observed that the author, addressing the crucial question of the high priest Melchisedec, attempted to demonstrate through numerous arguments that he who blessed the great patriarch Abraham possessed a divine nature and should not merely be regarded as an ordinary man. The author even ventured to claim that the Holy Spirit approached Abraham in the guise of a man; however, he failed to elaborate on how the Holy Spirit presented bread and wine or how he received the tithe of the spoils from Abraham after his conquest over the four kings. You have requested my thoughts on both the author and the subject matter. I admit I preferred not to voice my opinions and engage in a potentially contentious discussion, where any assertion I made could meet objections. Yet, upon rereading your letter, I encountered a strong appeal not to dismiss your request. I proceeded to delve into the works of ancient scholars to ascertain their views, seeking to respond to you from the wisdom of many. I soon found a discussion on Melchisedec in Origen's first discourse on Genesis. He, considering the topic from various viewpoints, referred to Melchisedec as an angel. When discussing higher powers, he employed nearly the same arguments as your author did concerning the Holy Spirit. I then moved on to Didymus, his successor, who faithfully followed the ideas of his mentor. When I turned to Hippolytus, Irenaeus, Eusebius of Caesarea, Eusebius of Emisa, Apollinarius, and our own Eustathius—who was the first bishop of Antioch to boldly confront Arius—I discerned that all of their diverse opinions converge on the assertion that Melchisedec was a man of Canaanite lineage, ruling over the city of Jerusalem, first named Salim, then Jebus, and finally Jerusalem.

It is not surprising that the priest of the Most High God is characterized as uncircumcised, standing apart from the ceremonial law and the Aaronic lineage, given that both Abel and Enoch were righteous in God's sight and offered sacrifices; further, in the Book of Job, we read that Job himself was a priest, making offerings and sacrifices for his children (Job 1), although Job is recorded not to belong to the lineage of Levi but to the tribe of Esau, despite differing Jewish beliefs. As Noah, inebriated and vulnerable in his own dwelling, served as a type of the Saviour while being mocked by his middle son (Genesis 9), and as Samson, enamored by the harlot Delilah, ultimately defeated his foes in death more decisively than in life (Judges 16)—so too do many patriarchs, saints, and prophets reflect aspects of the Saviour's image; Melchisedec, as a Canaanite not of Jewish descent, symbolizes the priesthood of the Son of God, as noted in Psalm 109: Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec. The order of Melchisedec is multifaceted: He was both king and priest and held the priesthood prior to circumcision—an indication that priesthood would ultimately be granted to Gentiles and not exclusively to Jews. He was anointed not with the ceremonial oil prescribed by Mosaic law (Lev. 8:1) but with the oil of gladness and purity of faith. He did not offer sacrifices of flesh and blood or the innards of lifeless beasts; rather, he sanctified the sacrament through bread and wine, the unblemished and spiritual sacrifice of Christ.

Many other connections can also be drawn, but a thorough discussion is limited by the constraints of this letter. I do not touch upon the more comprehensive analysis provided in the epistle to the Hebrews, widely accepted by Greeks and some Latins, which explains that Melchisedec, the king of righteousness, ruled over Salim—translated as king of peace. The scripture describes him as one without father or mother, and this understanding is clarified by the term άγηνεαλόγητος—not implying he was without parents, since Christ had both a human mother and father, but because Genesis presents him abruptly as encountering Abraham after the latter’s triumph over his adversaries, with neither a lineage preceding nor succeeding him mentioned. The Apostle states that the Aaronic priesthood, associated with the Jewish people, had a beginning and an end, while Melchisedec’s priesthood—representative of Christ and the Church, both in the past and future—is eternal, lacking a human founder. With the cessation of this priesthood came a change in the law, indicating that the word of God and divine law emanated not from Hagar and Mount Sinai but from Sarah, the free woman, and the stronghold of Zion (Heb. 5:11). Not that the Apostle was unable to explain this further, but rather because it was detrimental to persuade the Jewish people—addressing those who could grasp the mystery more fully. However, if even the Apostle, a chosen vessel, finds himself bewildered regarding the sacrament, recognizing certain matters as ineffable, how much more ought we, the weak and insignificant, to acknowledge our ignorance, representing great truths concisely and fleetingly? The Apostle underscores that before Levi and Aaron, there was Melchisedec, the priest of the Gentiles, whose exalted nature surpassed theirs, as he blessed the Jewish priesthood while still enfolded within the loins of Abraham. All subsequent commendations directed to Melchisedec ought to be associated with the Christ-figure, whose attributes personify the mysteries of the Church. I have compiled this information from various Greek texts, wishing to offer a compact representation of a vast body of knowledge, outlining salient points while allowing you to discern a multitude of viewpoints. Yet, since you have kindly sought my insights and I trust that all I share will reach attentive ears, I will also convey the thoughts of the Jewish tradition, quoting their words directly: umilchesedek melec salem hosi lehem vaiain, uhu choen leel elion: vaibar cheu vaiomer baruch abram leel elion cone samaim va ares: ubaruch el el elion eser maggen sarach biadach vaiothen lo maaser mecchol (Gen. 14:18). In Latin, this translates, "And Melchisedec, king of Salem, brought forth bread and wine; and he was the priest of the God of the highest; and he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abraham by the God of the highest, who made heaven and earth; and blessed be the God of the highest, who delivered your enemies into your hands; and he gave him a tithe of all things." Melchisedec is also identified as Shem, the first son of Noah, at the period when Abraham was born, who lived three hundred ninety years as follows: Shem fathered Arphaxad in the second year after the flood at the age of one hundred, and he lived five hundred years afterward. Arphaxad, at thirty-six years, fathered Salem (Sulu); Salem fathered Eber at thirty years; Eber fathered Rehu at thirty-four; Rehu fathered Seruch at thirty-two; Seruch, at thirty years, fathered Nahor; Nahor, at twenty-nine, fathered Terah, who, at seventy, fathered Abram, Nahor, and Haran. By tallying the years prior to each son's birth, it becomes evident that three hundred ninety years passed from Shem's birth to Abraham's. Such calculations reveal that Shem outlived his descendant from the tenth tribe, Abraham, by thirty-five years. Furthermore, it is acknowledged that prior to the Aaronic priesthood, all the firstborn from Noah's lineage, listed in Genesis, served as priests and offered sacrifices to God; this was the birthright Esau sold to Jacob (Gen. 27). Thus, it is reasonable to infer that Melchisedec approached the victorious Abraham, offering bread and wine to him and his warriors—since he was to bestow such honors upon his great-grandson—and received a tithe from Abraham's spoils of victory or, as it is ambiguous, perhaps he offered a tithe from his own possessions, demonstrating his forefather's generosity toward a nephew (as the Hebrew text and the Septuagint can be interpreted to imply Melchisedec both received a tithe from the spoil and himself gifted a tithe to Abraham, although the Apostle clearly outlines in his Epistle to the Hebrews that it was not a tithe from the spoils but from his possessions). Salim should not be seen as merely Jerusalem—an etymological construct of Greek and Hebrew—as Josephus and others have theorized; the mixture of foreign terms reveals the fallacy of this idea. Instead, it refers to a city near Scythopolis, still recognized as Salim, where the remnants of Melchisedec’s palace attest to the grandeur of its former glory, mentioned in the concluding verses of Genesis: "And Jacob came to Succoth" (Gen. 33:17). This indicates that Jacob moved to Salim, a town in the territory of Shechem within Canaan.

Read the full text in the app

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

The triumphant individual must not credit his triumph to his own efforts, but instead recognize it as a gift from God. This lesson is exemplified by Abraham, who, after his victory, did not grow arrogant but rather embraced greater humility. He offered sacrifices and tithes, resulting in the blessing of Melchisedec, which translates to king of righteousness and king of peace, as he served as a priest of the Most High God. Who embodies the King of righteousness and the Priest of God, if not the one referred to as ‘You are a priest forever after the order of Melchisedec’ (Psalm 109:4), namely the Son of God, the Priest of the Father, who, through the offering of His body, atoned for our sins before the Father?

Maximus the Confessor

7th centuryChurch Father

It appears to me, through understanding and experience, that the extraordinary Melchisedec, about whom many remarkable accounts are found in Scripture, was exalted to rise above time and nature, taking on a likeness to the Son of God, embodying, as far as grace allows, what the Giver of grace perceives to be his true essence. When it is stated that he is “without father, without mother, without kindred,” it suggests that by virtue of the profound grace he received, he was free from the usual human lineage and natural attributes. His lack of “beginning of days nor end of life” indicates a knowledge that transcends the characteristics of both time and eternity, reflecting a contemplation that surpasses all material and immaterial essences.

Read more (789 words)

Furthermore, the statement that “the priest shall abide like unto the Son of God” (Hebrews 7:3) implies perhaps the unwavering nature of the highest virtue, as well as a divine focus that maintains an undistracted mind. Virtue is characterized by its ability to resist nature, while true contemplation defies the constraints of time and age, ensuring that neither are bound to anything beyond God, recognized only by Him as their origin. In turn, the latter—being beyond description—does not linger on anything that has a beginning and an end, representing God, who is the source of all beginnings and endings and draws to Himself with an indescribable joy the hearts of those who are wise.

In this way, divine likeness is manifested through knowledge and virtue, through which the worthy are upheld in their love of God alone. For this reason, they are given the sacred honor of sonship—not only to intercede continually (Hebrews 7:25) before God but also to stand before Him, embodying the divine likeness. This dimension of intercession implies a connection to the grace of self-transformation and divine advocacy.

Therefore, it follows that Melchisedec, who transcended the earthly constraints of nature and time, should not be defined by the ordinary markers of human existence, such as parentage and lineage. Instead, he is to be seen according to the virtues and wisdom by which he reinvented himself. Those whose will has triumphantly overcome the rigid laws of nature through virtue and whose intellect has risen above the limitations of time and age are rightly identified not by what they have left behind, but by the brilliance of what they have embraced—this is their true essence.

Similarly, our natural tendency is to focus on the visible world, such as identifying colors with the physical body and associating light with illuminated air and fire with matter. Melchisedec, having consciously chosen virtue over natural limitations due to the honor of our divine calling, transcended all aspects of time and age through his knowledge, having deliberately left behind the seen for the unseen. He approached the eternal, divine, and immortal natures of God through the Word and in the spirit. His existence manifests the divine likeness bestowed upon him by the One who begot him: “that which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit” (John 3:6-7).

Thus, it is fitting that he should not be categorized by temporal and natural qualities, such as names or genealogy, but rather by the divine attributes he embodied—attributes which elude the reach of time, nature, intellect, or any existing thing. Melchisedec is presented in Scripture as one without parentage, ancestry, or life's boundaries—not due to a created origin, but in accordance with the eternal, transcendent grace that exists above all creation and time, related to the eternally existent God, through whom he is wholly recognized as consciously born.

Scripture likely presents him singularly as the first to have achieved a state above material existence and species through virtue and knowledge, his existence beginning within time yet not confined to it. His nature is uniquely and profoundly mysterious, universally veiled from human understanding, draped in the divine, and embodying the essence of God. Thus, he, like all saints who choose goodness, reflects the image of God, sharing in the divine virtue which elevates him as an image of Christ and His ineffable mysteries, to whom all saints are drawn as the Archetype and Source of all goodness within them—particularly Melchisedec, who exhibits the attributes of Christ more explicitly than any other.

Now, applying this understanding to our Lord, Jesus Christ, we find Him singular and unique, without father or mother or genealogy, without beginning or end: born eternally from the Father in a manner that transcends understanding; His earthly mother unable to define His divine origin. Thus, He cannot be measured by human genealogy, as both of His births surpass comprehension and are wholly ineffable dimensions of His nature, remaining eternally a priest, imperishable and untouched by mortality as He is God, the source of life.

Let us not think any individual is deprived of this grace, for it is solely upon the great Melchisedec that Scripture declares it. God has endowed all creation with the innate capacity for salvation, ensuring that anyone who desires may assimilate divine grace and emulate the greatness of Melchisedec, Abraham, Moses, and all saints—not through the mere change of names or titles, but by imitating their virtuous paths.

Furthermore, anyone who has renounced worldly wisdom and has subdued all carnal desires to focus on divine grace can also attain this state akin to Melchisedec, being freed from the dominion of flesh and nature through their union with the Spirit of God.

Cyprian of Carthage

3rd centuryChurch Father

In the priest Melchisedec, the sacrament of the Lord's offering was anticipated, as affirmed by Sacred Scripture: And Melchisedec king of Salem brought forth bread and wine - he was a priest of the Most High God - and blessed Abram. The Psalms further witness to Melchisedec as a foreshadowing of Christ, for the Holy Spirit speaks of the Son in the name of the Father, saying, ‘Before the day, I begat thee... Thou art a priest forever after the order of Melchisedec.’ The significance of the Eucharist is rooted in this offering, as Melchisedec served as a priest of the Most High God, presenting bread and wine and blessing Abraham. Who, then, is the true Priest of the Most High God, if not our Lord Jesus Christ, who provided a sacrifice to God the Father by presenting what Melchisedec presented—bread and wine, which signifies His body and blood?

Dimitri of Rostov

17th centuryChurch Father

Numerous interpretations of Melchisedec have emerged over time. Some Jewish traditions identified him with Shem, Noah's son, or even Noah himself, while others suggested he was Enoch. Origen and Didymus viewed Melchisedec as an angel, and some heretical groups even claimed he was the Holy Spirit, which led to their designation as ‘Melchisedekian’. It is important for us to understand that Melchisedec shared our human condition entirely; he had earthly parents from the lineage of Ham and was one of the rulers in Canaan. Yet, among all Canaan's kings, he uniquely acknowledged the one true God, the Creator of heaven and earth, offering Him sincere sacrifices; he was the king of the city of Salem.

Read more (854 words)

The holy Apostle Paul describes Melchisedec as one without father, mother, or genealogy (Hebrews 7:3). St. John Chrysostom clarifies this point: ‘We do not know who his father or mother were, nor do we have records of their names, or any information about his beginning or end. Instead, he is said to be like the Son of God’ (Hebrews 7:3). This comparison arises from our lack of knowledge regarding either his origins or his conclusion, but we do have certainty about both Melchisedec's life and the life of Christ, who transcends all comparisons (Discourse 25 on the Book of Genesis, Exh. 5). The absence of a specified lineage for Melchisedec does not imply that he was not human; he was indeed a man like us. The omission of his lineage in scripture is due to Moses’ intention to document only the lineage of Abraham, descending from Shem's son Arphaxad, through whom Christ was ultimately born. Since Melchisedec did not belong to this lineage, his parents' names were not recorded.

Melchisedec reflected the image and likeness of the Son of God in several ways. His name, Melchisedec, translates to ‘king of righteousness,’ paralleling Christ, who embodies righteousness itself, as He justified us through His blood from the divine wrath. Melchisedec was the ruler of Salem, which signifies peace; Christ, too, is the very embodiment of peace, bringing reconciliation between us and God the Father, as stated by the apostle: ‘This is our peace, which hath made both one’ (Eph. 2:14). Just as Melchisedec was exalted in Salem, Christ was glorified in Jerusalem when He entered the city on a young donkey, with the crowds proclaiming, ‘Blessed is the coming King!’ (Luke 19:38; John 12:13), and again when the inscription overhead at His crucifixion declared, ‘Jesus of Nazareth is King’ (John 19:19). While Melchisedec is recorded in scripture as having no father or mother, indicating the absence of these details, Christ is truly without earthly mother from the Father ab aeterno and without earthly father in His temporal birth. The lack of detail regarding Melchisedec's birth and death in Holy Scripture signifies that while it’s not mentioned when he came into existence or left this world, it is clear that he had a beginning and an end; contrastingly, Christ is eternal and without beginning. Melchisedec stands as the first and last priest of his time, with no successors noted afterward; however, Christ our Lord is the supreme High Priest who has ascended through the heavens and alone holds the position as the first and last High Priest, sacrificing Himself on the cross for the sins of humanity. Melchisedec’s offering consisted of bread and wine; conversely, our Savior has left us His own body and precious blood as a sacrifice, presented under the forms of bread and wine. This is foreshadowed in the Psalms: ‘Thou art a priest for ever, according to the rank of Melchisedec’ (Ps. 109:4). This does not imply an eternal priesthood in the same temporal sense of Melchisedec but pertains to the sacrificial offering made with bread and wine, since only the Son of God is eternal, while Melchisedec eventually passed away, as St. Chrysostom notes, ‘He (Melchisedec) died, and was not a priest for ever.’ Ignatius the Theologian, in his letter to the Philadelphians, further describes Melchisedec as a figure reflecting the Son of God, who shines as both King and Priest, the very source of purity and the Bridegroom of virgins.

For those who wish to delve deeper into the narratives surrounding Melchisedec, one may refer to the Prologue for the month of May (22nd day) and February (23rd day). Melchisedec, king of Salem (Gen. 14:18), is mentioned in the Gospel of John, where it states, ‘Be John baptized in Enon near Salim, for there were many waters there’ (John 3:23). It is commonly believed that this Salim was not Jerusalem, despite many attributing that name to it; rather, it was a separate city. Salim was located in the territory of Manasseh, close to Enon and Scythopolis near the Jordan river, while Jerusalem belonged to the district of Benjamin, atop Mount Moriah, also known as Zion, where Abraham sacrificed Isaac to God in an area that was then uninhabited. When Melchisedec met Abraham returning from battle, Isaac had yet to be born, indicating that Melchisedec was indeed the king of the Salim located by the Jordan, close to where John later baptized during Christ's time. This historical context is also supported by Jerome, who recounts traditions based on Jewish rabbinic teachings, noting that the birthplace of Melchisedec is still referenced today. As for the claim that Melchisedec founded Jerusalem, this came after the sacrifice Abraham made on Mount Moriah, when he offered Isaac. This narrative can be deemed authentic; the holy Melchisedec, filled with prophetic insight, foresaw the future miracles to take place in this locale and relocated from Salim to establish a city named ‘Jerusalem.’ This name merges Greek and Hebrew terms: ‘hieros’ meaning ‘holy’ and ‘salim’ signifying ‘peace.’ Thus, ‘Jerusalem’ translates to ‘holy peace,’ a place sanctified through Abraham's sacrifice and God's covenant of eternal peace made with him.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

Melchisedec. This term refers to Jonathan, the interpreter of Jerusalem, who is Shem; Damian, a member of the Melchisedekian sect, signifying the Son of God; Hierax, from Egypt, representing the Holy Spirit; and Origen along with Didymus, viewed as the Angel. The esteemed Theodoret suggests that Melchisedec likely descended from the peoples residing in Palestine, serving both as king and priest among them. This perspective is straightforward and logical, especially considering how most alternatives contradict the Mosaic narrative. Melchisedec is referred to as King of Salim, which is at times identified with Jerusalem, as noted in Psalms 75:3. Interestingly, there exists another Salim.

Read more (589 words)

He offered bread and wine, an action that some associate with the priestly duty of offering these elements, stemming from the priestly designation given to Melchisedec. However, since this name emphasizes the act of blessing, there is no necessity to infer an additional priestly function; the Apostle highlights only the actions of Presentation and Blessing concerning Melchisedec (Heb. 7:1). In ancient customs, presenting bread and wine or water served as a common expression of respect, unity, and hospitality (Deuteronomy 23:4). He was a priest of God Most High, a title distinguishing Melchisedec from the servants of various gods (Psalms 96:9), as well as from other kings and even Abram, who, despite performing sacred functions, is not designated a priest. This leads to the conclusion that Melchisedec was a remarkable servant of the true God throughout Palestine. This was conceivable during a time when the extent of the Amorites' sins was not yet complete (Genesis 15:16), despite the existence of even more grievous times, as evidenced by Balaam.

The identity of Melchisedec is shrouded in mystery, a realization that Abram himself seemingly acknowledged when he honored him in a manner unlike any other. Throughout the later period of the Old Testament, Melchisedec was perceived as a symbolic figure of the future. David’s reference to a priest in the order of Melchisedec (Psalms 109:4) cannot pertain to any mortal individual, since no man can serve as a priest forever. Only Melchisedec himself has received from God the unique combination of the titles of king and priest. Hosea's attempt to merge these roles resulted in severe repercussions (2 Chronicles 26:19). In the New Testament, the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews portrays Melchisedec as a deliberate foreshadowing of the Son of God, encompassing the entire context of the Mosaic account.

The constituents of this portrayal include the name Melchisedec, which translates to "king of righteousness." The Son of God is similarly referred to as the Sun of righteousness (Malachi 4:2) and the King of righteousness (Zechariah 9:9). Melchisedec is depicted as a king in whose presence even the conqueror of kings bowed down; in comparison, Christ, the Son of God, claims the title of Prince of the kings of the earth (Revelation 1:5). Melchisedec holds a regal status recognized throughout the world, whereas Jesus Christ is known as the Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9:6), reflecting the nature and influence of His reign. Melchisedec serves as both king and co-priest of the Most High God; Jesus, the Son of God, embodies the great Hierarch who has ascended into heaven (Hebrews 4:14). In the Mosaic account, Melchisedec appears without a father, mother, or genealogy; there are no indications of either the beginning of his days or the end of his life. The omission of these details is intentional, reflecting a profound purpose to depict him, as the Apostle states, in a likeness to the Son of God, who exists without a father in His earthly birth and without a mother in His eternal birth; His generation being beyond expression (Isaiah 53:8), as He transcends all creation, existing without beginning or end, recognized as He who is, who was, and who is to come (Revelation 1:4).

The greatness of the Melchisedec priesthood seems timeless, as there are no visible predecessors or successors, which echoes the nature of the priesthood held by Jesus Christ. Some view the bread and wine associated with Melchisedec as a foreshadowing of the sacrament of the body and blood of Christ; however, the apostle does not elaborate on this association.

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryCommentator

‘Salim,’ the original designation of the city later known as “Jebus,” was called Jerusalem from the reign of David onward. Even during David's era, this city was occasionally referred to as Salim (Psalms 75:3). Melchisedec, the king of Salem, engaged in a sacred assembly with Abram out of a genuine respect for him as God's chosen one, having no personal obligation or indebtedness to Abram. He greeted Abram with bread and wine, embodying the hospitality customary for noble hosts. ‘But he was a priest of the Most High God.’ While the combination of regal authority and priesthood was rare among the Jews, it was prevalent in other cultures; for instance, it continues among the Chinese through their leader Goddikhan.

Read more (614 words)

It's likely that the kings of the Canaanite tribes where Melchisedec resided also held priestly roles, albeit in worshipping lesser beings rather than the Creator, and they did not acknowledge the one true God who reigns supreme over all creation. Melchisedec stood apart from them: he was ‘the priest of the highest God, who created heaven and earth’ (Gen. 14:19), the same God whom Abram worshipped and whom Abram would publicly declare as the ‘highest God, who created heaven and earth’ (Gen. 14:22). There is a distinction; in this confession, Abram will refer to God as ‘the Lord,’ in Hebrew, ‘Jehovah,’ the everlasting name of the covenant God unique to him and his descendants. Although Melchisedec honored the true God, he could not call Him ‘Jehovah’ since he was not part of God’s chosen lineage but partaken of the covenant established with Noah (Gen. 9:9). This covenant was an agreement made by God with all humanity descended from Noah, rather than with a select group. Melchisedec existed outside of this intimate covenant, recognizing God as the deity of the universe and all nations, akin to Job and Balaam, who maintained the original revelations given to all people through Noah and the pre-Flood traditions. How, then, could a priest of the Most High God exist within the pagan context of Canaan? As a worshipper of the true God, he could have been an anomaly among the Canaanites, reminiscent of Job and Balaam among their own kin, even though he was a Canaanite himself. It is conceivable that, despite residing among them, Melchisedec was a descendant of Shem, with some of Shem's lineage potentially having lived in territories that the Canaanites later occupied. Nevertheless, the specific origins of Melchisedec remain uncertain and obscure. Speculations from rabbinical sources and certain ancient Christian writers that suggest Melchisedec may have been the Son of God, the Holy Spirit, an angel, or another pre-Flood patriarch like Enoch or Shem are overly conjectural and not credible. This absence of details regarding his genealogy and the time of Melchisedec is intentional, a point later emphasized by the Apostle Paul in his epistle to the Hebrews (Hebrews 7), to illustrate that Melchisedec serves as a foreshadowing of Christ, the Son of God, who is beyond any human lineage, existing as the eternally begotten Son without a mother, having no beginning or end. Furthermore, the unity of kingly and priestly roles within Melchisedec symbolizes Jesus Christ, the everlasting King ‘whose kingdom shall have no end’ (Luke 1:33) and the eternal High Priest who offered Himself as the ultimate sacrifice on the cross and continually intercedes for us because of that sacrifice (Hebrews 7:25). The Apostle also perceives a prophetic representation of Christ in the name ‘Melchisedec’ and the name ‘Salim’ that he ruled. The former conveys the meaning of ‘king of righteousness,’ while the latter refers to ‘king of peace.’ Hence Christ is both ‘the king of righteousness’ (Zechariah 9:9) and ‘the prince of peace’ (Isaiah 9:6), reigning over those justified by His precious blood and reconciled with God. In the Apostle's view, Melchisedec primarily symbolizes Christ, the Son of God, as a priest, confirmed by the Psalmist’s declaration: ‘Thou art a priest forever, after the order of Melchisedec’ (Ps. 109:4, Heb. 5:6, Heb. 7:17, 21). The priestly service of Jesus Christ in the order of Melchisedec surpasses the entire Levitical priesthood. The Apostle underscores this superiority, noting that Abram, the forefather of the Levitical line, received a blessing from Melchisedec; a clear indication that ‘the lesser is blessed of the greater’ (Heb. 7:7) and that Abram gave Melchisedec a tithe from the spoils of battle. This blessing is referenced in the following verses.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.