The Church Fathers on this verse

John 6:68Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Then Jesus said to the twelve: Will you also go away?

Douay-Rheims

απεκριθη ουν αυτω σιμων πετρος κυριε προς τινα απελευσομεθα ρηματα ζωης αιωνιου εχεις

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

What then does Peter say? “To whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life, and we have believed and known that You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”

Do you see that Christ’s words were not the cause of the scandal, but the inattention, negligence, and ingratitude of the hearers?

Even if He had not spoken those words, they would still have been scandalized and would not have found rest. They were continually thinking of bodily food and were nailed to the earth.

Those Apostles heard together with them, and yet they said something altogether different: “To whom shall we go?”

Read more (196 words)

This answer reveals great love. It shows that the Teacher was dearer to them than everything, even fathers, mothers, and possessions. If they left Him, they could no longer find anywhere to take refuge.

But lest it seem that Peter said, “To whom shall we go?” because there was no one who would receive them, he immediately added, “You have the words of eternal life.”

Others listened to Christ’s words sensually and with human reasonings. But the Apostles listened spiritually, entrusting everything to faith.

Therefore Christ also said, “The words that I speak to you are spirit.” That is, do not suppose that the teaching contained in My words is subject to the ordinary order of things and to the laws by which all things happen.

Spiritual things are not like this. They cannot be subjected to earthly laws.

Paul also points to this when he says, “Do not say in your heart, Who will ascend into heaven? that is, to bring Christ down. Or, Who will descend into the abyss? that is, to bring Christ up from the dead” (Rom 10:6-7).

See, they had already received the teaching concerning the resurrection and the future recompense.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

What then does Peter say? “To whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life, and we have believed and known that You are the Christ, the Son of the living God” (vv. 68-69).

Do you see that Christ’s words were not the cause of the scandal, but the inattention, negligence, and ingratitude of the hearers?

Even if He had not spoken those words, they would still have been scandalized and would not have found rest. They were continually thinking of bodily food and were nailed to the earth.

Those Apostles heard together with them, and yet they said something altogether different: “To whom shall we go?”

Read more (201 words)

This answer reveals great love. It shows that the Teacher was dearer to them than everything, even fathers, mothers, and possessions. If they left Him, they could no longer find anywhere to take refuge.

But lest it seem that Peter said, “To whom shall we go?” because there was no one who would receive them, he immediately added, “You have the words of eternal life.”

Others listened to Christ’s words sensually and with human reasonings. But the Apostles listened spiritually, entrusting everything to faith.

Therefore Christ also said, “The words that I speak are spirit.” That is, do not suppose that the teaching contained in My words is subject to the ordinary order of things and to the laws by which all things happen.

Spiritual things are not like this. They cannot be subjected to earthly laws.

Paul also points to this when he says, “Do not say in your heart, Who will ascend into heaven? that is, to bring Christ down. Or, Who will descend into the abyss? that is, to bring Christ up from the dead” (Rom 10:6-7).

“You have the words of eternal life.” See, they had already received the teaching concerning the resurrection and the future recompense.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

In the person of one representative, all speak, preserving the decorum truly fitting for the saints. In this also they become for those after them a model of prudence and admirable propriety. It was not fitting for all at once to speak aloud before the Teacher, indiscriminately and in rivalry, unseemly interrupting one another. Rather, they had to yield prudently to those who held the higher place in discernment and rank. Therefore Paul also says, "Let two or three prophets speak, and separately" (1 Cor 14:29, 27). He did not permit them to speak without order because they had been granted the grace of prophecy. Since they were holy, he commanded them to speak to their hearers with still greater propriety. Thus it was an act of decorum fitting for the saints to allow one to answer for all, namely the one who held the highest place among the Apostles. "To whom," he says, "shall we go?" This means: who can initiate us into anything like this? Or: to whom shall we come and find something better? "Thou hast the words of eternal life." They are not hard, as those men say, but lift us up to what is best of all, to unceasing and eternal life, free from all corruption. From these words also it must be plain to us that we ought to follow Christ alone as Teacher. We must remain constantly and inseparably with Him and have Him as our guide, for He perfectly knows how to lead us to endless life. In this way we shall ascend to the heavenly and divine court. Entering the Church of the firstborn, we shall enjoy good things beyond the human mind. That the desire to follow Christ alone and always to be with Him is good and saving is something the very nature of the matter can assure us. Yet we can also be convinced of it from the most ancient Scriptures. When the Israelites had been delivered from the cruelties of the Egyptians and were hastening to the land of promise, God commanded them not to march in disorder. The Lawgiver did not allow each one to go wherever and however he wished. Had they done so, having no guide, they would undoubtedly have gone astray. Therefore, again as an example for us, it is written in the book called Numbers: "On the day when the tabernacle was set up, the cloud covered the tabernacle, the house of witness. In the evening it was over the tabernacle like the appearance of fire until morning. So it was always: the cloud covered it by day, and the appearance of fire by night. When the cloud was taken up from the tabernacle, then the sons of Israel set out. In the place where the cloud halted, there the sons of Israel encamped. By the command of the Lord the sons of Israel shall set out, and they shall keep the watch of God. They shall not set out until the voice of the Lord. By the voice of the Lord they shall encamp, and by the command of the Lord they shall set out" (Num 9:15-20). You see how they are commanded to follow and begin their journey when the cloud departs. Conversely, they are to halt with it and remain at rest. Thus, to be with the guide was then saving for the Israelites, just as it is now saving for us not to be separated from Christ. He was prefigured of old as tabernacle, cloud, and fire. But the historical sense must again, so far as possible, be applied spiritually. When "Wisdom," as it is written, "built Her house" (Prov 9:1), and raised the truest tabernacle, that is, the temple from the Virgin, then God the Word came down into it in a manner inaccessible to our understanding and befitting God. He is in the bosom of God the Father, and He became man (Jn 1:14, 18). He did this so that, for those already enlightened and walking "as in the day," according to Paul (Rom 13:13), He might be a cloud overshadowing and destroying the heat of the passions of our weakness. For those who do not yet know and are wandering, passing life as in darkness and night, He might be fire, enlightening and transforming them into the fervor of the Spirit. For we believe that those who are virtuous are fervent in spirit. Thus, I think, for no other reason than the one indicated above, the cloud appeared over the tabernacle by day, and fire by night. The command joined to this, not to travel by one's own will, but to set out with the tabernacle and halt with it, was again given in type. It was so that you might understand what Christ said: "If anyone serves Me, let him follow Me; and where I am, there shall My servant be also" (Jn 12:26). Firmness in following and constancy of abiding are shown by walking inseparably with Him. Walking with Christ the Savior and following Him are not, of course, understood bodily. Rather, this is accomplished through works of virtue. The wise disciples fixed their mind on virtue and rejected departure backward with the unbelievers as a ruinous thing. Therefore they rightly cry, "To whom can we go?" This means: we shall always be with Thee, hold fast Thy commandments, and receive Thy words. We shall not accuse Thee of anything. We shall not, with the ignorant, consider hard what Thou speakest mystically. Rather we cry: "How sweet are Thy words to my throat, sweeter than honey to my mouth" (Ps 119:103). This is the meaning of the passage being interpreted. That the tabernacle was for the ancients a type of Christ, we shall learn again if we direct the sharpness of our mind to what was said about it to holy Moses. Though speech about this may seem to someone a digression, it will bring no small benefit. I think it must be examined carefully and in detail, despite the groundless objections of our accusers. The divine revelation concerning the tabernacle is as follows. We shall set it forth separately and explain, as far as possible, the shadowed letter. "And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: On the first day of the first month, at the new moon, thou shalt set up the tabernacle" (Ex 40:1-2). One of the studious may reasonably ask what moved the Lord of all to command that the tabernacle be set up in one day, not in two or three. Why at the new moon? Why not in any month at all, but in the first? All this truly requires proper and careful inquiry from us, since nothing in the divine Scriptures is said in vain. Let us hold to our former thoughts on this. The tabernacle being set up signifies the holy Body of Christ and, so to speak, the erection of His precious tent. In it all the fullness of the Godhead was pleased to dwell bodily (Col 1:19; 2:9). He commands it to be set up "on one day." This is very wise and providential, so that by one day you may understand the present age. In this age alone He became man. By the new moon we should understand nothing other than the coming of the Savior, which renews us. In it "the old has passed away, and all things have become new" (2 Cor 5:17). A new time has dawned for us in Christ. It drives away the oldness of service under the Law by Gospel teaching and changes us into a new and renewed life. It renews into original righteousness those who had grown old through sin and were near destruction (Heb 8:13). It destroys the oldness of corruption that had crept in. By the renewal of incorruption, it gladdens those who ascend through faith to eternal life. "For if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation," as it is written (2 Cor 5:17). He commands the divine tabernacle to be raised "in the first month." Then the charm of the spring turning shines forth, as though washing away the gloom of winter. The earth is gently warmed by the brighter and purer rays of the sun. The vineyards bloom, the farmer is gladdened by the fragrance of flowers, the valleys are clothed with green. "All the fields bristle with the tips of ears of grain," as one of the Greek poets says. Then "the winter is past," as it is written, "the rain is gone with it," and "the time of pruning has come" (Song 2:11-13). But you must understand all this spiritually. By the disappearance of winter and the ceasing of the rain, understand the temptations that burden us from the devil's tyranny and cruel dominion over all. For in the days of Christ the rule of demons came to an end, and the bright Sun shone upon us. This is the very One of whom God the Father says: "The Sun of Righteousness shall rise for you" (Mal 4:2). He warms those chilled by sin with the heat of the Spirit unto righteousness. Likewise understand the vineyard spiritually, the flowers spiritually, and by the ears of grain understand the saints. They are distinguished by manifold piety toward God and bear the fruit of many forms of virtue. To speak briefly, spring adorns everything with flowers and makes the earth bring forth grass. It crowns the meadows with young growth. It makes young again the trunks that were dry because of the unbearable harshness of winter. It brings them into a better state, clothes them with their usual green foliage, and generously grants nature's gifts to the laboring farmer. Something like this, as we shall see, happened also to us. Once we were dry because sin reigned over us, and we lacked the fruits of virtue. Through Christ we blossomed with righteousness and now bring to the Farmer of spirits the newly appeared and fresh fruit of faith. In this way we find it right to understand what was said by one of the holy prophets, as though in the person of Christ: "I Myself am He who spoke: behold, I am present, like the season upon the mountains" (Isa 52:6-7). What the "season," that is, the springtime, does upon the mountains, we have already clearly said above. It is therefore most beneficial that He commands the tabernacle, which is a type of Christ, to be set up "on one day." By this you may understand of Him that He died only once in this one present age. He will not be born again, nor will He die again. He was born once, died once, and rose from the dead. Resurrection had necessarily to follow death, and it was like the erection of the holy tent. It is at the new moon because we have a new age in Christ, and all creation is new in Him. The first month is chosen to indicate the renewal of human nature from death and corruption to life and incorruption. It also indicates the passage from barrenness to fruitfulness, and deliverance from diabolical tyranny, like winter ceasing and disappearing. Then again, in another way, as in type and allegory, He points us to Emmanuel in the words: "Thou shalt put in the ark of the testimony, and cover the ark with the veil" (Ex 40:3). In the preceding ordinance, the Word was pictured for us as in the whole tabernacle. The holy Body of Christ was the house of God who dwelt in Him. Yet He is no less indicated for us particularly through the ark. It was made of incorruptible wood, that you might understand His incorruptible Body. It was entirely overlaid with pure gold, as it is written, within and without (Ex 25:9-10; 37:2). Everything in Him is most precious and royal, both the divine and the human. In all things He has preeminence, according to Paul (Col 1:18). Gold is taken as an image of honor and superiority over all. The ark, made of incorruptible wood and overlaid with gold, had the divine Law placed within it. This was an image of God the Word dwelling in and united to the holy flesh. For the Law also was a word of God, though not hypostatic as the Son is. The ark is covered with the veil because God the Word, when He became man, was as though invisible to many. He had His Body as a covering and was hidden in His flesh as in a veil. Because of this, some did not recognize His divine dignity. At one time they tried to stone Him, accusing Him because, being a man, He called Himself God (Jn 10:33). At another time, without any shame, they said: "Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How then does He now say, I came down from heaven?" (Jn 6:42). Thus the covering of the ark with the veil indicated that Jesus would not be known by many. In this way the ark was His type. Therefore it also went before the Israelites in the wilderness, then taking the place of God, for it was the guide of the people.

Read the full text in the app

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Peter answered for all, one for many, unity for all. “Simon Peter answered Him: Lord, to whom shall we go?” (Jn 6:68). “You drive us away from Yourself; give us another You, da nobis alterum te.

To whom shall we go? If we depart from You, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.”

See how Peter understood all things by the gift of God, being strengthened by the Holy Spirit. Through what, if not through the fact that he believed?

“You have the words of eternal life.” “You have eternal life in the ministry of Your Body and Blood.”

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

It belongs to piety not to compel, but to persuade, as we have said. For the Lord Himself did not compel, but gave the possibility of free choice. He said to all: “Whoever desires to come after Me” (Mt 16:24; Mk 8:34), and to the disciples: “Do you also wish to go away?”

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

“Simon Peter therefore answered Him: Lord, to whom shall we go?” The brother-loving Peter defends all the brethren, saying, “Lord, to whom shall we go?”

He shows strong love for Jesus Christ, because they have no one else dearer to them, neither parents, nor relatives, nor friends, in a word, no one.

Then, lest it seem that he said this as though there were no one who would receive them, he added, “You have the words of eternal life,” words that bestow eternal life.

See, then, that the words were not the stumbling block, but the inattention of the hearers and their fleshly, not spiritual, understanding of them.

It was altogether natural, and even necessary, to say this in connection with the Jews’ discourse about manna. The hearers should either have understood spiritually, or, if they were unable, accepted all this and then carefully inquired.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

Content missing.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

But the apostles’ faith had already taken deep root. To this question Simon Peter, on behalf of the whole apostolic company, answered Him: “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. And we have believed and known that You are the Christ, the Son of the living God!”

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

“Simon Peter answered”: on behalf of the other Apostles, whose beliefs and convictions he knew, except perhaps Judas, who was hypocritical and concealed his thoughts and intentions under the guise of devotion.

“To whom shall we go?” There is no other teacher to whom we could pass over from You, and we remain faithful to You.

They well understood and saw the falsehood and vanity of the people’s teachers, the Pharisees, and the immeasurable superiority of their divine Teacher over them.

The Apostle Peter indicates two features of this superiority, on account of which the Apostles remain faithful to Him. The first is that He has the words of eternal life. The second is that they have believed and known that He is the Messiah.

“The words of eternal life” are words by attending to which and believing, one can receive eternal life. This repeats what the Lord had just said about His words or His teaching (Jn 6:63).

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

“Then Jesus said to the twelve, ‘Do you also wish to go away?’”

The Evangelist is so exact in describing historical details, yet here he sets forth neither the names nor even the title of the Apostles. This is explained only by the fact that he assumes both are known to his readers from the other Gospels.

The Savior’s question is put in such a form that it anticipates a negative answer, and therefore expresses the Savior’s trust in the chosen ones.

Yet as a question concerning the decision of another will, it shows that being, or not being, among the saved depends on each person’s will.

The Savior does not force anyone to follow Him, although His love desires that they should follow.

Read more (678 words)

The proposed choice concerned Judas especially. He wished to appear as one of the best. It would surely have been better for him to leave Jesus then than to be brought by vainglory and greed to the role of betrayer.

“Simon Peter answered: Lord, to whom shall we go? We have believed and known that Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.”

The disciples did not yet understand much in the words of the heavenly Teacher. Yet the foundations of faith were already in them.

They already believed that Jesus is the Messiah and the Son of God. Later, under the light and moisture of the Holy Spirit, this seed would unfold into a beautiful tree.

St. Cyril remarks: “They had to believe and to know. For if faith already receives the divine, it does not thereby refuse all inquiry.

“On the contrary, it must strive to raise itself to a certain knowledge, a knowledge, according to Paul, in a mirror and in an enigma.

“They also speak well by not putting knowledge first and faith afterward. They set faith first and leave knowledge to follow it. For knowledge comes after faith, not before faith” (In Ioh. lib. VI, c. 29).

Instead of “the Son of the living God,” the best Greek manuscripts read “the Holy One of God.” The origin of the first reading is clear. It was taken from Simon’s confession spoken at another time, Mt 16:16.

In Daniel’s prophecy, Dan 9:24, the Holy One of God is the Messiah, who elsewhere is called the Righteous One, Is 53:11.

“Jesus answered them: Did I not choose you, the twelve? Yet one of you is a devil.”

Jesus not only adds no approval to Peter’s confession, but even gives an admonition. Why is this so?

“Otherwise the disciples who remained with Him, while others had left Him, might have imagined that He would flatter them” (Chrysostom).

At that moment there was need not for encouragement, but for admonition. The Lord’s love had distinguished the twelve disciples with special attention and a special honor, the name of messengers.

Therefore it had every right to expect that the confession uttered by Peter was the inward and inalienable possession of all twelve.

To the sorrow of love, it turned out that one of them was very far from the desired perfection. For the benefit of those beloved, love declares: “One of you is a devil.”

There is no doubt that Judas, of whom, as the Evangelist notes in verse 71, Christ was now speaking, was at first a good and pious man.

In many respects he did not yield to the other chosen ones. Otherwise he would not have been numbered among the twelve chosen.

The leader of the apostate spirits, at the beginning of his existence, belonged to the higher and better creations of God. But afterward, by his own will, he became leader of spirits disobedient to God, who abandoned their appointed service, Jude 6.

In exactly the same way Judas did not retain his high dignity, being carried away by pride and love of money.

He is called a devil in the sense of an enemy and adversary of Jesus. Thoughts wholly opposed to Peter’s confession lay hidden in his soul.

Judas the betrayer is also called Iscariot in the other Gospels, Mt 10:4; Mt 26:14; Lk 22:3. What is this name?

One may think that Iscariot is the same as ish Kerioth, a man from the town of Kerioth, a native of Kerioth. Some manuscripts read: ἀπὸ τοῦ Καριώτου.

Kerioth was a city of the tribe of Judah, Josh 15:25. But then one would have to see in Greek ἀνὴρ Καριώτης.

Otherwise it is impossible to point to an example where ish, joined with the name of a place, is used without translation.

Therefore it is considered more probable that Iscariot is a nickname given from Judas’s occupation. It means bearer of the box, steward. In the Syriac translation, skariuta means steward.

This occupation of Judas is indicated in the Gospel, Jn 13:29.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 12 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἀπεκρίθη
    apekrithē
    I answer
    G611 · ἀποκρίνω
  2. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  3. Σίμων
    simōn
    Simon
    G4613 · Σίμων
  4. Πέτρος
    petros
    Peter
    G4074 · Πέτρος
  5. Κύριε
    kyrie
    lord
    G2962 · κύριος
  6. πρὸς
    pros
    to
    G4314 · πρός
  7. τίνα
    tina
    who
    G5101 · τίς
  8. ἀπελευσόμεθα
    apeleusometha
    I come or go away from
    G565 · ἀπέρχομαι
  9. ῥήματα
    rhēmata
    a thing spoken
    G4487 · ῥῆμα
  10. ζωῆς
    zōēs
    life
    G2222 · ζωή
  11. αἰωνίου
    aiōniou
    eternal
    G166 · αἰώνιος
  12. ἔχεις
    echeis
    I have
    G2192 · ἔχω