John Chrysostom
He arose before Him like a shoot and a sprout from parched earth. Aquila interprets this as Him rising like a young pet before Him; Symmachus expresses it as Him arising as a beauty, while Theodotion states that He shall rise like a child before Him. The prophet strips them of any defense, and his words were more than enough to hold them accountable. Like an offspring and a sprout from arid soil, Aquila says He is like a root emerging from untended ground. He appeared as a child, yet not like any ordinary child; He was a sprout, but from dry land. This dry land symbolizes the chaste virgin, untouched by marital union or the life-giving dew. This alone was enough to draw people to Himself. Did He come solely in His divine nature, or did He manifest as a complete man?
Read more (381 words)
Did He not partake in meals with them and grow among them? Did He not dwell with humanity for thirty years? He did not distance Himself from the company of people so as not to confuse them, and simultaneously He was not lesser than others, lest they perceive Him as merely one of the crowd. As a youth, He was on par with others; yet, as an offspring and a sprout from dry ground, He surpassed them. There is no outward beauty or dignity in Him. Aquila comments that He has no form or splendor. Symmachus notes that there is nothing worthy of esteem. We beheld Him and found no visual allure that drew us to Him. What do you mean? Was He truly so unappealing? The prophet would urge you not to say this. I will illustrate this with what follows. There is lack of form or majesty in Him: I address the absence of glory as an unattractive nature, for He humbly chose to come in a guise of lowliness. He was born of a humble virgin, willingly subjected to suffering, labeled a demoniac and deceiver, refusing to take vengeance on those who opposed Him. Often, when He traveled, He did so with companions, demonstrating His humility rather than pride. We must not only pursue glory but also embrace the dishonor from which glory springs. What injury did dishonor inflict upon Him, or, more aptly, how beneficial was humility to His greatness? If you desire to see Him as God, take a closer look. Furthermore, consider many other aspects, and you will discover His power equal to that of the Father. When the prophet expressed that there is neither form nor majesty in Him, he wished to prevent anyone from assuming He lacked all glory. He added, And we saw Him, and there was no sight in Him that attracted us to Him—indicating that His appearance was beyond our comprehension, and that we cannot perceive Him as one deserving to be gazed upon. However, His glory was affirmed by Christ Himself, when He stated, Now glorify thou me, Father, with thyself with the glory which I had with thee before the world existed (John 17:5). Otherwise, the prophet referred to the manifestation of the cross as an unattractive glory.
He was deserving of awe, not only for His miracles, but also because His very presence radiated profound beauty, as indicated by the prophet’s words, ‘More beautiful than the sons of men’ (Ps 44:3). However, when Isaiah declares, ‘There was no appearance in Him that attracted,’ he refers either to the unfathomable and ineffable glory of the Divine nature or to the humiliation He endured during His Passion, specifically the disgrace He faced while being crucified or the humility He exhibited throughout His entire earthly existence.