The Church Fathers on this verse

Hebrews 7:14Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

For it is evident that our Lord sprung out of Juda: in which tribe Moses spoke nothing concerning priests.

Douay-Rheims

προδηλον γαρ οτι εξ ιουδα ανατεταλκεν ο κυριος ημων εις ην φυλην ουδεν περι ιερωσυνης μωυσης ελαλησεν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

9 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

The meaning of his words is this: I know and say that this tribe did not have the priesthood, and no one from it was a priest. This is precisely what the words mean: from which no one has attended at the altar. But in everything a change took place. Therefore the law and the old covenant had to be changed, because the very tribe was changed. Do you see how he shows still another distinction between the covenants from the distinction of the tribes? He proves their difference not only by this, but also from the person of the High Priest, from the covenant, from the manner of action, and from the type itself.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

The expression has shone forth is significant. It is taken both from Balaam's prophecy, which says, A star shall rise from Jacob (Num 24:17), and from Malachi's prophecy, which calls Him the Sun of righteousness (Mal 4:2). This shows that the Lord appeared to enlighten the world. Concerning this tribe Moses said nothing about priesthood. For everything concerning priesthood Moses assigned to the tribe of Levi, but to the tribe of Judah what concerns leadership in wars.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Those who come from the tribe of Levi receive tithes from the people, though from their brothers. Meanwhile the one not counted by lineage among them, that is, Melchizedek, for he was not from the tribe of Levi, tithed Abraham and blessed him.

The type consists in this. Christ, in turn, depicted in shadows, was not counted in the genealogy of those appointed to the priesthood according to the law, for He shone forth from the tribe of Judah.

Concerning this tribe Moses said nothing about priesthood. Christ tithed the sons of Levi, that is, the lawful priesthood.

He tithed them of old in Melchizedek, and later in Aaron. For Aaron also tithed the sons of Levi, bearing in himself the image of Christ's priesthood, as we have already said before.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

For it is known that our Lord Jesus Christ shone forth from Judah, from a tribe concerning which Moses never said anything about priesthood. On the contrary, King Uzziah was struck with leprosy for this when he actually wished to transfer the priesthood to the tribe of Judah before Jesus came and received this priesthood in His own time, since He was from Judah (2 Chr 26:16-20).

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle used the word manifest in the sense of indisputable. When the Magi came and Herod asked the Jews, Where is Christ to be born? they said, In Bethlehem of Judea.

Then they confirmed their word with the testimony of Scripture: For it is written, And you, Bethlehem, land of Judah, are by no means least among the rulers of Judah. For from you shall come a ruler Who will shepherd My people Israel (Mt 2:4-6).

From this tribe, says the Apostle, not one priest appeared. On the contrary, Uzziah, having dared to undertake a priestly act, was punished for this arrogance by the dishonor of leprosy.

Read more (42 words)

This mystery of the divine economy is worthy of wonder. As the Master Christ, being eternal King, was called our High Priest, so the tribe of Judah, being first royal, was deemed worthy of the priesthood in the person of the Master.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

For it is evident that our Lord sprang from the tribe of Judah. From the tribe of Judah means from the royal tribe. For as priests were from the tribe of Levi, so kings were from the tribe of Judah. And as the tribe of Judah, which had formerly been royal, afterward became priestly in Christ, so also Christ, being King as God, became Priest as man when He offered Himself in sacrifice for the remission of our sins. Concerning this tribe Moses said nothing about priesthood. That is, concerning the tribe of Judah, because everything relating to the priesthood was established by Moses for the tribe of Levi.

Kochomski S.W.

19th centuryChurch Father

These words must be understood with limitation, in accordance with the words of Jesus Christ: Do not think that I came to destroy the law or the prophets. I did not come to destroy, but to fulfill (Mt 5:17).

Therefore it is necessary to distinguish between the destruction of the law and its change. Change may contain not the destruction of the law, but on the contrary even its confirmation. Therefore the Apostle says: Do we then overthrow the law by faith? By no means. Rather, we establish the law (Rom 3:31).

Read more (520 words)

The apostolic word establish is equivalent to Christ's word fulfill, in I came to fulfill. In the law there is, on the one hand, the demand of God's holiness and righteousness. On the other hand, there is an indication of how it must be fulfilled, according to the conditions and circumstances of the time.

The law of God would be destroyed if both were abolished. But if the demand remains the same, and a better path to its realization, or way of fulfilling it, is indicated, then the law cannot be considered abolished.

Its divine and eternal side remains the same, while only the temporary and, as it were, human side is changed. In this change, the demand of God's holiness and righteousness receives still better and more perfect satisfaction.

The law, being changed, is not destroyed, but established. Let us apply this to the Apostle's subject in Hebrews 7. The eternal demand of God's holiness consists in this: that there be priesthood and priests.

But besides this demand, the law of Moses also contained an indication of the way to realize it. This indication corresponded to the conditions of the Old Testament time.

It consisted in this: that the priests be from the tribe of Levi, from the house of Aaron, and that at their head stand the high priest, Aaron and his successors.

In the New Testament the eternal divine demand for the existence of priesthood remained the same. Therefore the law was not destroyed. But another, eternal High Priest arose, according to the order of Melchizedek, High Priest and King, see verses 1-4.

He has an unchangeable priesthood (v. 24), according to the power of an endless life (v. 16). He is holy, innocent of evil, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens (v. 26).

Has the law been destroyed? No, it has been established, since we have as High Priest the Son of God, perfected forever (v. 28).

In a similar way one must reason about all the other ordinances of the law of Moses. For example, the ordinances about sacrifices contained, on the one hand, the fundamental demand of God's holiness and righteousness that men purify themselves through sacrifices and offerings.

Yet God, as the all-sufficient Being, has no need of our good things, Ps 16:1. On the other hand, they contained particular indications for fulfilling this demand.

This was done through the slaughter of sacrificial animals on the altar of the tabernacle or temple, and through bringing into the tabernacle or temple the fruits of righteous labor (Prov 3:9).

In the New Testament, in fulfillment of this demand, the most perfect sacrifice of Christ has been offered and is offered in the Eucharist. Through this also the Old Testament law has not been destroyed, but fulfilled in the most perfect way, and therefore established.

Thus, in the light of the Word of God and under the guidance of Holy Tradition, one must distinguish what is imperishable in the Mosaic ordinance and what has ceased. One must distinguish what belonged to the Old Testament time and what was appointed to exist in all times.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

Next the Apostle explains how and under what circumstances the actual replacement of one priesthood by another was fulfilled.

First, our Lord Jesus Christ shone forth not from the priestly tribe, that is, not from Levi, but from Judah (Gen 49:10; Mt 1:2ff.; Lk 3:23-38). This was fitting according to the order of Melchizedek, who was not even from Abraham's family at all.

Second, the Lord Jesus Christ became priest not according to the law of a fleshly commandment. That is, He received His priesthood not by inheritance from ancestors, not Levitical ones, and not in order to pass it after His death to His likewise mortal heirs.

Read more (59 words)

Rather, He received it according to the power of an indestructible life. That is, after His Resurrection He became an immortal priest, having no need to pass on His priesthood by inheritance.

This again took place according to the type of Melchizedek, as was foretold of the Messiah: You are a priest forever, according to the order of Melchizedek.

Rosanow N.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

In proof of the correctness of this explanation, the Apostle refers to the well-known fact that Jesus the Messiah came from the tribe of Judah, which by law had no right to the priesthood. Yet these things are said of Him, eph' hon legetai tauta, that is, eternal high priesthood is ascribed to Him.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 17 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. πρόδηλον
    prodēlon
    evident
    G4271 · πρόδηλος
  2. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  3. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  4. ἐξ
    ex
    from out
    G1537 · ἐκ
  5. Ἰούδα
    iouda
    Judah
    G2455 · Ἰούδας
  6. ἀνατέταλκεν
    anatetalken
    I make to rise
    G393 · ἀνατέλλω
  7. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. Κύριος
    kyrios
    lord
    G2962 · κύριος
  9. ἡμῶν
    hēmōn
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  10. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  11. ἣν
    hēn
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  12. φυλὴν
    phylēn
    a tribe
    G5443 · φυλή
  13. περὶ
    peri
    about
    G4012 · περί
  14. ἱερέων
    hiereōn
    a priest
    G2409 · ἱερεύς
  15. οὐδὲν
    ouden
    no one
    G3762 · οὐδείς
  16. Μωϋσῆς
    mōysēs
    Moses
    G3475 · Μωϋσῆς, Μωσῆς
  17. ἐλάλησεν
    elalēsen
    I speak
    G2980 · λαλέω