The Church Fathers on this verse

Isaiah 8:5Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And the Lord spoke to me again, saying:

Douay-Rheims

וַיֹּ֣סֶף יְהוָ֔ה דַּבֵּ֥ר אֵלַ֛י ע֖וֹד לֵאמֹֽר׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

4 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

It is characteristic of God to not only predict the consequences of sin but also to provide justifications for them, thereby educating His listeners. He fulfills this purpose in the present context as well.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

And since He became incarnate, He captured Satan, liberating those previously ensnared by his cruelty and enslaved by sin. This fulfilled the prophecy regarding His imminent act of capturing and plundering the one who had stolen from God’s creation. Furthermore, as God, He possessed the divine authority to redeem those living on earth, as foretold, saying, “For before he knoweth to name father or mother, he shall receive the power of Damascus, and the lucre of Samaria before the king of Assyria.” The depth of these words necessitates a spiritual interpretation.

Read more (450 words)

The Divine message often remains veiled in obscurity; for in the historical accounts and outward events, we do not observe that the newborn Messiah immediately took control of Damascus or the territory of the king of Assyria by freeing those who had been abducted from Samaria.

However, when understood spiritually, we can recognize the true accomplishment. Damascus, representing all of Syria, along with the land of Assyria—essentially Persia and Midian—was filled with idols, earning it the title "the land of the sculptured" (Jeremiah 50:38). Sacred altars and places of worship abounded, frequented by false prophets and practitioners of sorcery. The strength of these individuals was rooted in demons, which they venerated, alongside their leader, Satan. Thus, Christ's purpose was to seize the dominion of Damascus and the influence of Assyria—symbolically representing Satan and the hoards of malevolent and unclean spirits—liberating those who had been seduced and held captive by him, all before reaching the maturity characterized by the understanding of parental names.

Indeed, as expressed, “For before he understands adolescence to name father or mother, will receive the power of Damascus.” The phrase “will receive” is significant, suggesting a taking rather than outright conquest. He would also “receive the lucre of Samaria,” meaning He would free the captives, waging war on the king of Assyria—the spiritual embodiment of Satan, who represents Damascus and the authority over Syria. Idolatrous individuals placed their hopes for salvation in false deities; thus, it is evident that Christ, from the moment of His birth, ensnared Satan. This is corroborated by Matthew, who writes: “Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea, in the days of Herod the king, and wise men from the east came to Jerusalem, saying, ‘Where is He that is born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the east, and are come to worship Him’” (Matthew 2:1, 2). They indeed worshiped Him and presented gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh (Matthew 2:11). This illustrates how He captivated Satan and rapidly executed His plundering.

Ultimately, the intention behind His incarnation was to redeem those entangled in spiritual bondage, as indicated by Christ Himself, speaking through the prophet Isaiah: “The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me; because He hath anointed Me to preach good tidings unto the meek; He hath sent Me to bind up the broken-hearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound” (Isaiah 61:1). The blessed David also prophesied about Him, declaring that when He ascended on high, He led captivity captive (Ps. 67:19; cf. Eph. 4:8). He further taught, “If I be lifted up from the earth, I will draw all men unto Me” (John 12:32).

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

What is the reason God admonishes the people regarding the water of Siloam? Why would they reject this water, which, according to the account, was not harmful and did not afflict those who partook of it? What connection exists between those who disregard the water of Siloam and Rasson, as well as the son of Romelius? What is the association between this lifeless water and the sovereign who governs over his subjects? However, the term Siloam should be understood metaphorically; according to Gospel teachings, it is elucidated by the Messenger. As stated in the Gospel of John: ‘Go, wash yourself in the pool of Siloam, which is translated as Sent’ (John 9:7). Thus, who is the One who is Sent, if not the One about whom it is proclaimed: The Lord has sent Me and His Spirit (Isa.

Read more (582 words)

48:16) and He will not shout nor raise His voice, nor let it be heard in the streets (cf. Mt. 12:19)? Those who reject the One sent from above dismiss His gentleness and instead are drawn to the son of Romelius, a doctrine filled with false claims yet purporting to be grounded in Divine Scripture, and to Rasson, which signifies high-sounding, leading the listener beyond the confines of faith in accordance with Divine Scripture, mocking him and diverting him from the foundation of faith. For Aram signifies a dialect. Therefore, anyone who scorns the steadfast doctrine and does not embrace that which is unwavering, calm, and devout, but instead mingles obscure scriptural passages with ideas foreign to the Faith, will face the prophetic warning that powerful and numerous torrents, represented by the king of Assyria, the ruler of this age, shall come upon them. It is clear from the same Prophet that the name Assyrian often refers to an adversary. He states: When the Lord has completed all His work on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem, He will bring a lofty spirit against the prince of Assyria and the alluring heights of his pride. He declared: ‘By the strength of my hand I have accomplished it, and by my wisdom I have gained understanding; I have removed the boundaries of the peoples, and have plundered their treasures, and I have brought down the inhabitants like a nest; I have gathered the eggs that are left, and not one shall escape, nor shall anyone speak against me’ (Isaiah 10:12-14). The Prophet is likely referring to this same prince of Assyria, who is indeed a torrent of many waters, like a river that swiftly and forcefully pulls away those who encounter it. Those fortunate enough to navigate through this stream without harm say: Our souls pass through the torrent, the water that is unstable (cf. Ps. 123:4, 5). The Gospel illustrates this water in the parable, comparing the person who hears the word but does not act upon it to someone who built a house without a foundation; when the flood arose, as stated, the house collapsed and great was the ruin of that house (cf. Lk. 6:48, 49). But this water is substantial, says the prophet; it will rise upon all your desolation. The desolations refer to the depressions of the earth. Why does it state that the water will rise rather than fall? Because every humiliation brought upon people due to sin is vastly greater than the initial streams and serves as foundations of deceit. Once they are surrendered to opposing forces, they will obliterate every stronghold of the apostates, destroying everything they consider a sanctuary. Due to their abandonment of Siloam and their inclination towards destructive rulers, the prophetic word warns of the removal of every man capable of rising up, or achieving any meaningful initiative from Judah, meaning every individual who excels in wise contemplation and righteous deeds, empowered to bring forth what is deemed best. Additionally, it warns of establishing a war camp throughout the territory of those who have rejected Siloam. Since they have chosen the path of breadth and expansion, they deserve to be a battlefield for the opposing forces—not as the condemned, but as those who have willingly opted for a dire fate. Because they sought not to have God in their thoughts, God has given them over to a futile mind, to do what ought not to be done (Rom. 1:28). God is with us.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

And the Lord spoke to me once more, declaring that this people has overlooked the serene waters of Siloam and preferred instead the allure of Racine and the son of Romelia. Therefore, behold, the Lord will bring upon them a mighty and abundant river, the king of Assyria, along with all his splendor; it will rise above all its sources and overflow its banks. It will sweep through Judah, flooding and extending to the neck, with its wings stretching across the expanse of your land, O Immanuel. I previously mentioned that the strength of Damascus and the treasures of Samaria would be taken away in front of the king of Assyria, alongside two other kings in the invasion. The Assyrians will be taken captive; now God addresses the prophet in the customary manner of the Scriptures.

Read more (596 words)

He contrasts the gentle stream of Siloam in Jerusalem with the powerful river of Assyria, indicating that it will inundate the entire land of Israel with its waves, leave its channel, and surge with such force that it will invade the territory of the ten tribes, extending its reach into Judah, ultimately ascending to the neck. This signifies impending captivity; for although Judea had not been conquered at that time, all the cities of the two tribes had been taken, leaving Jerusalem alone, preserved by the immense mercy of God. Moreover, the strength of the Assyrian king and his countless army is illustrated by the image of a flood, which, with its wings—symbolizing leaders and a vast multitude—will cover the land of Immanuel, which represents the God who protects it, yet it will not conquer it (though the term Immanuel in the LXX relates to the subsequent verse and is not identified by its proper name as in the Hebrew, but is rendered as God is with us). The stream of Siloam is at the base of Mount Zion; it is not constantly filled with water but flows forth at specific times, cascading noisily through the uneven terrain and the hollows of the strongest mountain—this is evident, especially to those of us residing in this region. The implication is clear: the people of the ten tribes preferred to submit to Racine and the son of Romelia, the kings of Damascus and Samaria, rather than to the Davidic line, which received the kingdom through My decree. Hence, I will place them under bondage, not to the kings they chose, but to the king of Assyria, whose dominance over Samaria is likened to a deluge. References are made to Immanuel, the inherent God, asserting that the king of Assyria has risen to such a degree that he attempts to seize his territory, even Judah. In a sacramental context, any heretic who seeks to exert temporal wisdom to seize Jerusalem, representing the Church, while forsaking the waters of the stream of Siloam (John 9)—symbolizing that which is sent and which leads to eternal life—will be betrayed to the leader of Assyria, with the full implications to be revealed later, and the source of his power will drown in the depths of his transgressions. For he is so presumptuous as to present the Savior with all the kingdoms of the earth, claiming, ‘All these have been entrusted to me’ (Luke 4). He will strive to infiltrate Judah, the house of confession, and will often reach the neck of the inattentive in the church, aiming to constrict the believers in Christ, and will spread his wings, saturating the whole area of Immanuel, but will not succeed in possessing it, for Judah possesses God inherently. In the Gospel of John (9), we learn that the Lord sent a man blind from birth, whom He healed by applying mud made from His saliva to his eyes, instructing him to wash in the waters of Siloam; by doing so, the blind man was restored to sight. This miracle serves as a testament that the blindness of the Jews, and indeed of every unbeliever, can only be healed if the darkness of previous errors is dispelled by the teaching of the waters of Christ, which flow gently, devoid of loud words. The text found in the LXX stating that it shall overtake each wall of your city and remove from Judah one who could stand or act is absent in the Hebrew texts and is noted in the Greek codices as having a crushing significance.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.