John Chrysostom
In what preceded, the Apostle proved that the sacrifices are useless for perfect cleansing, that they were only a prefiguration, and that they are wholly insufficient.
At this point an objection presented itself to him. If they are prefigurations, then why, when the truth has been received, have they not ceased and come to an end, but are still offered by the Jews?
Here he resolves this by showing that they are no longer offered as prefigurations, and that God does not accept them.
Again he proves this not from the New Testament, but from the prophets. From antiquity he brings the strongest testimony that the sacrifices have ceased and come to an end, and that the Jews offer them wholly in vain, always resisting the Holy Spirit.
Read more (335 words)
He also strongly proves that they have not ceased only now, but from the very coming of Christ, or rather, even before His coming.
It was not Christ who put an end to them. Rather, first they were abolished, and only afterward did He come. First they were brought to an end, and then His coming followed.
So that they might not say, “We could please God even without this sacrifice of Christ,” He waited until the sacrifices had exposed themselves. Only then did He come.
For “neither sacrifice nor offering,” he says, “hast Thou desired.” By this he rejected everything. After speaking generally, he also speaks particularly: “Neither burnt offerings nor sacrifice for sin,” which are offered according to the law, “hast Thou been pleased with.”
“Offering” meant everything else besides sacrifices.
“Then He added: Behold, I come to do Thy will, O God.” Of whom is this said? Of no one other than Christ.
Here the Apostle in no way accuses those who offered. He shows that God does not refuse the sacrifices because of their vices, as He said elsewhere.
Rather, the insufficiency of the action itself has finally been revealed, and it has become manifest that it has no power and is now untimely.
How, then, is this to be reconciled with the frequent offering of sacrifices? It is not only from their frequent offering, he says, that they are seen to be weak and useless.
It is also from the fact that God does not accept them, since they are barren and useless. The same thing is expressed elsewhere when it says, “For if Thou hadst desired sacrifice, I would have given it” (Ps 50:18).
From this it is clear that He does not desire them. Therefore the will of God does not desire sacrifices, but the abolition of sacrifices. Thus there is no will of God that they be offered.
What does “to do Thy will” mean? It means to hand Himself over. This is the will of God.