The Church Fathers on this verse

John 5:22Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

For neither does the Father judge any man: but hath given all judgment to the Son.

Douay-Rheims

ουδε γαρ ο πατηρ κρινει ουδενα αλλα την κρισιν πασαν δεδωκεν τω υιω

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

15 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

We need great carefulness in all things, beloved. We shall give the strictest account for both our words and our deeds.

Our deeds do not end with the present life. Another life will meet us, and we shall stand before the dread judgment seat.

“We must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ,” says Paul, “so that each may receive according to what he has done in the body, whether good or evil” (2 Cor 5:10).

Let us always keep this judgment seat in mind. In this way we shall be able to remain continually in virtue.

One who drives the thought of that day from his soul rushes into the abyss, like a horse that has thrown off the bridle. “His ways are always ruinous,” says Scripture.

Read more (984 words)

And showing the reason for this, it adds, “Your judgments are far from him” (Ps 9:26). But one who constantly has this fear within himself passes his life chastely.

“Remember your end,” says Scripture, “and you will never sin” (Sir 7:39).

He Who forgives us our sins now will then sit upon the judgment seat. He Who died for us will appear again to judge the whole human race.

“He will appear a second time,” says Scripture, “not to deal with sin, but to save those who are eagerly waiting for Him” (Heb 9:28).

For this reason He also said here: “The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son, that all may honor the Son as they honor the Father.”

Then, someone will say, should He also be called Father? By no means. He said “the Son” precisely so that we might honor Him, while He remains Son, just as the Father is honored.

One who calls Him Father no longer honors the Son as the Father, but confuses Them.

Since men are moved not so much by benefits as by punishments, He speaks here so fearfully. At least fear might compel them to honor Him.

When He says “all judgment,” He expresses that He has authority both to punish and to reward, and to do both as He wills.

The expression “gave” is used so that you may not regard Him as unbegotten, and may not suppose that there are two Fathers.

Everything that is in the Father is also in the Son, except that He is begotten and remains Son.

To be persuaded that “gave” here is equivalent to “begot,” hear the explanation from another place. “As the Father has life in Himself, so He gave to the Son also to have life in Himself” (Jn 5:26).

What then? Did the Father first beget Him and only afterward give Him life? For one who gives gives something to one already existing.

Was He then begotten without life? Even demons cannot think this, for it is not only impious, but mad.

Therefore, just as “gave life” means that He begot Him as life, so “gave judgment” means that He begot Him as Judge.

When you hear that the Son has the Father as cause, do not think that the Son has an essence different from the Father, or is lower than Him in dignity.

Behold, He Himself comes to judge you, proving by this also His equality. He Who has authority to punish and reward whom He wills surely possesses the same power as the Father.

Otherwise, if the Son received this honor later, after His birth, one could ask why He was honored later in this way.

By what progress did He reach the point of receiving such dignity and being raised to such rank?

Are you not ashamed to ascribe so boldly these human and lowly properties to the immortal Being, Who has nothing that came later in time?

Why then, you say, does He speak of Himself in this way? So that what was said might be readily received and prepare the way for higher thoughts.

For this reason He mingles both things in His words, the lofty and the humble. See how He does so. It is useful to examine this first.

He said, “My Father works, and I work,” thereby showing His equality and equal honor with the Father. But the Jews sought to kill Him.

What does He do after this? He softens His expressions, while retaining the very same thoughts, and says, “The Son can do nothing of Himself.”

Then again He raises the discourse: “For whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise.” Again He speaks humbly: “For the Father loves the Son and shows Him all that He Himself does, and greater works than these He will show Him.”

Again He speaks loftily: “For as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom He wills.”

And again He speaks both humbly and loftily: “For the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son.” And still more loftily: “That all may honor the Son as they honor the Father.”

Do you see how He varies His discourse, using names and expressions now lofty, now humble?

Thus it could be readily received by the people of that time, while those afterward would lose nothing. From the lofty expressions they would receive the proper understanding concerning the rest.

Otherwise, if His words were not spoken by condescension to men, why were such lofty expressions added?

When one who has the right to say something lofty of himself instead says something lowly and humble, he certainly has a fair reason and some special purpose.

But if one who ought to speak humbly of himself says something great, why would he use expressions surpassing his nature?

This is no special good intention, but extreme impiety. Therefore we may say that Christ’s humble expressions about Himself have a just cause worthy of God.

This cause is condescension toward us, His intention to teach us humility, and through this the ordering of our salvation. He Himself explains this elsewhere, saying, “These things I say that you may be saved” (Jn 5:34).

When He had recourse to John’s testimony, setting aside His own, this could seem unworthy of His majesty. Therefore, giving the reason for such humility in speech, He said, “These things I say that you may be saved.”

But you who assert that He does not have the same authority and power as Him Who begot Him, what will you say when you hear His own words?

By these words He expresses equality of power, authority, and glory with the Father. Why does He demand for Himself equal honor with Him, if, as you say, He is far lower than the Father?

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Christ, having wrought many signs, proved that He can bestow benefits. But since He did not persuade them or draw them to render Him fitting honor, He says that the Father has given all judgment to the Son. Thus fear of judgment might incline them to render Him honor. For we men, especially the more senseless among us, are usually taught what is necessary more by fear than by benefits. Understand the words "the Father has given judgment to the Son" in this way: He begot Him as Judge. In the same way, when you hear that He gave Him life, you understand that He begot Him as Living. Since the Father is the cause of the Son's being, it is said that everything the Son has He has received from the Father, as having it from Him by nature.

Read more (126 words)

Thus He also has judgment from the Father, just as the Father has it. Lest we, hearing that the Father is the cause of the Son, understand that He produced Him as He produced creatures, and thereby introduce a diminution of honor, He says that there is no difference between the Father and the Son. For He who has authority to punish and reward as He wills has power equal to the Father's. Therefore He must be honored in the same way as the Father. [...] When you hear that the Father gave the Son life, judgment, and all the rest; Jn 5:22, 26, understand "gave" as "begot" Him. Thus He has life, judges, and all this comes from the Father to the Son by nature.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

“For the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son.”

He brings forward another God-befitting and wondrous work, persuading by many arguments that He is God by nature and in truth.

Indeed, to whom else could judgment over the universe belong, if not to the one God who is over all?

The divine Scriptures call upon Him for this, saying, “Arise, O God, judge the earth” (Ps 81:8), and again, “For God is judge; He humbles one and exalts another” (Ps 74:8).

Yet when He says, “Judgment has been given to Him by the Father,” He does not say this as one outside its possession.

He says it as man, and according to the divine economy, teaching that all things must be referred to the divine nature.

Read more (694 words)

In that nature He Himself abides as Word and God, having in Himself authority over all.

But since He became man, to whom it is said in one place, “For what do you have that you did not receive?” (1 Cor 4:7), He rightly acknowledges that He has received judgment.

To this, perhaps, one of the opponents will again say: “Now the Son clearly says that He received judgment from the Father.

He obviously receives as one who does not have. How, then, will the One who gives with authority not be higher and greater than the One who needs to receive?”

What shall we say to this?

In the preceding discourse, I think, we gave a not empty contemplation concerning what especially befits the time of becoming man and most corresponds to the divine economy with the flesh.

This is when He is called a servant, when He humbled Himself, being in our likeness (Phil 2:7).

But if it pleases you to treat the simpler doctrines with contempt and make more detailed inquiries, then, opposing your objections again, we shall first say this.

It is not always and not necessarily the case, dear friend, that one who is called a giver imparts to the receiver as to one who does not have.

Nor is the giver always greater than the receiver.

Otherwise, what will you do when you see the sacred Psalmist speaking in the Spirit: “Give glory to God” (Ps 67:35)?

Shall we dare to imagine that God needs glory? Or shall we, who are commanded to bring it to Him, therefore prove to be above the Creator?

Even the opponent himself, hardened as he is in blasphemies, would not dare to say this.

The Godhead, of course, is full of glory, even if it does not receive it from us.

Receiving as honor what It has in Itself, It certainly cannot be conceived as less than those who bring glory to It as a gift.

Thus one can often see that one who has received something is not lower than the one who gave it.

Therefore the Father does not surpass His own Son in nature, if He “has given all judgment” to Him.

Then, besides this, we must also attend to the following point.

To judge, or to be a judge, is rather an action or manifestation of what is conceived under essences than it is essence itself in its truth.

Thus we perform a certain action when we render judgment, but properly remain what we are.

If we assign to judgment, or to the exercise of judgment, the significance of essences, will it not become necessary and unavoidable to admit that some beings could not exist at all unless they were judges?

And when judgment ended, their essence, of course, would cease. But to think this is the height of absurdity.

Judgment is a certain action, and nothing else.

What, then, did the Father give the Son? He did not give Him some advantage from His own nature in granting Him all judgment.

Rather, He gave an action extending over those who are judged.

How, then, will the Father be greater or higher in nature? What will He have added to the Son that was not already in the Son, who says, “All things that the Father has are Mine” (Jn 16:15)?

Listen, then, to how the expression “gave” must be understood.

As God the Father, having the power to create, creates all things through the Son, as through His own Power and Might, so also, having the power to judge, He does this through the Son, as through His own Righteousness.

This is like saying that fire grants to the action naturally proceeding from it the ability to burn something.

Thus, interpreting the expression “gave” piously, we will escape the snares of the devil.

But if they shamelessly persist in asserting that glory was added to Him by the Father through declaring Him judge of the earth, then let them teach us how He can still be understood as the Lord of glory.

For according to them, He is crowned with this honor only in the last times.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

A little earlier we thought that the Father does something which the Son does not do, when He said, "For the Father loves the Son, and shows Him all that He Himself does" (Jn 5:19). It seemed as though the Father acted and the Son watched.

Such was a carnal understanding, weakening our thought, as though the Father did what the Son did not do. The Son, then, would look on while the Father showed what was being created by Him.

Thus it seemed that the Father did what the Son did not do. Yet now we see that the Son does something which the Father does not do.

How He moves us and draws our thought onward. He pulls it this way and that. He does not allow it to remain in one carnal place. By moving it, He trains it. By training it, He purifies it. By purifying it, He makes it receptive. By making it receptive, He makes it perfect.

What are these words doing with us?

What, then, does what follows mean? "For the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son, that all may honor the Son, even as they honor the Father" (Jn 5:22-23). He added this as though returning to the point of the preceding statement.

This demands serious thought. Be attentive.

The Son gives life to whom He wills. The Father gives life to whom He wills. The Son raises the dead, as the Father raises the dead. "For the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son" (Jn 5:22).

If the dead must rise in the judgment, how does the Father raise them if He judges no one? Certainly, He has given all judgment to the Son. Yet in that judgment the dead rise. Some rise to life, others to punishment.

If the Son does all this, and the Father does not, because "the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son," this seems to contradict what was said: "As the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom He wills."

Therefore They raise together. If They raise together and give life together, then They also judge together. How, then, is it true that "the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son"?

Yes, these questions compel thought. May the Lord gladden us and grant their solution.

So it is, brethren. No question brings joy by its solution unless it first strains the mind. May the Lord Himself guide us, so that He may disclose Himself, at least a little, in the questions He has set before us.

For He has covered His light with a cloud. It is hard for us, like an eagle, to fly above every cloud that has covered the whole earth (cf. Sir 24:3), and to behold the purest light in the Lord's words.

Perhaps He will disperse our mist by the heat of His rays and deem us worthy to see Him a little in what follows. Let us set these questions aside and look at what comes next.

What does this mean? He spoke of the resurrection of the dead, saying that as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so the Son gives life to whom He wills.

But why did He immediately add, as something weighty, concerning judgment: "For the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son, that all may honor the Son, even as they honor the Father"?

Was it not because He was speaking of that resurrection of the dead which will take place at the future judgment?

"For the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son, that all may honor the Son, even as they honor the Father" (Jn 5:22-23).

A little earlier we thought that the Father does something which the Son does not do, when He said, "For the Father loves the Son and shows Him all that He Himself does." It seemed that the Father acted and the Son looked on.

So a carnal notion entered our mind, as though the Father did what the Son did not do. The Son, then, looked upon the Father showing what comes into being through Him.

And now, just as the Father seemed to do what the Son did not do, we see the Son doing something which the Father does not do.

How He turns us in different directions and tunes our mind. He leads us here and there. He does not allow us to remain in one place of the flesh. Through turning, He trains us. Through training, He purifies us. Through purification, He makes us able to receive. Having made us able to receive, He fills us.

What are these words doing with us? What was He saying? What does He say?

A little earlier He said that the Father shows the Son everything He does. Then I saw the Father acting and the Son waiting. Now again I see the Son acting and the Father idle.

"For the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son, that all may honor the Son, even as they honor the Father" (Jn 5:22-23).

What then? When the Son judges, will the Father do nothing and not judge? What does this mean? How must I understand it?

Lord, what will You say? O Word, You are God, and I am a man. Do You say that the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son?

Elsewhere I read You saying, "I judge no one. There is One who seeks and judges" (cf. Jn 8:15, 50). Of whom do You say, "There is One who seeks and judges," if not of the Father?

He searches out your injustices. He judges your injustices. How, then, should we understand here, "The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son"?

Let us ask Peter and hear his answer from his Epistle: "Christ suffered for us, leaving us an example, that we should follow in His steps. He committed no sin, nor was deceit found in His mouth. When He was reviled, He did not revile in return. When He suffered, He did not threaten, but committed Himself to Him who judges righteously" (1 Pet 2:21-23).

How is it true that "the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son"?

Here we are perplexed. Being perplexed, we grow weary while seeking the truth. Growing weary, we are purified. Let us strive, as far as we can, by His gift, to enter the deepest mysteries of these words.

Perhaps we act rashly, wishing to examine and enter into the words of God. But why were they spoken, if not for us to enter into them? Why did they sound forth, if not for us to hear them?

Why were they heard, if not for us to understand them? Let Him encourage us, and let Him give us what He Himself deems worthy. Even if we do not reach the spring, let us drink from the little stream.

See, John himself has flowed to us like a little stream. He has brought the Word to us from the heights. He has brought Him down and, in a certain way, spread Him out over the plain.

He did this so that we would not tremble before Him in His loftiness, but would cling to Him in His humility.

Without doubt there is a sure and solid meaning, if somehow we can grasp it, why "the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son."

This was said because no one except the Son will appear before men at the judgment. The Father will be hidden, and the Son will be manifest.

In what form will the Son be manifest? In the form in which He ascended. For in the form of God He was hidden with the Father. In the form of a servant He was manifest to men.

Therefore "the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son" refers to what is visible. The Son will judge in that visible judgment, for He Himself will appear to carry out judgment.

Scripture reveals with complete clarity that He Himself will appear. On the fortieth day after His resurrection He ascended into heaven before the eyes of His disciples (cf. Acts 1:3, 9).

Then the angelic voice said to them, "Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into heaven? This Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will come in the same way as you saw Him go into heaven" (Acts 1:11).

In what way did they see Him ascend? In the flesh which they touched and handled. They touched its scars to be assured of the resurrection.

In that body He came to them and departed from them after forty days. He showed Himself to them in truth and not in any deception. He was not a phantom, not an apparition, not a spirit.

Rather, as He Himself said without deceiving them, "Handle Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have" (Lk 24:39).

Yet that body was already worthy of the heavenly dwelling. It was not subject to death and not changed by time. As it had grown from infancy to mature age, yet grew no stronger afterward, so from mature age it did not decline toward old age.

He remains as He ascended into heaven, so that He may come to those to whom He willed His word to be preached before He comes.

Therefore He will come in human form. The impious will see this form, and those placed at His right hand will see it. Those separated and placed at His left hand will also see it (Mt 25:34, 41).

As it is written, "They shall look on Him whom they pierced" (Jn 19:37; Zech 12:10). If they look on Him whom they pierced, they will see the body which they pierced with the spear. The Word cannot be pierced with a spear.

Thus the impious will be able to see what they were able to wound. They will not see God hidden in the body. After the judgment, those who will be at His right hand will be able to see Him as God.

This, then, is what He meant when He said, "The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son."

For the Son will come to judgment, manifest to men in a human body. He will say to those at His right hand, "Come, blessed of My Father, inherit the Kingdom" (Mt 25:34).

He will say to those at His left hand, "Depart into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels" (Mt 25:41).

See, that form of man will be seen by the pious and the impious, by the righteous and the unrighteous, by believers and unbelievers. It will be seen by those filled with joy and by those filled with sorrow.

It will be seen by those full of hope and by those thrown into confusion. See, they will behold Him in the form of man.

When this form is seen at the judgment, and when the judgment is completed, of which it is said that the Father judges no one but has given all judgment to the Son, what will follow?

This is said because the Son will appear at the judgment in the form which He received from us. What, then, will follow afterward?

When will the form of God be seen, which all believers thirst to behold? When will that be seen which in the beginning was the Word, God with God, through whom all things were made (Jn 1:1, 3)?

When will that form of God be seen of which the Apostle says, "Being in the form of God, He did not consider equality with God robbery" (Phil 2:6)?

For that great form, in which above all the equality of the Father and the Son was revealed, is ineffable and incomprehensible, especially for the weak. When will it be seen?

See, on the right hand are the righteous, and on the left are the unrighteous. Both will alike see the man. They will see the Son of Man. They will see Him who was pierced.

They will see Him who was crucified. They will see Him humbled. They will see Him born of the Virgin. They will see the Lamb from the tribe of Judah.

But when will they see the Word, God with God? He will indeed be present even then, but the form of a servant will be manifest (Phil 2:7).

The form of a servant will be shown to servants. The form of God (Phil 2:6) will be kept for sons.

Therefore let the servants become sons, those who are at the right hand. Let them come to the eternal inheritance once promised, in which the martyrs believed without seeing it.

For the sake of that promise they shed their blood without hesitation. Let them come there and behold there. When will they come there? Let the Lord Himself say: "And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life" (Mt 25:46).

See, He spoke of eternal life. Did He tell us that there we shall see and know the Father and the Son? What if we live forever, but do not see the Father and the Son?

Read the full text in the app

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

"For He has given all judgment to the Son"; Jn 5:22. He gave it to Him as begotten, not as to one who received a benefit. See: He did not will to take you away from His Son, but gives Him to you as Judge. But it is fearful lest a sterner judge appear. Consider what Judge you will have. For the Father has given all judgment to Christ. Therefore He will be able to punish you, who were redeemed by His death, for whom He offered Himself in sacrifice, and whose life He knows was redeemed by His death.

John Damascene

8th centuryChurch Father

Therefore the Divinity is perfect, unchangeable, and immutable. According to its foreknowledge, it predestined everything that does not depend on us, appointing to everything its proper and fitting time and place.

For this reason "the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son" (Jn 5:22). Certainly the Father judges, and the Son as God, and the Holy Spirit.

Yet the Son alone, as man, will descend bodily and sit on the throne of glory (Mt 25:31). For descent and sitting belong only to a circumscribed body. He will judge the world in righteousness (Acts 17:31).

Maximus the Confessor

7th centuryChurch Father

How are we, according to piety, to understand the words of the Gospel: "The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son"? And why does the Lord say elsewhere, "I judge no one"; Jn 8:15, but "the word that I have spoken will judge him"; Jn 12:48? As God, neither the Father nor the Son will judge anyone. A man too becomes a judge for men, not for animals. The Father gave judgment to the Son not because the Son is God, but because He became man. He will judge all by comparing His human life with ours. His word will also judge, that is, the teaching which He manifested through deeds, according to what is written: "all that Jesus began to do and teach"; Acts 1:1. Cf. St.

Read more (72 words)

Gregory the Theologian: "Christ tests our obedience and measures all things by His sufferings, being guided by the art of His love for mankind. By His own experience He learns what is possible for us, how much should be required of us, and how much should be excused, if our weakness is considered together with our sufferings." This passage will become the subject of St. Maximus's interpretation in Difficulties to Thomas 4.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

Again He passes from what is lofty to what is lower. Here too the word “gave” must be understood in a manner worthy of God.

Jesus Christ speaks so not only to heal the weakness of the Jews, as has been said. He also speaks so that we may know the cause, and see that the Son is not unbegotten. Thus we do not fall into the sickness of Sabellius.

Sabellius thought that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit were one and the same. He absurdly taught that the Holy Trinity is one person.

When did the Father give judgment to the Son? The answer may be this: before every “when.” One ought indeed to answer directly: together with the Son’s birth. But when was the Son born, if the Father was not born?

Read more (740 words)

It is impossible, utterly impossible, to conceive any time or age by which one could reach that boundary, even with the greatest effort.

The Father gave all judgment to the Son so that, fearing Him on this account, they might honor Him as they honor the Father. By the word “all” He indicated judgment whose consequence is the reward of those whom He wills.

Yet by this the authority to judge is not taken away from the Father. If all that the Father has belongs to the Son, except being unbegotten, then plainly all that the Son has belongs to the Father, except being begotten.

Therefore the Son judges, but with the Father’s good pleasure and the cooperation of the Holy Spirit. We understand the same concerning all His works.

It should be noted that the word “as” (ὥσπερ, καθώς), and others like it, signify equality when used of the uncreated Trinity. When used of creatures, they more often signify likeness and some partial resemblance.

Why, then, did the Father give judgment to the Son? Because He created man in the beginning, recreated him when corrupted, and gave saving commandments.

Also, He did this so that He Who became man might judge men, not only as God, knowing human nature, but also as man, having been tempted in it.

Why did the Son create man? Because He is the Wisdom, Word, and Power of the Father (1 Cor 1:24, 30; Heb 1:3).

Why did the Son become man, and not the Father or the Holy Spirit? Because the Son had to remain Son in heaven and on earth, lest there be two Sons.

The Creator had to renew His creation, which had become corrupt. The rational being had to be freed from irrational passions through reason, or the Word (Λόγος).

The one created according to the image of God, and who had altered it, had to be raised to his former dignity through the unchangeable Image of the Father. In this way there would be complete correspondence in all things.

If we honor Jesus Christ as we honor the Father, shall we also call Him Father? No. Knowing that He is Son, we shall not call Him Father, lest we confuse Their personal properties.

We must only honor Him as the Father. The discourse here concerns honor, not naming. In an improper sense we also call Him Father, as our Creator, Provider, and Teacher.

We have seen the wise and wondrous interweaving of lofty and simple sayings. Those who were present then could easily understand the discourse, and it did not harm those who came afterward.

If Jesus Christ spoke simple sayings not by condescension, why would He weave lofty sayings into them? When one who ought to speak loftily of himself speaks humbly, he has a defense in a wise purpose.

He does this with a most wise purpose. But when one who ought to speak meanly of himself speaks great things, he does this not from a wise purpose, but from extreme arrogance.

If the Son is lower than the Father, as the followers of Arius foolishly said, why does He demand equal honor with the Father? He not only demands it, but also inspires fear, saying: “He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father Who sent Him.”

“And he who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father Who sent Him.” That is, he who does not honor Him as He said above, namely, as the Father.

He said “Who sent Him” not to show that the Son is lower, but to silence the Jews. For this reason He constantly has recourse to the Father, while at the same time setting forth His own lofty origin.

If Jesus Christ had spoken of everything according to His dignity, they would not have received Him. They would have regarded Him as an adversary of God, since even for these brief sayings they persecuted Him and wished to stone Him.

If He had spoken of everything by humbling Himself, this would have harmed many. Therefore, as we have said, Jesus Christ mingles both and so forms His teaching.

So that He might be better understood, He speaks not so much loftily as humbly. Therefore, when we meet humble sayings, we must see in them a most wise purpose, or refer them to His humanity.

Likewise, the lofty sayings must be referred to His Godhead.

Hilarius of Poitiers

4th centuryChurch Father

That all judgment has been given to Him is shown by both nature and birth. Only one nature without differences can possess all things. Yet even birth cannot possess anything unless it is given.

All judgment has been given to Him because He gives life to those whom He wills.

But it cannot be seen that judgment has been taken away from the Father because He does not judge. For the judgment of the Son is from the judgment of the Father. By Him all judgment has been given to the Son.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

As for the discourse of Jesus Christ on the resurrection of the dead and the judgment of men, it may be divided into the following parts. In verses 21-24 the general thought is given distinctly. In verses 25-27 He speaks of spiritual resurrection and judgment. In verses 28-30 He speaks of the future bodily resurrection and the final judgment of the world. Verses 21-24. Between resurrection and enlivening, verse 21, there is this difference. The first denotes the negative concept of the destruction of death. The second denotes the positive concept of communicating to man the powers for a new life. But in the following words, "so also the Son gives life to whom He wills," the concept of enlivening also includes the concept of resurrection.

Read more (207 words)

Verse 22 grounds the reason why the Son gives life not to all, but only "to whom He wills." It is because He gives life only to those who, according to His judgment, are worthy of it. Judgment here is understood not in the sense of condemnation, but of judging, adjudication, and sentence. Further, in verse 23, the purpose is stated for which God the Father has given all things into the hands of the Son. He wills that divine worship of Him be rendered only in the Son and through the Son; verse 24. Previously Jesus Christ spoke of Himself as of another person, calling Himself the Son of God. Here He speaks of Himself personally, and thereby applies all the preceding words to Himself. At the same time, He states here the condition on man's part by which man may be given life by Christ. It is attentive hearing of the word of Jesus Christ, accompanied by faith in Him and in God, who sent Him into the world for the salvation of men. Eternal life is holy life, pleasing to God. It begins here with gracious regeneration, and continues and develops without end in eternity. Judgment here is understood in the sense of condemnation.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

"The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son." In later discourses the Lord said that He would judge the whole human race at His Second Coming.

At present He came not to judge sinners, but to save them. Nor is there any need to judge them now, because each one condemns himself.

Whoever believes in the Christ sent by God is justified. Whoever does not believe pronounces sentence upon himself.

Therefore, when Christ said that the Father had given all judgment to the Son, He was speaking of the future Dread Judgment.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

"The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son." Judgment is understood here as condemnation; Jn 3:17 and following. It is opposed to enlivening, or moral and spiritual resurrection, verse 21. Therefore it first means moral judgment in the present life over unbelievers. Since this judgment inevitably entails condemnation also at the universal judgment on the day of judgment, that final judgment is also understood. According to the pre-eternal counsel of God, the work of redeeming mankind is appointed to be accomplished by the Son of God. Therefore the authority also belongs to Him to carry out judgment, undoubtedly in union with the will of God the Father. This judgment falls on those who do not believe in Him as Redeemer.

Read more (44 words)

Having rejected Him, they remain in the state of the unredeemed, and so are subject to God's wrath for sin and to condemnation. In this sense it is said that the Father has given all judgment to the Son, as the accomplisher of salvation.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Verses 21-22. It is explained wherein consists the greater thing which, as was said, the Father will show in the Son, to the amazement of men. It consists in the resurrection of the dead and the judgment of the universe. Is resurrection here to be understood as the bodily resurrection of the dead, or as the correction of those morally dead? Among the ancients Ammonius, and among the moderns Eckermann and others, understand it as moral correction. In defense of this opinion, they say that in Scripture the dead also means those morally dead. They also say that the action of resurrection is assigned to the present time, not the future: ζωοποιει, εγειρει, και νυν εςι, verses 21, 22, 25. But the dead are shown here to be those "who are in the tombs," verse 28.

Read more (304 words)

The discourse concerns not teaching, but the Savior's miracle-working power, verse 17. Moreover, during His earthly life the Savior showed examples of physical resurrection in certain persons; Mk 5:41; Lk 7:14; Jn 11:43. This is precisely what He designates by the words, "and now is." From this addition it is evident that verse 21 does not speak of the future resurrection. Rather, the Lord ascribes life-giving power to Himself without referring its actions to a definite time. The other divine prerogative of the Son consists in His right to judge the human race. The right of judgment over the universe can belong to God alone; Gen 18:15. But the Father does not judge by Himself for the same reason that He Himself did not take upon Himself the work of saving men, but entrusted it to the Son. The Son, having taken this work upon Himself, thereby also received the right to judge all men in their faithfulness or unfaithfulness to eternal righteousness. The Apostles and the Savior Himself ascribed this judgment to the Son of God, but to no human being; Mt 25:31; 2 Cor 5:10. They said not only to Jews, but also to Gentiles, that there will be a time of judgment over the universe; Acts 17:31; Rom 14:10; 2 Cor 5:10. The depictions of this judgment found in the words of the Savior and the Apostles show that this judgment does not mean judgment over the Jewish people alone, which occurred in its time. It means judgment over the whole universe. Those who wish to understand this judgment as judgment over the conscience, produced by the teaching imparted by the heavenly Teacher, forget something. Such a judgment can also be ascribed to the Apostles, whereas what the Judge of the universe says about Himself cannot be referred to the Apostles.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryChurch Father

The Father has given judgment to the Son: a great mystery of mercy. God, clothed in corruptible human flesh and bearing in the flesh all man's burdens and sufferings, is the Judge of His brethren according to the flesh. "The Lord measures all things by His sufferings, as by the science of love for mankind, so that from His own He might know ours. He knows how much we can be examined, and how much we should be forgiven, when our weakness is considered together with suffering"; Gregory the Theologian. Or let us express this mystery in another way. God is absolute truth. Yet He judges man while taking into account all the weaknesses and frailties of both man's flesh and spirit.

Read more (412 words)

Since, even after this merciful judgment, much debt remains upon the sinner, He also redeems and washes away this debt by His precious blood, shed on the Cross. This is why the Father, revealing Himself to man in the Son and thereby revealing His mercy to man, has given all judgment to the Son. By this He proclaims the triumph of mercy in judgment. Therefore the Lord also requires man to forgive his brother his trespasses. For "judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy; and mercy triumphs over judgment"; Jas 2:13. Cf. Mt 18 and following, the parable of the king who wished to settle accounts with his servants. Thus a judgment of mercy has been proclaimed to man. But what does God require for this? The Lord wills "that all should honor the Son as they honor the Father," and that they should have faith in the Son. For "he who believes in Him is not condemned"; Jn 3:18; 5:24. Faith in the Son, by which man honors the Father, contains within itself the seed of all virtues. He who believes in the Son cannot fail to forgive his brother his trespasses. For what is this insignificant act of human mercy in comparison with the greatness of God's mercy, incomprehensible and immeasurable to our weak reason? It is also necessary to point out the difference between God's manifestation to man in the Old and New Testaments. In the Old Testament, Israel had to be set apart from all other nations, so as to be the keeper of the promises. Therefore for the whole world that covenant was a covenant of the future, but for the chosen people it was a covenant of fear. With the Incarnation on earth of the Lord Jesus Christ, who came to save the whole world and to "break down the dividing wall"; Eph 2:14, the moment arrived of which all the prophets had foretold. The mercy of the Lord would restore the people of God, who would be governed by mercy and would love God. "There is no fear in love"; 1 Jn 4:18. But the time of mercy is only for those who honor the Son. He who rejects the Son does not honor God, who manifests Himself to man in order to have mercy on him. Below, in verse 27, we shall see a fuller explanation that judgment is given to the Son because He is "the Son of Man."

Tertullian

3rd centuryTeacher of the Church

The Father judges no one, but from the beginning has given all judgment to the Son.

For the One who speaks of all authority and all judgment, and of all things beginning to be through Him (Jn 1:3), and of all things being delivered into His hands (Jn 3:35), allows no limitation of time.

None of these things will be true unless they belong to all time.

Therefore the Son is the One Who from the beginning executed judgment. He destroyed the tower of excessive pride and confused the tongues. He punished the whole earth with the wrath of waters. He poured fire and brimstone on Sodom and Gomorrah, God from God.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 13 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. οὐδὲ
    oude
    neither
    G3761 · οὐδέ
  2. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  3. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  4. Πατὴρ
    patēr
    father
    G3962 · πατήρ
  5. κρίνει
    krinei
    I judge
    G2919 · κρίνω
  6. οὐδένα
    oudena
    no one
    G3762 · οὐδείς
  7. ἀλλὰ
    alla
    but
    G235 · ἀλλά
  8. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  9. κρίσιν
    krisin
    judging
    G2920 · κρίσις
  10. πᾶσαν
    pasan
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  11. δέδωκεν
    dedōken
    I offer
    G1325 · δίδωμι
  12. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. Υἱῷ
    huiō
    a son
    G5207 · υἱός