The Church Fathers on this verse

John 10:18Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

No man taketh it away from me: but I lay it down of myself. And I have power to lay it down: and I have power to take it up again. This commandment have I received of my Father.

Douay-Rheims

ουδεις αιρει αυτην απ εμου αλλ εγω τιθημι αυτην απ εμαυτου εξουσιαν εχω θειναι αυτην και εξουσιαν εχω παλιν λαβειν αυτην ταυτην την εντολην ελαβον παρα του πατρος μου

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

14 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Because they had often plotted to kill Him, He says, "Apart from My consent, your labor is vain." By what came before He proves what follows, and by His death He proves the resurrection.

This is wondrous and extraordinary, because both things, His death and His resurrection, occurred in a singular and extraordinary manner.

But let us attend carefully to what is said. "I have authority," He says, "to lay down My soul." Yet who does not have authority to lay down his soul? Everyone who wishes can kill himself.

But His words do not have this meaning. What, then, do they mean? "I have such authority to lay it down that, against My will, no one can take it from Me." This cannot be said of men.

Read more (611 words)

We cannot lay down our soul by ourselves except by killing ourselves. But if we fall into the hands of men who plot against us and are able to kill us, we no longer have authority to lay it down or not.

They kill us even against our will. But with Him it is not so. He had authority not to lay down His soul, even when others plotted against Him.

Therefore, after saying, "No one takes it from Me," He then added, "I have authority to lay down My soul." That is, "I alone have authority to lay it down, while you do not have this authority, because many others can take yours."

At the beginning He did not say this, because then His words would not have seemed credible.

But when He already had proof in the deeds themselves, and when those who had repeatedly plotted against Him could not seize Him, for He had often gone out of their hands, then He says, "No one takes it from Me."

If this is true, then it follows that He goes to death voluntarily. And if this also is true, then beyond doubt He can again receive His soul whenever He wills.

If His death was an act surpassing human power, do not doubt the rest concerning Him. The fact that He alone has authority to lay down His soul shows that, by the same authority, He can also receive it again.

Do you see how by the first He established the second, and by His death gave irrefutable proof of the resurrection?

"This commandment I have received from My Father."

What commandment is this? To die for the world. Did He wait first to hear it, and only then decide? Did He need to learn it? What sound-minded person could say this?

No. Above, by saying, "For this reason the Father loves Me," He showed His voluntary desire and destroyed every contrary thought.

So here also, when He says that He received a commandment from the Father, He expresses nothing other than this: "What I do is pleasing to the Father."

He says this so that, when they kill Him, they may not think that they killed Him as one abandoned and betrayed by the Father.

Nor should they reproach Him as they did: "He saved others; Himself He cannot save," and, "If You are the Son of God, come down from the cross" (Mt 27:42, 40).

For precisely because He is the Son of God, He does not come down from the cross.

And lest, hearing that He received a commandment from the Father, you think this work alien to Him, He had already said beforehand, "The good shepherd lays down his soul for the sheep."

By this He showed that the sheep are His own, that all that followed was His own work, and that He has no need of a commandment.

If He had need of a commandment, how could He say, "I lay it down of Myself"? Whoever lays it down of himself has no need of a commandment.

Moreover, He also indicates the reason why He acts in this way. What is the reason? That He is the shepherd, and the good shepherd.

A good shepherd has no need for another to urge him to such a work. If this is so among men, much more must it be expected of God.

Therefore Paul also says that He emptied Himself (Phil 2:7).

Thus the word "commandment" here means nothing other than His oneness of mind with the Father. If He speaks here so humbly and humanly, the reason is the weakness of His hearers.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

"No one takes My life from Me." He says this for those who intended to kill Him. You thirst for My blood, He says, but know firmly that no one can shed it without My will.

Lest anyone think that He dies like a slave and servant, at another's command and in submission to it, He says, "I Myself have authority over My death, as Master of death. I have authority to lay down My life."

Each of you has authority to lay down his life, since anyone who wishes may kill himself. Yet the Lord is not speaking of this kind of death. He means that no one could do this without His will.

Read more (159 words)

It is not so with men. Others can kill us even against our will. But Christ would never have suffered without His own will. Therefore, since He submits to death only by His own choice, He also has the greater right to take life again.

"This commandment," to die for the world, "I have received from My Father." He says, I am not opposed to God. Indeed, this very death has been commanded Me by the Father.

Earlier He spoke loftily of Himself: "I have authority to take My life again." This reveals in Him the Master of death and the Author of life. Now He adds the humble word: "This commandment I have received from My Father."

Thus wondrously He joins both together, so that He may not be considered less than the Father or His slave. He is to be regarded not as opposed to God, but as equal in power and one with Him in will.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Here He teaches that He is not only the good shepherd, who sacrifices Himself for the flock, but also God by nature.

Therefore He could suffer death only voluntarily, since He has divine "authority" over this divine economy, which is most profitable for us. The construction of His words shows that the Jews could never have had authority over Him against His will.

For He did not say, "I have authority," only concerning the laying down of His soul. He used this "I have authority" of both things, death and resurrection.

He did this so that it would not seem to be the work and operation of another power, merely granted to Him by command as to a servant and subordinate.

Read more (797 words)

Rather, He shows as the fruit of His own nature both His power of authority over the bonds of death themselves and His unhindered ordering of events according to His own will. This truly belongs to God by nature.

This is what He wishes to show in the words, "I have authority to lay down My soul, and I have authority to take it again." He did not come to this by command, as a slave or servant, nor by necessity or compulsion from anyone, but voluntarily.

"This commandment I have received from My Father."

Someone might say that apart from the will of the Son the Father cannot receive His soul. Such a person might introduce division and discord into the one Godhead of the Father and the Son.

Therefore, in the words, "I have received a commandment," He shows that the Father also was of one mind and consented to this.

He confesses that He came to this as from one purpose, since He Himself is the counsel of the Father. This also accords with the divine economy in the flesh.

When He says that He received, as a commandment, the right accomplishment of what pleased the Father, He does not lower Himself before the Father, being God by nature. He renders what is proper to His becoming man.

Yet when He says that He received, as a commandment, the common will or agreement in purpose, ϰοινοβουλίαν, with God the Father, He reminds us that He is that Prophet concerning Whom the Father said, "He shall speak as I command Him" (Deut 18:18).

He said this also to the Jews, lest they think that He utters commands apart from the Father's will.

If the Father called His Son a prophet, do not be troubled by this. When He became man, the name prophet was applied to Him. Then, we say, commandments were given Him economically by the Father.

Yet the One who receives commandments is not thereby made less or unlike the essence or nature of the One who commands.

For men command men, and angels command angels. For this reason we do not call those who receive commands foreign in nature or lesser by nature.

So also the Son is not less than the Father, even though He became man in order to become for us the pattern of every virtue.

Therefore He also teaches us that we must obey our parents in all things, although we have the same nature as they do; cf. the commentary on Jn 6:38-39.

There is also one passage where the word "I command," ἐντελοῦμαι, spoken by the Father, means, "I will certainly do it." This is when He says, "And I will command," that is, accomplish, repay, and punish, "the whole world for its evil, and the ungodly for their sins" (Isa 13:11).

Sometimes, however, the Son speaks by condescension to us, so that we may understand, as far as possible, ineffable revelations.

Yet in the words, "I received a commandment," He does not affirm that He Who is God by nature is not God.

Therefore either call Him God, and give Him all that befits the Godhead, or openly call Him a creature. For the receiving of a commandment does not take away the natural properties inherent in anyone.

And since He utters what the Father commanded the Son, and says, "I and the Father are one," you must affirm that the Father commanded the Son to speak either truth or falsehood.

For the Son speaks what He says He received as commandment from the Father. "The Father who sent Me," He says, "gave Me a commandment, what I should say and what I should speak" (Jn 12:49).

If He also said, "My Father is greater than I" (Jn 14:28), He did not contradict Himself.

For insofar as He is God by nature, He is equal to the Father. Insofar as He became man and humbled Himself, He spoke economically the words proper to humanity.

Yet the concept of commandment, being outside the concept of essence, cannot serve as an accusation against the essence. For the being of the Son does not consist in the Father's giving a commandment.

This can in no way be a definition of essence.

Thus the Son, as the counsel and wisdom of the Father, knows what has been immutably resolved by Him.

If He receives it as a commandment, do not marvel at this. With human words He expresses what is beyond speech, and with our sounds He brings down the ineffable to our language, so that we may be able to understand.

Therefore we must not accuse the subject itself of impropriety, but rather the weakness of language, which cannot attain due precision in expressing the quality of realities.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

The Spirit of the Mediator showed that no punishment for sin reaches as far as bodily death, for He destroyed it not unwillingly, but because He willed it, when He willed it, and as He willed it. Being brought into unity by the Word of God, He says here: "I have authority to lay down My life."

How, then, does the Lord lay down His soul? [...] The Word and man. Not man as flesh alone, but the whole man in Christ. The Apollinarists were called heretics because they asserted that He had no human soul. Who lays down the soul and then takes it again? Does Christ, because He is the Word, lay down the soul and then take it again? Or, because He is a human soul, does that soul lay itself down and then take itself again? Or, because He is flesh, does the flesh lay down the soul and then take it? If we said that the Word of God laid down His soul and then took it again, we must beware lest a wrong opinion arise. We might be told, "Then at some time that soul was separated from the Word." What did death do except separate the body from the soul? It did not separate the soul from the Word. If we said that the soul laid itself down and then took itself again, this would be utterly absurd. What was not separated from the Word cannot separate itself from itself. The flesh lays it down, but by permission of the Word. The flesh takes it again, but by permission of the Word.

Hear elsewhere in the Gospel that not only did the Father uphold the Son, but the Son upheld Himself. "Destroy this temple," He says, "and in three days I will raise it up" (Jn 2:19). The Evangelist explains: "He spoke of the temple of His Body" (Jn 2:21). For what had died was raised. The Word is immortal, and His soul is immortal. If even your soul is immortal, can the Lord's soul die?

"How do I know," you will say, "that my soul is immortal?" It cannot be destroyed by you and cannot die. "How," you say, "can I kill my soul?" Not to speak of other sins: "A slanderous mouth kills the soul" (Wis 1:11). "How," you ask, "can I be certain that it does not die?" Listen to the Lord Himself calming His servant: "Do not fear those who kill the body and after that can do nothing more" (Lk 12:4; cf. Mt 10:28). Is it clear what He says? "Fear Him who can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna" (Mt 10:28; cf. Lk 12:5). See: it both dies and does not die. What is its death? What is the death of your flesh? The death of your flesh is the loss of its life. The death of your soul is the loss of its life. The life of your flesh is your soul. The life of your soul is your God. As the flesh dies when it loses the soul, which is its life, so the soul dies when it loses God, who is its life. Therefore it is clear that the soul is immortal, for it lives even when dead. What the Apostle said about the pleasure-loving widow may also be said of the soul if it loses its God: she "is dead while she lives" (1 Tim 5:6).

How, then, does the Lord lay down His soul? Brethren, let us consider this more carefully. We are not pressed by time, as usually on the Lord's Day. We have time, and let it serve those who have gathered today for the word of God. "I lay down," He says, "My life." Who lays it down? What does He lay down? What is Christ? The Word and man. He is not man as flesh alone. Since man consists of flesh and soul, the whole man is also in Christ. He would not have assumed the worse part and rejected the better. Clearly the soul is the better part of man than the body. Since the whole man is in Christ, what is Christ? The Word, I repeat, and man. What does "the Word and man" mean? The Word, soul, and flesh.

Hold to this, because there is no lack of heretics who have appeared on this question. They were once driven out from catholic truth. Yet, like thieves and robbers who did not enter through the door, they do not cease laying snares for the sheep. These heretics are called Apollinarists. They dared to dogmatize that Christ is only the Word and flesh, and nothing more. They asserted that He did not assume a human soul. Even some of them could not deny that there was a soul in Christ. Consider this unbearable absurdity and madness. Supposing that He had an irrational soul, they denied Him a rational one. They gave Him the soul of a beast and took away the soul of a man. Certainly they took reason away from Christ because they had lost their own reason.

Let this be far from you. Be nourished and strengthened in the catholic faith. On this matter, beloved, I wish to admonish you as well. In previous readings we instructed you sufficiently against the Sabellians and Arians. Against the Sabellians, who say, "The Father is the same as the Son." Against the Arians, who say, "The Father is one thing, the Son another," as though the Father and the Son did not possess one and the same essence. We also instructed you, as you remember, and you ought to remember, against the Photinian heretics. They asserted that Christ is only man, without God. We instructed you against the Manichaeans, who said that He is only God, without man. On this point we wish to instruct you against the Apollinarists. They say that our Lord Jesus Christ had no human soul, that is, no rational soul, no thinking soul. I mean the soul by which we differ from beasts and are human.

How, then, did the Lord say here, "I have authority to lay down My soul"? Who lays down the soul and restores it again? Does Christ, because He is the Word, lay down the soul and restore it again? Or, because He is a human soul, does it lay itself down and restore itself? Or, because He is flesh, does the flesh lay down the soul and restore it again? I have proposed three possibilities. Let us examine them all and choose the one that accords with truth.

If we say that the Word of God laid down His soul and took it again, we must beware of falling into a distorted judgment. It might be said to us, "Then at some time that soul was separated from the Word. At some time, until the Word took that soul again, the Word remained without a soul." Indeed, I see that the Word was without a human soul, but only when "in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (Jn 1:1). But from the time when "the Word became flesh" to dwell among us (cf. Jn 1:14), and man was assumed by the Word, that is, the whole man, soul and flesh, what did the Passion do? What did death do except separate the body from the soul? It did not separate the soul from the Word. For if the Lord died, or rather, since the Lord died, for He died for us on the cross, His flesh undoubtedly yielded up the soul. The soul left the flesh for a time. Yet that flesh was to rise when the soul returned. But I do not say that the soul was separated from the Word. He said to the soul of the thief, "Today you will be with Me in Paradise" (Lk 23:43). He did not abandon the believing soul of the thief. Did He then abandon His own? By no means. In order to protect that soul, the Lord preserved His own and did not separate it.

If we say that the soul laid itself down and again took itself back, our judgment will be exceedingly absurd. What was not separated from the Word could separate itself from itself. Therefore let us say what is true and what may be understood without difficulty. Here is a man, composed not of Word, soul, and flesh, but only of soul and flesh. Let us ask about such a man how he lays down his soul, as every man does. Can an ordinary man not lay down his soul? You may tell me that no man has authority to lay down his soul and take it again. If a man could not lay down his soul, the Apostle John would not have said, "As Christ laid down His soul for us, so we also ought to lay down our souls for the brethren" (cf. 1 Jn 3:16). Therefore it is granted to us also, if only we are filled with His strength, because without Him we can do nothing, to lay down our souls for our brethren.

When any martyr laid down his soul for the brethren, who laid it down, and what did he lay down? If we understand this, then we shall see in what sense Christ said, "I have authority to lay down My soul." O man, are you ready to die for Christ? "I am ready," he says. I will put my question in other words: "Are you ready to lay down your soul for Christ?" He will answer me, "I am ready," just as he would answer the question, "Are you ready to die?" Therefore to lay down the soul is the same as to die. Why, then, dispute? All men, when they die, lay down the soul, but not all lay it down for Christ. No one has authority to take back what he laid down. But Christ laid it down for us. He laid it down when He willed, and likewise, when He willed, He took it again.

Therefore to lay down the soul is to die. So also the Apostle Peter said to the Lord, "I will lay down my soul for You" (Jn 13:37), that is, "I will die for You." Attribute this to the flesh. The flesh lays down its soul, and the flesh takes it again. Yet it does this not by its own power, but by the power of Him who dwells in the flesh. Thus the flesh lays down its soul by yielding it up. Look at the Lord Himself on the cross. He said, "I thirst" (Jn 19:28). Those who stood nearby dipped a sponge in vinegar, fixed it to a reed, and brought it to His mouth. Having tasted it, He said, "It is finished" (Jn 19:30). What does "It is finished" mean? It means, "Everything that had to happen before death, as foretold about Me, has been fulfilled." Since He had authority to lay down His soul when He willed, after He said, "It is finished," what did the Evangelist say? "And bowing His head, He gave up the spirit" (Jn 19:30). This is to lay down the soul.

Listen to this, beloved. "Bowing His head, He gave up the spirit." Who gave it up? What did He give up? He gave up the spirit. His flesh gave it up. What does it mean that His flesh gave it up? His flesh released it, His flesh breathed it out. For this is why we say "expire," to make the spirit be outside. Likewise, to be in exile is to be outside one's land. To deviate is to be outside the road. So to expire is to make the spirit be outside, the spirit which is the soul. When the soul leaves the flesh and the flesh remains without the soul, then a man is said to have laid down his soul. When did Christ lay down His soul? When the Word willed it. For primacy belonged to the Word. It determined when the flesh would leave the soul and when it would take it again.

If, then, the flesh laid down the soul, how did Christ lay down the soul? For Christ is not flesh. Certainly Christ is flesh, Christ is soul, and Christ is the Word. Yet these three are not three Christs, but one Christ. Ask man, and from yourself take a step toward what is above you, if not yet to understand, at least to believe. Just as one man is soul and body, so one Christ is the Word and man. See what I have said, and understand. Soul and body are two things, but man is one. The Word and man are two things, but Christ is one.

Ask, then, about man. Where is the Apostle Paul now? If someone answers that he is at rest with Christ, he speaks the truth. If someone answers that he is in Rome in a tomb, he also speaks the truth. One answers me concerning his soul, the other concerning his flesh. Yet we do not say that there are two Apostle Pauls, one at rest with Christ and the other lying in the tomb. We say that the Apostle Paul lives in Christ, and we also say that the Apostle Paul lies dead in the tomb. Someone dies, and we say, "He is a good man, a faithful man, and he is at peace with the Lord." Then immediately we say, "Let us go to his funeral and bury him." You are going to bury the one about whom you just said that he is at peace with God. One statement refers to the soul, which flourishes in immortality. The other refers to the body, which lies in corruption. Yet because the unity of soul and flesh has received the name of man, both names are used of man, even when each is apart from the other.

Read the full text in the app

Gregory of Nyssa

4th centuryChurch Father

Thus, at the time of the Passion, He foretells that He will voluntarily separate His soul from His own body, saying: "No one takes My soul from Me, but I lay it down of Myself. I have authority to lay it down, and I have authority to take it again."

The Godhead remains one and the same before the Incarnation, during the Incarnation, and after the Passion. It always remains by nature what it was, and continues always.

In the Passion of the human nature, the Godhead fulfilled its care for us. It separated the soul from the body for a time, while not being separated from either part with which it was united.

It then joined again what had been divided. Thus it gives sequence and beginning to the whole human nature's resurrection from the dead.

Read more (48 words)

The corruptible is to put on incorruption, and the mortal immortality, since our firstfruits were transformed into the divine nature through union with God.

See also Hilary of Poitiers, On the Trinity 10.57-60, who expands Gregory's argument, and Augustine of Hippo, Tractate on the Gospel of John 47.9-13.

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

To be troubled belongs to the flesh. But to have authority to lay down and take up the soul whenever one wills belongs not to men, but to the God of power.

A man dies not by his own authority, but by natural necessity and against his will. The Lord, however, being Himself immortal yet possessing mortal flesh, had authority as God to depart from the body and to take it again whenever He willed.

David also sings of this: "For You will not leave My soul in Hades, nor will You give Your Holy One to see corruption" (Ps 15:10).

It was necessary that the flesh, being corruptible, should no longer remain mortal according to its nature. Rather, it had to become incorruptible through the Word who had put it on.

For as He, being in our body, imitated us, so we, receiving Him, obtain immortality from Him.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The Master teaches more clearly about His taking a soul upon Himself. To those who supposed that His suffering was involuntary, He said before the Passion: "I have authority to lay down" My soul, "and I have authority to take it again. No one takes it from Me; I lay it down of Myself, that I may take it again" (Jn 10:17-18).

By this He clearly showed that the soul laid down and received back is one thing, and the Godhead that lays it down and receives it back is another. I say "one thing and another" not to divide Him into two persons, but to show the distinction of natures.

Thus the Lord also said elsewhere: "For this reason the Father loves Me, because I lay down My soul for the sheep" (Jn 10:15, 17).

Read more (187 words)

In another place He clearly showed the distress that His soul endured during the Passion. He said, "Now My soul is troubled; and what shall I say? Father, save Me from this hour. But for this reason I came to this hour" (Jn 12:27).

By this He revealed the struggle of thoughts, now fearing the suffering and now repelling the fear.

Luke portrays this fear still more clearly. He says that the suffering brought Him into such struggle that His sweat became bloody. "His sweat," says the Evangelist, "became like drops of blood" (Lk 22:44).

He also adds that an angel came, "strengthening Him" (Lk 22:43). From all this, behold the weakness of human nature.

If the Godhead of the Only-begotten is united to His humanity, and the Spirit is present as anointing, why does an angel strengthen the weakness of soul and body?

Is it not evident from this that the divine nature allowed all this to occur? Thus in later times these proofs would confirm those who believe in His taking a soul and body, and such clear testimonies would refute those who contradict it.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

"No one takes it from Me," that is, against My will. No one would hand Me over to death unless I willed it.

"But I lay it down of Myself," voluntarily, as the Lover of mankind. By these words Jesus Christ points to His death on the Cross and His Resurrection from the dead.

"I have authority to lay it down, and I have authority to take it again." I have this authority as almighty and all-powerful God.

Thus the plotters would have labored in vain if Jesus Christ had not willed to die. Yet later some madmen reproached Him, saying, "He saved others; can He not save Himself?" (Mt 27:42).

"This commandment I have received from My Father," to lay down His soul for the sheep and to die for the world.

Read more (156 words)

The Jews put Jesus Christ to death because He taught the people. He led them from darkness to light, from sin to virtue, and from death to life.

Having said above, "For this reason the Father loves Me, because I lay down My life" (Jn 10:17), Jesus Christ indicated His voluntary death. By the words, "This commandment I have received from My Father," He showed that He dies according to the Father's will.

If Jesus Christ needed a commandment, how did He say, "I lay it down of Myself; I have authority to lay it down"? And earlier, "I am the good shepherd" (Jn 10:11)? Such a One has no need of a commandment.

Here the Father's commandment indicates nothing other than the complete agreement of Jesus Christ with God the Father. The sayings cited explain only the designs of the divine economy. They were used because of the hearers' weakness, as we have often said.

Irenaeus of Lyon

2nd centuryChurch Father

The mighty Word and true man, rationally redeeming us by His blood, gave Himself as a ransom for those subjected to captivity.

Since apostasy unjustly gained dominion over us, and unnaturally alienated us from Him, though by nature we are the possession of almighty God, it made us its own disciples.

Therefore the Word of God, almighty yet not lacking in His justice, righteously turned against apostasy itself. He redeemed His own possession from it, not by force, as apostasy had gained dominion over us by greedily snatching what belonged to another.

Rather, He redeemed by persuasion, as befits God. He persuades, and does not use violence, to receive what He wills. Thus justice would not be violated, and the ancient creation of God would not perish.

Read more (73 words)

Therefore, when the Lord redeemed us by His blood, He gave His soul for our souls and His flesh for our flesh. He poured out the Spirit of the Father for the reunion and communion of God with man.

Through the Spirit He brought God to men. On the other hand, through His Incarnation He drew man to God. By His coming He surely and truly granted us incorruption through communion with God.

Cyrill of Jerusalem

4th centuryChurch Father

Do you wish to be assured that He went voluntarily to the Passion? Others die unwillingly or unexpectedly. But He foretold His Passion: "Behold, the Son of Man is handed over to be crucified" (Mt 26:2).

Do you know why the Lover of mankind did not flee death? It was so that the world might not perish completely because of sins.

"Behold, we are going up to Jerusalem, and the Son of Man will be handed over and crucified" (Mt 20:18). And elsewhere: "He set His face to go to Jerusalem" (Lk 9:51).

Do you wish to know precisely that the Cross is glory for Jesus? Listen not to my words, but to His own.

Read more (297 words)

Judas betrayed Him, becoming ungrateful toward the Master of the house. Shortly after he left the table and after drinking the cup of blessing, he went to shed righteous blood for the saving drink.

"He who ate His bread magnified his treachery against Him" (Ps 40:10). His hands had just received blessings, and at once he prepared the betrayal unto death for silver.

Though he had been exposed and had heard the words, "You have said it" (Mt 26:25), nevertheless he went.

Then "Jesus said, The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified" (Jn 12:23). Do you see that He finds His glory in the Cross?

It is not dishonorable for Isaiah that he was sawn in two. Shall it then be dishonorable for Christ to die for the world?

"Now the Son of Man is glorified" (Jn 13:31). This does not mean that He had no glory before. He was glorified with glory before the foundation of the world.

As God, He was always glorified. But now He is glorified because He is crowned with the crown of endurance.

He did not leave life by necessity, nor was He slain by force. Hear what He says: "I have authority to lay down My life, and I have authority to take it again."

By My own will I permit My enemies, He says. If I did not will it, this would not happen.

Therefore He went to the Passion by free choice, rejoicing in the completion of the work, glad in the crown, and consoled by the salvation of men.

He was not ashamed of the Cross, for by it He saved the universe. The One who suffered was not a weak man, but God become man, contending by the contest of endurance.

Gennadios Scholarios

15th centuryChurch Father

We believe that our Lord Jesus Christ was crucified and died willingly, for many benefits and for many reasons. All this was according to His human nature. For the LOGOS is neither crucified, nor dies, nor rises again. Yet, of course, He raised the dead, just as He raised the flesh which He bore.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

Speaking of Himself as the Shepherd who lays down His life for His sheep, Jesus said that He gives His life voluntarily. No one takes it from Him or can take it from Him.

He said that authority belongs to Him both to lay it down and to take it again, and that He received this authority from His Father.

By these words He pointed to His approaching death. So that His disciples would not fall away from Him when they saw Him on the Cross, He explained beforehand that no one could deprive Him of life without His will.

He also explained that, giving His life voluntarily, He had authority to take it again.

Read more (43 words)

He had already told His apostles more than once that He would rise. By these words He explained that He would not be raised, but would rise Himself, by the power of His authority to take again the life given for His sheep.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

"No one takes it," that is, by force. Created beings can take nothing from the Almighty. If He dies according to God's eternal decree, He does not die unwillingly, but voluntarily, out of love (cf. Jn 14:31), so that after the bonds of death He may take up life again.

"I have authority" expresses complete freedom to do both this and that. According to His divine-human nature, the Lord was not subject to death by necessity. Nor was He necessarily under death.

Death is the necessary consequence only of sin, and the nature of the God-man was sinless. Therefore it lay within the Lord's authority to hand Himself over to death. Yet He had still greater authority to take up again the life over which death had no power (cf. Chrysostom).

Read more (60 words)

"This commandment" means the will of God, which is also Christ's will. The commandment is to lay down His life voluntarily and voluntarily to take it up again.

The emphatic word "commandment" points to the Lord's humility before the will of His heavenly Father. He expresses this everywhere when speaking of His relation to the Father (cf. Chrysostom and Theophylact).

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

"For this reason the Father loves Me, because I lay down My life, that I may take it again" (Jn 10:17-18). Wondrous love breathes in these words.

The Father looks with delight upon the love with which the Son loves His sheep. He also looks upon the joy with which, in accord with the Father's will (v. 18), He gives His life for their salvation.

The Son's love for men is such that the heavenly Father Himself beholds it with rapture. And the Father's love is such that He does not spare even His own Son.

"No one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself." Out of love for the Father's will, the Son sacrifices His life for men. He does not do so because He is supposedly compelled.

Read more (133 words)

If He had wished to preserve His life, no one could have taken it. By His own will and in complete freedom, He hands Himself over to death. With the same freedom He will restore His life to Himself.

According to these words, in Christ Jesus there is seen not only a free person. This person in Him is also not separated from boundless power. Only through the union of the human person with divine power could He have authority to restore life to Himself.

"This commandment I have received from My Father." "By saying that He received a commandment from the Father, He shows that He does what is pleasing to Him. Thus, when they seize Him, they should not think that He has been abandoned and betrayed by the Father" (Chrysostom).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 29 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. οὐδεὶς
    oudeis
    no one
    G3762 · οὐδείς
  2. αἴρει
    airei
    I raise
    G142 · αἴρω
  3. αὐτὴν
    autēn
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  4. ἀπ᾽
    ap
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  5. ἐμοῦ
    emou
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  6. ἀλλ᾽
    all
    but
    G235 · ἀλλά
  7. ἐγὼ
    egō
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  8. τίθημι
    tithēmi
    I put
    G5087 · τίθημι
  9. αὐτὴν
    autēn
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  10. ἀπ᾽
    ap
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  11. ἐμαυτοῦ
    emautou
    of myself
    G1683 · ἐμαυτοῦ
  12. ἐξουσίαν
    exousian
    power
    G1849 · ἐξουσία
  13. ἔχω
    echō
    I have
    G2192 · ἔχω
  14. θεῖναι
    theinai
    I put
    G5087 · τίθημι
  15. αὐτήν
    autēn
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  16. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  17. ἐξουσίαν
    exousian
    power
    G1849 · ἐξουσία
  18. ἔχω
    echō
    I have
    G2192 · ἔχω
  19. πάλιν
    palin
    again
    G3825 · πάλιν
  20. λαβεῖν
    labein
    I receive
    G2983 · λαμβάνω
  21. αὐτήν
    autēn
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  22. ταύτην
    tautēn
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  23. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  24. ἐντολὴν
    entolēn
    an ordinance
    G1785 · ἐντολή
  25. ἔλαβον
    elabon
    I receive
    G2983 · λαμβάνω
  26. παρὰ
    para
    from
    G3844 · παρά
  27. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  28. Πατρός
    patros
    father
    G3962 · πατήρ
  29. μου
    mou
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ