The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 29:28Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

He yielded to his pleasure: and after the week was past, he married Rachel:

Douay-Rheims

וַיַּ֤עַשׂ יַעֲקֹב֙ כֵּ֔ן וַיְמַלֵּ֖א שְׁבֻ֣עַ זֹ֑את וַיִּתֶּן־ל֛וֹ אֶת־רָחֵ֥ל בִּתּ֖וֹ ל֥וֹ לְאִשָּֽׁה׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

6 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Upon hearing this, the righteous man willingly agreed to everything; and after another seven years, it is written that Laban delivered his daughter Rachel to him as a wife. Here, you can observe that the institution of marriage in ancient times was conducted with due respect. However, when you learn that Jacob married the elder daughter first and then the younger, do not be troubled or pass judgment on the practices of that era; rather, adapt your views to current conditions. By the grace of God, humanity has now flourished in vast numbers, and the standard of virtue has risen. Christ, having come to this world, instilled virtue among humanity, transforming people into, in a manner of speaking, angels, and abolished many of the ancient customs.

Read more (97 words)

It is evident that we should not rely solely on tradition; instead, we ought to seek what is beneficial. The practice of polygamy was not favorable; it has been removed, and it is now not acceptable for anyone to evoke it. Therefore, do not cling to tradition in any matter, but continuously search for what is advantageous and not detrimental to the soul. If something is good, even if it is outside of customary practice, let it be embraced by us; conversely, if something is harmful, even if it is customary, let us shun and detest it.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

After the completion of the seven weeks of toil for the elder, he took Rachel, the younger, to be his wife—a union he originally yearned for. The second, following the first, was brought into the Church from the Gentiles, referred to symbolically as ‘the sheep of God,’ which aligns with the meaning of the name Rachel, as mentioned earlier. The divine James further illustrates that Christ also worked for her, dedicating seven years of effort for Rachel. If the Son, who is inherently divine, engaged in labor, was it not a true toil for Him to experience persecution from Herod, subsequent afflictions from the Pharisees, derogatory remarks from rulers, mockery, spitting, striking, contempt from soldiers, and ultimately, death upon the cross?

Read more (482 words)

Thus, Christ initially allied Himself with the Jewish synagogue, having Moses as His friend and angels as mediators; later, He established a second church comprised of Gentiles, with the blessed John the Baptist serving as a form of mediator.

He indicated this spiritual and divine union, stating, ‘He who has the bride is the bridegroom, and the friend of the bridegroom, who stands and listens to him, rejoices when he hears the voice of the bridegroom. This is my joy fulfilled. He must increase, but I must decrease’ (John 3:29-30). Grace and faith serve as the dowry of the bride, for the Bridegroom of the Church from the Gentiles, who descends from above, declared through the prophets, ‘I will betroth thee to Me for ever, and I will betroth thee to Me in righteousness and judgment, in goodness and mercy. And I will betroth thee to Me in faithfulness, and thou shalt know the Lord’ (Hosea 2:19-20). Prior to the establishment of the Church among the Gentiles, He was wedded to her elder counterpart. However, this betrothal and marriage bond lacked permanence, as it was proclaimed, ‘This woman is not my wife, and I am not her husband’ (Hosea 2:2). Again, it was stated, ‘I will give her the book of remission in her hand’ (Jeremiah 3:8; Isaiah 50:1), indicating her rejection due to her infidelity and improper actions. He questioned, ‘If a husband lets his wife go, and she departs from him and becomes the wife of another, could she ever return to him? Would that land not be defiled? And yet you have committed adultery with many lovers, yet you wish to return to Me, says the Lord. Lift up your eyes to the heights, and see where they have not been unfaithful to you? You have sat by the roadside for them, like an Arabian in the wilderness, and have defiled the land with your adultery and deceit. The rains have been withheld, and the skies have not shown forth rain; yet you have the countenance of a harlot and have discarded all shame. Will you not henceforth cry out to Me, ‘My Father, You were the guide of my youth!’ (Jeremiah 3:1-5)?

In this instance, the elder was chastised; yet Rachel, the younger—the Church of the Gentiles—is eternally betrothed to Him. The phrase ‘To Himself’ (Hosea 2:19) signifies that He committed Himself to the Jewish synagogue through Moses’ mediation, while He entered into union with the Church of the Gentiles directly, calling her to Him with His own voice and living among men. He granted His consent to the bride, who implored, ‘Show me your face; let me hear your voice’ (Song of Songs 2:14). The ancients heard Him through Moses and the prophets, yet in the final days of this age, the Son spoke directly to us, a truth also attested by the wise Paul (Hebrews 1:2).

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Jacob concluded that if Leah remained in Laban's household, a man of unfaith, it might lead the righteous lineage to become ensnared in idolatry. He also feared deceiving Rachel, for she was already his wife. Thus, Jacob chose one, to uphold his promise to her, and the other, to prevent his offspring from being led into sin through her influence. Had Laban demanded that Jacob labor for seven years for Leah instead of marrying Rachel, Jacob would not have consented to such a lengthy service for her. This was not due to Leah's appearance, but rather because the thought of having two wives was repugnant to him.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

St. Rachel represents a rather enigmatic figure rather than a straightforward model of matrimony (Genesis 29:28ff.), yet in her story lies a reflection of the grace bestowed upon the original union. Jacob cherished deeply the one he had chosen as his wife; even the deception surrounding their engagement did not diminish his feelings, nor did the consummation of their marriage lessen his love for her. The revered patriarch thus instructs us on the reverence we ought to hold for the first marriage, as he himself valued that initial commitment highly. Therefore, daughters, exercise caution and strive to uphold the blessings of your original union; do not allow yourselves to endure unnecessary heartaches.

Andrew of Crete

8th centuryChurch Father

The patriarch faced the sweltering sun during the day and the unsettling chill of night out of necessity, dedicating himself each day to the tasks of tending his flocks and hard work so that he could acquire two wives. These two wives symbolize the interplay of action and reflection: Leah represents action, resembling the multitude of tasks, while Rachel embodies contemplation, achieved through extensive effort. For the soul cannot attain perfection in either action or contemplation without labor. The Great Canon, Song 4

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

Jacob indeed acts in accordance with Laban's requests, yet his response is more justifiable than Laban's actions. First, the union with Leah was unlawful, lacking the consent of the bride, rendering it potentially void; in contrast, Jacob rightfully sought to marry Rachel, a commitment he had made long before. The fact that his bond with Leah remained intact cannot be blamed on his lack of self-control, but rather on his enduring patience and graciousness. Furthermore, Jacob felt compelled to comply with Laban, who was his sole source of refuge. It is important to recognize that Jacob's turmoil was intensified by his deep affection for Rachel (Genesis 29:30).