John Chrysostom
The prophecy stating that "the greater shall serve the lesser" (Gen. 25:23) gradually began to come to pass. Pay attention to this now.
And Jacob said to him: Sell me thy first birthright.
וַיֹּ֖אמֶר יַעֲקֹ֑ב מִכְרָ֥ה כַיּ֛וֹם אֶת־בְּכֹֽרָתְךָ֖ לִֽי׃
7 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 8 commentaries
The prophecy stating that "the greater shall serve the lesser" (Gen. 25:23) gradually began to come to pass. Pay attention to this now.
The former individual was driven by unchecked physical desires, valuing higher benefits over lesser ones, trading the essential for the trivial and inexpensive. Conversely, the latter was an avid seeker of the highest good, striving for that which would bring him glory in all respects. He acquired the birthright, while Esau dismissed it, carelessly prioritizing his own achievements over the blessing of his lineage. Thus, he was named Edom, which means 'earthly.' This serves as a stark condemnation of a genuinely worldly and humble spirit that overlooked the honor due to him, choosing instead to elevate fleeting pleasures above the significance of his birthright, even valuing momentary enjoyment—despite its consequences—over enduring dignity.
This is why the Apostle Paul rightly labeled Esau as a fornicator and irreverent man who chose to lead such a shameful life, presenting him as a prototype of individuals who degrade themselves through such debauchery. He strongly denounces unchecked desires of the flesh, stating, “Lest there should be among you any fornicator or profane person, like Esau, who for one morsel of food sold his birthright” (Hebrews 12:16). Consequently, the firstborn Israel was esteemed in God's eyes, yet he did not fully recognize the honor associated with his birthright. In essence, he relinquished his primogeniture to a new people from the Gentiles, being considerably attracted to earthly matters. This led to what is depicted in the Gospel parables: “The king made a wedding feast for his son” (Matthew 22:2). Those invited to the feast appeared, delivering God's message to the guests: “Behold, I have prepared my dinner, my oxen and what is fattened and slaughtered; all things are ready; come to the wedding feast.” However, it is said, “But they made light of it” (Matthew 22:4-5). Each one offered reasons for their rejection: one claimed, “I have married a wife, and therefore I cannot come,” while another stated, “I have bought a piece of ground, and I must go and see it” (Luke 14:20, 18). This illustrates how they followed in Esau’s footsteps, preferring temporary and carnal gains over the divine glory offered to them, essentially allowing others to claim their inheritance. Consequently, those who believed among the Gentiles were invited in their place, receiving the glory intended for Israel due to their willingness to obey and their eagerness to fulfill God’s desires. This is similarly supported by the words of David: “Lord! Thou hear’st the desire of the humble; strengthen their heart; incline Thine ear” (Psalms 9:38). For it is always the faithful who exhibit readiness to obey, despite the prior teachings of the Israelites. While the Gentiles may have lacked comprehensive divine guidance, they were more open to faith and readily heeded Christ’s commands, as evidenced by the Psalmist's words, “The people whom I have not known serve me; as soon as they hear of me, they obey me” (Psalm 17:44-45). However, concerning Israel, who had strayed and was unwilling to follow the righteous path, it is said, “The foreigners submit before me; the foreigners tremble and shudder in their fortresses” (Psalm 17:45-46). The correct paths that guide to Christ, preventing straying, are referred to as teachings through the law and the prophecies of the holy prophets. Yet, upon reaching the fulfillment of the law and the prophets—Christ—they became spiritually crippled, not out of a lack of understanding but through unreasonable actions, treating Him with contempt and daring to execute the Source of life.
Before the blessing was bestowed, Esau had succumbed to the temptation of the lentils prepared by Jacob... and exchanged his birthright for a simple meal. Esau departed with fleeting gratification, while Jacob gained lasting respect. This serves as a warning for those within the Church who are enslaved by momentary pleasures, consuming lentils—an act clearly associated with Jacob's preparation, although Jacob himself did not partake. Idolatry was more prevalent in Egypt than in any other region; hence, lentils symbolize the deceptions of the Gentiles. This starkly illustrates that the Church would emerge from these non-Jewish peoples, akin to Jacob cooking lentils while Esau consumed them.
The nations that honored idols ultimately abandoned them, while the Jews remained devoted to their idols. Those whose hearts had diverged while in Egypt journeyed through the wilderness, yet, upon witnessing their enemies perish in the sea, they wished to revert to idolatry, for they had lost sight of Moses (Refer to Exodus 14, Exodus 32). They failed to realize their dependence was not on God’s presence but rather on human visibility; when they no longer saw man before them, they began to question the existence of God. Their queries were rooted in physical sight, lacking the insight of the heart to acknowledge God's presence in Moses. Consequently, they forfeited their birthright when those converted in Egypt found gratification in lentils. Let us reflect on this: within the Christian community, only those of Jacob's lineage possess the birthright. Those who live, believe, and hope according to the flesh remain part of the Old Covenant, yet have not transitioned to the New. They continue to share in Esau’s fate without inheriting Jacob’s blessing.
Excessive indulgence led to Adam's demise and heralded the downfall of creation due to the allure of carnal desires. As a consequence, Noah faced ridicule, Ham received a curse, Esau abandoned his birthright, intertwining his lineage with the Canaanites, and Lot engaged in an incestuous union with his own daughters, fulfilling the roles of both father-in-law and son-in-law.
Jacob observed that Esau was disregarding his birthright, which led him to devise a plan to claim it for himself, relying on God's promise that “the greater shall serve the lesser” (Genesis 25:23). Jacob then approached Esau, saying, "Give me... my rightful position,” and allow yourself to have everything else.
The law serves to limit excessive eating and the overindulgence in food, not only to control waywardness but also to provide a pathway for reasoning through the contemplation of disciplined teaching. This approach addresses the roots of gluttony and other desires while curbing bodily appetites and turmoil. Consequently, moderation acts as a precursor to correction and an instructor in learning. Hence, St. James received a level of authority that he had not previously held, and with his brother's approval, he began to emphasize that those who lack self-control are unfit for making sound judgments.
The sons of Noah, despite inhabiting the same household, were unable to achieve unity in their ways. Similarly, Esau and Jacob resided with their father, yet they were not the same, as there was a lack of favor between them, leading one to favor himself over the other while competing for the blessing’s precedence (see Gen. 27). When one individual is harsh and the other gentle, it is challenging to maintain positive relations between contrasting natures and conflicting ambitions. Moreover, St. James could not show preference for the unworthy descendant of his lineage over the righteous one.
Sell me your birthright now. The privileges of the firstborn included a particular honor and authority above the other siblings, a special blessing from the father, a larger share of the inheritance (Deuteronomy 21:17), and for some, a preferential right to fulfill priestly duties within the communal worship alongside their brothers. Was it possible for these firstborn rights to be transferred to another? Indeed, this is illustrated by the case of Reuben, whose esteemed rights and blessings were given to Judah, the lesser portion to Joseph, and the priesthood to Levi. However, could these rights rightly be exchanged through purchase?
In the case of Esau, his sale is criticized precisely because it shows a disregard for innate and sacred entitlements, and even more so because it stemmed solely from impatience, which is why Scripture refers to him as a profane person (Hebrews 12:16). Conversely, Jacob's transaction appears to stem from a lack of brotherly love and even humanity, leaving no justification for his actions other than a troubling hint of his ulterior motive.