John Chrysostom
Esau responded, "What value is my birthright if I face death unless I eat?"
He answered: Lo I die, what will the first birthright avail me?
וַיֹּ֣אמֶר עֵשָׂ֔ו הִנֵּ֛ה אָנֹכִ֥י הוֹלֵ֖ךְ לָמ֑וּת וְלָמָּה־זֶּ֥ה לִ֖י בְּכֹרָֽה׃
6 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 7 commentaries
Esau responded, "What value is my birthright if I face death unless I eat?"
The former was consumed by sensual desires, choosing the highest of his benefits over the least and trading what was essential for what was trivial and worthless; while this one was an unquenchable seeker of the very best, striving for that which would bring him glory in all respects. He secured the birthright, unlike Esau, who dismissed it and thought little of the blessings of his lineage. Thus, he earned the name Edom, meaning ‘earthly,’ which clearly indicates his shallow, earthly mindset. He failed to recognize the glory intended for him and deemed the dignity of his birthright unworthy, opting instead for transient pleasures, even valuing fleeting satisfaction over lasting honor, despite the harm it caused him.
That is why Paul rightly categorized him as a fornicator and unholy individual for choosing such disgraceful living, likening Esau to those who devalue themselves in such a manner, harshly condemning unrestrained desires that are evidently carnal and earthly by stating: ‘Lest there be any fornicator or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright’ (Hebrews 12:16). Thus, the firstborn of Israel was honored by God, but he did not fully embrace the majesty that his birthright conferred. It was as if he surrendered his position of primogeniture to a new people who came from among the Gentiles and leaned heavily towards the fleshly and worldly. This dynamic is reflected in the Gospel parables, where it is said: ‘The king made a marriage for his son’ (Matthew 22:2). Those summoned to the feast then appeared, delivering God's invitation to the guests: ‘Behold, I have prepared my dinner, my oxen and fatlings are killed, and all things are ready; come to the marriage’ (Matthew 22:4-5). Yet those invited made excuses. One claimed, ‘I have married a wife, and therefore I cannot come’; another stated, ‘I have bought a piece of ground, and I must needs go and see it’ (Luke 14:20, 18). This illustrates how they emulated Esau, valuing immediate, earthly gratification over divine glory, essentially allowing others to claim their birthright. Consequently, those who believed among the Gentiles were called to take their place, receiving the honor and blessings that were meant for Israel due to their willingness to obey and their readiness to fulfill what pleased God. Divine David also testifies to this, saying: ‘Lord, thou hast heard the desire of the humble; thou wilt prepare their heart; thou wilt cause thine ear to hear’ (Psalms 9:38); for it is the faithful who are more inclined to obedience, even though the Israelites had previously received the law. While Gentiles lacked extensive Divine instruction, they were more open to faith and readily inclined their ears to the teachings of Christ, as He Himself affirmed through the Psalmist: ‘The people that I knew not shall serve me; as soon as they hear of me, they shall obey me’ (Ps. 17:44-45). In contrast, Israel, having strayed and not yet committed to walking rightly, is depicted as having compromised the strength of their thoughts, indicated by the words: ‘Strangers shall submit themselves unto me: as soon as they hear, they shall be obedient’ (Psalm 17:45-46). The paths that lead towards Christ, steering clear of confusion, are those directed by the law and the prophecies of the holy prophets. Yet when they arrived at the culmination of the law and the prophets, namely Christ, they became weakened not by sound reasoning but by irrationality, having treated Him disrespectfully and daring to execute the Author of life.
Before the blessing was conferred, Esau succumbed to the temptation of the lentils prepared by Jacob, trading away his birthright to his younger sibling. He departed with fleeting satisfaction, while Jacob gained lasting honor. Likewise, within the Church, there are those who are enslaved to momentary pleasures, indulging in lentils—food that Jacob may have prepared, though he refrained from eating them. Idols thrived in Egypt more than anywhere else; lentils symbolize the sustenance of Egypt, representing the illusions of the Gentiles. This symbolically indicated that the Church would emerge from the Gentiles, akin to Jacob who cooked the lentils, while Esau consumed them. The nations that honored idols eventually renounced them, whereas the Jews persisted in idol worship.
Those who turned their hearts in Egypt were guided through the wilderness. After their foes perished in the sea and their enemies were drowned by the waves, they yearned to create an idol anew because they had not seen Moses. They failed to realize that their faith was not in the presence of God, but rather in the presence of a mortal; unable to perceive Moses, they began to doubt God’s existence. They sought with physical sight, lacking spiritual vision to recognize God in Moses. Consequently, they forfeited their birthright, for those who converted while in Egypt partook of the lentils. Now consider this: there exists a nation of Christians, but within that nation, only those of Jacob’s lineage possess the right of inheritance. Those who live according to the flesh, who believe and hope with fleshly desires, remain tied to the Old Testament, but have yet to enter the New Covenant. They continue to share the fate of Esau, without possessing the blessing of Jacob.
The excessive indulgence of Adam led to his demise and initiated the downfall of creation due to the allure of carnal desires (See Gen. 3:1-4:16). Consequently, Noah faces ridicule (See Gen. 9:21), Ham receives a curse (See Gen. 9:25), Esau discards his birthright and intermingles with the Canaanites (See Gen. 36:2-3), while Lot enters into relationships with his own daughters, becoming both their husband and father (See Gen. 19:35).
The law serves to limit overeating and excessive indulgence, not merely to prevent moral decay, but also to guide through thoughtful discipline the development of reason, which counters the root causes of gluttony and other cravings while controlling bodily desires and restlessness. Consequently, moderation acts as a precursor to correction and a teacher of wisdom. In this way, St. James received a position of prominence from his brother that he initially lacked, and with his brother’s approval, he subsequently conveyed the importance of temperance, asserting that those who lack self-control are ineffective in making sound judgments.
Vice exists prior in time but is marked by the frailty of youth. It holds a temporal precedence, while virtue boasts the splendor of glory, which the unjust judge always attributes to the righteous. A testament to this is found in Scripture, where we learn that Esau, whose name signifies folly, willingly relinquished his birthright to his brother Jacob, exclaiming, "What is the birthright to me?" (Gen. 25:32). What Esau abandoned, the seasoned husband sought to attain, evident in the meaning of his name. Does it not appear that Esau, feeling as though he had lost a competition and viewing himself as lesser due to the weakness of his own reasoning, surrendered the honor to the victor? He recognized that his brother was not swayed by the same passions that he, like dust, found unbearable. "What am I," he lamented, "to be the firstborn?"
What do I possess in this birthright? This sentiment of Esau represents a grievance, offending his father, whose blessing he scorns, and denying his descendants the benefits that come from that blessing.
Passages read together with this verse.